No description available.

The purpose of this thesis is to analyze changes and constants of the Cross-Strait relationship since 1949 on the basis of a constructivist framework of International Relations theory. After having introduced basic assumptions of rule-based constructivism, mainly following Nicholas Onuf, the thesis argues that the Cross-Strait relationship can be analyzed as a social construct that has mainly been governed by the “one China” rule, which is designed and influenced by speech acts performed by relevant agents in Taiwan, China, the US, as well as academia. A summary of the historic context of Cross-Strait relationship developments (1949-2000) which highlights the circumstances of the creation of the “one China” rule as well as gradual challenges to it, is followed by a comparison between the approaches of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Kuomintang (KMT) of constructing this relationship between 2000-2008 and 2008-2011, respectively. Due to the DPP's and KMT's very different ideologies, and their antithetic definitions of Taiwan's relationship to China, there were distinct variations in their performances of speech acts, that are analyzed in the context of three discursive examples and which, together with related practices, aimed either at weakening (DPP) or strengthening (KMT) the “one China” rule as a cornerstone for Taiwan's relationship to China. Despite attempts by Taiwanese agents during the two consecutive DPP administrations to break the “one China” rule, it remains an important aspect of the Cross-Strait relationship as it is sustained, to different degrees, by agents in China, the US and the current KMT government. However, due to their adjustments over time and the development of Taiwan's democratic system, a new “status quo” rule has steadily gained momentum. Therefore, the thesis argues, that it will be crucial to see how the preferences of the Taiwanese populace with respect to their home's relationship to China will evolve in the future and how the relevant agents will respond to these developments.

<p>Informationsteknologin (IT) fortsätter att utvecklas snabbt. Det ger möjlighet för företag och organisationer att kostnadseffektivisera sina processer och hitta alternativa lösningar som ökar konkurrenskraften. Den höga utvecklingstakten och de stora kostnader som är inbegripna skapar samtidigt en genuin beslutsosäkerhet vid investering i IT. Företagare ställs inför en rad dilemman: var, när och hur ska investeringar göras? I de situationer där utfallen av ett beslut är oklara eller motstridiga befinner sig beslutsfattaren i ett dilemma. Syftet med denna studie är att beskriva och analysera beslutsdilemman som beslutsfattare har vid dessa IT-investeringar.</p><p>Studien bygger på beslutsteori, där referensramen bestäms av såväl den rationella skolans mycket bestämda beslutskedja som av mer socialkonstruktivistiska beslutsmodeller. Beslutsperspektiven varierar med kontexten och intressenterna. Företaget är en koalition mellan olika aktörer, alla med sitt perspektiv på företagets beteende i den specifika branschen.</p><p>Empirin utgörs av två myndigheter (fallstudier), Skatteverket respektive Premiepensionsmyndigheten (PPM). Genom intervjuer, studier av arkivmaterial samt deltagande observation har jag samlat information om två beslutsprocesser: PPM:s val mellan att köpa ett färdigt IT-system och att utveckla ett eget samt Skatteverkets val mellan ett proprietärt IT-verktyg och ett baserat på öppen källkod.</p><p>Analysen av det empiriska materialet har resulterat i en typologi med tre typer av beslutsdilemman vid IT-investeringar. Den första typen av dilemman är de beslutspunkter som uppstår i samband med investeringar. Jag kallar dessa för (a) dilemmapunkter. Den andra typen av dilemman beror av att resultat och konsekvenser ofta är svårbestämda. Det leder till en hög beslutsosäkerhet och jag benämner därför det (b) konsekvensdilemman. Beslutsdilemmat kan också betyda att man ställs inför flera beslutsalternativ med både förväntat önskat och möjliga, oönskade resultat. Det ställer beslutsfattaren inför valet att balansera mellan alternativen. Jag kallar dessa för (c) balansaktsdilemman.</p> / <p>Summary: The rapid progress of Information Technology (IT) continues. IT can make processes more cost-effective and be a tool when identifying alternative solutions to increase competitiveness. However, the rapid pace of development and the high costs attached, creates a genuine uncertainty when it comes to IT-investments. Eventually, the organization will be confronted with dilemmas such when decisions or their outcomes are unclear or contradictory, you have a dilemma.</p><p>The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze balance acts (dilemmas) of IT-investments. The base of study is decision theory, from the traditional rational way of reasoning to more socially constructed models. The perspective varies with the contexts and actors. The company is a coalition of actors, all with a different perspective on a specific part of the business.</p><p>The empirical data consist of two public authorities (case-studies), Swedish Tax Authority and Premium Pension Authority (PPM). I have collected data by conducting interviews, taking part of archived material and being an observant participator. PPM’s dilemma is whether to buy or to develop a system and Swedish Tax Authority’s dilemma is whether to use open source or a proprietary development tool.</p><p>The analysis of the empiric material have resulted in a typology of dilemmas in conjunction with IT-investments. The typology consists of:</p><p>(a) dilemma points - events where the dilemmas originate.</p><p>(b) dilemma consequences – dilemmas that are hard to discern and thus associated with a great deal of risk.</p><p>(c) balancing acts dilemmas - the decision maker must balance between multiple choices in order to reach a satisfying outcome. Each choice has its pros and cons.</p>

Informationsteknologin (IT) fortsätter att utvecklas snabbt. Det ger möjlighet för företag och organisationer att kostnadseffektivisera sina processer och hitta alternativa lösningar som ökar konkurrenskraften. Den höga utvecklingstakten och de stora kostnader som är inbegripna skapar samtidigt en genuin beslutsosäkerhet vid investering i IT. Företagare ställs inför en rad dilemman: var, när och hur ska investeringar göras? I de situationer där utfallen av ett beslut är oklara eller motstridiga befinner sig beslutsfattaren i ett dilemma. Syftet med denna studie är att beskriva och analysera beslutsdilemman som beslutsfattare har vid dessa IT-investeringar. Studien bygger på beslutsteori, där referensramen bestäms av såväl den rationella skolans mycket bestämda beslutskedja som av mer socialkonstruktivistiska beslutsmodeller. Beslutsperspektiven varierar med kontexten och intressenterna. Företaget är en koalition mellan olika aktörer, alla med sitt perspektiv på företagets beteende i den specifika branschen. Empirin utgörs av två myndigheter (fallstudier), Skatteverket respektive Premiepensionsmyndigheten (PPM). Genom intervjuer, studier av arkivmaterial samt deltagande observation har jag samlat information om två beslutsprocesser: PPM:s val mellan att köpa ett färdigt IT-system och att utveckla ett eget samt Skatteverkets val mellan ett proprietärt IT-verktyg och ett baserat på öppen källkod. Analysen av det empiriska materialet har resulterat i en typologi med tre typer av beslutsdilemman vid IT-investeringar. Den första typen av dilemman är de beslutspunkter som uppstår i samband med investeringar. Jag kallar dessa för (a) dilemmapunkter. Den andra typen av dilemman beror av att resultat och konsekvenser ofta är svårbestämda. Det leder till en hög beslutsosäkerhet och jag benämner därför det (b) konsekvensdilemman. Beslutsdilemmat kan också betyda att man ställs inför flera beslutsalternativ med både förväntat önskat och möjliga, oönskade resultat. Det ställer beslutsfattaren inför valet att balansera mellan alternativen. Jag kallar dessa för (c) balansaktsdilemman. / Summary: The rapid progress of Information Technology (IT) continues. IT can make processes more cost-effective and be a tool when identifying alternative solutions to increase competitiveness. However, the rapid pace of development and the high costs attached, creates a genuine uncertainty when it comes to IT-investments. Eventually, the organization will be confronted with dilemmas such when decisions or their outcomes are unclear or contradictory, you have a dilemma. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze balance acts (dilemmas) of IT-investments. The base of study is decision theory, from the traditional rational way of reasoning to more socially constructed models. The perspective varies with the contexts and actors. The company is a coalition of actors, all with a different perspective on a specific part of the business. The empirical data consist of two public authorities (case-studies), Swedish Tax Authority and Premium Pension Authority (PPM). I have collected data by conducting interviews, taking part of archived material and being an observant participator. PPM’s dilemma is whether to buy or to develop a system and Swedish Tax Authority’s dilemma is whether to use open source or a proprietary development tool. The analysis of the empiric material have resulted in a typology of dilemmas in conjunction with IT-investments. The typology consists of: (a) dilemma points - events where the dilemmas originate. (b) dilemma consequences – dilemmas that are hard to discern and thus associated with a great deal of risk. (c) balancing acts dilemmas - the decision maker must balance between multiple choices in order to reach a satisfying outcome. Each choice has its pros and cons.

Nuestro propósito es analizar los Acta Pauli et Petri apocrypha en lengua griega desde los puntos de vista gramatical y léxico. Dividimos nuestro estudio en dos partes principales: la primera está dedicada a la fonética, la morfología, la sintaxis, el orden de palabras y el estilo y la segunda al léxico. También realizamos una comparación de los escritos mencionados con otros no literarios (papiros, inscripciones, ...) o literarios, así como con algunos más correspondientes a niveles de lengua distintos, relativamente contemporáneos o que se pueden incluir en una tradición común (Nuevo Testamento, novelas griegas, etc.). / Our aim is to analyse the Greek Acta Pauli et Petri apocrypha from a grammatical and lexical point of view. We divide our study in two main parts: the first one devoted to phonetics, morphology, syntax, word order and stylistics, the second one dealing with lexical uses. We also compare the texts mentioned above to non-literary (papyri, inscriptions, ...) or literary works, as well as to different stages of language, relatively contemporary or included in a common tradition (New Testament, Greek novels, etc.).

Decisions are performatives - or at least, they share important features with performative utterances that can elucidate our theory of what type of thought they are, and what they do. Namely, decisions have an analogous force to that of performatives, where the force of a propositional attitude or utterance is constituted by (i) its point, or purpose, which is mainly a matter of its direction-of-fit, and (ii) its felicity conditions. The force of both decisions and performatives is to bring into being the states of affairs represented in their intentional contents, merely in virtue of the decision or performative’s occurrence and the satisfaction of the felicity conditions they presuppose. The first chapter of the thesis explicates this general framework, and the second and third attempt to show some of the work it can do for a theory of decisions.

This article addresses the notion of linguistic meaning with reference to Kiswahili. It focuses particular attention on meaning typology, with the assumption that a discussion of meaning types can enhance the understanding and appreciation of linguistic meaning. The discussion takes its general conceptual orientation from the approach that considers meaning as use, whereby the unit of analysis is the speech act. This is a functional view of linguistic meaning, the tenets of which are contained in functional grammar. From a broader perspective, this article distinguishes conceptual and associative meaning then proceeds to deal with the individual types. Ultimately, five types of linguistic meaning are discussed: conceptual, connotative, social, affective and collocative. From the discussion, conclusionsabout the value of the typology for defining the concept and the scope of semantics are drawn.

本研究旨在討論新聞記者如何運用語用學之「前提」概念來引導受訪者回答，藉由「丟面子問題」質疑並挑戰受訪者「答非所問」之迴避回應。個案研究以一則平面政經新聞報導為言說分析之例，從主張與前提兩個語言單位來探究前提在訪談問答間扮演何種角色與功能。 相關語言學文獻討論曾指出記者前提影響受訪者之回應面向。本文進一步認為，記者訪談前提往往誘導受訪者針對該前提回應(而非針對問題本身)，並藉助記者的背景知識與訪談對話以預設前提並挑戰受訪者。 歸納個案文本的言說分析與個案記者訪談後，本研究發現，記者前提所產生的命題確實影響並誘導受訪者回應，並以記者的前設知識來探討前提技巧如何獲得受訪者更多、更深入的回應。整理上述提問、回應模式，本研究擬出語用前提作為「問好問題」之言談方法及雙方互動的橋樑，盼能提供訪談者一套語言策略。 / The goal of this research aims to explore how pragmatic presuppositions in news interviews influence the interaction of interlocutors, conducted by discourse analysis on assertions and presuppositions within each pair of questioning. By identifying the face-threatening questions which ends up leading the interviewee to non-reply responses, the case study concentrates on one public-figure interview in attempts to unveiling the tactics of placing presuppositions, added by the in-depth interview with the journalist of the case to take the speaker’s meaning into account. The result of this research enabled the author to discover the interaction of presupposition in the form of propositions between the interlocutors that leads the interviewee’s response to challenge the journalist’s presuppostions. The researcher also found evidences indicating the presumption of the journalist produces presuppostion as well as the response, which enables this research to develop a pragmatic strategy of news interview based on the use of presuppositions.

Originally presented as the author's Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Frankfurt am Main, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [xxi]-xliv).

I institutionella samtal såsom närståendesamtal mellan en logoped, en närstående till en person med afasi och personen med afasi råder en asymmetri gällande maktförhållandet. Asymmetrin som uppstår i det institutionella samtalet kan innebära att samtalsdeltagaren med minst makt upplever ansiktshot. I samtal ses förståelse som en dynamisk process och när förståelsen innebär ett problem i konversationen störs den pågående aktiviteten. Mottagaren kan lösa problemet som uppstått genom att ge talaren en candidate understanding. Hur kommunikativa strategier används i närståendesamtal är ett relativt obeforskat område och ett viktigt område då närståendesamtal är en vanligt förekommande för logopeder. Syftet med föreliggande studie var därför att undersöka ett antal kommunikativa strategier för att få en gemensam förståelse och minska ansiktshot  vid delgivning av testresultat och rådgivning i närståendesamtal. Tre närståendesamtal mellan logopeder, närstående och i två fall personer med afasi spelades in, transkriberades och analyserades enligt samtalsanalytiska principer (CA). Två logopeder, tre närstående och två personer med afasi medverkade i studien. Totalt omfattade det inspelade materialet en timma och 37 minuter. Deltagande logopeder fick även fylla i ett frågeformulär. Strategier för avdramatisering och förståelse identifierades. Strategierna delades in i två kategorier; avdramatisering av råd och förmedling av testresultat och candidate understandings för att uppnå förståelse. I studien framkom det att candidate understandings ofta initierades av den närstående. Det framkom även att de positiva testresultaten som förmedlades inte avdramatiserades samt att dessa istället ofta framhävdes och att face threatenings acts vid delgivning av negativa testresultat ofta avdramatiserades med hedging. / In institutional interactions such as conversations between a speech and language therapist, a person closely related to a person with aphasia and the individual with aphasia there is an asymmetry considering the power. The asymmetry arising in institutional interactions may mean that the participant with the least power will experience a face threatening act. Understanding is seen as a dynamic process and when understanding is a problem in the conversation the ongoing activity is disturbed. The receiver can solve the problem by giving the speaker a candidate understanding. How these strategies are used in conversations between a speech and language therapist with a person closely related to a person with aphasia is a relatively unexplored field and an important area which is a common for speech therapists. The aim of the present study was to investigate a number of communication strategies in the conversation with a person closely related to a person with aphasia; how understanding was reached and how face threatening acts were reduced when the speech therapists delivered test results and gave counseling. Three conversations between speech and language therapists, persons closely related to a person with aphasia and in two of the recordings the person with aphasia were recorded, transcribed and analyzed according to principles of Conversation Analysis (CA). Two speech and language therapists, three persons closely related to a person with aphasia and two persons with aphasia participated in the study. In total, the recorded material is one hour and 37 minutes. Participating speech and language therapists also filled in a questionnaire. Strategies for mitigation and understanding were identified. The strategies were divided into two categories; strategies to mitigate FTA:s when delivering the test results and counseling, the other categorie was the use of candidate understandings for gaining an mutual understanding. The study revealed that candidate understandings were often initiated by the person closely related to a person with aphasia. The study also revealed that the test results with positive outcome where not mitigated and often emphasized and test results that could be perceived as negative were mitigated with hedging.