A presente dissertação busca compreender as afirmações da vida sem condicionantes, o amor fati, tal como foi compreendido por Nietzsche, nos processos formativos de educadores. Ao lado dessa noção, os conceitos de sujeitos em processualidade, corpo-de-sonho, autopoiéticos, (ou seja, sujeitos abertos aos riscos, sem garantias quaisquer) dialogam com a perspectiva trágica nietzschiana na apreensão das escolhas existenciais-profissionais do ser e tornar-se professor. Os procedimentos metodológicos provêm das técnicas da História Oral e das pesquisas que interligam as Ciências Sociais e a memória, mais precisamente aquelas produzidas pelo método autobiográfico. Para sua realização foram coletados e interpretados relatos autobiográficos de dois educadores, além de registros memorialísticos do próprio pesquisador, compreendidos no trabalho como narradores, sob a ótica de Walter Benjamim. Desse modo é possível apreender a complexidade de cada itinerário formativo, os impasses da narrativa no mundo contemporâneo, como já indicara Benjamim, e contribuir, na perspectiva de formação nietzscheana, para a crítica do ensino e da formação de educadores na atualidade. / This presentation aims to understand the statements of life without conditioning, the amor fati, as understood by Nietzsche, in the formative processes of educators. Alongside this notion, the concepts of subjects in processuality, body-of-dream, autopoietic subjects (i.e. open to risks, with no guarantees) dialogue with the tragic Nietzschean perspective in the capture of existential-professional choices of being and becoming a teacher. The methodology utilized in this work derives from the techniques of Oral History and from research interlinking social sciences and memory, namely those produced by the autobiographical method. We collected and interpreted autobiographical notes of two educators, as well as the researchers own memoirs, understood in this work as narrators, as defined by Walter Benjamin. That allowed us to grasp the complexity of each formative itinerary, the impasses of narrative in the contemporary world, as pointed out by Benjamin, and also to contribute to the critique of education and training of educators today, from the Nietzschean perspective of formation.

A presente dissertação busca compreender as afirmações da vida sem condicionantes, o amor fati, tal como foi compreendido por Nietzsche, nos processos formativos de educadores. Ao lado dessa noção, os conceitos de sujeitos em processualidade, corpo-de-sonho, autopoiéticos, (ou seja, sujeitos abertos aos riscos, sem garantias quaisquer) dialogam com a perspectiva trágica nietzschiana na apreensão das escolhas existenciais-profissionais do ser e tornar-se professor. Os procedimentos metodológicos provêm das técnicas da História Oral e das pesquisas que interligam as Ciências Sociais e a memória, mais precisamente aquelas produzidas pelo método autobiográfico. Para sua realização foram coletados e interpretados relatos autobiográficos de dois educadores, além de registros memorialísticos do próprio pesquisador, compreendidos no trabalho como narradores, sob a ótica de Walter Benjamim. Desse modo é possível apreender a complexidade de cada itinerário formativo, os impasses da narrativa no mundo contemporâneo, como já indicara Benjamim, e contribuir, na perspectiva de formação nietzscheana, para a crítica do ensino e da formação de educadores na atualidade. / This presentation aims to understand the statements of life without conditioning, the amor fati, as understood by Nietzsche, in the formative processes of educators. Alongside this notion, the concepts of subjects in processuality, body-of-dream, autopoietic subjects (i.e. open to risks, with no guarantees) dialogue with the tragic Nietzschean perspective in the capture of existential-professional choices of being and becoming a teacher. The methodology utilized in this work derives from the techniques of Oral History and from research interlinking social sciences and memory, namely those produced by the autobiographical method. We collected and interpreted autobiographical notes of two educators, as well as the researchers own memoirs, understood in this work as narrators, as defined by Walter Benjamin. That allowed us to grasp the complexity of each formative itinerary, the impasses of narrative in the contemporary world, as pointed out by Benjamin, and also to contribute to the critique of education and training of educators today, from the Nietzschean perspective of formation.

No description available.

No description available.

The Prose Edda chapter, Ragnarok as recorded by Snorri, was taken as a pivotal point for exploring fate according to the Norse mythology. The eschatological concept of collapsing gods and destruction of the world was explored through the logical and theological fatalist theory, diverging the orientation from standard textual exploration. The thesis examines the concept by employing the methodology of hermeneutics to scrutinise the text. The analysis derived results confirmed the existence of belief in fate embedded in the text; the logical fatalism that polarises statements by their truthfulness, even though it was not found or indicated textually, provided a strong contrast to theological fatalism, evidenced throughout the text. The weak theological fatalism (determinism) was suggested in the findings based on Ragnarok text, by which the inexorable change of aeons as set-in motion by the Universal Force (predicted by the three Volvas), does not entirely compromise the Aesir's free will; such as the cosmic order includes the free will in its mechanism; while Aesir's voluntary choice was dependent on God's forescience, it was still free to operate within the remit of its emission, unperturbed within the cosmic design. The Nietzschean concept of Amor Fati (Love for Fate) in accepting the inevitable, through the cyclicality of time, and as it appears with a reason that is to keep one happy, additionally illuminated our understanding of fate in Ragnarok. To counterbalance this idea and bring it into equilibrium, I reflected upon the notion of "Designer of Destiny", whereby human beings are assumed to run the entirety of their destiny, soon to learn that this human urge clashes with theit biology (over which they do not have complete control) and the cosmic power that has already predetermined the human path.

Au sein de la pensée de Deleuze, la poésie d'Antonin Artaud apparaît comme la ligne de fuite par excellence à partir de laquelle tout le foisonnement conceptuel deleuzien s'articule. Artaud est en effet celui qui brise l'image de la pensée – ou ce que nous voulons dire habituellement par " penser " en philosophie – en refusant son innéité et son universalité, c'est-à-dire la cogitatio natura universalis. Car pour Artaud comme pour Deleuze, le plus souvent, la pensée s'affronte à son problème véritable, qui est son impouvoir ou son impossibilité. Ainsi, la première partie de la thèse s'attaque à la compréhension de la destitution de l'image de la pensée dans Différence et répétition de Deleuze, à partir de l'idée de " génital inné " d'Artaud dans la Correspondance avec Jacques Rivière. Si l'image de la pensée ne dit rien du processus de penser, de quelle logique sommes-nous capables ? Au travers de la découverte de la logique paradoxale déployée dans les paradoxes de Logique du sens de Deleuze, il s'agira de penser le rapprochement entre Artaud et Nietzsche. L'axe principal de cette partie est la critique du jugement menée par Artaud. Enfin, jeté dans les paradoxes de la vie, la troisième partie envisage le grand impensé de la philosophie qu'est le corps : en effet, de quel corps sommes-nous capables ? L'enjeu, de l'impossibilité de penser à la question du corps - rapprochant L'Ethique de Spinoza du corps sans organes d'Artaud - est bien de renouer la pensée avec la vie, selon le projet du Gai savoir de Nietzsche et qu'Artaud ne cesse de reformuler dès ses premiers écrits. L'impossibilité de penser dit non seulement la séparation d'avec la vie, mais aussi l'impensable qu'est le corps : en effet, que dire de notre propre corps, tel que nous le vivons ? Dans quelle mesure la création de concepts en rhizome dans Mille Plateaux de Deleuze et Guattari explore-t-elle le corps sans organes d'Artaud, ce corps vécu qui reste encore mystérieux pour la pensée ? Artaud souhaitait qu'on l'aime non pas pour son œuvre mais pour sa vie, témoignant d'une grande santé contre un monde malade : l'horizon de l'impossibilité de penser est alors la pensée blessée et profonde assumant la vie elle-même dans toute son opacité. / In the thought of Deleuze, the poetry of Antonin Artaud seems like the line of convergence par excellence from which all the Deleuzian proliferation of concepts are developed. Indeed, Artaud is the person who shatters the image of thought – or what we usually mean by " thinking " in philosophy – rejecting its innateness and universality, in other words, the cogitatio natura universalis. Because, for both Artaud and Deleuze, thought is most often confronted by its real problem – its powerlessness or its impossibility. So the first part of the thesis deals with understanding the dismissal of the image of thought in Deleuze's Difference and Repetition, from Artaud's notion of " génital inné " [innate sexuality] in the Correspondence with Jacques Rivière. If the image of thought says nothing about the process of thinking, of what logic are we capable ? Through the discovery of the paradoxical logic deployed in the paradoxes in Deleuze's Logic of Sense, it is a matter of thinking about the connection between Artaud and Nietzsche. The main thrust of this section is a critique of the judgement made by Artaud. Lastly, thrown into the paradoxes of life, the third part considers the great non thought of philosophy, that is the body : indeed, of what body are we capable ? The challenge, the impossibility of thinking about the question of the body - comparing Spinoza's Ethics and Artaud's body without organs - is to reconnect thought with life, in accordance with the intention of Neitzsche's Gai saber [The Gay Science] and that Artaud did not cease to revise from his earliest writings. The impossibility of thought implies not only a separation from life, but also the unthinkable that is the body: indeed, does this mean talk of our own body as we experience it ? To what extent does the creation of a rhizome of concepts in A Thousand Plateaux by Deleuze and Guattari explore Artaud's body without organs, the body experienced that still remains mysterious for thought ? Artaud hoped that he would be loved not for his work, but for his life, testifying to a great health against a sick world: the prospect of the impossibility of thinking is then thought wounded and profound, taking on a life of its own in all its opacity.

Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-10T18:26:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Leonardo Augusto Catafesta.pdf: 452585 bytes, checksum: 515c147274cd20b36866601e5be4e4ad (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-12-14 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / This paper aims to investigate the conception of Dionysian philosophy presented by Friedrich Nietzsche in his final writings. The German philosopher articulates the Dionysian notion along with the notion of Apollo in his first published book, namely, The birth of the tragedy (1872). In this work, there is a direct influence of Wagner s music and Schopenhauer s philosophy in the main theoretical conceptions, thus initiating a metaphysic of artist because, according to his conception, life can only be vindicated while aesthetic phenomenon. Since his work Too human (1878), the Dionysian concept disappears from Nietzschian texts, even in later fragments, returning only in the so called third phase, that is, from Thus spoke Zarathustra (1883), this time under a new approach Nietzsche completely disengages himself from Wagner and Schopenhoauer by not working with the metaphysic of artist or using the concept of Apollo. With a more mature thinking, the German philosopher diffuses his Dionysian philosophy proposing to be completely free from the metaphysic and at the same time affirming existence without boundaries. To do so, it is mainly necessary to transpose the Dionysian into philosophical pathos. Nietzsche makes use of tragic wisdom as the main instrument for such transposition for, only then, one can converse as regards Dionysian philosophy. Understanding tragic wisdom not as theoretical knowledge, but as the understanding and acceptance of the incessant fight that pervades all fractions of life, Nietzsche can declare himself as the first tragic philosopher. Not to fall in pessimism that depreciates life, due to his relentless fighting character, the philosopher exploits game notion. With it, man establishes common sense to the coming-to-be, interlining himself as supreme creator. Thus, a child s image is the example of the most skillful player because he or she inexorably throws him or herself at it without worrying about victory or defeat -- the important thing is to play the game. Hence, the path to understand Dionysian philosophy without presupposed metaphysisists is open. For Nietzsche metaphysic is articulated with the duplication of worlds a real world is envisioned as a condition of the apparent world . Having the need for truth as modus operandi, metaphysic mendaciously created a fixed and immutable world to justify the flow from the coming-to-be. According to the nietzschinian view, this entails the denial of effectiveness because by privileging the real world the apparent world is refuted, the only sphere on which the phenomenon life is possible. With the conception of the eternal recurrence of it, Nietzsche reaches a thought without metaphysic duality, overcoming the instant/everlasting dichotomy. For the metaphysic tradition, eternity has always been transcendent to the instant, as the eternal recurrence, eternity and instant have become equivalent, in other words, the instant is conceived as eternal. Moreover, to reach supreme affirmation of eternal recurrence, Nietzsche has notion of amor fati as being the great formula for the Yes, ie, of unrestricted affirmation for joy and pleasure as well as pain and suffering. In this sense, we can understand the Dionysian philosophy proposed by Nietzsche in his last writings while total suppression of affirmative pathos and metaphysic par excellence. / O objetivo do presente trabalho consiste na investigação da concepção da filosofia dionisíaca apresentada por Friedrich Nietzsche em seus escritos finais. O filósofo alemão lança a noção de dionisíaco, ao lado da noção de apolíneo, em seu primeiro livro publicado, a saber, O nascimento da tragédia (1872). Nesta obra há uma influência direta da música de Wagner e da filosofia de Schopenhauer nas principais concepções teóricas, surgindo, assim, uma metafísica de artista , pois a vida, na concepção de Nietzsche, só pode ser justificada enquanto fenômeno estético. Desde a obra Humano demasiado humano (1878), o conceito de dionisíaco desaparece dos textos nietzschianos, inclusive nos fragmentos póstumos, retornando apenas na chamada terceira fase do autor, ou seja, a partir de Assim falou Zaratustra (1883), só que agora sob uma nova abordagem: Nietzsche desvencilha-se completamente de Wagner e Schopenhauer, não trabalha sob uma metafísica de artista e não necessita mais da noção de apolíneo. Com o pensamento mais maduro, o filósofo alemão lança sua filosofia dionisíaca com a proposta de ser totalmente livre da metafísica ao mesmo tempo em que afirma irrestritamente a existência. Para isso, é necessário, primeiramente, transpor o dionisíaco em pathos filosófico. Nietzsche utiliza a sabedoria trágica como principal instrumento para tal transposição, pois, apenas assim, pode-se falar em filosofia dionisíaca. Entendendo a sabedoria trágica não como um conhecimento teórico, mas como a compreensão e aceitação da luta incessante que permeia todos os âmbitos da vida, Nietzsche pode declarar-se o primeiro filósofo trágico. E, para não cair num pessimismo que deprecie a vida, devido o seu caráter de luta sem trégua, o filósofo utiliza a noção de jogo. Com esta noção, o homem instaura sentido ao vir-a-ser, pautando-se como supremo criador. Deste modo, a imagem da criança é o exemplo do mais hábil jogador, pois se entrega inexoravelmente sem se preocupar com vitórias ou derrotas: o importante é jogar. Assim, abre-se o caminho para entender a filosofia dionisíaca sem pressupostos metafísicos. A metafísica, para Nietzsche, se articula com a duplicação de mundos: um mundo verdadeiro é concebido como condição do mundo aparente . Tendo a vontade de verdade como modus operandi, a metafísica criou mendazmente um mundo fixo e imutável para justificar o fluxo proveniente do vir-a-ser. Isso acarreta, segundo a visão nietzschiana, a negação da efetividade, pois, ao privilegiar o mundo verdadeiro, nega-se o mundo aparente, único âmbito no qual o fenômeno vida é possível. Com a concepção do eterno retorno do mesmo, Nietzsche atinge um pensamento sem dualidades metafísicas, superando também a dicotomia instante/eternidade. Para a tradição metafísica, a eternidade sempre foi transcendente ao instante, com o eterno retorno, eternidade e instante passam a ser equivalentes, ou seja, o instante é concebido como eterno. E, para atingir a afirmação suprema do eterno retorno, Nietzsche dispõe da noção de amor fati como sendo a grande fórmula para o Sim, ou seja, da afirmação irrestrita tanto da alegria e do prazer, quanto da dor e do sofrimento. Neste sentido, podemos compreender a filosofia dionisíaca, proposta por Nietzsche em seus últimos escritos, enquanto supressão total da metafísica e pathos afirmativo por excelência.

L’objet de ce travail est d’éclairer l’esthétique et l’éthique de la poétique de Francis Ponge à partir de la notion de Nature. La première partie étudie la notion de Nature chez Ponge en tant que monde extérieur et son matérialisme qui, fortement influencé par le matérialisme antique, est caractérisé par l’antimétaphysique. Cette partie met également en relief le rapport étroit entre sa pensée matérialiste et la pensée immanente spinoziste, résumée dans l’expression de « Dieu ou la Nature ». Les aspects immanents des choses dans ses œuvres peuvent être mieux saisis, en effet, à l’aide de la notion d’« immanence » spinoziste. La deuxième partie explore, quant à elle, la relation entre la Nature et la littérature et le développement d’un nouveau lyrisme matérialiste chez Ponge. Pour lui, la littérature se naturalise et la Nature se littérarise. Son approbation de la Nature se traduit par sa contresignature apposée aux choses.Son nouveau lyrisme matérialiste, qui s’oppose au lyrisme traditionnel, se caractérise autour de notions telles que la vibration, l’aspiration, ou la « réson ». La troisième partie, enfin, examine le nouvel humanisme de Ponge ainsi que son éthique.La relation entre la Nature et l’homme s’articulera autour de thèmes éthiques essentiels comme l’altérité, le nouvel humanisme et le salut de l’homme. Son éthique consiste à vivre heureux. Nous l’aborderons à travers différents thèmes tels que la sagesse antique, l’harmonie du « non-soi » et du « soi », l’éthique de la joie, le hasard et la liberté. / The purpose of this study is to examine the aesthetics and the ethics of Francis Ponge’s poetry through the notion of Nature. The first part examines the concept of Nature in Ponge as the outside world and his materialism which, heavily influenced by ancient materialism, is characterized by the anti-metaphysical. This part also explore the close relationship between his idea and Spinoza’s immanent idea, summarized in the expression of "God, or Nature". The immanent aspects of things in his work can be fully understood with the help of the concept of "immanence" of Spinoza. The second part examines the relationship between Nature and literature and the development of Ponge’s new materialist lyricism. For him, literature becomes naturalized and nature becomes literarized. The approval of nature is reflected in his countersignature for things. His new materialist lyricism, contrasted with the traditional lyricism, is characterized by notions such as vibration, aspiration, "réson". The third part will focus on the new humanism and the ethics of Ponge. The relationship between Nature and man will be treated primarily on certain essential themes of ethics such as otherness, the new humanism and the salvation of man. His ethics is to live à happy life. Various topics, such as ancient wisdom, the harmony of the "non-self" and the "self", the ethics of joy, chance and freedom, will be discussed.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:12:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JoanaBL.pdf: 510109 bytes, checksum: e5551032ad7d4bbf15927e80f9372702 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-06-15 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / It is investigating why reason Nietzsche affirms, in 1888, when revises his work (Ecce Homo), that to be exactly with The Birth of Tragedy it will be necessary to forget some things , and, in spite of, insist, in the same writing, in naming himself the first tragic philosopher - that is, the opposite and antipode of a pessimistic philosopher . Nietzsche elaborates in The Birth of Tragedy a theory about tragic starting from the opposition and complementarity among Apollo and Dionysian, rationalism and instinct, and in the refusal of the pessimistic perspective. The objective of the dissertation is to discuss how the theory of tragedy modifies due to the rupture with the inspiring of the first moment of the nietzschian philosophy, Schopenhauer and Wagner - maybe the such things to be forgotten about The Birth of Tragedy - and the implications of this rupture, that transforms the philosophy of Nietzsche in dissident of the metaphysical tradition. Like this, it is noticed that there is more continuity than estrangement in what concerns to the definition of tragic, just announced in 1871. By the sentence of the eternal return to the concept of will of power Nietzsche elaborates a tragic perspective, marked by the Dionysian celebration of the life, also acted through the pessimism dionisiac , defined in Gaya Science's ? 370 (1881-2), and of the sentence of the love fate, enunciated in the ?276 of the same work; all those concepts, discussed in this research, concentrate, decisively, the acceptance idea and statement of life, or more precisely, the decline of the tragic hero, between joy and ruin / Trata-se de investigar por que raz?o Nietzsche afirma, em 1888, quando revisa sua obra (Ecce Homo), que para ser justo com O Nascimento da Trag?dia ser? preciso esquecer algumas coisas , e, n?o obstante, insista, no mesmo escrito, em nomear-se o primeiro fil?sofo tr?gico isto ?, o extremo oposto e o ant?poda de um fil?sofo pessimista . Nietzsche elabora em O Nascimento da Trag?dia uma teoria do tr?gico a partir da oposi??o e complementaridade entre apol?neo e dionis?aco, racionalismo e instinto, e na recusa da perspectiva pessimista. Desse modo, o objetivo da disserta??o ? discutir como a teoria da trag?dia se modifica devido ? ruptura com os dois inspiradores do primeiro momento da filosofia nietzschiana, Schopenhauer e Wagner talvez as tais coisas a serem esquecidas de O Nascimento da Trag?dia e as implica??es desta ruptura, que transforma a filosofia de Nietzsche em dissidente da tradi??o metaf?sica. Assim, percebe-se que h? mais continuidade do que distanciamento no que concerne ? defini??o de tr?gico, apenas anunciada em 1871. Da senten?a do eterno retorno ao conceito de vontade de poder Nietzsche elabora uma perspectiva tr?gica, marcada pela celebra??o dionis?aca da vida, tamb?m representada atrav?s do pessimismo dionis?aco , definido no ? 370 da Gaia Ci?ncia (1881-2), e da m?xima do amor fati, enunciada no ?276 da mesma obra; todos esses conceitos nietzschianos, discutidos nesta pesquisa, concentram, decisivamente, a id?ia de aceita??o e afirma??o da vida, ou mais precisamente, o ocaso do her?i tr?gico, entre j?bilo e ru?na

(EN) In the last of his finished works, Nietzsche presents a special sort of retrospect of his past and, at the same time, prospect of his future. The aim of the thesis is to examine the possibility that Nietzsche attempts to present some of the results of his preceeding inquires in practice and provides readers with a guideline for creation of practical philosophy in accord with their own constitution, being aware of external and internal dangers of the project. By means of an exemplary self-interpretation, Nietzsche demonstrates the process of human self-becoming.