警務工作在國家政府組織中依法所賦予的任務是維持公共秩序、保護社會安全、防止一切危害以促進人民福利。警察任務的達成與否及其執行的態度如何，直接觸及人民的權益及社會安全秩序。在現實的生活中警察人員的私領域如何？尤其是警察人員的家庭生活。警察工作的特質對警察人員的家庭生活影響情況為何；又如何的轉過來的影響到警察工作。自是值得研究的重要課題。 本研究旨在探討男性警察配偶對於其家庭之家務分工、婚姻滿意度與家庭價值之情況。為瞭解不同的個人特質，對於家務分工、婚姻滿意度與家庭價值等各面向有無差異，採取問卷調查法。問卷採自行編制而成之「家庭價值觀量表」，以進行施測。 樣本來源，係以台北縣為例，將範圍界定於以男性警察為配偶的女性作為研究對象，研究內容只限於男性警察的家庭，樣本選取係以台北縣政府警察局外勤工作警察為對象。範圍包括15個分局，有效樣本533份，有效回收比率88.83%。研究項目分為下列4部分：一、警察配偶基本資料。二、家務分工量表。三、婚姻滿意度量表。四、家庭價值量表。主要在於想了解不同的個人特質對警察家庭的家務分工參與頻率、家務分工參與情形、婚姻滿意度、家庭價值觀四變項之間的差異性及相關情形。 問卷回收後，經統計分析，首先採次數分配與平均數之描述性統計，對問卷內容做普遍性地描述，進而對「家事參與頻率」、「家事在何種情況下完成」、「婚姻滿意度」、以及「家庭價值」量表，進一步利用SAS進行因素分析，中萃取共同因素，再以變異法作正交轉軸分析，在分析過程中，取艾根值大於1。在家事參與頻率中，共計有12個有效項目，從中萃取5個因素，因素1協助採買頻率；因素2協助整理頻率；因素3協助修繕頻率；因素4協助清洗頻率；因素5家人互動。總解釋量為55.46%。在家事在何種情況下完成中，共計有12個有效項目，從中萃取3個因素，因素1家居環境情況；因素2清洗餵食情況；因素3與家人互動情況，總解釋量為85.14%。在婚姻滿意度中，計有31個有效項目，從中萃取5個因素，因素1情緒交流；因素2婚姻生活；因素3婚姻維持；因素4尊重因素；因素5婚姻重要性，總解釋量為67.88%。在家庭價值觀中，計有37個有效項目，從中萃取8個因素，因素1生兒育女；因素2子女養育；因素3父母權威；因素4成員互助；因素5婚姻正當性；因素6子女價值；因素7婚姻破綻；因素8角色分工，總解釋量為67.05。 進而針對這些因素，與個人基本資料進行差異性檢驗，以及家務分工、婚姻滿意度、家庭價值等三個量表之間之相關分析。以對假設進行檢驗，結果發現：1.個人背景因素之不同與婚姻滿意度之間有顯著差異性，部分修正。2. 個人背景因素之不同與家務分工之間有顯著差異性，部分修正。3.個人背景因素之不同與家庭價值之間有顯著差異性，部分修正。婚姻滿意度、家務分工與家庭價值之間有顯著相關，此部分完全成立。 本研究根據研究結果，提出十點建議，以供相關單位參考：（一）夫妻溝通、彼此配合協調。（二）調整勤務、配合正常作息。（三）分擔家務、減輕妻子負擔。（四）角色執行、避免過度權威。（五）身心健康、當前重要課題。（六）勤休合度、勤務家庭並重。（七）落實代理、分擔個人責任。（八）伴兒成長、舉辦親子活動。（九）三代同堂、重視倫理價值。 / The duty of police service work is entrusted legally to maintain the public peace, protect social security and prevent all harms to improve people's welfare by national government. How does the duty achieve or not and the execution manner touches people's rights and the social security order directly. How is the police officers' personal life, particularly their personal family life in reality? How is the job characteristics influence their family life and also how the family life influence their work performance? The work/life interaction is the important topic which is worth studying. The purpose of the research is to discuss the masculine police spouses' value of housework division, the degree of marital satisfaction and the attitude regarding their family value. In order to understand the difference between the individual characteristics and the three aspects mentioned above, we adopt the questionnaire survey. The questionnaire was self-established and executed by “the family values scale.” To take Taipei County as the example, limits in the masculine police's spouse as the object of this study. The research content is restricted in the masculine polices' family and the sample selection takes the Taipei County Police Department, the front-end officers, as an object. With 15 branches included, 533 effective samples and 88.83% effectively return rate, the research divides into the following 4 parts: First, the spouses' basic information. Second, the housework division scale. Third, the degree of marital satisfaction scale. Finally, the family value scale. It aims to understand the deviation and correlation between individual characteristic and the four variables, the housework participation frequency, situation, the marital satisfaction degree and the family values. After recovering the questionnaires, we adopt frequency and the description analysis through statistics analysis. And then do the common description to the questionnaires content, then to "family affairs participation frequency", "family affairs that condition under completion" , "marriage satisfaction" , and "family value" scales. Further, we carry on Causal Factor Analysis (aka CSA) in extract a common factor, and make by Variation Method over Shaft Analysis and Varimax. In this analysis, make eigenvalue greater than one(Kaiser's rule). In the housework participation rate, there are 12 effective items, extracted 5 factors from it: 1. the assistant rate of purchasing; 2. the assistant rate of cleaning; 3. the assistant rate of repairing house stuffs; 4. the assistant rate of washing; 5. the interactions. The total explanation quantity is 55.46%. In the housework accomplishment circumstances rate, there are 12 effective items, extracted 3 factors from it: 1. the environment; 2. the assistant of washing and feeding; 3. the interactions. The total explanation quantity is 85.14%. In the marital satisfaction degree, there are 31 effective items, extracted 5 factors from it: 1. emotional and psychological interaction; 2. the marriage life; 3. the maintenance of marriage; 4. esteem of each other; 5. the importance of marriage. The total explanation quantity is 67.88%. In the value of family, there are 37 effective items, extracted 8 factors from it: 1. child bearing and rearing; 2. child rearing; 3. the parents' authority; 4. helping each other; 5. the validity of marriage; 6. the value of child bearing; 7. the marriage flaws; 8. role divisions. The total explanation quantity is 67.05%. Then aim at the factors, carry on a Differencial with personal information. And division of household, marriage satisfaction, family value...etc. three forms of scales is analytical. With assumption that carry on an examination, find the following result: 1. The dissimilarity of personal background factor and of the marriage satisfaction has significance difference and the part is revised. 2. The dissimilarity of personal background factor and of the division of household has significance difference and the part is revised. 3. The dissimilarity of personal background factor and of the family value has significance difference and the part revised. Be related between family value and marriage satisfaction, division of household, this part completely establishes. Based on those findings, 10 suggestions proposed to be a reference for the related organizations: 1. Communicate with each other. 2. Adjust working hours, try to live normally. 3. share housework, reduce spouse's workload. 4. the role play, avoids excessively authoritative. 5. physical and moral integrity is the most important topic. 6. work/life balances, pays equal attention to job and family. 7. to execute proxy plan, share the work load. 8. companion grows, conducts the parent-child activity. 9. three generations under the same roof, take ethics value.

自1960年代開始，女性的生涯發展議題開始受到重視，多位學者就女性的生涯發展提出看法與相關研究成果；另一方面，雖然隨著婦女工作人數日益增加，婦女地位逐漸提高，但是社會規範對婦女在家庭中的角色要求與期望並未減少，繁重的家務及子女教養工作，大部分仍由婦女承擔，由於家庭的羈絆與社會的期待，使得女性學者往往要付出比別人更多的代價，才能換得學術上的成就，因此已婚女性教授在面對家庭與工作的平衡問題上，成為一重要且不容忽視的課題。希望藉由本研究探討已婚女性教授的生涯歷程來瞭解自我，對其處境覺知上有所助益，並提供未來欲進入大學任教之女性學者或是正面臨工作與家庭衝突的女性學者一些正面的調適方法與幫助。 本研究採質化研究中的深度訪談之方式瞭解已婚女性教授的生涯歷程與工作－家庭的關係。研究發現歸納為七大主題，分別為「受內外部影響的生涯發展歷程」、「兼顧工作與家庭的雙軌生涯型態」、「性別角色對女性教授的影響」、「工作與家庭間的拉扯－多重角色的考驗」、「多元的滿足感與成就感」、「工作與家庭衝突的調適之道」與「天平或蹺蹺板」。

自古以來，遊民(homeless )就一直存在人類社會。在過去，遊民主要是災民或乞丐，他們多半由於戰亂、天災、瘟疫、疾病、意外傷害等因素，而造成流離遷徙，甚至無家可歸的慘況，因此向為政府及地方善心人士布施的對象。現代的遊民，除了某些戰禍頻仍或經濟落後的地區，主要因為失業、貧窮、疾病、缺乏住宅，以及家庭破碎等而露宿街頭、公園、火車站等公共場所，或暫時棲身遊民收容所。他們的組成更廣泛地涵蓋社會的底層，包括失業工人、臨時短工、精神病患、單親婦女及失依兒童等，不僅人數暴增，並有日益複雜的趨勢，因此，此課題值得深入探討之需要。 本研究為瞭解臺北縣的遊民形成原因、遊民生活處境、遊民情感性、工具性社會支持及人生觀與未來展望，採深入訪談法，以12位遊民及4位從業人員為訪談對象。研究發現：受訪者對遊民印象充滿污名化與標籤化，加上現行社會救助法的資格審查機制背後所隱藏的工作倫理與家庭照顧責任，及社會福利發展趨勢邊緣化遊民福利，使遊民形同被社會拋棄的一群人。 最後，依據本研究發現提出幾項建議，包括：（一）全國統一界定遊民；（二）政府、民間與居民共同為遊民脫離遊民生活；（三）政府部門橫向聯繫，建立綿密整合性團隊工作模式；（四）預防高風險家庭生計者落入遊民；（五）預防走失人口淪為遊民；（六）重視人權，加強社區居民認知宣導；（七）加強政府與民間單位合作機制；（八）開設遊民職業媒合專門窗口，提供就業機會、急難救助與短期住宅；（九）建立遊民的自信心，推動社會重建協助重回職場；及（十）鼓勵大專院校社會工作相關科系學生實習或組成社團。 / From time immemorial, homeless has been existing in human being society. In the past, homeless were mainly of victims or beggars, who were suffered from wars, disasters, plague, diseases and accidents, forcing them scatter around, nowhere like home to stay, and became the target group aided by the government and local charities. In contrast, homeless people today, besides those who are in the war regions or low economy development areas, are caused by unemployment, poverty, disease, lack of shelters, and misfortune/unhealthy family as to live on the streets, parks, stations , either the other public places or stay in the homeless institutions temporarily. The whole group is widely contained of the bottom level of the society, including unemployed workers, temporary workers, mental sickness people, single-child parents (or mother) and orphans. The number of this group is increasing, and also growing more complicated. As the result, the problem requires deep research and discussion. The purpose of this study is to understand the reasons of being homeless, living conditions of homeless, emotional and instrumental supports from home and society, and the their perspectives of life and future. By taking deep interview, there are 12 homeless people and 4 homeless-relevant employees as the interviewees. The study found that interviewees have bad impressions and biases on homeless, moreover the inspecting mechanism of the qualification under the social rescue regulations has presumed the working ethic and family care responsibilities, while the benefit of homeless in the whole social welfare is lessening, homeless were like being abandoned by the society. Eventually, the research proposed several suggestions: (1) unified definition of homeless group; (2)aligning government、civil and residents to help homeless out of their homeless life; (3) horizontally connect governmental sub-division as to establish an integrated team work pattern; (4)prevent high-risk-family becoming homeless; (5) prevent stray becoming homeless; (6) emphasize on human rights, and strengthen the announcement in the community; (7) reinforce the corporation between government and civil authorities; (8) set up the service counter regarding to homeless as to provide job opportunities、emergent rescue and help, and temporary settlement; (9) rebuild the confidence among homeless and promote society reconstruction and aid to return working force; (10) encourage students who takes social work and other related subjects to practice intern or to organize clubs.

以政大財政系的學生綜合資料表為主，分析縣市差異和家庭背景對高等教育的影響。在縣市差異中，各縣市國民教育經費支出、每生教育經費支出會帶來顯著的影響力，表示縣市間不同步的發展情形，將造成發展落後縣市的高中畢業生在求學上的劣勢。 至於家庭背景因素部分，為避免因高中區域選擇的問題，產生分析上的偏誤，因此僅以台北縣市的高中為主。將佔政大財政系學生比例低於2%的學校劃歸於其他高中，並將高中分成女校、男校合校三類。實證結果中並無證據顯示家庭背景因素對高中學校選擇有任何的影響力，反而是入學年齡和居住地對女校及男女合校才具有影響力。

摘要 傳統之補貼政策大都只依所得的多寡來從事補貼，此補貼政策只適用於政府的補貼對象為個人。一旦政府的補貼對象為整個家庭時，傳統的補貼政策是否亦適用於對家庭之補貼就值得商榷。Deaton曾在1997年於其書中寫道由N人所組成之家庭會有家庭規模經濟的產生。故政府如再以傳統的補貼政策來從事補貼，則顯然會忽略家庭規模經濟 － 此影響家庭是否貧窮的另一個重要指標。另外由Lanjouw和Ravallion於1995年之實証分析亦可知家庭規模經濟的大小確實和貧窮相關。所以政府在對家庭從事補貼時，除了應考慮家庭所得的多寡外，也應考量到家庭規模經濟的大小，如此才能使真正貧窮的家庭獲得較多的補貼。 本篇論文的目的，即是在探討當政府考量到家庭規模經濟的大小來對家庭從事補貼時，隨著家庭規模經濟的改變，家庭消費行為將會如何改變。此外我們也比較了傳統的補貼政策與本文所探討之補貼政策間之異同。 目　錄 第一章 前言 ．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．1 第二章 文獻回顧 ．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．2 第三章 家庭消費行為之分析 ．．．．．．．．． 5 第一節 模型簡介．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．6 第二節 基本模型之比較靜態分析．．．．．．．．．．．7 第三節 本章小結 ．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．13 第四章 補貼政策下家庭消費行為之分析 ．．．．14 第一節 價格補貼下家庭消費行為之分析 ．．．．．．．16 第二節 定額補貼下家庭消費行為之分析 ．．．．．．．33 第三節 價格補貼與定額補貼之比較 ．．．．．．．．．50 第四節 考慮庭規模經濟之補貼政策與傳 統補貼政策之比較 ．．．．．．．．．．．．． 58 第五節 本章小結 ．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．66 第五章 結論 ．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．69 參考文獻 ．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．71

家庭收支調查是每個國家最重要的統計調查工作之一，其主要目的在於：藉由蒐集家庭的收支狀況及其所得來源資料，以明瞭一般家庭實際的生活狀況，並加以分析，可提供政府做為擬訂政策之參考，因此，家庭收支調查統計可說是顯示民間經濟活動之重要統計。自此一調查工作實施以來，相關的改進研究就不斷地在進行，而隨著社會迅速的變遷，此一制度已存在著諸多問題，實有檢討、研擬改進措施之必要。 本文即是根據Kish所提出的滾進式樣本（Rolling Samples）的概念，建議將一年調查一次的訪問調查改為按月調查，以縮短調查資訊的涵蓋期間，這樣一來，不但可以取得較穩定且可靠的資訊，還可以顯示季節性的變化。本文利用民國八十六年臺北市的家庭收支調查資料來做分析，經過按月抽樣的程序後，發現：對推論總體平均而言，按月調查的確有其可行性。 / The Survey of Family Income and Expenditure is one of the most important statistical surveys in every country. The major purpose is to understand the actual life of common family. Thus, this survey is an important statistical work of social economic activity. Since this survey has been started, the related research is continued. While the society changes fast, there are many problems in this survey and we must improve it. This paper is according to the concept of Rolling Samples which is mentioned by Kish. We suggest making the interview-survey monthly. In this way, we can obtain more stable and more reliable information, and we can also obtain seasonal changes. This paper uses the data of the survey on Taipei in 1997 to analyze. We find that making the interview-survey monthly is usable.

No description available.

單親家庭已是目前主要的家庭型態之一。由於在單親家庭中，只有一位家長負擔生活與教養子女的重擔，因而他們的負荷與壓力比一般雙親家庭要得更多更沈重，值得加以重視與協助。因此作者試圖透過本研究，加以探索單親家長的社會適應情形及支持網路的來源、影響，和探討單親家長的支持網絡與社會適應間之相關情形之外，亦以透過對不同特性的單親家庭之比較，來嘹解其在社會適應、支持網絡及福利需求上的差異情形。 本研究之研究資料，係對大台北地區的國民中學以簡單隨機抽樣方式取得樣後，進行發放問卷，並輔以對相關機構郵寄問卷，共取得655份有效樣本。 而本研究主要發現為： 一、在社會適應方面，單親家長的社會適應情形會因單親家長不同的基本特性而有所差異。 二、在支持網絡方面，單親家長的情緒支持與財物支持會因單親家長的不同特性而有不同的差異；但是單親家長的人力支持與整體性支持卻不因單親家長的不同特性而有所差異。而單親家長於支持網絡上獲得協助的情形，則會因單親家長的基本特性之交互作用影響，而有顯著差異。 三、在福利需求方面，亦會因單親家長不同基本特性而有所差異。 四、在支持網絡與社會適應間的關聯上，部份項目並無險著相關，而部份項目（社會關係適應與人力支持、情緒支持、整體性支持；心理適應與人力支持、情緒支持、整體性支持），則呈顯著正相關。 最後，本研究根據研究結果，提出具體建議與未來研究展望，以供單親家長、政府相關單位與實務界以及往後研究作為參考。

本研究採用論述分析來研究台灣電腦居家化初期的出現的流行論述，經由檢視媒體論述，來挖掘出社會對家中電腦投注的文化意涵，瞭解電腦進入家庭過程中出現哪些論述，這些論述又怎麼反映當時的社會價值與訴求。研究資料的分析時間為1995年至1996年。分析的媒介以平面媒體為主，包括報紙、雜誌、平面廣告。 電腦居家化的論述大多都和「有小孩的核心家庭」相關。對於核心小家庭而言，學校成為比企業更重要的聯結家庭和電腦的仲介，父母往往是為了小孩購買電腦，而不是自己。電腦可能是橫亙在父母與小孩間的代溝，父母不懂電腦語言、文化，而難以進入孩子的世界；相對的，也可能成為兩代之間溝通的橋梁，成為另一種親子關係促進器。 電腦居家化論述中，女性的角色多劃限成小家庭中的母親角色，消費電腦的動機為能負起教育下一代的職責。不過女性仍在社會設限的眼光中，致力尋找抗爭的可能，展現對於電腦求知的渴望，只是渴求而不可得，跳脫過往認為女性對於科技使用上完全弱勢的形象，反映女性對於科技的恐懼其實是由周遭社會環境塑造出來的。 電腦居家化四面向中納入、佔用、轉化的概念都和電腦家庭的想像「核心小家庭」相關連，但無法斷論是否是由核心小家庭出發，形成其它概念的相關論述；亦或相反。只能說是論述間各有牽涉，互為因果，並構成了主要以核心小家庭為中心的論述。 除此之外，電腦居家化論述在佔用及物化概念上，以將電腦「去高科技形象」的論述為主。同樣的，物化的空間論述為電腦外觀和家庭美感衝突所苦，因此從消費端和生產端都可見到擺脫電腦高科技形象的努力：消費端試圖降低電腦外觀擺在家中的衝突感，同時生產端則調整電腦外觀設計，推出更時尚的家用電腦產品。 從家庭概念的角度來看，電腦居家化的論述主題是界線的延伸以及模糊。電腦被想像成家中的神經中樞，未來的使用者可從遠端控制家庭中的各式電器，家庭隨著電腦遙控延伸至遠方。不只家庭概念向外擴張，社會也滲透進家庭，讓家庭/社會界線日趨模糊。

兩地家庭已成為臺灣一種新的家庭型態之一，其成因，各有因素，其中ㄧ種原因係特殊職業別的工作輪調制度所造成。在這種情況下形成的兩地家庭，對於當事人和其家庭而言，可說是較無選擇性的，以公務人員為例，此種職業相較於其他職業較具有永業性的，亦即一旦投入公務人員行列，絕大部分的人都繼續從事這份職業直到退休，因此在這種職業別下設有跨地區的工作輪調制度，大部分的人不論是否出於自願，均得接受工作的調整，然而對於已經組成家庭的人而言，跨地區的工作輪調制度多半會形成兩地家庭，其家庭關係、夫妻關係、親子關係會有什麼衝擊及影響？以及面臨何種問題？都是值得深究的課題。 本研究採質性研究之深度訪談法。研究對象總數共計8人，均為現服務於法務部及所屬各機關之公務人員，夫妻其中一方或雙方曾經因法務部之工作輪調，造成兩地夫妻，且當時兩地婚姻的狀態至少持續6個月以上並育有1個以上子女。 經分析訪談資料後，研究發現綜述如下： 一、雖有準備、有異其他家庭：因法務部暨所屬機關工作之特殊性而設有輪調制度，雖然對於將來有可能會成為兩地家庭的情形已有心理準備，但兩地家庭與其他類型家庭生活的不同，包括平日溝通無法見面，只能依賴電話聯繫、無法陪伴配偶、子女等。 二、適應與否、有賴內外支持：分隔兩地的夫妻雙方對於生活適應程度與是否有內在、外在支援有關係，因本研究訪談對象大部分分隔兩地家庭的子女年齡均較小，且多為學齡前兒童，因此由夫妻其中一方要獨力負起照顧幼兒的責任，負擔是相當重的。 三、工作繁重、另一半亦心憂：如果同時還有工作，照顧小孩更是分身術，另一方在異地工作也會擔心家中的情況。 四、時空乖隔、噓寒問暖不易：分隔兩地對於配偶和子女未能朝夕相處，減少感情聯繫，多了疏離感。 依據本研究發現，提出以下建議： 一多加溝通：建議在進入分隔兩地的生活前，應該充分和家人溝通和討論，降低分隔兩地對家庭的衝擊。 二接受支援：本研究建議適時接受內在、外在的支援可以減輕兩地家庭的生活壓力。 三常保聯繫：因此建議保持聯繫、常常溝通、定期相聚，強化夫妻關係以及和子女的關係。 四有賴有司：因工作性質特殊，同仁需配合工作歷練而調動造成的兩地家庭，建議機關可以提供住宿、交通費補貼、彈性請假制度、調動時尊重個人意願等協助，幫助同仁及其家人早日適應兩地生活，減輕壓力，讓同仁無後顧之憂。 / Economic and social transformation has created great impact and change on life, including wider disparity between wealth and poor and emergence of M-shaped society. To earn a living, it is more and more common to seek job opportunities in other places or for both spouses to be in work, which is the cause of two-location families that are more and more prevailing and have become a new family trend in Taiwan. This study is to discuss one of the reasons for two-location families to emerge – the rotation system of particular occupations – which researchers consider less optional for the party involved and their families. For example, compared with other occupations, being civil servants is a relatively permanent career; that is, once being a civil servant, the majority stay until they retire. No matter they are voluntary or not, most civil servants have to accept the change of rotational relocation in their position. However, for those who have families, rotational relocation will lead to two-location families and it can't be neglected how the phenomenon will impact family relationship, spousal relationship, parent-child relationship and what problem will therefore occur. In-depth interview of qualitative research is adopted in this study. The interview subjects are 8 civil servants currently employed in Ministry of Justice and the subordinating agencies and one or both of each couple was once rotationally relocated due to work, causing l two-location families that lasted for at least 6 months and raised at least 1 child. After the interview data are analyzed, findings discovered are summarized as follows: 1.Even though likelihood of two-location family due to particularity of the rotation system in Ministry of Justice and the subordinating agencies has been expected, two-location family is different from other types of family, including relying only on telephone but not face-to-face communication or not being able to accompany the spouse or children. So, sufficient communication and discussion with family members are recommended before living separately to reduce impact on the family. 2.Is internal or external support related with how long-distance spouses get accustomed to life? Because most interview subjects in this study have relatively young children in two-location families, most of whom are pre-school kids, it is a rather heavy burden for one spouse to shoulder responsible alone to take care of young children, to say nothing of being torn between looking after them and work. Besides, the spouse working in the other place will be worried about the family. So, it is recommended in this research that appropriately accepting internal or external support can relieve life pressure of being a two-location family. 3.Long distance causes alienation between spouses and children so it is recommended to stay in contact, frequently communicate and regularly gather together to strengthen spousal and parent-child relationship. 4.Due to particularity of work, fellow employees have to be relocated based on work experiences, which leads to two-location families. Therefore, it is recommended that government organizations can provide accommodation, transportation subsidies and a flexible system for taking leaves as well as respect personal choice for relocation to help fellow workers and their families to get accustomed to living in two places and relieve pressure. Also, it can help fellow workers devote themselves to work without any further concern.