Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2016-11-01T11:24:29Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Claudio Ernani Litig.pdf: 49657709 bytes, checksum: 07cd53d4807b9282121d0fc9ecac6333 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-01T11:24:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Claudio Ernani Litig.pdf: 49657709 bytes, checksum: 07cd53d4807b9282121d0fc9ecac6333 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-09-16 / This research investigated the social, cultural and economic impacts suffered by indigenous nations in the state of Espírito Santo, because of the new demarcation and ratification of their land and the process of struggle and resistance that intend to redeem the collective rights of these people. The study was developed in third time: In the first time, the study analyzed the academic literature, lifting of indigenous historic informations, the implantation process of the industrial complex of COFAVI and Aracruz Cellulose and the process of demarcation and ratification of indigenous land. The second time investigated the governmental documents to evaluate environmental, social, cultural and economic impacts caused by the eucalyptus monoculture and the impacts at institutions and public services. The third time executed a field research, identifying and registering impacts resulted by eucalyptus monoculture and the impacts at institutions and public service with reflex on indigenous land. It was found damage for all extension of indigenous land. The research allowed conclude that, to recover the indigenous' collective rights it's necessary to pressure the government of Espírito Santo and the City Hall of Aracruz to evaluate the environmental, social, cultural and economic impacts caused by private companies and the public power itself / Esta pesquisa investigou os impactos ambientais, sociais, culturais e econômicos sofridos pelos povos indígenas no Espírito Santo com a nova demarcação e homologação de suas terras e o processo de luta e resistência que visa o resgate dos direitos coletivos destes povos. O estudo foi desenvolvido em três momentos: No primeiro momento analisou-se a bibliografia acadêmica, levantando as informações históricas dos povos indígenas, do Brasil ao Espírito Santo; o processo de implantação de complexo industrial: Da COFAVI a Aracruz Celulose e o processo de luta pela demarcação e homologação das terras indígenas. No segundo momento, foram investigados os documentos governamentais para avaliar os impactos ambientais, sociais, culturais e econômicos decorrentes da monocultura do eucalipto e os impactos de estruturas e serviços públicos. No terceiro momento realizou-se pesquisa de campo, identificando-se e registrando-se os impactos decorrentes da monocultura do eucalipto e os impactos de estruturas e serviços públicos com reflexos nas Terras Indígenas. Constataram-se danos por toda extensão da área indígena. A pesquisa permitiu concluir que para resgatar os direitos coletivos dos índios de Aracruz é necessário cobrar a responsabilidade do Estado do Espírito Santo e da Prefeitura Municipal de Aracruz de avaliação dos impactos ambientais e o consequente dano social, cultural e econômico gerado pelas empresas privadas e pelo próprio poder público (Estado e Município)

This research develops the social psychological study of lay perception of human rights and of rights-based reactions to perceived injustice. The pioneering work by social representation theorists is reviewed. Of particular interest is the use of rights-based responses to perceived relative subgroup disadvantage. It is argued that these responses are shaped by the historical development of the legal concept of unique subgroup rights; rights asserted by a subgroup that cannot be asserted by outgroup members or by members of a broader collective that includes all subgroups. The assertion of unique subgroup rights in contrast to individual rights was studied by presenting participants with scenarios suggestive of human rights violations. These included possible violations of privacy rights of indigenous Australians (Study 1), civil and political rights of indigenous Australians under mandatory sentencing schemes (Study 2), privacy rights of students in comparison to public servants (Study 3), refugee rights (Study 4), and reproductive rights of lesbians and single women in comparison to married women and women in de facto relationships (Study 5). The scenarios were based on real policy issues being debated in Australia at the time of data collection. Human rights activists participated in Studies 4 and 5. In Study 5, these activists participated via an online, web-based experiment. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. A social identity theory perspective is used drawing on concepts from both social identity theory and self-categorization theory. The studies reveal a preference for an equality-driven construal of the purpose of human rights law (i.e. that all Australians be treated equally regardless of subgroup membership) in contrast to minority support for a vulnerable groups construal of the purpose of human rights (i.e. that the purpose of human rights law is to protect vulnerable subgroups within a broader collective). Tajfelian social belief orientations of social mobility and social change are explicitly measured in Studies 3-5. Consistent with the social identity perspective, these ideological beliefs are conceptualised as background knowledge relevant to the subjective structuring of social reality (violation contexts) and to the process of motivated relative perception from the vantage point of the perceiver. There is some indication from these studies that social belief orientation may determine construals of the purpose of human rights. In Study 5 the observed preference for using inclusive human rights rhetoric in response to perceived subgroup injustice is explained as an identity-management strategy of social creativity. In Studies 4 and 5, explicit measurement of activist identification was also made in an attempt to further explain the apparently-dominant preference for an equality-driven construal of the purpose of human rights law and the preferred use of inclusive, individualised rights rhetoric in response to perceived subgroup injustice. Activist identification explained some action preferences, but did not simply translate into preferences for using subgroup interest arguments. In Study 5, metastereotyping measures revealed that inclusive rights-based protest strategies were used in order to create positive impressions of social justice campaigners in the minds of both outgroup and ingroup audiences. Ideas for future social psychological research on human rights is discussed.

Licensiering utgör ett viktigt verktyg inom upphovsrätten och har en stor praktisk betydelse för såväl upphovsmän som rättighetsutnyttjare och andra. Avtalslicensen är en nordisk rättsfigur som framtagits för att klarera rättigheter vid massutnyttjanden av upphovsrättsligt skyddade verk och ger möjlighet att utnyttja verk av utanförstående upphovsmän utan att inhämta tillstånd. Upphovsmännens rättigheter tillvaratas genom rätt till ersättning och erforderliga skyddsregler. Nyligen genomförda nationella lagändringar tillsammans med lagstiftningsprojekt på EU-nivå har aktualiserat avtalslicenskonstruktionen och dess funktion. De nationella lagändringarna har utvidgad avtalslicensbestämmelserna som nu omfattar fler tillgängliggöranden, fler verkstyper och fler rättssubjekt än tidigare, något som ger såväl positiva som negativa effekter på marknadens parter. Inom EU har direktiv om kollektiv rättighetsförvaltning och andra lagstiftningsprojekt såsom en gemensam EU- rättslig upphovsrättslagstiftning föranlett frågor om avtalslicensens framtid. Avtalslicenser har funnits i Sverige sedan 1960-talet och fortsätter att utvecklas och utvidgas i takt med att nya tekniska lösningar uppstår. Ett mer globalt, gränsöverskridande samhälle skapar nya förutsättningar och nya möjligheter men kan även ge upphov till nya problem. De upphovsrättsliga organisationerna är välfungerande i Sverige vilket är en förutsättning för att konstruktionen skall fungera på ett tillfredställande sätt. Stor kollektiv anslutning och transparens kan identifieras som anledningar till konstruktionens framgång i Sverige. Utvidgningen av avtalslicenserna tyder också på ett stort förtroende för rättsfiguren från samtliga parter. Vidare ger nya avtalslicenser möjligheter att utveckla nya innovativa tjänster där strömmade tjänster kommer att spela en central roll i framtiden. Avtalslicensens framtid är beroende av många faktorer, bland annat utvecklingen inom EU där det sker ett kontinuerligt arbete för att harmonisera medlemsstaternas upphovsrättsliga lagstiftning. Idéer om gemensam EU- registrering av upphovsrätt och en harmoniserad EU-rättslig upphovsrättslagstiftning kan komma att bli avgörande för avtalslicensernas framtid.

Orientador: Elisabete Maniglia / Banca: Carlos Frederico Marés de Souza Filho / Banca: Antonio Alberto Machado / Resumo: Este trabalho propõe analisar e conceber instrumentos de construção de direitos étnicos e coletivos às comunidades tradicionais faxinalenses, localizadas no Centro-Sul do país. Isto, a partir de uma realidade agrária em que o modelo de desenvolvimento do agronegócio prevalece e recebe o incentivo do Estado brasileiro com o propósito de expansão do capital em detrimento do meio de vida dos povos tradicionais. A pesquisa apresenta as violações aos direitos coletivos e territoriais perpetrado pelos empreendimentos ligados ao agronegócio e pelos sujeitos que incorporam sua lógica de funcionamento. A partir de então, de forma crítica aos paradigmas vigentes no direito, vislumbra-se uma forma pluridimensional de manifestação do mesmo com o propósito de conceber uma retórica jurídica garantidora a estas comunidades. Além disso, aprecia-se a utilização da função social da propriedade em territórios tradicionalmente ocupados, relevando nesta análise a importância dos agentes que compõe este espaço social. Por fim, utilizam-se métodos e instrumentos jurídicos progressistas para possibilitar a efetivação de direitos étnicos e coletivos, potencializando um pluralismo jurídico emancipatório e que somente se justifica pela dinâmica das lutas sociais / Abstract: This paper aims to analyze and develop tools for the construction of ethnic and collective rights to faxinalenses traditional communities, located in the Mid-South of country. This, from an agrarian reality in which the model of agribusiness development prevails and receives encouragement from the Brazilian state with the purpose of capital expansion at the expense of the livelihoods of traditional peoples. The research shows collective and territorial rights violations perpetrated by the enterprises related to agribusiness and the individuals who embody its logic of operation. Thereafter, in order to critique current paradigms in the law, envisions a pluri-dimensional manifestation of the same in order to devise a legal rhetoric guarantor to these communities. It also assesses the use of the social function of property in territories traditionally occupied, emphasizing in this analysis the importance of the agents that make up this social space. Finally, using legal methods and progressive instruments to enable the realization of ethnic and collective rights, empowering a legal pluralism emancipatory that is only justified by the dynamics of social struggles / Mestre

This thesis explores the meaning and content of s. 41 of the Official Languages Act of Canada, which imposes certain duties on all federal institutions towards French- and English-language minority communities. While vitally important as a component of Canada's language rights archictecture, the nature and content of s. 41 as a legal norm remain woefully unclear. The immediate aim is to determine: (1) whether s. 41 confers a right to specific measures in particular cases; (2) whether such rights are individual or collective; and (3) if collective, what sort of interests are protected. Section 41 presents a number of interpretive challenges. First, it uses terminology which is undefined in the Act and yet has no self-evident meaning. Thus, the nature of the primary legal subject, 'linguistic minority communities' (LMCs), is unclear, as are the nature of the protected interests, 'vitality' and 'development'. Second, the interpretive principles developed by the case-law for official language rights rely on a conceptual framework that is vague and under-theorized. Key components of that framework, like the concept of a necessary link between language and culture, have yet to be fully explored, either in the case-law or in legal scholarship. This presents an acute problem in the case of s. 41, where the content of these concepts will likely prove dispositive. In order to grapple with these challenges, this thesis develops an account of language rights as collective rights. Drawing on the philosophical literature and existing case-law, I argue that LMCs should be conceived of as collectivities rather than mere aggregates of individuals, and that a number of language rights, such as s. 41 of the OLA, and ss. 16.1 and 23 of the Charter, aim to protect the collective interests of these collectivities. I then define some of these interests from both an empirical and a normative perspective. I conclude by arguing that s. 41 of the OLA protects an 'autonomy interest', which both prohibits federal institutions from interfering with existing LMC autonomy, and provides a basis for claiming enhancements to that autonomy, within the confines of the statutory mandate of the institution in question.

Given the lack of regulation about the protection of collective rights in Peru, the main goal of this investigation is to show what should be some elements of the content of a due collective process. Thus each of its elements is studied taking into account the Peruvian jurisprudence and legislation. / Ante la insuficiente regulación de tutela colectiva de derechos en el Perú, el objetivo de la investigación es plantear el contenido de algunos de los elementos del derecho fundamental al debido proceso colectivo en el Perú. Para ello, se analiza los elementos que se considera relevantes tomando en consideración las características particulares de la tutela colectiva y considerando la jurisprudencia y legislación existentes en el Perú.

O presente estudo tem como objetivo discutir o mandado de segurança coletivo como verdadeira demanda a serviço da tutela processual de direitos coletivos em sentido amplo. Nesse sentido, as intenções principais residem em destacar o mandamus coletivo naquilo em que o distingue do mandado de segurança individual. Desse modo, são propositalmente lançados problemas que acentuam essas substanciais diferenças entre os dois institutos, o que passa pela discussão da natureza jurídica, dos direitos tutelados, da legitimidade, da coisa julgada, da litispendência, do procedimento (especialmente no tocante ao deferimento de liminares), da intervenção de terceiros e da desistência. É evidente que a construção do trabalho não prescinde da análise da Lei 12.016/2009, primeira lei a regulamentar o mandado de segurança coletivo cujo fundamento de validade, até então, se concentrava apenas na Constituição Federal (art. 5o, inc. LXX). Essa Lei trouxe várias disposições acerca do writ coletivo, fracassando, no entanto, em dialogar diversos de seus pontos com o microssistema de tutela coletiva. / The aim of this dissertation is to discuss the class mandamus writ as an action for the protection of collective rights. It seeks to underline the distinction between the individual and the class mandamus writ with a focus on the latter. In order to emphasize the substantial differences between the two institutes, particularly with regard to their nature, the rights they protect, res judicata, pendency, other procedural issues (particularly in relation to interim injunctions), joint of parties and quitclaim, the dissertation proposes questions related to these topics. It is clear that this dissertation cannot dispense with the analysis of Lei 12.016/2009, which was the first act to regulate the class mandamus writ. Until the enactment of that act, the class mandamus writ fundament of validity was exclusively the art. 5, LXX of the Federal Constitution. Although, this act has brought many provisions on the class mandamus writ, it failed in establishing a dialogue with the collective redress microsystem.

This master's thesis focuses on the argumentation of library organisations and European national libraries in their contributions to the European Commission's public consultation on the review of the EU copyright rules. This study aims to explain how the debate around copyright limitations and exceptions is constructed in library stakeholders' contributions. The construction is explained through argumentation analysis and a theoretical framework of the relations between structural, instrumental, and discursive power. The main findings are that library stakeholders in general are strongly supportive of a EU copyright reform, arguing that democratic values as well as the EU Single Market would benefit. There are also library stakeholders who argue against legislative change, either suggesting extended collective licences, or arguing that the Member States' sovereignity is more important than a pan-European copyright legislation. Furthermore, many library stakeholders propose either a general ”fair use” exception in EU copyright law, or adding several specific exceptions, e.g. for text and data mining, e-lending, publicly funded research openly available, and that contracts and technical protection measures cannot override limitations and exceptions. National libraries and library organisations from the Central and Eastern European Member States' are more supportive of a copyright reform than their Western European counterparts. They do not mention licences as a possible solution. In general, the library stakeholders agree that the interoperability, exchange and cooperation in activities and projects involving several EU Member States suffers from the current copyright legislation. / I den här masteruppsatsen utreds argumentationen som används av biblioteksorganisationer och europeiska nationalbibliotek i deras svar på Europeiska kommissionens samråd rörande en granskning av EU:s upphovsrätt. Studien ämnar besvara frågan om hur debatten kring inskränkningar och undantag i upphovsrätten konstrueras i biblioteksintressenternas samrådssvar. För att besvara denna fråga används argumentationsanalys, samt ett teoretiskt ramverk bestående av relationerna mellan strukturell, instrumentell och diskursiv makt. Resultatet av analysen är att biblioteksintressenterna generellt sett stöttar en reform av EU:s upphovsrätt, med argumenten att både demokratiska värden och EU:s inre marknad gagnas av detta. Andra biblioteksintressenter argumenterar mot en upphovsrättsreform och föreslår i stället kollektiva avtalslicenslösningar, eller så argumenterar de att medlemsländernas suveränitet är viktigare än en sameuropeisk lagstiftning. Dessutom föreslår många biblioteksintressenter antingen ett allmänt ”fair use”-undantag i EU:s upphovsrätt, eller att flera specifika undantag ska läggas till, t.ex. för text- och data-mining, e-bokslån, offentligt finansierad forskning ska publiceras öppet, och att kontrakt och tekniska skyddsåtgärder inte kan upphäva inskränkningar och undantag. Nationalbibliotek och biblioteksorganisationer från central- och östeuropeiska medlemsländer stöttar en upphovsrättsreform i större utsträckning än sina västeuropeiska motsvarigheter. De nämner inte alls licenser som en möjlig lösning. Överlag instämmer biblioteksintressenterna i att interoperabilitet, utbyte och samarbete i aktiviteter och projekt som involverar flera medlemsländer lider av upphovsrättens nuvarande skick.

[pt] O enfoque deste trabalho é analisar o direito de proteção à saúde no Brasil, decorrente de sua configuração, além da vertente subjetiva, também como direito fundamental social de caráter coletivo, constituindo um dever a ser provido pelo Estado. Sua garantia e concretização ocorrem mediante a realização de políticas públicas destinadas a reduzir o risco de doenças e propiciar o acesso aos respectivos serviços, de forma universal e igualitária a todos os cidadãos, bem como às ações de promoção, proteção e recuperação. Devem ser considerados os preceitos constitucionais e legais regentes da matéria, verificando-se a configuração de um sistema único de saúde, por meio do qual estão estabelecidas as competências dos três entes da federação brasileira para o desempenho das respectivas atividades administrativas. Para tanto, existe a vinculação e destinação de percentuais mínimos de recursos orçamentários, os quais, se descumpridos, podem gerar severas sanções, entre elas a possibilidade de intervenção federal e a retenção e condicionamento de recursos repassados pela União aos Estados. Verifica-se uma séria omissão e ineficiência dos órgãos públicos encarregados do desempenho desse serviço de relevância pública, bem como, em decorrência do princípio da integralidade, questiona-se a abrangência das prestações devidas aos cidadãos, usuários do sistema. Esta situação desencadeia a denominada judicialização da saúde, em razão do deslocamento da resolução dos problemas para o Poder Judiciário, constituindo verdadeiros conflitos de massa, devido ao excesso de demandas. A maioria dos pedidos visa à obtenção de inúmeros e variados insumos, incluindo medicamentos e tratamentos médico-hospitalares, a serem custeados por recursos públicos. A adjudicação judicial indiscriminada ocasiona significativos reflexos orçamentários, gerando impactos sobre políticas públicas existentes, sendo necessário averiguar a situação sob o âmbito estrutural. A atuação do Ministério Público e também do Poder Judiciário para a garantia desse direito universal, constitui um dos parâmetros possíveis para a sindicabilidade das atividades administrativas, com o objetivo de verificar o cumprimento dessa obrigação principalmente em sede de tutela coletiva, onde possa haver o escrutínio sobre o planejamento e a execução das políticas públicas no tocante ao direito à saúde, sob o aspecto coletivo e também tendo em vista as implicações individuais decorrentes da ineficiência e ou omissão administrativa, em conjunto com a defesa do patrimônio público no tocante à alocação e uso das verbas orçamentárias destinadas a essa finalidade. / [en] The protection of health in Brazil is configured in the form of fundamental rights, as much as in a subjective character, as in a social one, and constitutes a duty to be fitted by the State, through the implementation of public policies to reduce the risk of diseases and to facilitate access to their services, in a universal and equal way to all whole citizens, as well as the actions of promotion, protection and recovery. There is a single health system, governed by constitutional and legal rules, throught which are laid down the competences of the three bodies of the federation for the performance of the respectives administrative activities. There are linkage and destination of minimum percentage of budgets resources, which, if not accomplished, can produce strict sanctions, v.g, the possibility of federal intervention and the retention and conditioning of resources repassed by the Union to Member States. It´s confirmed the omission and inefficiency of public bodies responsible for the performance of this service of public relevance, as well as, in derivation of the integrality principle is questioned the coverage of the benefits due to the citizens. This situation triggers the so called judicialization. It´s verified an excess of demands aiming the obtantion of varied medicines and treatments. The indiscriminate judicial award causes reflexes on the budget, generating too, impacts on public policies; necessary, so, the investigation under the structural approach. The performance of the Brazilian Public Ministry acting on public interest litigation and the response of the Judiciary Power is due to guarantee this right. One of the possible parameters for the syndicability of the administrative activities for the respective scrutiny in form of collective guardianship, in a way that can be evaluated the planning and execution of activities related to the right to health, under the collective aspect, but considering the individual implications arising from the inefficiency of the administrative performance, together with the defense of the public patrimony regarding the allocation and use of the budget.

La thèse propose de mesurer le rôle et la place que le droit accorde aujourd’hui à la volonté du salarié dans le rapport de travail. Elle cherche aussi, dans un même temps, à identifier, à l’aune de l’observation de certaines évolutions, un affermissement de sa prise en compte. Une telle démarche exige de dépasser le constat, classiquement posé, de l’état de subordination du salarié et de la protection impérative et collective dont il fait l’objet. La volonté, telle que définie par l’auteur, suppose, en effet, un domaine d’exercice reconnu et protégé par le droit, par le biais de prérogatives et droits individuels dont le salarié est titulaire et qui lui confèrent une certaine liberté, une faculté de choix, un pouvoir d’agir au sein du rapport de travail. Pour investir les figures volontaires du salarié, dans leur diversité et leur spécificité, l’approche est menée au regard successivement de la dimension contractuelle et de la relation de pouvoir de l’employeur contenues dans le rapport d’emploi. Le diagnostic qui est posé, mêlant étroitement faveur et suspicion, valorisation et protection de la volonté du salarié, laisse néanmoins apparaître une prise en compte plus systématique et plus radicale de cette volonté. L’orientation, ainsi engagée par le droit positif, est susceptible d’annoncer, non la fin du salariat, mais au contraire une forme de renaissance. / The thesis offers to measure the role and place which law reserves for the employee’s will in labour relations. It also tries, at the same time, to identify, through the observation of certain evolutions, that the employee’s will is being more clearly taken into account. This approach necessarily goes beyond the observation generally made of the degree of the employee’s subordination and of the necessary and collective protection from which he benefits. The will, as defined by the author, supposes, as a matter of fact, a recognized field of application protected by the law through prerogatives and individual rights held by the employee which give him/her a certain degree of freedom, the ability to choose and the power to act within the labour relations. In order to cover the diversified and specific forms of voluntary action by the employee, our approach is led with regard to firstly the contractual dimension and secondly the degree by which the employer’s power affects the job relationship. The diagnostic made, which mixes closely favour and suspicion, valorization and protection of the employee’s will, shows nevertheless that this will is more systematically and radically taken into account. The orientation, engendered by positive law, is likely to announce not the end of the salaried status but on the contrary some sort of renaissance.