L’ubiquitination est une modification post-traductionnelle des protéines qui consiste à attacher, d’une manière covalente, le groupement ubiquitine sur un résidu lysine de la protéine cible. Cette modification peut avoir un impact considérable sur la fonction, la localisation et la stabilité de ces cibles. Une fois établie par des enzymes appelées E3 ligases, l’ubiquitination peut être enlevée par des enzymes spécifiques appelées déubiquitinases, modulant ainsi les effets causés par cette modification. BAP1 (BRCA1-Associated Protein 1) est une déubiquitinase de la famille des UCH (Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolases) qui a été initialement identifiée comme partenaire du suppresseur de tumeurs BRCA1 (BReast Cancer Associated gene 1). De nombreux groupes de recherche, incluant le nôtre, ont montré que BAP1 est associée avec d’autres cofacteurs formant un large complexe multiprotéique. Ce dernier est impliqué dans plusieurs processus cellulaires comme la transcription des gènes, la régulation de la chromatine, la coordination du cycle cellulaire et la réponse aux dommages à l’ADN. La cible majeure de BAP1 est l’histone H2A ubiquitinée sur la lysine 119, une marque d’histone qui a été souvent associée avec une conformation répressive de la chromatine. Quels sont les mécanismes régulant le complexe BAP1 lui permettant d’exécuter ces fonctions biologiques? Cela implique-t-il des modifications post-traductionnelles touchant les partenaires de BAP1 ? Ces questions restent encore sans réponse définitive. Ainsi, les objectifs de cette thèse sont de caractériser le mécanisme et la fonction du complexe BAP1 en étudiant les modifications post-traductionnelles de ses partenaires. Pour répondre à ces questions nous avons étudié les modifications post-traductionnelles touchant BAP1 et ses cofacteurs mutuellement exclusifs ASXL1 et ASXL2 (Additional Sex Comb-like 1,2). Nous avons démontré qu’ASXL1 et ASXL2 sont monoubiquitinés uniquement lorsqu’ils sont associés à BAP1. Sachant que les complexes BAP1/ASXLs sont conservés au cours de l’évolution, nous avons aussi démontré que la monoubiquitination des ASXLs est conservée chez la Drosophile. En utilisant des méthodes de déplétion de protéines par siARN et CRISPR/Cas9 ainsi que des mutants de perte de fonction de BAP1 et ASXL2, nous avons identifié les enzymes responsables de la monoubiquitination des ASXLs ainsi que leur effet sur l’activité catalytique de BAP1. D’autre part, nous avons étudié le développement chez la Drosophile ainsi que le cycle cellulaire des cellules humaines pour identifier la fonction biologique de la monoubiquitination de ASXL2. Nos résultats démontrent que la monoubiquitination d’ASXL2 sur la lysine 370 en présence de BAP1 est une modification post-traductionnelle conservée et catalysée directement par la famille UBE2Es des enzymes de conjugaison de l’ubiquitine (UBE2E1,2,3 chez les mammifères et UbcD2 chez la Drosophile). Cette monoubiquitination stimule l’activité catalytique de BAP1 chez les mammifères et de son orthologue Calypso chez la Drosophile envers H2Aub. Le blocage de la monoubiquitination des ASXLs par des mutations ciblant la lysine K370 induit une inhibition de l’activité de BAP1, ce qui cause une dérégulation du cycle cellulaire chez les cellules mammifères et une transformation homéotique haltère-aile chez la Drosophile. De plus, il nous a été possible de constater l’importance de cette monoubiquitination dans le cancer en démontrant la forte corrélation d’expression de BAP1/ASXL2 et les UBE2Es au niveau du mésotheliome, un cancer connu pour la dérégulation de BAP1. Nos résultats indiquent l’importance des modifications post-traductionnelles, dont la monoubiquitination, dans la régulation de la fonction et la stabilité du complexe BAP1. De plus, nous décrivons un nouveau mécanisme d’activation d’une deubiquitinase par la monoubiquitination de son cofacteur. D’autres études seront nécessaires afin de comprendre le lien entre l’activation de BAP1/ASXL2 par monoubiquitination et la fonction suppresseur de tumeurs de BAP1 via la deubiquitination d’H2Aub. D’autre part, nous avons fait l’observation que la déplétion de la deubiquitinase associée à la particule régulatrice du protéasome, PSMD14, induit non seulement une réduction drastique d’H2Aub dans la cellule, mais aussi une mort cellulaire rapide. Ceci nous a poussé initialement à investiguer l’implication de l’activité catalytique du protéasome dans la régulation d’H2Aub en lien avec la mort cellulaire. Malgré le fait que nous n’ayons pas trouvé un lien direct entre PSMD14 et la deubiquitination d’H2Aub, nous avons identifié plusieurs candidats (DUBs et E2s) impliqués dans l’induction de la mort cellulaire tout en surmontant une résistance acquise contre des inhibiteurs ciblant l’activité catalytique du protéasome. Ces candidats pourraient représenter des cibles intéressantes pour développer des inhibiteurs spécifiques afin de contrecarrer la résistance aux inhibiteurs du protéasome. / Ubiquitination is a post-translational modification of proteins that involves covalently attaching the ubiquitin moiety to the lysine residues of the target protein. This modification has been reported to have a significant impact on the function, localization and stability of these targets. Once established by enzymes called E3 ligases, ubiquitination can be removed by specific enzymes called deubiquitinases, thus modulating the effects caused by this modification. BAP1 (or BRCA1-Associated Protein1) is a deubiquitinase, from the UCH (Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolases) family, that was originally identified as a partner of the BRCA1 (BReast Cancer Associated gene 1) tumor suppressor. We and other research groups have shown that BAP1 is associated with other co-factors forming a multi-protein complex involved in several cellular processes such as gene transcription, chromatin regulation, cell cycle regulation and DNA damage response. The major target of BAP1 is ubiquitinated histone H2A, a histone mark that has been frequently associated with a repressive chromatin conformation. What are the mechanisms regulating the BAP1 complex allowing it to perform its biological functions? Does this involve post-translational modifications affecting BAP1 partners? These questions are still incompletely answered. Thus, the objectives of our studies are to characterize the mechanism and the function of the BAP1 complex by studying the post-translational modifications that could affect its obligate partners including ASXLs. To address these questions, we studied the post-translational modifications affecting BAP1 and its two mutually exclusive co-factors ASXL1 and ASXL2 (Additional Sex Comb-like 1,2). We demonstrated that ASXL1 and ASXL2 are mono-ubiquitinated only when associated with BAP1. Taking into account that the BAP1/ASXLs complexes are highly conserved during evolution, we also demonstrated that the mono-ubiquitination of ASXLs is important for Drosophila development. Using RNAi and CRISPR/Cas9 gene depletion methods and loss-of-function mutants of BAP1 and ASXL2, we identified the precise site of ASXLs ubiquitination, the enzymes responsible for establishing this mono-ubiquitination as well as its effect on catalytic activity of BAP1. On the other hand, we investigated Drosophila development as well as human cell cycle progression to identify the biological function of ASXLs mono-ubiquitination. Our results indicate that the mono-ubiquitination of ASXL2 on lysine 370 in the presence of BAP1 is a conserved post-translational modification catalyzed directly by the UBE2E family of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (UBE2E1, 2, 3 in mammals and UbcD2 in Drosophila). This mono-ubiquitination event stimulates the catalytic activity of BAP1 in mammals and its Drosophila ortholog Calypso towards H2Aub in vivo and in vitro. Blocking the mono-ubiquitination of ASXLs, by mutations targeting lysine K370, induces an inhibition of BAP1 catalytic activity causing a deregulation of human cell cycle progression and a haltere-to-wing homeotic transformation in Drosophila. In addition, we were able to assess the importance of ASXLs mono-ubiquitination in cancer using the mesothelioma tumor model, demonstrating a strong correlation between the expression of BAP1/ASXL2 and UBE2Es. Our results indicate the importance of post-translational modifications, including mono-ubiquitination, in the regulation of the function and stability of the BAP1 complex. Moreover, we describe a novel mechanism of activation of a deubiquitinase by the mono-ubiquitination of its co-factor. Further studies will be needed to shed more light on the link between BAP1/ASXLs activation by mono-ubiquitination and the tumor suppressor function of BAP1 via H2Aub deubiquitination. On the other hand, we have noticed that the depletion of PSMD14, a deubiquitinase associated with the proteasome regulatory particle, induces not only a drastic reduction of H2Aub in the cell, but also rapid cell death. This prompted us initially to investigate the involvement of the catalytic activity of the proteasome in the regulation of H2Aub in connection with cell death. Although we did not find a direct link between PSMD14 and H2Aub deubiquitination, we identified several candidates (DUBs and E2s) involved in the induction of cell death while overcoming acquired resistance against proteasome catalytic inhibitors. These candidates may represent attractive targets for developing specific inhibitors to counteract resistance to proteasome inhibitors.

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are characterized by their unlimited capacity for self-renewal and the ability to contribute to every lineage of the developing embryo. The promoters of developmentally regulated loci within these cells are marked by coincident epigenetic modifications of gene activation and repression, termed bivalent domains. Trithorax group (TrxG) and Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins respectively place these epigenetic marks on chromatin and extensively colocalize with Oct4 in ESCs. Although it appears that these cells are poised and ready for differentiation, the switch that permits this transition is critically held in check. The derepression of bivalent domains upon knockdown of Oct4 or PcG underscores their respective roles in maintaining the pluripotent state through epigenetic regulation of chromatin structure. The mechanisms that facilitate the recruitment and retention of Oct4, TrxG, and PcG proteins at developmentally regulated loci to maintain the pluripotent state, however, remain unknown. Oct4 may function as either a transcriptional activator or repressor. Prevailing thought holds that both of these activities are required to maintain the pluripotent state through activation of genes implicated in pluripotency and cell-cycle control with concomitant repression of genes required for differentiation and lineage-specific differentiation. More recent evidence however, suggests that the activator function of Oct4 may play a more critical role in maintaining the pluripotent state (Hammachi et al., 2012). The purpose of the studies described in this dissertation was to clarify the underlying mechanisms by which Oct4 functions in transcriptional activation and repression. By so doing, we wished to contextualize its role in pluripotent cells, and to provide insight into how changes in Oct4 function might account for its ability to facilitate cell fate transitions. As a result of our studies we find that Oct4 function is dependent upon post-translational modifications (PTMs). We find through a combination of experimental approaches, including genome-wide microarray analysis, bioinformatics, chromatin immunoprecipitation, functional molecular, and biochemical analyses, that in the pluripotent state Oct4, Akt, and Hmgb2 participate in a regulatory feedback loop. Akt-mediated phosphorylation of Oct4 facilitates interaction with PcG recruiter Hmgb2. Consequently, Hmgb2 functions as a context dependent modulator of Akt and Oct4 function, promoting transcriptional poise at Oct4 bound loci. Sumoylation of Oct4 is then required to maintain Hmgb2 enrichment at repressed loci and to transmit the H3K27me3 mark in daughter progeny. The expression of Oct4 phosphorylation mutants however, leads to Akt inactivation and initiates the DNA Damage Checkpoint response. Our results suggest that this may subsequently facilitate chromatin reorganization and cell fate transitions. In summary, our results suggest that controlled modulation of Oct4, Akt, and Hmgb2 function is required to maintain pluripotency and for the faithful induction of transcriptional programs required for lineage specific differentiation.

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are characterized by their unlimited capacity for self-renewal and the ability to contribute to every lineage of the developing embryo. The promoters of developmentally regulated loci within these cells are marked by coincident epigenetic modifications of gene activation and repression, termed bivalent domains. Trithorax group (TrxG) and Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins respectively place these epigenetic marks on chromatin and extensively colocalize with Oct4 in ESCs. Although it appears that these cells are poised and ready for differentiation, the switch that permits this transition is critically held in check. The derepression of bivalent domains upon knockdown of Oct4 or PcG underscores their respective roles in maintaining the pluripotent state through epigenetic regulation of chromatin structure. The mechanisms that facilitate the recruitment and retention of Oct4, TrxG, and PcG proteins at developmentally regulated loci to maintain the pluripotent state, however, remain unknown. Oct4 may function as either a transcriptional activator or repressor. Prevailing thought holds that both of these activities are required to maintain the pluripotent state through activation of genes implicated in pluripotency and cell-cycle control with concomitant repression of genes required for differentiation and lineage-specific differentiation. More recent evidence however, suggests that the activator function of Oct4 may play a more critical role in maintaining the pluripotent state (Hammachi et al., 2012). The purpose of the studies described in this dissertation was to clarify the underlying mechanisms by which Oct4 functions in transcriptional activation and repression. By so doing, we wished to contextualize its role in pluripotent cells, and to provide insight into how changes in Oct4 function might account for its ability to facilitate cell fate transitions. As a result of our studies we find that Oct4 function is dependent upon post-translational modifications (PTMs). We find through a combination of experimental approaches, including genome-wide microarray analysis, bioinformatics, chromatin immunoprecipitation, functional molecular, and biochemical analyses, that in the pluripotent state Oct4, Akt, and Hmgb2 participate in a regulatory feedback loop. Akt-mediated phosphorylation of Oct4 facilitates interaction with PcG recruiter Hmgb2. Consequently, Hmgb2 functions as a context dependent modulator of Akt and Oct4 function, promoting transcriptional poise at Oct4 bound loci. Sumoylation of Oct4 is then required to maintain Hmgb2 enrichment at repressed loci and to transmit the H3K27me3 mark in daughter progeny. The expression of Oct4 phosphorylation mutants however, leads to Akt inactivation and initiates the DNA Damage Checkpoint response. Our results suggest that this may subsequently facilitate chromatin reorganization and cell fate transitions. In summary, our results suggest that controlled modulation of Oct4, Akt, and Hmgb2 function is required to maintain pluripotency and for the faithful induction of transcriptional programs required for lineage specific differentiation.

Human epidermis relies on a population of adult stem cells to maintain its homeostasis. Stem cells transit from a dormant to an active state and undergo a tightly regulated process of differentiation that replenishes the tissue according to its needs. This process either replaces cells that get shed away, or contributes to tissue healing upon injuries, such as wounding. Distinct molecular mechanisms are required to keep human epidermal stem cells localized in their niche and for their active proliferation and mobilization, while others regulate their differentiation status. However, little is known about the proper global chromatin modifications that ensure the correct transition between these stem cell states. This work shows that Cbx4, a Polycomb Repressive Complex-1 (PRC1)-associated protein, maintains human epidermal stem cells slow-cycling and undifferentiated, while protecting them from senescence. Interestingly, abrogating the polycomb activity of Cbx4 impairs its anti-senescent function without affecting stem cell differentiation, indicating that differentiation and senescence are independent processes in human epidermis. Conversely, Cbx4 inhibits stem cell activation and differentiation through its SUMO ligase activity. Global transcriptome and chromatin occupancy analyses indicate that Cbx4 regulates modulators of epidermal homeostasis and represses factors, such as Ezh2, Dnmt1, and Bmi1, to prevent the active stem cell state. Interestingly, Cbx4 also represses genes required for neuronal fate repression, suggesting that it might have a role in ectoderm patterning during development. Cbx proteins are differently expressed during epidermal differentiation and the activity of Cbx4 towards promoting human epidermal stem cell quiescence is unique among the Cbx proteins. This suggests that different Polycomb complexes are assembled, based on the availability of its core member, and balance epidermal stem cell dormancy and activation, while continually preventing senescence and differentiation. / La homeostasis de la epidermis humana depende de una población de células troncales adultas (CTAs). Las CTAs alternan ciclos de quiescencia y actividad, seguidos por una regulación estricta de su diferenciación, según las necesidades celulares del tejido. Este proceso es esencial para repoblar el tejido de células envejecidas o dañadas. Cada estadío por el que transita una CTA está regulado por procesos moleculares específicos. Sin embargo, aún sabemos poco sobre los procesos que regulan la reorganización de la cromatina necesarios para mediar dichas transiciones en la población de las CTAs. Estos resultados demuestran que la proteina Cbx4, pertenciente al complejo Polycomb Repressive Complex-1 (PRC1), es necesaria para mantener a las CTAs de la epidermis humana quiescentes, indiferenciadas, y protegidas de la senescencia. A nivel molecular, la actividad polycomb de Cbx4 es únicamente necesaria para su función antisenescente, pero es dispensable para la regulación de la proliferación y diferenciación de las CTAs. La inhibición de la proliferación y diferenciación celular sin embargo depende de la activdad E3 SUMO ligasa de Cbx4. Analisis del transcriptoma global y de unión a la cromatina (ChIP), demuestran que Cbx4 regula la expresión de moduladores esenciales de la homeostasis de la epidermis, y reprime la expresión de factores necesarios para la activación de las CTAs, tales como Ezh2, Dnmt1 y Bmi1. Cabe destacar que Cbx4 también reprime la expresión de genes que determinam el linage neuronal, lo que sugiere que Cbx4 pueda ser importante para separar el neuroectodermo entre ectodermo y neuronas, durante el desarrollo embrionario. Cbx4 es la única proteina Cbx capaz de inducir entrada en quiescencia de las CTAs, y el resto de proteinas Cbx se expresa de forma diferente durante la diferenciación en la epidermis. Por lo tanto, nuestros estudios sugieren que la actividad de distintos complejos Polycomb actúa en los sucesivos estadíos de quiescencia, proliferación y diferenciación de las CTAs, a la vez que impiden su senescencia de forma constante.

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are characterized by their unlimited capacity for self-renewal and the ability to contribute to every lineage of the developing embryo. The promoters of developmentally regulated loci within these cells are marked by coincident epigenetic modifications of gene activation and repression, termed bivalent domains. Trithorax group (TrxG) and Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins respectively place these epigenetic marks on chromatin and extensively colocalize with Oct4 in ESCs. Although it appears that these cells are poised and ready for differentiation, the switch that permits this transition is critically held in check. The derepression of bivalent domains upon knockdown of Oct4 or PcG underscores their respective roles in maintaining the pluripotent state through epigenetic regulation of chromatin structure. The mechanisms that facilitate the recruitment and retention of Oct4, TrxG, and PcG proteins at developmentally regulated loci to maintain the pluripotent state, however, remain unknown. Oct4 may function as either a transcriptional activator or repressor. Prevailing thought holds that both of these activities are required to maintain the pluripotent state through activation of genes implicated in pluripotency and cell-cycle control with concomitant repression of genes required for differentiation and lineage-specific differentiation. More recent evidence however, suggests that the activator function of Oct4 may play a more critical role in maintaining the pluripotent state (Hammachi et al., 2012). The purpose of the studies described in this dissertation was to clarify the underlying mechanisms by which Oct4 functions in transcriptional activation and repression. By so doing, we wished to contextualize its role in pluripotent cells, and to provide insight into how changes in Oct4 function might account for its ability to facilitate cell fate transitions. As a result of our studies we find that Oct4 function is dependent upon post-translational modifications (PTMs). We find through a combination of experimental approaches, including genome-wide microarray analysis, bioinformatics, chromatin immunoprecipitation, functional molecular, and biochemical analyses, that in the pluripotent state Oct4, Akt, and Hmgb2 participate in a regulatory feedback loop. Akt-mediated phosphorylation of Oct4 facilitates interaction with PcG recruiter Hmgb2. Consequently, Hmgb2 functions as a context dependent modulator of Akt and Oct4 function, promoting transcriptional poise at Oct4 bound loci. Sumoylation of Oct4 is then required to maintain Hmgb2 enrichment at repressed loci and to transmit the H3K27me3 mark in daughter progeny. The expression of Oct4 phosphorylation mutants however, leads to Akt inactivation and initiates the DNA Damage Checkpoint response. Our results suggest that this may subsequently facilitate chromatin reorganization and cell fate transitions. In summary, our results suggest that controlled modulation of Oct4, Akt, and Hmgb2 function is required to maintain pluripotency and for the faithful induction of transcriptional programs required for lineage specific differentiation.

The present study focuses on the biological functions of the transcription factor EMA/E2F-6, a member of the E2F-family of transcription factors that play an import role in cell cycle progression, differentiation and apoptosis. EMA/E2F-6 functions as a transcriptional repressor by recruiting a large protein complex, that includes polycomb group proteins, to specific target genes in order to silence their expression. To identify the biological functions of EMA/E2F-6 mice lacking this factor were developed and subsequently analysed. EMA/E2F6-/- mice are born with the expected frequency, are fertile and develop normally up to 18 months of age. Then about 25 % of these mice develop a paralysis of the hind limbs and present with a severe primary myelination defect of the spinal cord (and in part of peripheral nerves, too) that is accompanied by a massive infiltration of macrophages. Importantly, the histological findings were also detected in EMA/E2F-6-/- mice lacking clinical symptoms albeit to a lesser extend. With respect to EMA/E2F-6 association with polycomb group (Pc-G) proteins there were no significant findings such as skeletal transformations. In addition, only a mild proliferation defect of T-lymphocytes was observed that, in a more severe form, is typical for Pc-G mutations in the mice. Surprisingly, embryonic fibroblasts from EMA/E2F-6-/- mice have no obvious cell cycle defects. Accordingly, gene expression profiles showed that classical E2F target genes were normally regulated in these cells. However, EMA/E2F-6-/- fibroblasts ubiquitously express genes like alpha-tubulin-3 and -7 that are normally expressed in a strictly testis-specific manner. All EMA/E2F-6-dependent target genes identified contain a conserved E2F-binding site in their promoters that is required both for EMA/E2F-6 binding and regulation.

L'adenocarcinoma ductal pancreàtic (PDAC) és un dels càncers més letals. Per tal de millorar el diagnòstic precoç, s'estan investigant les etapes inicials de la formació del càncer, com és el cas de les lesions preneoplàstiques, i es vol desxifrar l'origen cel·lular de la malaltia. Les proteïnes Polycomb constitueixen una família de silenciadors epigenètics que es troben en una varietat de tumors sòlids. La hipòtesi principal és que Polycomb pot estar participant en els processos preneoplàstics del pàncreas i en l'aparició i progressió del tumor. La expressió de Bmi1 i Ring1B fou analitzada durant el desenvolupament del pàncreas, en teixit pancreàtic de diferents models murins de la malaltia i en mostres humans de teixit pancreàtic. Es va dur a terme l'anàlisi del mecanisme de Bmi1 mitjançant models in vitro i induint la depleció de Bmi1. Bmi1 i Ring1B s'expressaren en precursors pancreàtics durant etapes primerenques del desenvolupament i en cèl·lules ductals i dels illots,però no en els acins, en el pàncrees adult. Bmi1 s'induí en cèl·lules acinars durant lesió aguda, en lesions metaplàstiques acinoductals, en neoplàsies intraepitelials pancreàtiques (PanIN) i en PDAC. Ring1B s'incrementà significativament en PanINs de grau alt i en PDAC. La disminució dels nivells de Bmi1 en la línia cel·lular acinar canvià l'expressió dels enzims digestius pancreàtics. Aquests resultats suggereixen que Bmi1 i Ring1B podrien estar contribuint de diferent manera en la progressió tumoral. / Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers. To improve early diagnosis, research efforts are focused in characterising early events of cancer formation like preneoplastic lesions and deciphering the cell origin of the malignancy. Polycomb proteins constitute a family of epigenetic silencers found in a variety of solid tumours. The main hypothesis is that Polycomb might play a role in preneoplastic states in the pancreas and in tumour development and progression. The expression of Bmi1 and RingB was analysed during pancreatic development, in pancreatic tissue from mouse models of disease and in human pancreatic tissue samples. Mechanistic insights of Bmi1 were performed using in vitro models and with induced Bmi1 depletion. Bmi1 and Ring1B were expressed in pancreatic exocrine precursors during early development and in ductal and islet cells, but not in acinar cells, in the adult pancreas. Bmi1 was induced in acinar cells during acute injury, in acinar-ductal metaplastic lesions, in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) and PDAC. In contrast, Ring1B was significantly increased in high-grade PanINs and in PDAC. Bmi1 knockdown in acinar cell line changed the expression of pancreatic digestive enzymes. These results suggest that Bmi1 and Ring1B could contribute differently to tumour development.

Thymic epithelial cells (TECs) are the main component of the thymic stroma, which supports T-cell proliferation and repertoire selection. Here, we demonstrate that Cbx4, a Polycomb protein that is highly expressed in the thymic epithelium, has an essential and non-redundant role in thymic organogenesis. Targeted disruption of Cbx4 causes severe hypoplasia of the fetal thymus as a result of reduced thymocyte proliferation. Cell-specific deletion of Cbx4 shows that the compromised thymopoiesis is rooted in a defective epithelial compartment. Cbx4-deficient TECs exhibit impaired proliferative capacity, and the limited thymic epithelial architecture quickly deteriorates in postnatal mutant mice, leading to an almost complete blockade of T-cell development shortly after birth and markedly reduced peripheral T-cell populations in adult mice. Furthermore, we show that Cbx4 physically interacts and functionally correlates with p63, which is a transcriptional regulator that is proposed to be important for the maintenance of the stemness of epithelial progenitors. Together, these data establish Cbx4 as a crucial regulator for the generation and maintenance of the thymic epithelium and, hence, for thymocyte development.

L’ubiquitination, une modification post-traductionnelle importante pour le contrôle de nombreux processus cellulaires, est une réaction réversible. La réaction inverse, nommée déubiquitination est catalysée par les déubiquitinases (DUB). Nous nous sommes intéressés dans nos travaux à étudier l’ubiquitination de l’histone H2A (H2Aub), au niveau des résidus lysines 118 et 119 (K118/K119), une marque épigénétique impliquée dans la régulation de la prolifération cellulaire et la réparation de l’ADN. Le régulateur transcriptionnel BAP1, une déubiquitinase nucléaire, a été initialement identifié pour sa capacité à promouvoir la fonction suppressive de tumeurs de BRCA1. BAP1 forme un complexe multi-protéique avec plusieurs facteurs transcriptionnels et sa fonction principale est la déubiquitination de H2Aub. Plusieurs études ont démontré que BAP1 est un gène suppresseur de tumeurs majeur et qu’il est largement muté et inactivé dans une multitude de cancers. En effet, BAP1 émerge comme étant la DUB la plus mutée au niveau des cancers. Cependant, le ou les mécanismes d’action et de régulation du complexe BAP1 restent très peu connus. Dans cette étude nous nous sommes intéressés à la caractérisation moléculaire et fonctionnelle des partenaires protéiques de BAP1. De manière significative nous avons caractérisé un mécanisme unique de régulation entre deux composants majeurs du complexe BAP1 à savoir, HCF-1 et OGT. En effet, nous avons démontré que HCF-1 est requis pour maintenir le niveau protéique de OGT et que cette dernière est indispensable pour la maturation protéolytique de HCF-1 en promouvant son clivage par O-GlcNAcylation, une signalisation cellulaire nécessaire au bon fonctionnement de HCF-1. Également, nous avons découvert un nouveau mécanisme de régulation de BAP1 par l’ubiquitine ligase atypique UBE2O. En effet, UBE2O agit comme un régulateur négatif de BAP1 puisque l’ubiquitination de ce dernier induit sa séquestration dans le cytoplasme et l’inhibition de sa fonction suppressive de tumeurs. D’autre part nous nous sommes penchés sur la caractérisation de l’association de BAP1 avec deux facteurs de la famille des protéines Polycombes nommés ASXL1 et ASXL2 (ASXL1/2). Nous avons investigué le rôle de BAP1/ASXL1/2, particulièrement dans les mécanismes de déubiquitination et suppression de tumeurs. Nous avons démontré que BAP1 interagit directement iii via son domaine C-terminale avec le même domaine ASXM de ASXL1/2 formant ainsi deux complexes mutuellement exclusifs indispensables pour induire l’activité déubiquitinase de BAP1. De manière significative, ASXM s’associe avec BAP1 pour créer un nouveau domaine composite de liaison à l’ubiquitine. Ces interactions BAP1/ASXL1/2 régulent la progression harmonieuse du cycle cellulaire. De plus, la surexpression de BAP1 et de ASXL2 au niveau des fibroblastes induit la sénescence de manière dépendante de leurs interactions. D’autre part, nous avons identifié des mutations de cancers au niveau de BAP1 le rendant incapable de lier ASXL1/2, d’exercer sa fonction d’autodéubiquitination et de ce fait d’agir comme suppresseur de tumeurs. Ainsi nous avons révélé un lien étroit entre le gène suppresseur de tumeurs BAP1, son activité déubiquitinase et le contrôle de la prolifération cellulaire. / The reverse reaction of ubiquitination, a crucial post-translational modification, is catalyzed by deubiquitinases (DUBs). BAP1 is an ubiquitously expressed nuclear DUB that recently emerged as an important tumor suppressor highly mutated and inactivated in an increasing number of cancers of diverse origins. Both somatic and germline mutations with loss of heterozygosity were observed in tumors, making BAP1 the most mutated DUB in human malignancies. We previously reported that BAP1 is a component of a large multi-protein complex that includes several transcription regulators. The Drosophila homologue of BAP1, Calypso, forms the Polycomb-repressive DUB (PR-DUB) complex with Additional Sex Comb, ASX. This complex catalyzes the deubiquitination of histone H2A, an essential chromatin modification that regulates gene expression. Despite the ever increasing number of findings describing the occurrence of BAP1 mutations in cancers, few studies investigated the mechanisms of action of this DUB as a tumor suppressor. Therefore, the biological function and the mechanism of action and regulation of BAP1 remains largely uncharacterized. In the work described in this thesis, we investigated the roles of BAP1 partners in modulating its catalytic activity and tumor suppressor function. More specifically we discovered a unique mechanism of regulation between two major components of BAP1 complexes, namely HCF-1 and OGT. Indeed, HCF-1 is important for the maintenance of the cellular levels of OGT. OGT, in turn, is required for the proper proteolytic maturation of HCF-1 by promoting its O-GlcNAcylation. This signaling event is required for HCF-1 function as a cell cycle regulator. On the other hand, we deciphered an intricate mechanism of regulation of BAP1 by the atypical E2/E3 ligase, UBE2O. UBE2O, promote the multi-monoubiquitination of BAP1 on its NLS mediating its cytoplasmic sequestration and thus inhibition of its tumor suppressor function. Another aspect of modulation of BAP1 H2Aub catalysis is provided by the association of BAP1 with ASXL1 and ASXL2 (ASXL1/ASXL2), two orthologs of ASX. We investigated the role of BAP1/ASXL1/2, particularly in the mechanisms of deubiquitination and tumor suppression. We have demonstrated that BAP1 interacts directly via its C-terminal domain with the ASXM domain of ASXL1/2, thus forming two mutually exclusive complexes. Significantly, ASXM promote, through assembly with BAP1, the generation of a composite ubiquitin binding domain (CUBI), indispensable for inducing the deubiquitinase activity of BAP1 towards H2Aub. The interactions between BAP1 and ASXL1/2 regulate cell cycle progression. In addition, overexpression of BAP1 or ASXL2 in fibroblasts induces senescence in CTD- and ASXM-dependent manner. We also identified cancer-derived mutation of BAP1 that selectively abolish its interaction with ASXL1 and ASXL2 as well as its H2A deubiquitinase activity. Significantly, this mutant suppressed senescence induced by BAP1 overexpression. Thus we provided a link between the tumor suppressor BAP1, its deubiquitinase activity and the control of cell proliferation.

L'auxine est une hormone végétale qui coordonne plusieurs processus de développement des plantes à travers la régulation d'un ensemble spécifique de gènes. Les Auxin Response Factors (ARF) sont des régulateurs transcriptionnels qui modulent l'expression de gènes de réponse à l’auxine. Des données récentes montrent que les membres de la famille des ARF sont impliqués dans la régulation du développement des fruits de la nouaison à la maturation. L'objectif principal de la thèse est d’étudier la part qui revient aux ARF dans le contrôle du développement et de la maturation des fruits et d’en comprendre les mécanismes d’action. L’analyse des données d’expression disponibles dans les bases de données a révélé que, parmi tous les ARF de tomates, SlARF2 affiche le plu haut niveau d'expression dans le fruit avec un profil distinctif d’expression associé à la maturation. Nous avons alors entrepris la caractérisation fonctionnelle de SlARF2 afin d’explorer son rôle dans le développement et la maturation des fruits. Deux paralogues, SlARF2A et SlARF2B, ont été identifiés dans le génome de la tomate. Nous avons montré que l’expression de SlARF2A dans le fruit est régulée par l'éthylène tandis que celle de SlARF2B est induite par l'auxine. La sous-expression de SlARF2A, comme celle de SlARF2B, entraine un retard de maturation alors que l’inhibition simultanée des deux paralogues conduit à une inhibition plus sévère de la maturation suggérant une redondance fonctionnelle entre les deux paralogues lors de la maturation des fruits. Les fruits présentant une sous-expression des gènes SlARF2 produisent de faibles quantités d'éthylène, montrent une faible accumulation de pigments et une plus grande fermeté. Le traitement avec de l'éthylène exogène ne peut pas inverser les phénotypes de défaut de maturation suggérant que SlARF2 pourrait agir en aval de la voie de signalisation de l'éthylène. L'expression des gènes clés de biosynthèse et de signalisation de l'éthylène est fortement perturbée dans les lignées sous-exprimant SlARF2 et les gènes majeurs qui contrôlent le processus de maturation (RIN, CNR, NOR, TAGL1) sont sensiblement sous-régulés. Les données suggèrent que SlARF2 est essentiel pour la maturation des fruits et qu’il pourrait agir au croisement des voies de signalisation de l'auxine et de l'éthylène. Dans le but de mieux comprendre les mécanismes moléculaires par lesquels les ARF régulent l'expression des gènes de réponse à l'auxine, nous avons étudié l'interaction des SlARFs avec des partenaires protéiques ciblés, principalement les co-répresseurs de type Aux/IAA et Topless (TPL) décrits comme les acteurs clés dans la répression des gènes dépendant de la signalisation auxinique. Une fois les gènes codant pour les membres de la famille TPL de tomate isolés, une approche double hybride dans la levure a permis d’établir des cartes exhaustives d'interactions protéine-protéine entre les membres des ARFs et des Aux/IAA d’une part et les ARFs et les TPL d’autre part. L'étude a révélé que les Aux/IAA interagissent préférentiellement avec les SlARF activateurs et qu’à l’inverse les Sl-TPL interagissent uniquement avec les SlARF répresseurs. Les données favorisent l'hypothèse que les ARF activateurs recrutent les Sl-TPL via leur interaction avec les Aux/IAA, tandis que les ARF répresseurs peuvent interagir directement avec les Sl-TPL. Les études d’interactions ont permis également d’identifier de nouveaux partenaires comme les protéines VRN5 et LHP1, composantes des complexes Polycomb PRC impliqués dans la repression par voie épigénétique de la transcription par modification de l'état de méthylation des histones. Au total, le travail de thèse apporte un nouvel éclairage sur le rôle et les mécanismes d'action des ARF et identifie SlARF2 comme un nouvel élément du réseau de régulation contrôlant le processus de maturation des fruits chez la tomate. / The plant hormone auxin coordinates plant development through the regulation of a specific set of auxin-regulated genes and Auxin Response Factors (ARFs) are transcriptional regulators modulating the expression of auxin-response genes. Recent data demonstrated that members of this gene family are able to regulate fruit set and fruit ripening. ARFs are known to act in concert with Aux/IAA to control auxin-dependent transcriptional activity of target genes. However, little is known about other partners of ARFs. The main objective of the thesis research project was to gain more insight on the involvement of ARFs in fruit development and ripening and to uncover their interaction with other protein partners beside Aux/IAAs. Mining the tomato expression databases publicly available revealed that among all tomato ARFs, SlARF2 displays the highest expression levels in fruit with a marked ripening-associated pattern of expression. This prompted us to uncover the physiological significance of SlARF2 and in particular to investigate its role in fruit development and ripening. Two paralogs, SlARF2A and SlARF2B, were identified in the tomato genome and transactivation assay in a single cell system revealed that the two SlARF2 proteins are nuclear localized and act as repressors of auxin-responsive genes. In fruit tissues, SlARF2A is ethylene-regulated while SlARF2B is auxin-induced. Knock-down of SlARF2A or SlARF2B results in altered ripening with spiky fruit phenotype, whereas simultaneous down-regulation of SlARF2A and SlARF2B leads to more severe ripening inhibition suggesting a functional redundancy among the two SlARF2 paralogs during fruit ripening. Double knock-down fruits produce less climacteric ethylene and show delayed pigment accumulation and higher firmness. Exogenous ethylene treatment cannot reverse the ripening defect phenotypes suggesting that SlARF2 may act downstream of ethylene signaling. The expression of key ethylene biosynthesis and signaling genes is dramatically disturbed in SlARF2 down-regulated fruit and major regulators of the ripening process, like RIN, CNR, NOR, TAGL1, are under-expressed. The data support the notion that SlARF2 is instrumental to fruit ripening and may act at the crossroads of auxin and ethylene signaling. Altogether, while ethylene is known as a key hormone of climacteric fruit ripening, the ripening phenotypes associated with SlARF2 down-regulation bring unprecedented evidence supporting the role of auxin in the control of this developmental process. To further extend our knowledge of the molecular mechanism by which ARFs regulate the expression of auxin-responsive genes we sought to investigate interactions SlARF and putative partners, mainly Aux/IAAs and Topless co-reppressors (TPLs) reported to be key players in gene repression dependent on auxin signaling. To this end, genes encoding all members of the tomato TPL family were isolated and using a yeast-two-hybrid approach comprehensive protein-protein interaction maps were constructed. The study revealed that Aux/IAA interact preferentially with activator SlARFs while Sl-TPLs interact only with repressor SlARFs. The data support the hypothesis that activator ARFs recruit Sl-TPLs co-repressors via Aux/IAAs as intermediates, while repressor ARFs can physically interact with Sl-TPLs. Further investigation indicated that SlARFs and Sl-TPLs can interact with polycomb complex PRC1 PRC2 components, VRN5 and LHP1, known to be essential players of epigenetic repression of gene transcription through the modification of histones methylation status. These data establish a potential link between ARFs and epigenetic regulation and thereby open new and original perspectives in understanding the mode of action of ARFs. Altogether, the thesis work provides new insight on the role of ARFs and their underlying action mechanisms, and defines SlARF2 as a new component of the regulatory network controlling the ripening process in tomato.