Spelling suggestions: "subject:"caccini"" "subject:"baccini""
1 |
A study of Caccini's Le nuove musiche.Finch, Alfred Ashfield. Caccini, Giulio, January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (M.M.)--University of Rochester, 1942. / Typewritten. Caccini, G. Dolcissimo sospiro: p. 36-39. Bibliography: p. 40. Digitized version available online via the Sibley Music Library, Eastman School of Music http://hdl.handle.net/1802/10265
|
2 |
Giulio Caccini /Ehrichs, Alfred, January 1908 (has links)
Thesis--Leipzig. / Vita. "Verzeichnis der benützten Werke": p. [3] Digitized version available online via the Sibley Music Library, Eastman School of Music http://hdl.handle.net/1802/3048
|
3 |
Studien zum statuarischen Werk des Giovanni Battista CacciniSchmidt, Johann Karl, January 1971 (has links)
Inaug.-Diss.--Munich.
|
4 |
Giulio CacciniEhrichs, Alfred, January 1908 (has links)
Inaug.--diss.--Leipzig. / Vita. Bibliography: p. [3].
|
5 |
Giulio Caccini e suas Novas Musicas : um elogio ao canto / Giulio Caccini and this New Music : a praise of chantFederici, Conrado Augusto Gandara 14 August 2018 (has links)
Orientador: Eliana Ayoub / Acompanha 2 CD-ROM / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-14T22:12:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Federici_ConradoAugustoGandara_D.pdf: 5206614 bytes, checksum: 46e64165f8b4d883c90774efbae2f593 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009 / Resumo: Giulio Caccini (1561-1618) e suas Novas Músicas compõem o tema central desta pesquisa. A tradução de suas principais obras, Le Nuove Musiche (1601) e Nuove Musiche e Nuova Maniera di scriverle (1614), o estudo prático do canto e a observação cuidadosa de uma de suas árias fundamentam este trabalho sobre uma época em que imperava a todo artista de corte a habilidade em ser original. Giulio Caccini o fez encontrando em seu ofício de cantor e compositor as maneiras de viver coletivamente e eternizar seu legado pessoal. Chegar às reflexões imersas nas características da arte renascentista, sempre partindo do canto e do texto de origem, deixando-o ressoar, ou "recitar cantando", é o desejo maior deste estudo. Em 3 capítulos, 1. Elogio ao Canto, 2. Aspectos gerais sobre a música no Renascimento e 3. A Camerata Fiorentina, o artista de corte e a paideia, o trabalho aproxima a literatura especializada da musicologia, história e sociologia, integrando conhecimentos dispersos em prol de um melhor entendimento das publicações de Giulio Caccini. A fonte principal são os próprios textos e músicas do autor, colocados em diálogo com a experiência prática de seguir suas lições de canto e a contextualização das condições de seu surgimento. Encerram a pesquisa um apêndice de personalidades relacionadas ao autor e seu tempo, um breve glossário de termos referentes à música do período e, em anexo, as edições em fac-símile das referidas publicações e uma seleção em CDs de amostras musicais da obra de Giulio Caccini disponíveis no mercado. / Abstract: Giulio Caccini (1561-1618) and his New Music are the central subject of this research. The translation of his most important works, Le Nuove Musiche (1601) and Nuove Musiche e Nuova Maniera di scriverle (1614), the chant practical study and the carefully observation of one of his arias are the basis of this work about an age in which the skill of being original was a real high demand for every court artist. Giulio Cacini has done it finding in his job as a singer and composer, the manners of living collectively and leaving his personal legate to eternity. Get into the reflexions of the Renaissance art characteristics, always starting from the chant and original texts, trying to let them reverberate, or in armonia favellare, is the biggest desire of this study. To benefit from a better understanding of Giulio Caccini's publications, the work connect the specialized musicology literature, history and sociology in 3 chapters, in order to integrate the knowledge that uses to be separated: 1. A Praise of Chant, 2. General aspects of the music in Renaissance and 3. The Florentine Camerata, the court artist and the paideia. The author's texts and music are the principal sources, supported by the practical experience following his chant lessons and the context of the treatise's arise conditions. Ending the research, there are an appendix of personalities related to the author and his time, a short ancient music glossary, the copy of the facsimile original edition and a Giulio Caccini's musical selection from CDs that are available in trade market. / Doutorado / Educação, Conhecimento, Linguagem e Arte / Doutor em Educação
|
6 |
Le Nuove Musiche: Giovanni Battista Bovicelli?Gámez Hernández, Carlos 08 1900 (has links)
This thesis is a comparative study on the late 16th century manuals of ornamentation by Girolamo Dalla Casa, Giovanni Bassano, Riccardo Rognoni, and Giovanni Battista Bovicelli. The study demonstrates that the latest Renaissance manual should be given more credit for the innovative ornamentation style that was to come in the Early Baroque era. Bovicelli's use of sequence, dissonances, and less moving notes for more rhythmic varieties are features most often associated in the style of the Baroque. Unfortunately, the topic of ornamentation in the late Renaissance is most commonly discussed as a group of different entities writing in the same style. The research for this paper is intended to separate the manuals of the late Renaissance, focusing on the separate styles that led to the work of Giovanni Battista Bovicelli.
|
7 |
Speaking in Tones: Plainchant, Monody, and the Evocation of Antiquity in Early Modern ItalySwanson, Barbara Dianne 19 August 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
A Pragmatic Standard of Legal ValidityTyler, John 2012 May 1900 (has links)
American jurisprudence currently applies two incompatible validity standards to determine which laws are enforceable. The natural law tradition evaluates validity by an uncertain standard of divine law, and its methodology relies on contradictory views of human reason. Legal positivism, on the other hand, relies on a methodology that commits the analytic fallacy, separates law from its application, and produces an incomplete model of law.
These incompatible standards have created a schism in American jurisprudence that impairs the delivery of justice. This dissertation therefore formulates a new standard for legal validity. This new standard rejects the uncertainties and inconsistencies inherent in natural law theory. It also rejects the narrow linguistic methodology of legal positivism.
In their stead, this dissertation adopts a pragmatic methodology that develops a standard for legal validity based on actual legal experience. This approach focuses on the operations of law and its effects upon ongoing human activities, and it evaluates legal principles by applying the experimental method to the social consequences they produce. Because legal history provides a long record of past experimentation with legal principles, legal history is an essential feature of this method.
This new validity standard contains three principles. The principle of reason requires legal systems to respect every subject as a rational creature with a free will. The principle of reason also requires procedural due process to protect against the punishment of the innocent and the tyranny of the majority. Legal systems that respect their subjects' status as rational creatures with free wills permit their subjects to orient their own behavior. The principle of reason therefore requires substantive due process to ensure that laws provide dependable guideposts to individuals in orienting their behavior.
The principle of consent recognizes that the legitimacy of law derives from the consent of those subject to its power. Common law custom, the doctrine of stare decisis, and legislation sanctioned by the subjects' legitimate representatives all evidence consent.
The principle of autonomy establishes the authority of law. Laws must wield supremacy over political rulers, and political rulers must be subject to the same laws as other citizens. Political rulers may not arbitrarily alter the law to accord to their will.
Legal history demonstrates that, in the absence of a validity standard based on these principles, legal systems will not treat their subjects as ends in themselves. They will inevitably treat their subjects as mere means to other ends. Once laws do this, men have no rest from evil.
|
Page generated in 0.0367 seconds