No description available.

Citizens of today’s society are expected to be able to evaluate, make choices, take responsibility and act independently locally, nationally and globally in order to participate in both formal and informal political systems. This study contributes to the research on Civics Education (Social Studies) by examining how teachers, working in the grades 7-9, meet contemporary society in their civics teaching. The study enquires how this can be done in education by examining teacher´s descriptions and understandings of their teaching regarding civic competences as perspective-taking, critical thinking, reflexivity and autonomy. The study's most significant findings suggest that teachers express that they use students' experiences and initiatives in civics education to contribute to the qualification of civic skills. Teachers can use the students' individual experiences and initiatives to link the social content and democratic participation to late modern competences. By using students' experiences and initiatives, the teacher can broaden students' perspectives on various issues, support the students in developing a critical approach, offer the students opportunities to reflect on their own values, and their own roles in society, and independently try to take a stand and act. / I dagens föränderliga samhälle förväntas medborgare kunna värdera, göra val, ta ansvar och agera självständigt i både formella och informella politiska system, lokalt, nationellt och globalt. Denna studie undersöker hur lärare i samhällskunskap i sin undervisning kan möta det samtida samhällets utmaningar. Intervjumaterial från samhällskunskapslärare undervisande i åk 7-9 har analyserats och satts i samband med medborgerliga kompetenser som perspektivtagande, kritiskt tänkande, reflexivitet och självständighet. Av de intervjuade lärarnas tal om sin samhällskunskapsundervisning framgår att lärare använder elevernas erfarenheter och initiativ när de försöker utveckla elevernas kunskaper i samhällskunskap. Lärare kan använda elevernas individuella erfarenheter och initiativ för att knyta samman det samhällsvetenskapliga innehållet med demokratiskt deltagande och senmoderna kompetenser. Genom att använda elevernas erfarenheter och initiativ kan läraren vidga elevernas perspektiv i olika frågor, stötta eleverna i att utveckla ett kritiskt förhållningssätt, erbjuda eleverna möjlighet att reflektera över sina egna värderingar och sin egen roll i samhället och självständigt försöka ta ställning och agera.

[pt] Diante do desafio de se ressignificar sucesso organizational, torna-se primordialcompreender o papel da liderança em capacitar os seguidores para resolver oparadoxo lucro-propósito, bem como fomentar a criatividade voltada para o bemcomum (De Cremer & Moore, 2020; Winkler et al., 2019). Ao incluir as dimensõesética e moral ao lado dos objetivos econômicos, as organizações passam a inserir opropósito na estratégia organizacional, considerando os interesses das diversaspartes envolvidas (He & Ortiz, 2021; Moroz & Gamble, 2021). A partir deste panode fundo, o presente trabalho propõe a humildade do líder como atributo relevantepara auxiliar seguidores a navegar o paradoxo da sustentabilidade, criando o cenárioadequado para que a criatividade se desenvolva e frutifique. O primeiro artigoinvestiga a estrutura intelectual dos temas liderança humilde ecriatividade/inovação, integrando-os em um framework composto de três mapasconceituais, que avançam achados de pesquisas anteriores (Kelemen et al., 2022).O segundo artigo, composto de dois estudos experimentais, avalia relações decausa-e-efeito da liderança humilde e saídas ligadas à criatividade, através daperspectiva do paradoxo. O primeiro estudo confirmou que a humildade do líder éresponsável pela resolução criativa de problemas pelos seguidores via mentalidadede paradoxo, bem como pelo engajamento em processo criativo, apresentandoresultado marginalmente significativo para as emoções positivas. O segundoestudo, por sua vez, confirmou que a liderança humilde é responsável por níveismais altos de emoções positivas e tomada de perspectiva dos seguidores,provocando menos emoções negativas quando comparada à condição de controle. / [en] Amidst the cutting-edge challenge of reframing organizational success, it is paramount to understand the role of leadership in influencing followers capability of solving the paradox of purpose and profit dual-goal, as well as in leveraging creativity toward the common good (De Cremer & Moore, 2020; Winkler et al., 2019). By adding the ethical and moral dimensions alongside the economic goal, organizations start to place purpose into organizational strategy, considering multiple stakeholders interests (He & Ortiz, 2021; Moroz & Gamble, 2021). Therefore, against this backdrop, the present research contends that in terms of the leader s singular behaviors that may help followers navigate the sustainability paradox, leader humility emerges as a relevant attribute to set the stage for creative problem-solving to flourish and thrive. The first paper makes a concerted effort to investigate the business intellectual structure of leader humility and creativity/innovation, integrating past research findings into a synthetic framework composed of three conceptual maps that extend prior academic work (Kelemen et al., 2022). The second paper comprehends two experimental studies that address cause-and-effect concerns on humble leadership and creativity through the paradox perspective. The first study confirmed that leader humility is responsible for followers creative problem-solving via a paradox mindset, and also for creative process engagement; yielding a marginally significant effect on positive emotions. The second study, in turn, confirmed that humble leadership is responsible for promoting positive emotions and perspective-taking on followers, eliciting fewer negative emotions when compared to the control condition.

Les enfants d’âge préscolaire (≤ 5 ans) sont plus à risque de subir un traumatisme crânio-cérébral (TCC) que les enfants plus agés, et 90% de ces TCC sont de sévérité légère (TCCL). De nombreuses études publiées dans les deux dernières décennies démontrent que le TCCL pédiatrique peut engendrer des difficultés cognitives, comportementales et psychiatriques en phase aigüe qui, chez certains enfants, peuvent perdurer à long terme. Il existe une littérature florissante concernant l'impact du TCCL sur le fonctionnement social et sur la cognition sociale (les processus cognitifs qui sous-tendent la socialisation) chez les enfants d'âge scolaire et les adolescents. Or, seulement deux études ont examiné l'impact d'un TCCL à l'âge préscolaire sur le développement social et aucune étude ne s'est penchée sur les répercussions socio-cognitives d'un TCCL précoce (à l’âge préscolaire). L'objectif de la présente thèse était donc d'étudier les conséquences du TCCL en bas âge sur la cognition sociale. Pour ce faire, nous avons examiné un aspect de la cognition sociale qui est en plein essor à cet âge, soit la théorie de l'esprit (TE), qui réfère à la capacité de se mettre à la place d'autrui et de comprendre sa perspective. Le premier article avait pour but d'étudier deux sous-composantes de la TE, soit la compréhension des fausses croyances et le raisonnement des désirs et des émotions d'autrui, six mois post-TCCL. Les résultats indiquent que les enfants d'âge préscolaire (18 à 60 mois) qui subissent un TCCL ont une TE significativement moins bonne 6 mois post-TCCL comparativement à un groupe contrôle d'enfants n'ayant subi aucune blessure. Le deuxième article visait à éclaircir l'origine de la diminution de la TE suite à un TCCL précoce. Cet objectif découle du débat qui existe actuellement dans la littérature. En effet, plusieurs scientifiques sont d'avis que l'on peut conclure à un effet découlant de la blessure au cerveau seulement lorsque les enfants ayant subi un TCCL sont comparés à des enfants ayant subi une blessure n'impliquant pas la tête (p.ex., une blessure orthopédique). Cet argument est fondé sur des études qui démontrent qu'en général, les enfants qui sont plus susceptibles de subir une blessure, peu importe la nature de celle-ci, ont des caractéristiques cognitives pré-existantes (p.ex. impulsivité, difficultés attentionnelles). Il s'avère donc possible que les difficultés que nous croyons attribuables à la blessure cérébrale étaient présentes avant même que l'enfant ne subisse un TCCL. Dans cette deuxième étude, nous avons donc comparé les performances aux tâches de TE d'enfants ayant subi un TCCL à ceux d'enfants appartenant à deux groupes contrôles, soit des enfants n'ayant subi aucune blessure et à des pairs ayant subi une blessure orthopédique. De façon générale, les enfants ayant subi un TCCL ont obtenu des performances significativement plus faibles à la tâche évaluant le raisonnement des désirs et des émotions d'autrui, 6 mois post-blessure, comparativement aux deux groupes contrôles. Cette étude visait également à examiner l'évolution de la TE suite à un TCCL, soit de 6 mois à 18 mois post-blessure. Les résultats démontrent que les moindres performances sont maintenues 18 mois post-TCCL. Enfin, le troisième but de cette étude était d’investiguer s’il existe un lien en la performance aux tâches de TE et les habiletés sociales, telles qu’évaluées à l’aide d’un questionnaire rempli par le parent. De façon intéressante, la TE est associée aux habiletés sociales seulement chez les enfants ayant subi un TCCL. Dans l'ensemble, ces deux études mettent en évidence des répercussions spécifiques du TCCL précoce sur la TE qui persistent à long terme, et une TE amoindrie seraient associée à de moins bonnes habiletés sociales. Cette thèse démontre qu'un TCCL en bas âge peut faire obstacle au développement sociocognitif, par le biais de répercussions sur la TE. Ces résultats appuient la théorie selon laquelle le jeune cerveau immature présente une vulnérabilité accrue aux blessures cérébrales. Enfin, ces études mettent en lumière la nécessité d'étudier ce groupe d'âge, plutôt que d'extrapoler à partir de résultats obtenus avec des enfants plus âgés, puisque les enjeux développementaux s'avèrent différents, et que ceux-ci ont potentiellement une influence majeure sur les répercussions d'une blessure cérébrale sur le fonctionnement sociocognitif. / Preschool children (≤ 5 years old) are at particular risk of sustaining traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 90% of these injuries are mild in nature (mTBI). A substantial amount of research has provided evidence of acute and, in more isolated cases, long-term cognitive, behavioral, and psychiatric consequences following mTBI. In the last two decades, there has been an increase in scientific attention dedicated to the social and socio-cognitive (the cognitive functions that underpin socialisation) sequelae of pediatric mTBI; however, research has almost exclusively been conducted with school-aged children and adolescents. Thus, the literature concerning the social repercussions of mTBI remains comparatively sparse in preschool children, with only two studies that have examined social competence following mTBI. No study has investigated the consequences of early (preschool) mTBI on social cognition. Therefore, the overall objective of this thesis was to expand our understanding of the impact of preschool mTBI on social cognition. More specifically, we addressed an aspect of social cognition that typically emerges during the preschool years, that of theory of mind (ToM), known as the capacity to put oneself in others’ shoes and understand their perspective. The first article examined two subcomponents of ToM, that of false belief understanding and desires and emotions reasoning, 6 months post-mTBI. The findings indicate that preschool children (18 to 60 months) who sustain mTBI have significantly poorer ToM skills compared to typically developing peers 6 months post-injury. The second article focused on the debate in the mTBI literature concerning the most appropriate control group for isolating outcomes that are specific to brain injury. Indeed, it is argued that the choice of the control group (community controls vs. injured counterparts) is of paramount importance because it dictates the conclusions that can be drawn in TBI research. It is argued that brain-injury-specific effects constitute a valid conclusion only when compared to injured peers because in general, children who sustain accidental injuries (whether orthopedic or to the head) share certain pre-existing cognitive characteristics (e.g., impulsivity, attentional difficulties) that not only make them more accident-prone but may also be the origin of post-mTBI difficulties. Thus, the aim of the second paper was to determine whether the poorer ToM skills detected in preschool children with mTBI are the result of a general-injury effect or a brain-injury-specific effect. A second goal of this article was to examine the evolution of ToM skills following mTBI, from 6 months to 18 months post-injury. To do so, we compared children with mTBI to both a community control group and an orthopedic injury (OI) control group. The findings indicate that children who sustain mTBI performed worse on the desires and emotions reasoning task 6 months post-injury compared to both injured and uninjured counterparts, and this discrepancy in performance was maintained 18 months post-mTBI. Lastly, the third goal of this study was to investigate the link between performances on ToM tasks and social abilities, as measures by parental questionnaires. Overall, these two studies demonstrate a persistent brain-injury-specific effect on ToM skills following early mTBI, and poorer ToM skills are associated with reduced social functioning. This thesis provides evidence that early mTBI can interfere with socio-cognitive development, notably in terms of its repercussions on ToM. These findings support the theory according to which the young, immature brain is more vulnerable to brain insult. Importantly, our studies demonstrate that extrapolation from conclusions drawn with older pediatric age groups may be erroneous because the developmental issues faced by preschool children are fundamentally different. Indeed, neurodevelopmental immaturity may be a driving force that dictates the impact of mTBI on socio-cognitive functioning.

Introduction. Les fonctions cognitives évoluent avec l’âge : certaines tendent à diminuer dans leur efficacité alors que d’autres se maintiennent. Des recherches ont montré que le vieillissement affecte la rotation mentale, la perception spatiale, la visualisation spatiale et la prise de perspective. Des facteurs sociodémographiques et comportementaux peuvent aussi influencer le cheminement du vieillissement cognitif des personnes âgées. À titre d’exemple, l'expérience langagière, comme le bilinguisme, agit comme un facteur neuroprotecteur contribuant à la réserve cognitive. L’impact de l’utilisation d’une langue des signes sur la cognition spatiale a suscité beaucoup d’intérêt chez les chercheurs s’intéressant aux langues des signes. Pourtant, aucune recherche n’a encore abordé l’effet de l’utilisation à long terme d’une langue des signes sur la cognition spatiale des signeurs aînés. Objectif. Le but de cette thèse est d’examiner s’il existe des différences sur le plan des habiletés spatiales entre signeurs (sourds et entendants) et non-signeurs de différents groupes d’âge. Plus précisément, cette thèse a examiné i) si la performance à des tâches d’habiletés spatiales diffère selon l’âge (jeunes adultes/aînés) et l’expérience linguistique (signeurs sourds/entendants signeurs/entendants non-signeurs) et ii) si la performance diffère selon la sous-composante d’habiletés spatiales ciblée (perception spatiale; visualisation spatiale; rotation mentale; prise de perspective). Méthode. Pour investiguer l’effet de l’âge et de l’expérience linguistique sur les habiletés spatiales, une collecte de données auprès de 120 participants a été effectuée : 60 adultes âgés de 64 à 80 ans (20 sourds signeurs, 20 entendants signeurs, 20 entendants non-signeurs) et 60 jeunes adultes de 18 à 35 ans (20 sourds signeurs, 20 entendants signeurs, 20 entendants non-signeurs). Afin de s’assurer de l’admissibilité des participants, une évaluation de l’acuité visuelle, de l’acuité auditive, des compétences langagières (français et langue des signes québécoise), de la santé cognitive et de l’intelligence a été effectuée. Les participants ont été appariés entre groupes d’expérience linguistique selon leur niveau d’éducation et d’intelligence. Les quatre sous-composantes d’habiletés spatiales ciblées (perception spatiale; visualisation spatiale; rotation mentale; prise de perspective) ont été testées par l’entremise d’une batterie de sept tests psychométriques. Résultats. Conformément à ce qui a été précédemment observé sur l’effet de l’âge sur les habiletés spatiales, les résultats en termes de justesse de la réponse ont révélé que les jeunes signeurs sourds obtiennent globalement de meilleurs résultats que les signeurs sourds aînés dans toutes les tâches d’habiletés spatiales. De plus, les résultats ont montré un avantage des entendants signeurs sur les entendants non-signeurs aux tâches de rotation mentale et de prise de perspective, quel que soit leur âge. Un avantage général des signeurs aînés (sourds et entendants) par rapport aux non-signeurs aînés a été observé uniquement pour les tâches de visualisation spatiale en termes de justesse de la réponse. Ces résultats suggèrent que les changements cognitifs associés au vieillissement ont un effet sur le traitement de l’information spatiale quelle que soit la modalité linguistique utilisée et que l’effet de l’utilisation de la langue des signes sur les processus spatiaux semblent différer entre les signeurs sourds et les signeurs entendants. Discussion. Cette recherche transversale a permis d’étudier pour la première fois l’impact du vieillissement sur les habiletés spatiales des utilisateurs d’une langue des signes. Également, elle explore le facteur potentiellement atténuant de l’utilisation de la langue des signes quant aux effets de l’âge sur la performance à des tâches d’habiletés spatiales. Sur la base des résultats, il est proposé que l’effet de l’utilisation d’une langue des signes sur la cognition spatiale est spécifique aux sous-domaines d’habiletés spatiales (perception spatiale; visualisation spatiale; rotation mentale; prise de perspective), et que l’expérience linguistique, telle que le bilinguisme bimodal, est un facteur d’intérêt dans la relation entre l’utilisation d’une langue des signes et les processus spatiaux. Conclusion. Les résultats rapportés dans la présente thèse seront utiles aux futurs chercheurs intéressés par l’étude de la cognition chez les aînés signeurs. Des recherches futures devraient se poursuivre dans cette direction afin de préciser l’impact du bilinguisme bimodal sur la cognition spatiale à la lumière de ce qui est connu des effets protecteurs du bilinguisme unimodal face au vieillissement. De plus, les recherches futures devraient envisager d’élargir la perspective de l’effet de l’âge sur les habiletés spatiales des signeurs, en tenant compte des données cognitives et linguistiques. Ces recherches pourraient investiguer la cause de la distinction dans le traitement d’informations spatiales sur la production et la compréhension d’une langue des signes. / Introduction. Across the adult lifespan, cognitive abilities change: some tend to decrease with age whereas others are maintained. The results of previous studies have shown that performance on tasks spatial perception, spatial visualization, mental rotation and perspective taking are poorer in older adults than in younger adults. Sociodemographic and behavioral factors may influence the cognitive aging trajectories of older adults. For example, language experience, such as bilingualism, may be a neuroprotective factor contributing to the cognitive reserve. The impact of language experience in another modality, as it is the case for visual-spatial language, on spatial cognition has generated much interest. To date, no research has addressed this issue with regards of the potential effect of longtime use of sign language on the spatial cognition of older signers. Aim. The aim of this thesis is to investigate whether there are differences in spatial abilities among signers (deaf and hearing) and non-signers of different age groups. More specifically, this thesis examined i) if performance on tasks of spatial abilities differs according to age (younger/older) and linguistic experience (deaf signers/hearing signers/hearing non-signers) and ii) if performance differs according to the type of spatial abilities subcomponent targeted (spatial perception; spatial visualization; mental rotation; perspective taking). Methods. To examine the effect of age and linguistic experience on spatial abilities, data were collected from 120 participants: 60 older adults from 65 to 80 years of age (20 deaf signers, 20 hearing signers, 20 hearing non-signers) and 60 young adults ranging in age from 18 to 35 years (20 deaf signers, 20 hearing signers, 20 hearing non-signers). Prior to the experiment, participants were tested for visual and hearing acuity, language proficiency (Quebec Sign Language and French), cognitive health and intelligence. Based on their linguistic experience, the participants were matched on the basis of their educational level as well as their level of intelligence. The four subcomponents of spatial abilities were tested using a battery of seven tests. Results. Consistent with previously published data on the effect of age on spatial abilities, accuracy results revealed that the younger deaf signers constantly performed better than the older deaf signers on all tasks. Results also highlighted a specific advantage of hearing signers over hearing non-signers in terms of accuracy on mental rotation and perspective taking tasks regardless of age. A general advantage of older signers (deaf and hearing) over older non-signers was observed on spatial visualization tasks only. These results suggest that age-related cognitive changes impact the processing of spatial information regardless of the linguistic modality used. Also, the effect of sign language use on spatial processes may differ between deaf signers and hearing signers. Discussion. This cross-sectional research made it possible to investigate for the first time the impact of aging on spatial abilities among sign language users, as well as to explore the potential effect of sign language use with regards to performance on tasks of spatial abilities in an older population. Based on the results, it is proposed that the effect of sign language use is subdomain specific and that language experience such as bimodal bilingualism is a factor of interest in the relation between sign language use and spatial processing. Conclusion. The results reported in the present thesis will be helpful to future researchers interested in investigating aspects of cognition throughout the lifespan of older signers. Future research should be pursued in order to investigate the impact of bimodal bilingualism on spatial cognition in the light of the aging factor. In addition, future research should consider broadening the scope of this research area by examining in detail the interaction between cognitive skills and linguistic modality. Researches could address the effect of the distinction observed between deaf signers and hearing signers in terms of spatial processing and investigate links between spatial processing and sign language production and comprehension.

One of the main environmental policy challenges is convincing individuals and organisations to engage in socially desirable courses of action; that is, to have them internalise the consequences of their decisions. As contributions from institutional and behavioural economics have indicated, policies aimed at fostering pro-social action can be ineffective and even counterproductive if the interests and concerns of the relevant actors are not properly considered throughout the policy process. In fact, international conventions and national legislation around the world generally recommend stakeholder involvement in order to properly address pressing environmental challenges. The evidence that underpins and informs this recommendation, however, is still insufficient and scattered across different strands of literature. On the one hand, research on participatory governance has indeed systematically documented the potential for policymakers and resource managers to obtain high-quality, context-specific and legitimate input for environmental policymaking from participatory processes. On the other, the available research has also cast doubt on the potential of participatory processes to produce concrete change in (pro-social) action on the ground. In general, the success of these processes ultimately depends on their design, implementation and context. However, most of these conclusions stem from rich qualitative accounts of participatory processes, structured comparisons of cases and systematic reviews of case studies and the available literature. With this type of evidence, it is difficult to neatly identify the impact of participatory interventions on pro-social and cooperative behaviour and systematically assess the underlying mechanisms. This thesis addresses these knowledge gaps. The thesis investigates the extent to which and the mechanisms by which participatory interventions could foster (or hinder) pro-social and collective action for natural resource management and environmental protection. It comprises four chapters, each constituting a stand-alone, self-contained academic paper. Throughout the different chapters, the thesis reviews and integrates insights from the literature on participatory governance and from the institutional and behavioural analyses of pro-social and collective action. Furthermore, using two laboratory economic experiments (Chapters 3 and 4) and one framed lab-in-the-field experiment (Chapter 5), the thesis systematically assesses specific hypotheses concerning the potential impacts of participatory interventions on cooperative and pro-social behaviour and the underlying mechanisms of these impacts. The introductory chapter of the dissertation gathers, presents and discusses the insights gathered from each chapter. It expands on the motivations for the thesis, presents the general and specific research gaps and questions the thesis tackles and clarifies the conceptual, theoretical and methodological foundations upon which the thesis is grounded. Chapter 2 (entitled Participatory interventions for collective action in environmental and natural resource management) reviews the literature on participatory governance together with the literature on collective action in natural resource and environmental management. The main goal of this review is to contribute to integrating the main insights from both strands of literature regarding (a) the potential of participatory interventions to foster collective action and (b) the channels through which they might foment (or hinder) collective action. It therefore seeks to help integrate the insights from these different strands of literature, which, although related, have generally been disconnected until now. The chapter draws on the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework to organise these insights within a coherent conceptual framework. As the results of this literature review indicate, participatory interventions have the potential to foster collective action through two channels. Firstly, by helping resource users to change (and enhance) the rules, norms and strategies that constrain and guide their behaviour (the indirect channel) and, secondly, by directly influencing the specific behavioural factors (e.g. knowledge, trust, preferences, perceptions and beliefs) that collective action hinges upon (the direct channel). However, to sustain collective action, the relevant literature has consistently emphasised that trust needs to be continually cultivated and ensured. Therefore, in line with insights from earlier studies on participatory governance, the results of this literature review also indicate that practitioners and policymakers must not only design participatory interventions carefully to effectively build the trust needed to heighten and sustain collective action, but participatory interventions must also be adequately embedded within the broader (social-ecological and governance) context, providing for follow-up, enforcement, monitoring and conflict-resolution mechanisms. From Chapter 3 through Chapter 5, the thesis focuses on the direct channel, studying the potential of participatory interventions to directly influence behaviour within relevant economic action situations such as social dilemma and distributive action situations. Within a given environment and institutional context, the studies recreate processes commonly facilitated within participatory interventions. Chapter 3 assesses the effects of externally structured and facilitated processes of information exchange, and Chapters 4 and 5 examine the impact of inducing perspective-taking via role-switching techniques (Chapter 4) and instructions (Chapter 5). Thanks to this experimental approach, it is possible to systematically assess the behavioural impacts of these types of processes as well as the underlying mechanisms. Chapter 3 (entitled Structuring communication effectively for environmental cooperation) starts by reviewing previous experimental studies on the effects of two-way communication in social dilemmas to identify the elements that are commonly involved in effective communication processes. This review notes four cooperation-enhancing components of communication: (i) problem awareness, (ii) exploration of strategies to tackle the problem at hand, (iii) agreement on desirable joint strategies and (iv) ratification of agreed-upon strategies. A total of 560 students at Osnabrück University participated in a laboratory implementation of a voluntary contribution mechanism; a public goods game. The experiment implemented a series of interventions that represented these components of communication and contrasted the resulting levels of cooperation with the average outcomes of control groups interacting under either free (unstructured) communication or no communication whatsoever. The intervention that facilitated agreement on a common strategy (i.e. the combination of (ii) and (iii)) was particularly effective at boosting cooperation. Furthermore, combined with interventions promoting problem awareness and ratification, this intervention produced levels of cooperation similar to the average levels of cooperation observed in groups with free-form communication. The results of this experiment expand the understanding in the literature of the role of communication in social dilemmas and provide insights into the potential of structured and facilitated processes of information exchange and social interaction to foster collective action for environmental management. Chapter 4 (The effects of inducing perspective-taking through role reversal in a give-and-take a dictator game on pro-social behaviour) and Chapter 5 (Perspective-taking for pro-social behaviour in watershed management) deal with the effects of inducing perspective-taking on unilateral pro-social behaviour. The results outlined in Chapter 4 indicate that perspective-taking, induced through role reversal, can be associated with significant average changes in the participants’ self-reported state of emotions (in terms of both empathic and positive as well as in distressing and negative emotions). The emotional reactions that the role reversal seems to influence, however, do not appear to result in significantly more (or less) pro-social behaviour. The chapter explores and discusses two plausible explanations for these results, namely the transient effects of emotional reactions and the opposing effects of diverging emotional reactions on pro-social behaviour. These results come from the analysis of data from 144 students at Osnabrück University who participated as dictators in a laboratory implementation of a give-and-take dictator game. The design of the experiment allows the identification of the effect of inducing decision-makers to experience the other person’s position through unilateral role reversal on pro-social behaviour. During the simulation round, dictators in treatment groups experienced how it would feel to be in the role of the recipient. Dictators in the control groups only learned about the distributional consequences of their allocation decisions on recipients. Hence, through a treatment comparison, it was possible to single out the effects resulting from temporarily taking on the position of the other participant. To understand the underlying drivers of a potential behavioural change, the study elicited participants’ emotional states both before and after the simulation round. The results in Chapter 5 indicate that inducing perspective-taking can be associated with relatively greater pro-social behaviour based on an experimental study of downstream farmers’ behaviour in a watershed management context. Moreover, the provision of information on the social-ecological context during the perspective-taking exercise cannot account for the different behavioural patterns in the treatment and control groups. These results come from a lab-in-the-field experiment carried out with 177 downstream farmers in a Peruvian watershed. In the experiment, farmers in the treatment groups were motivated to imagine the upstream farmers’ perspective (i.e. to think about their thoughts and feelings) before deciding on whether or not to contribute to an initiative in the upper watershed. The initiative intends to help upstream farmers improve their well-being without compromising the water supply downstream. The behaviour of farmers in the treatment groups was compared against the behaviour of farmers in the control groups wherein perspective-taking was not induced. Taken together, the results of Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 illustrate the potential of inducing perspective-taking—commonly promoted in participatory processes—to trigger pro-social behaviour in economic situations. It can indeed alter relevant behavioural variables and trigger pro-social behaviour in distributive and social-dilemma situations. Nevertheless, as the literature on perspective-taking has previously indicated, the final effects depend on the specific procedures by which and the situations and contexts wherein perspective-taking is induced. Based on these findings, it is possible to sustain that participatory interventions do have the potential to effect changes in pro-social and cooperative behaviour at both the collective and individual level. Whether this impact is realised or hindered hinges on the procedures and contexts of participatory interventions. It would also depend on the mechanisms provided to follow up on the initiated processes and sustain and build upon the early outcomes. The contributions of this thesis are threefold. Firstly, it integrates insights from the literature on the institutional and behavioural analysis of pro-social and collective action and the literature on participatory governance for natural resource management. Secondly, it generates new evidence, based on experimental methods, in terms of the potential for participatory interventions to foster pro-social and collective action, and in terms of the mechanisms by which participatory methods and processes could effectively impact (or hinder) pro-social and cooperative behaviour. In this way, the thesis helps to bridge the gap of knowledge in terms of how participatory interventions can effectively change behaviour and, subsequently, encourage socially desirable social-ecological outcomes. In doing so, it also adds to the understanding of pro-social and cooperative human behaviour and the way that the processes of information-exchange and perspective-taking, which are often facilitated by participatory processes, may (or may not) advance it. Research on participation is, however, still ongoing and, in terms of the way forward, the thesis makes a third, methodological contribution. It demonstrates how experimental research in both the laboratory and in the field, conducted under a coherent conceptual and methodological framework, can complement one another and shed light on the extent to which and the means by which participatory interventions can produce changes in behaviour. The experimental method, in terms of both laboratory and field experiments, can therefore complement the set of methods traditionally employed to analyse participatory processes. The results of the studies comprising the thesis underscore the importance of carefully analysing the policy process. As contributions from the behavioural literature have repeatedly indicated, human behaviour is driven by a combination of self-regarding, social and procedural preferences. Hence, addressing pressing environmental challenges involving externalities and social dilemmas not only entails getting the policy design right to synergistically coordinate and orchestrate these different types of preferences. It also requires careful design, analysis and implementation of the activities and methods that structure and facilitate stakeholder interactions throughout the policy process.

Bientôt, les robots ne travailleront plus de manière isolée mais avec nous. Ils entrent peu à peu dans notre vie de tous les jours pour coopérer, assister, aider, servir, apprendre, enseigner ou même jouer avec l'homme. Dans ce contexte, nous considérons que ce ne doit pas être à l'homme de s'adapter au robot. Au contraire, le robot doit être capable d'intégrer, dans ses stratégies de planification et de décision, différents facteurs d'effort et de confort et de prendre en compte les préférences et désirs de l'homme ainsi que les normes sociales de son environnement. Tout en respectant les principes de sécurité réglementaire, le robot doit se comporter, naviguer, manipuler, communiquer et apprendre d'une manière qui soit pertinente, acceptée et compréhensible par l'homme. Cette thèse explore et définit les ingrédients clés nécessaires au robot pour développer une telle intelligence socio-cognitive. Elle définit également un cadre pour l'interaction homme-robot permettant de s'attaquer à ces challenges dans le but de rendre le robot socialement intelligent / Robots will no longer be working isolated from us. They are entering into our day-to-day life to cooperate, assist, help, serve, learn, teach and play with us. In this context, it is important that because of the presence of robots, the human should not be on compromising side. To achieve this, beyond the basic safety requirements, robots should take into account various factors ranging from human’s effort, comfort, preferences, desire, to social norms, in their various planning and decision making strategies. They should behave, navigate, manipulate, interact and learn in a way, which is expected, accepted, and understandable by us, the human. This thesis begins by exploring and identifying the basic yet key ingredients of such socio-cognitive intelligence. Then we develop generic frameworks and concepts from HRI perspective to address these additional challenges, and to elevate the robots capabilities towards being socially intelligent

This study examines high school students' experience of a political role play in social studies. The purpose of the thesis is to investigate which abilities role-playing games develop for students and through this contribute to the social studies didactic research of experience-based teaching that reflects reality. The ambition of the thesis is to understand whether the effects of role-playing as a teaching method for the learning of political skills are experienced as useful for their role as citizens. Through a digital survey, the students in this study answer questions about their perceived development of their political self-confidence, their political abilities and whether the role-play motivates effort, which in turn answers the question of whether political role-play in social studies is effective for students' self-governance in society. The result shows that the political role-play has beneficial effects for most of the surveyed students development of their political abilities. The students in the study feel that their political self-confidence has increased and that the teaching has benefited their understanding of dissenting views. The result also shows that large parts of the student group have made an effort, which shows that they experience the effects of the teaching as useful in their future role as citizens. / Denna studie undersöker gymnasieelevers upplevelse av ett politiskt rollspel i samhällskunskap. Syftet med uppsatsen är att undersöka vilka förmågor rollspel utvecklar för elever för att bidra till den samhällskunskapsdidaktiska forskningen av upplevelsebaserad undervisning som speglar verkligheten. Ambitionen för uppsatsen är att förstå om effekterna av rollspel som undervisningsmetod för lärandet av politiskt förmågor upplevs som nyttiga för sin roll som medborgare. Genom en digital enkät svarar eleverna i denna studie på frågor om sin upplevda kunskapsutveckling av sin politiskt självtillit, sina politiska förmågor och om rollspelet motiverar till ansträngning, som i sin tur ger svar på frågan om politiskt rollspel i samhällskunskap är effektfullt för elevers självstyrning i samhället. Resultatet visar att det politiska rollspelet har fördelaktiga effekter för de flesta av de tillfrågade eleverna i sin utveckling av politiska förmågor. Eleverna i studien upplever att deras politiska självtillit har ökat och att undervisningen har gynnat deras förståelse för oliktänkande åsikter. Resultatet visar även att stora delar av elevgruppen har ansträngt sig vilket visar att de upplever effekterna av undervisningen som nyttiga i sin framtida rollsom medborgare.

For effective Human-Robot Interactions, robots have to achieve the same level of understanding as humans in every aspect. Humans are highly versatile, able to switch between frames of reference and consider multiple perspectives efficiently. Additionally, humans help and care for each other in the hope of contributing to a better society. When we talk about interacting with robots, the uncertainty around how to collaborate with them has become an emerging topic in the past few years. To bring social robots into humans’ lives, researchers need to understand the conditions and implications of robots’ actions on human responses and perceptions of robots. This project aims at understanding the link between a robot taking a human’s perspective and the human’s exhibition of prosocial behaviour toward the robot. To test our hypotheses, we have designed an activity where the participant picks an object from an array of objects in front of them, after listening to the robot’s descriptions of that object. Divided into three between-subject conditions, the robot took different perspectives to address the objects in each condition. After completing the tasks, participants could either help the robot collect speech data or move on with filling the final questionnaire and finishing the experiment. Our findings show that the participants were significantly more likely to help the robot when the robot took their perspective (human-centred) compared to both the control condition (object-centred) and when the robot did not take their perspective (robot-centred). Additionally, the results show that when the robot’s descriptions of an object were ambiguous, in the first instruction, 96% of the participants perceived the robot’s first instruction using an egocentric perspective. However, when the robot made such ambiguous instructions again later, participants perceived the instructions based on the mental model developed about the robot for that condition. / Robotar måste, i alla avseenden, uppnå samma nivå av förståelse som människor, i syfte till att skapa ett effektivt samspel. Människor är versatila, kan växla mellan olika referensramar och beakta flera perspektiv på ett effektivt sätt. Dessutom hjälper dem och även tar hand om varandra i hopp om att bidra till ett bättre samhälle. När man talar om att interagera med robotar har osäkerheten kring samarbetet blivit ett framväxande ämne under de senaste åren. För att få in sociala robotar i människors liv måste forskarna förstå förutsättningar för och konsekvenser av robotars handlingar gentemot människors reaktioner och uppfattningar om dem. Detta projekt syftar därför till att förstå kopplingen mellan en robot som intar en människas perspektiv samt människans uppvisande av prosocialt beteende gentemot roboten. För att testa hypotesen har en aktivitet designats där en robot ger instruktioner till en deltagare att välja ett visst föremål som den beskriver, utifrån en rad med olika objekt. Med tanke på att deltagarna endast tilldelas ett villkor av tre möjliga, tog roboten olika perspektiv för att adressera objektet i varje betingelse. Efter den slutförda uppgiften kunde deltagarna antingen hjälpa roboten att samla in tal-data eller gå vidare med att fylla i ett sista frågeformulär och avsluta experimentet. Resultatet visar på att deltagarna var mer benägna att hjälpa roboten när den tog deras perspektiv (människokoncentrerad) i jämförelse med både kontrollvillkoren (objektcentrerad) och när roboten inte tog deras perspektiv (robotcentrerad). Dessutom visar även resultatet att robotens beskrivning av ett objekt var tvetydliga. I den första instruktionen upplevde 96% av deltagarna att robotens instruktion hade ett egocentriskt perspektiv. När roboten gjorde ytterligare sådana tvetydliga instruktioner, När roboten gjorde ytterligare sådana tvetydliga instruktioner, uppfattades instruktionerna däremot utifrån den mentala modellen som utvecklades om roboten för just det villkoret.

Parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) face many challenges which lead to low levels of psychological well-being, partly caused by inability to parent in accordance with one’s values. Child-directed play, a moment of being fully attentive and responsive to one’s child, has the potential to increase parental values. A non-concurrent multiple-baseline experimental design investigated whether daily exercises of child-directed play improved valued parenting and parental perspective-taking. Eight parents of children with diagnosed or suspected ASD were followed daily for six weeks. The intervention comprehended daily practice of child-directed play and video supervision. Child-directed play increased ratings of parental values for all but one participant (Hedges’ g* = 1.67) with effect maintained at follow-up, and increased ratings of parental perspective-taking. A gradual effect indicates the need for greater difference in baseline length between participants. No effects on children, nor on parental well-being were investigated in the present study.