Global ETD Search

21	A tutela jurídica do patrimônio imaterial ambiental no Direito brasileiro Battochio, Mariana 25 February 2015 (has links) Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:23:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Mariana Battochio.pdf: 1323681 bytes, checksum: 31c6f600da075e729878c60253358ace (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-02-25 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / The purpose of this paper is to provide a study on the possibility of recognized the injuries caused to the right of the ecological balance, collective interest that transcends the private sphere of human damage, affecting the whole community. Initially, it will be necessary to analyze the Law in Postmodernity, checking the inevitable axiological content of standards involving the law of nature, inserted as a human right third generation. We will analyze some philosophical currents that support and assist the perception of contemporary environmental law, in particular his interpretation. Also be traced an overview of the evolution of environmental law by addressing their social, economic and ecologic character; and these pillars necessary for the realization of human dignity. Then, we intend to recognize the existence of a collective intangible heritage, analyzing the possibilities and difficulties of obtaining and quantify the damage of this nature, given the basic principles that will guide the collective protection. For this, we will study the civilian view of moral damage, through the transition that culminated in the extent of injuries caused to an ecologically balanced environment damage. Finally, we see the evolution of matter in the higher courts, analyzing aspects such as the quantification of collective damages and allocation of its resources to the defense fund of diffuse rights / A proposta do presente trabalho é oferecer um estudo sobre a possibilidade do reconhecimento de danos imateriais às lesões causadas ao direito ao equilíbrio ecológico, interesse metaindividual que transcende a esfera privada dos seres humanos, atingindo toda a coletividade. Inicialmente, será necessária uma análise do Direito na Pós-Modernidade, verificando o inevitável conteúdo axiológico das normas que envolvem o direito da natureza, inserido como direito humano de terceira geração. Para tanto, analisaremos algumas correntes filosóficas que embasam e auxiliam a percepção do direito ambiental contemporâneo, em especial a sua interpretação. Ainda, será traçado um panorama da evolução do Direito Ambiental, abordando o viés sustentável em seus aspectos social, econômico e ambiental; sendo esses pilares necessários para a concretização da dignidade da pessoa humana. Em seguida, pretendemos reconhecer a existência de um patrimônio imaterial coletivo, examinando as possibilidades e dificuldades de auferir e quantificar os danos dessa natureza, diante dos princípios basilares que vão nortear a tutela coletiva. Para isso, estudaremos a visão civilista dos danos morais, passando pela transição que culminou na extensão dos danos imateriais às lesões causadas ao meio ambiente ecologicamente equilibrado. Por fim, veremos a evolução da matéria nos tribunais superiores, analisando aspectos como a quantificação dos danos morais coletivos e a destinação de seus recursos ao fundo de defesa dos direitos difusos Dano ambiental imaterial Dano moral ambiental Dano moral coletivo Tutela coletiva de danos imateriais Patrimônio imaterial coletivo Danos ambientais Responsabilidade ambiental Dignidade da pessoa humana Sustentabilidade Imaterial environmental damage Environmental moral damages Collective moral damage Collective intangible heritage Environmental damage Environmental responsibility Dignity of the human person Sustainability
22	Les conditions de la responsabilité en droit privé : éléments pour une théorie générale de la responsabilité juridique / The conditions of responsibility in private law : elements for a general theory of legal responsibility Lagoutte, Julien 16 November 2012 (has links) Alors que l’on enseigne classiquement la distinction radicale du droit pénal et de la responsabilité civile, une étude approfondie du droit positif révèle une tendance générale et profonde à la confusion des deux disciplines. Face à ce paradoxe, le juriste s’interroge : comment articuler le droit civil et le droit pénal de la responsabilité ? Pour y répondre, cette thèse suggère d’abandonner l’approche traditionnelle de la matière, consistant à la tenir pour une simple catégorie de classement des différentes branches, civile et pénale, du droit de la responsabilité. La responsabilité juridique est présentée comme une institution autonome et générale organisant la réaction du système à la perturbation anormale de l’équilibre social. Quant au droit de la responsabilité civile et au droit criminel, ils ne sont plus conçus que comme les applications techniques de cette institution en droit positif.Sur le fondement de cette approche renouvelée et par le prisme de l’étude des conditions de la responsabilité en droit privé, la thèse propose un ordonnancement technique et rationnel du droit pénal et de la responsabilité civile susceptible de fournir les principes directeurs d’une véritable théorie générale de la responsabilité juridique. En tant qu’institution générale, celle-ci engendre à la fois un concept de responsabilité, composé des exigences de dégradation d’un intérêt juridiquement protégé, d’anormalité et de causalité juridique et qui fonde la convergence du droit pénal et du droit civil, et un système de responsabilité, qui en commande les divergences et pousse le premier vers la protection de l’intérêt général et le second vers celle des victimes. / While the radical distinction between criminal law and civil liability is classically taught, a thorough survey of positive law reveals a general and profound trend towards a confusion of these two disciplines. Faced with this paradox, the jurist wonders : how to articulate the civil and criminal laws of responsibility ? To answer this question, the thesis suggests abandoning the traditional approach of the subject, which consists in treating it as a mere category of classification of the different branches, civil and criminal, of responsibility/liability. Legal responsibility is presented as an autonomous and general institution organizing the response from the system to abnormal disturbance of social equilibrium. Civil liability law and criminal law are, as far as they are concerned, henceforth conceived as the mere technical applications of this institution in positive law.On the basis of this new approach and through the prism of the study of liability conditions in private law, the thesis proposes a technical and rational organization of criminal law and civil liability that may provide the guiding principles of a real general theory of legal responsibility. As a general institution, it gives not only a concept of responsibility, requiring degradation of a legally protected interest, abnormality and legal causation, and establishing the convergence of criminal law and civil law, but also a system of responsibility, determining the divergences of them and steering the first towards the protection of general interest and the second towards the protection of victims. Anormalité Antijuridicité Bien juridique Causalité juridique Causalité Cause étrangère Cessation de l’illicite Complicité Contrainte Culpabilité Dangerosité Discernement Dol général Dol spécial Dommage Droit des obligations Droit pénal Faits justificatifs Faute simple Faute Fautes qualifiées Force majeure Illicéité Immunités de fonction Imprudence consciente Imprudence inconsciente Imputabilité Infraction impossible Infraction Intention Mobile Personnalité juridique Personnalité morale Préjudice écologique Préjudice extrapatrimonial Préjudice patrimonial Préjudice Présomptions Principe de précaution Responsabilité civile Responsabilité contractuelle Responsabilité des personnes morales Responsabilité du fait d’autrui Responsabilité du fait des choses Responsabilité du fait personnel Responsabilité extracontractuelle Responsabilité juridique Responsabilité pénale Responsabilité pour faute Responsabilité préventive Responsabilité sans faute Résultat légal Risque Tentative Troubles du voisinage Volonté Abnormality Aggravated faults Attempt Causation Cessation of illegality Civil liability Complicity Duress Contractual liability Corporate personality Crime Criminal law Criminal liability Culpability Damage Dangerousness Discernment Dolus directus Dolus specialis Ecological damage External cause Fault Fault-based liability Force majeure Functional immunities Harm Illegality Impossible crime Individual responsibility Intent Justifications Law of obligations Legal causation Legal consequences Legal personality Legal property Legal responsibility Liability of corporations Material damage Mere faults Moral damage Motive Neighbourhood disturbances Precautionary principle Presumptions Preventive responsibility Recklessness Negligence Responsibility for the actions of things Risk Strict liability Tortious liability Vicarious responsibility Wilfulness 340

Search results

A tutela jurídica do patrimônio imaterial ambiental no Direito brasileiro

Les conditions de la responsabilité en droit privé : éléments pour une théorie générale de la responsabilité juridique / The conditions of responsibility in private law : elements for a general theory of legal responsibility