Spelling suggestions: "subject:"emmanuel levinas"" "subject:"emmanuel levinase""
71 |
Practicing the law of human dignityChatzipanagiotou, Matthildi 03 March 2016 (has links)
Die philosophischen Grundlagen der Meta-Dimension des Rechts auf Menschenwürde lösen eine Fragestellung aus, die die Grenzen der Disziplin des Rechts übertrifft: wie könnte das Transzendentale als ein Aspekt der Bedeutung von Menschenwürde dargestellt werden? Das Beharren auf der nicht-Bestimmung des Menschenbildes oder auf dem Begriff ‚Gott’ in der Präambel des Deutschen Grundgesetzes, wie es sich in der Deutschen Dogmatik widerspiegelt, gepaart mit dem Bestreben nach einer Fall-zu-Fall ad hoc Konkretisierung dessen, was Menschenwürde bedeutet, inspiriert diese Untersuchung von ‚etwas fehlt’ [‘something missing’]. In postmoderner Art und Weise beschreibt diese Geschichte das Gesetz der Menschenwürde als Trojanisches Pferd und bietet hermeneutische und literarische Grundlagen für eine affirmative Haltung gegenüber einer ''leeren'' Rede im juristischen Diskurs. Die Forschungsfrage erweckt und umkreist die polemisch verbrämten Begriffe von ‚Leere’ und ‚Black Box’: Warum erscheint der Rechtsbegriff der Menschenwürde ‚leer’? Oder wie ist er ‚leer’? Warum und wie ist er eine ‚Black Box’? Wie erscheinen Manifestationen des Konzepts abstrakt wie Universalien, aber im Einzelnen konkret? Die ontologischen, sprachlich-analytischen und phänomenologischen philosophischen Erkenntnisse, vorgestellt im ersten Kapitel, bilden die Linse, durch die fünf maßgebliche Fälle des Bundesverfassungsgerichtes – über Abtreibung, lebenslange Freiheitsstrafe, Transsexualität, staatliche Reaktion auf Terroranschläge und die Gewährleistung eines menschenwürdigen Existenzminimums – im zweiten Kapitel analysiert werden. Die philosophischen Quellen werden nicht als Momente im langen Verlauf der Menschenwürde in der Geschichte der Ideen eingeklammert. / The philosophical underpinnings of what may be called the meta-dimension of the law of human dignity trigger a question that surpasses the boundaries of the discipline of law: how could the transcendental as an aspect of human dignity meaning be portrayed? The insistence on non-determination of the Menschenbild [human image] or ‘God’ in the Preamble to the German Basic Law [Grundgesetz] reflected in German legal doctrine, paired with the commitment to case-by-case ad hoc concretization of what human dignity means inspire this story of ‘something missing’. In postmodern fashion, this story portrays the law of human dignity as a Trojan Horse and provides hermeneutic and literary foundations for an affirmative stance towards ‘emptiness’ talk in legal discourse. The research question rekindles and twists polemically framed ‘emptiness’ and ‘black box’ contentions: Why does the legal concept of human dignity appear ‘empty’? Or, how is it ‘empty’? Why and how is it a ‘black box’? How do manifestations of the concept appear abstract as universals and concrete as particulars? The ontological, linguistic-analytical, and phenomenological philosophical insights presented in Chapter One compose the lens through which five benchmark Bundesverfassungsgericht cases – on abortion, life imprisonment, transsexuals, state response to terrorist attacks, and the guarantee of a dignified subsistence minimum – are analyzed in Chapter Two. The philosophical sources are not bracketed as moments in the long course of human dignity in the history of ideas.
|
72 |
Taking Mormons Seriously: Ethics of Representing Latter-day Saints in American FictionWilliams, Terrol Roark 10 July 2007 (has links)
My paper examines the ethics of representing Mormons in serious American fiction, viewed through two primary texts, Bayard Taylor's nineteenth-century dramatic poem The Prophet and Maureen Whipple's epic novel The Giant Joshua. I also briefly examine Walter Kirn's short stories “Planetarium” and “Whole Other Bodies.” Using Werner Sollors' and Matthew Frye Jacobson's writings on ethnicity as foundational, I argue in that Mormonism constitutes an ethnicity, which designation accentuates the ethical demands of those who represent the group. I also use W.J.T. Mitchell's theories of representation as the basis of my arguments of the ethics of representing ethnicity. As ethical theorists, Emmanuel Levinas and Edward Said inform the theoretical framework of my project, and I place their theories both in opposition to and harmony with each other in terms of what it means to be truly “Other” and the responsibility of those who view, represent, project, or accept otherness as essential to being. I also borrow from Wayne C. Booth, particularly in his practical application of ethics theory. I employ Terryl Givens, Michael Austin, Bruce Jorgensen, and Gideon Burton to help bring the theory into the field of Mormon studies. In applying all these theorists to Taylor and Whipple I examine Taylor's exoticizing, “Othering” Mormons, creating an “Oriental” version of the rise of Mormonism, parallel to some of his Middle Eastern travel writing. Taylor also makes the remarkable ethical step of being the first non-Mormon to “take Mormons seriously” in literary fiction. I demonstrate how his use of classical literary forms and themes moves the ethical treatment of Mormons forward in an unprecedented way. Maureen Whipple relies on some of the sensational, romantic tropes in common use, but overall she also moves forward ethical representation of Mormons in serious literature, being the best-received of “Mormondom's Lost Generation” of literary writers. In conclusion I argue that these texts, along with the more problematic Kirn stories, help create a positive ethical climate for Mormon representation.
|
73 |
Förtvivlade läsningar : Litteratur som motstånd och läsning som etikHjort, Elisabeth January 2015 (has links)
This study has two aims and addresses two areas of investigation. The first aim is to examine, in four novels and their textual worlds, what role is played by collective self-images and essentialist identities in maintaining power structures in regard to gender, class, norms for mental functions, and ethnicity. Whether, and if so, how, the novel’s deconstruction of language and images can function as resistance to hegemonic oppression? What does the encounter between the privileged collective and the marginalized look like in the novel, and what happens in this encounter? The project’s second aim is to probe what criticism of, and what strategies for resistance to, various power structures reading can provide. To what extent is it possible to speak of responsibility for, and in, the reading of fictional works? What role is played by the (un)expected and the conditionality in the poetical novel’s ethical demands on the reader? What might reading as an ethical practice mean and entail? The dual aim situates this dissertation in an interdisciplinary field between ethics, literary studies and aesthetics. In this study despair is the fundament on which the ethical reader stands to approach literature. Rather than discovering meanings, finding examples, or experiencing empathy, it is being engaged in the conditions determined by suffering and injustice that constitutes ethical reading. The novels Drömfakulteten (The Dream Faculty) by Sara Stridsberg, Hevonen häst (Hevonen Horse) by Annika Korpi, Montecore by Jonas Hassen Khemiri, and Personliga pronomen (Personal Pronouns) by Daniel Sjölin comprise the material for the study. They are analysed in terms of deconstructive hermeneutics. Theories brought to bear are primarily Gayatri Spivak’s post-colonial and Emmanuel Levinas’ phenomenological thinking about ethics, together with ideas from, among others, Derek Attridge, Judith Butler, and Sara Ahmed. The readings of the novels are done via four points of entry: identity, the body, the human, and the post-political, as part of the project’s work process, with each reading leading to new questions and critical interventions. The analysis points to a responsibility in relation to identity, a practice where oneself is shifted and transformed. This responsibility also encompasses accountability for the normative orders that need to be changed. Literary projects per se cannot achieve this, but they can be read as a stab at resistance, material for the reader to elaborate upon. This responsibility is an ethical practice that is not completed, that has uncertainty inscribed in its very essence, and that is reinvigorated with each new reading.
|
74 |
暴力與和平:列維納斯的道德形上學及其政治蘊義研究 / Violence and Peace: Studies on Levinas's Moral Metaphysics and its Political Implications鄧元尉, Teng ,Yuan-wei Unknown Date (has links)
本文嘗試以和平問題與暴力問題為焦點,重新理解列維納斯道德形上學之梗概,並解決其政治蘊義所造成的疑難。列維納斯的哲學基本上是一種和平哲學,其所論之和平乃被界定為對暴力的非暴力抵抗,並在其前期作品中具體展現為倫理學對政治學的抵抗。但此一抵抗關係隨著列維納斯的思想進程而逐漸呈現出一種兩歧性,從而引發其思想是否前後不一致的批判,亦產生對和平之純粹性的質疑。筆者的努力即在於說明此一疑難的成因並構想一調和方案。筆者主張,應將列維納斯的思想進程視為一條闡發其倫理學之政治蘊義的思路,但這條從倫理學走到政治學的和平之路,須途經社會學的迂迴方才可能,而如此一種中介性的社會學之建構,惟在列維納斯的他勒目詮釋中獲得。因此,本文綜觀列維納斯的哲學作品與宗教作品,先是闡述責任倫理學的和平蘊義,再從其宗教詮釋學對以色列社群的刻畫得到那基於倫理學之社會學的基本模式,最後參照解構主義的批判,在對質疑政治學與回答社會學的構想中,統括列維納斯的倫理思想與政治思想。 / Peace, as the non-violence resistance to violence, is one of the main topics of Levinas's philosophy. In this dissertation, I attempt to summarize Levinas's moral metaphysics and reflect its political implications by investigating the relation of peace and violence. The relation which in Levinas's early works could be seen as an opposition between ethics and politics has some ambiguity in his later works that emerges in a dialectical way: ethics both opposes and demands politics. My opinion is that this problem can be solved by referring to his religious works, especially his interpretations of the Talmud. In brief, the path of argument is from ethics to politics through sociology. First, I describe the basic principles of Levinas's ethical metaphysics by illustrating the typology of the other and the genealogy of the same, i.e. the phenomenology of the face of the other and the transformation from the same in itself to the same for the other. Second, I find the basic political model in terms of the hermeneutics of Talmud, especially the texts about the people of Israel. Final, I try to appeal to the postmodern thoughts in order to reconcile the risk of violence in Levinas's religious works, and integrate Levinas's ethical thoughts and political thoughts by constructing the politics of questioning and the sociology of response.
|
75 |
LIVING DISABILITY: WAYS FORWARD FROM DECONTEXTUAL MODELS OF DISABILITYKavanagh, Chandra January 2020 (has links)
Living Disability: Ways Forward from Decontextual Models of Disability consists
of six articles that provide both theoretical and pragmatic commentaries on decontextual
approaches to vulnerability and disability. In What Contemporary Models of Disability
Miss: The Case for a Phenomenological Hermeneutic Analysis I argue many commonly
accepted models for understanding disability use a vertical method in which disability is
defined as a category into which people are slotted based on whether or not they fit its
definitional criteria. This method inevitably homogenizes the experiences of disabled
people. A hermeneutic investigation of commonly accepted models for understanding
disability will provide an epistemological tool to critique and to augment contemporary
models of disability. In A Phenomenological Hermeneutic Resolution to the Principlist-
Narrative Bioethics Debate Narrative, I note narrative approaches to bioethics and
principlist approaches to bioethics have often been presented in fundamental opposition
to each other. I argue that a phenomenological hermeneutic approach to the debate finds a
compromise between both positions that maintains what is valuable in each of them.
Justifying an Adequate Response to the Vulnerable Other examines the possibility of
endorsing the position that I, as a moral agent, ought to do my best to respond adequately
to the other’s vulnerability. I contend that, insofar as I value my personal identity, it is
consistent to work toward responding adequately to the vulnerability of the other both
ontologically and ethically. Who Can Make a Yes?: Disability, Gender, Sexual Consent
and ‘Yes Means Yes’ examines the ‘yes means yes’ model of sexual consent, and the
political and ethical commitments that underpin this model, noting three fundamental
Ph.D. Thesis – C. Kavanagh; McMaster University - Philosophy
v
disadvantages. This position unfairly polices the sexual expression of participants,
particularly vulnerable participants such as disabled people, it demands an unreasonably
high standard for defining sexual interaction as consensual, and allows perpetrators of
sexual violence to define consent. In Craving Sameness, Accepting Difference: The
Possibility of Solidarity and Social Justice I note realist accounts typically define
solidarity on the basis of a static feature of human nature. We stand in solidarity with
some other person, or group of people, because we share important features in common.
In opposition to such realist accounts, Richard Rorty defines solidarity as a practical tool,
within which there is always an ‘us’, with whom we stand in solidarity, and a ‘them’,
with whom we are contrasted. I argue that by understanding Rorty’s pragmatic solidarity
in terms of the relational view of solidarity offered by Alexis Shotwell, it is possible to
conceptualise solidarity in a manner that allows for extending the boundaries of the
community with whom we stand in solidarity. In Translating Non-Human Actors I
examine Bruno Latour’s position that nonhuman things can be made to leave
interpretable statements, and have a place in democracy. With the right types of
mediators, the scientist can translate for non-humans, and those voices will allow for nonhuman
political representation. I wish to suggest that, like scientists, people with
disabilities are particularly capable of building networks that facilitate translation
between humans and non-humans. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / Living Disability: Ways Forward from Decontextual Models of Disability consists of six separate articles that provide both theoretical and pragmatic commentaries on decontextual approaches to vulnerability and disability. The first three articles examine contemporary approaches to understanding vulnerability and disability, and explore what a contextual theoretical approach, one that puts the experiences of people with disabilities at the centre, might look like. The second three articles provide a bioethical examination of practical ethical questions associated with the treatment of people with disabilities when it comes to social and political positions on disability and sexuality, solidarity with people with disabilities, and the relationship between people with disabilities and objects.
|
76 |
Gottesoffenbarung angesichts des Anderen / Revelation of God in face of the otherSchwarz, Jonathan 11 1900 (has links)
Text in German, summaries in German and English / Diese Masterarbeit handelt von Transzendenzmomenten angesichts des Anderen
und nimmt damit Bezug auf einen der einflussreichsten Philosophen der
Gegenwart, Emmanuel Levinas. Philosophiegeschichtlich bildet der linguistic
turn den Kontext dieses Diskurses. So wird der Wandel im Denken, der mit dem
linguistic turn einhergeht, anhand verschiedener philosophischer und
theologischer Essays reflektiert und auf das Problem der Gewalt im Prozess des
Erkennens hin zugespitzt. In Diskussion mit den Schriften Dietrich Bonhoeffers
leistet diese Arbeit hinfort einen Beitrag zum systematisch-theologischen Diskurs
über Gottesoffenbarung in zwischenmenschlichen Beziehungen und über Ethik.
In Auseinandersetzung mit Levinas und Bonhoeffer baut diese Arbeit eine Brücke
zwischen postmodernem, dekonstruktivistischem Denken und der fortwährenden
theologischen Aufgabe, Gottes Sein mittels menschlicher Sprache Ausdruck zu
verleihen. / This master thesis is about moments of transcendence in face of the other by
means of one of the most important philosophers in our days, Emmanuel Levinas.
The philosophically based historical context is represented by the term linguistic
turn which marks a change of thinking within the 20th century. To outline this
change the thesis brings several philosophical and theological essays up for
discussion which leads to the problem of power in the process of recognition.
Bringing up Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s writings, this research will make a
contribution to the systematic-theological discourse about God revealing himself
within relationships and about ethics. Furthermore it builds a bridge between
postmodern anti-constructivist thinking and the continual theological task of
using human language to explore God’s being. / Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology / M. Th. (Systematic Theology)
|
Page generated in 0.0455 seconds