Les confins méridionaux et orientaux de la Champagne, correspondant approximativement à la Haute-Marne actuelle, ont été touchés de plein fouet par la guerre de Trente Ans, en raison de leur position frontalière avec deux redoutables ennemis, la Franche-Comté et la Lorraine. La guerre ouverte entre la France et les Habsbourg en 1635 ne s’est d’ailleurs pas interrompue en 1648, aux traités de Westphalie, mais s’est prolongée jusqu’en 1659-1660 contre l’Espagne et le duc Charles IV de Lorraine.Après vingt-cinq années de conflit, on peut s’interroger sur le degré de destruction subi par le Bassigny et la Montagne langroise. Le célèbre Journal du curé d’Hortes Clément Macheret, qui narre les désastres survenus pendant cette période, demeure pour l’historien un témoignage incontournable, mais il subsiste de nombreuses autres sources archivées qui permettent d’approfondir l’enquête. Le règne personnel de Louis XIV, qui s’étend de 1661 à 1715, correspond à la phase de reconstruction de la Champagne méridionale. Plusieurs questions demeuraient à ce jour sans réponse : - Quelle a été l’ampleur des dévastations et des pertes démographiques suite à la guerre de Trente Ans ? - Quel a été le rythme du relèvement après 1660, et à partir de quelles ressources humaines et économiques ? - Comment s’est opérée la reconstruction matérielle de la région ? Il s’agit de comprendre quels facteurs ont favorisé, ou au contraire freiné, le redressement champenois durant cette période. La comparaison avec d’autres provinces dévastées au cours de cet interminable conflit, comme la Lorraine, l’Alsace ou la Franche-Comté, peut également être éclairante. Peu étudiée par les historiens de la Champagne, cette récupération laborieuse de la seconde moitié du XVIIe siècle a pourtant, à bien des égards, enfanté le bel essor démographique et économique du siècle des Lumières. / Champagne’s southern and eastern borders, approximately within today’s Haute-Marne, were severely hit by the Thirty Years’War, due mainly to their frontier position with two fearsome foes, Franche-Comté and Lorraine. The open war between France and the Habsburgs in 1635 didn’t however come to an end in 1648, after the Peace of Westphalia, but dragged on until 1659-60 against Spaniards and Charles IV, Duke of Lorraine. Following a twenty-five-year old conflict, the point at issue is to what extent Bassigny and the Plateau de Langres were destroyed. Historians can rely on the famous Journal by the parish priest of Hortes Clément Macheret relating that period’s disasters, but many other archives can lead on to further research. Louis XIV’s personal reign (1661-1715) spans the reconstruction period of southern Champagne. Several questions still remain unanswered today : - How important were the devastations and demographic losses caused by the Thirty Years’War ?- How fast was the recovery after 1660, and from what human and economic resources ? - How did people manage to rebuild their region ? The question at stake is to understand what factors have favoured or, on the contrary slowed down the reconstruction of Champagne during that period. The comparison with other damaged provinces, such as Lorraine, Alsace or Franche-Comté throughout that endless conflict, may be also helpful. Although it hasn’t been much studied by the historians of Champagne, this difficult recovery during the second half of the 17th century has, in many ways, given birth to the fine demographic and economic surge of the Enlightenment.

Une somme considérable de légendes véhiculent des images éculées d’Henri IV et Louis XIII. Au premier d’être alors évoqué comme un personnage débonnaire, guerrier, vert galant, préférant les joies populaires de la poule au pot et des chansons licencieuses du Pont Neuf aux fastueux spectacles de cour, quand son fils est appréhendé comme un monarque taciturne, dominé par sa mère puis par le tout-puissant Richelieu. Rarement l’intérêt se porte alors sur leurs personnalités politiques qui pourtant, animées par la passion de la gloire, pleinement conscientes de leur rôle de souverains du royaume, usèrent toutes deux de l’art à des fins d’autorité, ouvrant la voie à leur illustre descendant : Louis XIV. Notre étude a pour ambition première d’analyser quel fut l’initiation, voire l’édification, de ces deux souverains. Les usages politiques des spectacles de cour ont pour beaucoup été mis en exergue, mais le lien entre éducation artistique et politique est, quant à lui, bien moins étudié. Or, apprentissage politique et enseignement artistique passent par la ‘‘rencontre’’ entre l’enfant et les spectacles. De cette rencontre, le prince pourra envisager les potentialités du fastueux et utiliser ces premières expériences comme une référence qu’il accommodera par la suite, à son profit. Quelle place fut alors donnée à la musique dans la formation humaniste que reçut le jeune Henri de Navarre ? Quel fut le rôle confié aux arts dans l’éducation de Louis XIII, tandis que sa mère, digne représentante de la dynastie Médicis, mettait un point d’honneur à entourer sa cour de fêtes perpétuelles ? Ce sont en effet les femmes, c’est indéniable, qui jouèrent un rôle de tout premier plan dans la mise en place et le développement des spectacles utilisés pour servir la propagande royaliste. C’est cette réflexion, autour de la place de ces ‘‘muses’’ dans la formation des souverains au mécénat artistique et plus encore à l’utilisation politique des arts, qui nourrit notre première partie. La seconde est entièrement consacrée à l’utilisation propagandiste de l’art. Sous les premiers Bourbons, la musique se développa sous ses aspects les plus divers, psaumes, cantiques, chansons populaires ou airs de cour, ballets, tous utilisés afin d’ancrer plus fortement leurs règnes au cœur de la tradition monarchiste française. Sous ces souverains, au pouvoir bien controversé, les fêtes firent partie intégrante de la stratégie gouvernementale ; elles ne jouèrent plus seulement le rôle décisif, mais désormais connu, de consolidateurs du pouvoir en place mais le légitimèrent, l’assirent. Ainsi naquit la dynastie Bourbon. / A considerable amount of legends conveys hackneyed images of Henri IV and Louis XIII. The first one was then evoked as a good-natured, warlike figure and a Green Gallant who preferred the popular enjoyments of the boiled chicken and the bawdy songs of the Pont Neuf to the celebrations of the Valois court. His son was, as for him, considered as a taciturn monarch, dominated by his mother or by the almighty Cardinal Richelieu. Curiosity is then rarely aroused by their political personalities which, nevertheless livened up by the passion of the glory, conscious of their role as Kings of France, used both the art for authority purposes, opening the way to their illustrious descendant: Louis XIV.The first purpose of this study is to explore the initiation, if not the edification, of these sovereigns. The political uses of the splendoures were largely underlined, but the link between arts and political education is not much studied. Yet political learning and art education are conveyed by the "encounter" between the child and these shows. This encounter enables the prince to consider the potentialities of the luxurious, and to use these early experiences as a reference that he will accommodate to his profit afterward. Then what place was given to the music in the humanist formation received by the young Henri de Navarre? What was the role assigned to arts in the education of Louis XIII, while his mother, deserving representative of the Medici dynasty, made it a point of honor to provide her court with perpetual celebrations? Women undeniably played a first rank role in the implementation and the development of the court’s shows used to serve the royalist propaganda. This reflection around the role of these "muses" concerning the education of the sovereigns in the artistic sponsorship in addition to the political use of the arts will be the main focus of the first part. The second part is entirely dedicated to the propagandist use of the art. Under the first Bourbons, music developed as a wide range of appearances, psalms or hymns, popular songs or ‘‘airs de cour’’, ballets. All these forms emerged, anchoring more strongly their reigns in the tradition of the French monarchy. Under Henri IV and under his son, asserting a controversial power, the fêtes were part of the governmental strategy; they did not only play a decisive role in strengthening the power any more, they legitimized it, they consolidated it. This is how the dynasty of Bourbons was born.

En 1631, Marie de Médicis (1573-1642), reine de France, opposée à la politique de Richelieu, quitte précipitamment le royaume pour trouver refuge à la cour de Bruxelles. Jusqu’à sa mort en 1642, elle ne réussit jamais, malgré maintes tentatives, à rentrer en France. Elle vit dans les Pays-Bas espagnols jusqu’en 1639, puis, après un bref passage dans les Provinces-Unies, à Londres jusqu’en 1641, pour finir ses jours à Cologne. Alors que la guerre de Trente ans déchire l’Europe, Marie de Médicis tisse des liens avec les princes, mais aussi avec d’autres émigrés français, tels que Gaston d’Orléans ou la duchesse de Chevreuse. A travers cette situation exceptionnelle, nous étudions les réseaux, officiels ou secrets, qui se font et se défont autour de ces émigrés. La mise en place des réseaux et leur bon fonctionnement sont assurés par des hommes, ambassadeurs, courtisans, serviteurs, qui ont chacun des profils et des ambitions différents. Leurs histoires individuelles permettent de restituer la logique organique de cet ensemble complexe et mouvant à travers lequel circulent des nouvelles. Celles-ci sont analysées du point de vue matériel de leur support et de leur acheminement, mais aussi en fonction de leur contenu, qui varie selon les circonstances et les tensions politiques du moment. La circulation et les mutations de l’information ont sur la diplomatie des incidences qu’il faut évaluer. De plus, elles reflètent des idées politiques et révèlent des codes, des symboles, des représentations et des comportements particuliers. La mise en scène de l’information devient alors un objet d’étude fondamental. / In 1631, Mary de’ Médici (1573-1642), queen mother of the French king, opposed to Richelieu’s government, precipitately leaves the kingdom to find shelter at the court of Brussels. Until her death in 1642, she never succeeds, in spite of many attempts, to be allowed to come back to France. She lives in the Spanish Netherlands from 1631 to 1639. Then, after a short passage through the United Provinces, she stays in London until 1641, to move out again to Cologne, where she finally dies. Whereas the Thirty Years War tears Europe to pieces, Mary de’ Médici weaves bonds not only with foreign princes, but also with other French banned emigrants, such as Gaston of Orleans or the duchess of Chevreuse. The study of this outstanding situation reveals official or secret networks, which are built up and undone around those emigrants. The making and good working of those networks are ensured by a pool of ambassadors, courtiers, servants, who have various profiles and follow different purposes. By rebuilding the individual stories of these men, we can disclose the organic logic of this complex and moving party, in which the news arise and flow. We try to provide an analysis from the point of view of the material support and routing of information, but also according to its content, which may vary following the peculiar circumstances and political issues. The circulation and changes of the news affect the diplomatic deeds in a way that must be investigated and explained. Moreover, information, as a mirror of political thoughts, is reflecting codes, symbols, representations and behaviors. Therefore, the setting and showing of information can be seen as a significant matter for political studies.

This is a study on crowns, wreaths and diadems as role symbols in Peter Paul Rubens’s 24 paintings for Marie de’Medici in Paris, 1622 – 1625. In these paintings, historic facts are shown with the addition of mythological gods and their symbols giving allegorical scenes, where sometimes also Christian symbols or subjects can be traced. A reader of these painted motifs therefore can choose to see the symbols as regal, Christian or mythological. The crown and the wreaths rarely present a challenge in modern interpretations, but the magnificent diadem does. Rubens chooses this diadem for higher goddesses, and for the queen a couple of times too. For some reason, this symbol is mostly misread in analyses. At this point in history, the crowns and the wreaths have been collected from divine spheres and turned into physical objects on earth used by the high and mighty. The large diadem has not; it is still only a symbol on a goddess. If and when put on a human in a portrait, the symbol gives the lady the abilities and characters of a goddess. Rubens uses his own design when turning this symbol into a physical picture;it is a high, pointed diadem with pearls and coloured gems set in gold. He has used it on goddesses both before and after the Medici commission. Today, we have seen numerous spectacular headpieces like this from late 18th century an onwards, wherefore it is an easy mistake to believe that Rubens copied what he saw instead of, as he actually did, foreboding a coming fashion. In addition to confirming this, I also suggest that it is the highest goddess Juno queen Marie is personifying. Juno is mostly known today as a goddess for women and childbirth. But she had far more masculine tasks in earlier days: she was seen as the saviour of the country and a special counsellor of the state. These two important roles are exactly what Marie de’ Medici took on when acting as regent for her young son, Louis XIII,after the murder of her husband, the late Henry IV. By putting Juno’s diadem on Marie’s head, when sitting on a throne, the divine abilities are manifested according to how a historic period could be transferred to the allegorical language in a painting at the time.

Cardinal Richelieu is traditionally accredited with defeating the power of the grands, the upper echelon of the French nobility, as part of his supposedly successful project for monarchical absolutism. Modern historians have recast Richelieu as a nobleman of his time, who advanced himself within the social and political hierarchies through marriage alliances and patronage. He therefore worked hard to forge alliances with the grands rather than trying to destroy them. Yet his ministry was riven by persistent noble conspiracies and rebellions, which have gone largely without systematic investigation. This study examines the nature and causes of that unrest during Richelieu’s final six years, offering a radical re-assessment of the opposition and the politics of the period. Noble conspiracy was not just a by-product of government by a first minister, but reflected the factional nature of Richelieu’s approach. Factional rivalry was exacerbated by the emergence, after 1638, of a struggle for the anticipated regency. After this, Richelieu took a more hostile approach to his adversaries, forcing them to adopt strong countermeasures in order to preserve their positions. Richelieu’s opponents were surprisingly successful in asserting their independence. As well as enjoying widespread domestic support, they allied with the Habsburg powers to engineer military rebellion, posing a major threat to the Cardinal and undermining the war effort against Spain. The Spanish set their stall out for a long-term war, expecting that Richelieu’s opponents would eventually gain power and negotiate peace on more flexible terms. The ability of the grands to re-assert themselves was still a dominant characteristic of French politics. Richelieu’s legacy, on his death in 1642, was a highly volatile political situation in which success was still a long way off for France. These findings suggest the catalytic impact of Habsburg power on France’s internal divisions, which should consequently be seen as integral to the forging of the ancien régime.

Dire qu’il n’est pas possible de séparer la religion de la politique avant le XVIIIe siècle, c’est énoncer un lieu commun. Mais comment étudier l’influence des représentations religieuses sur la politique ? Si depuis Marc Bloch et Ernst Kantorowicz de nombreuses études ont été publiées sur la légitimation religieuse du pouvoir temporel, les autres dimensions de la politique, c’est à dire le développement et la réalisation de politiques, ont souvent été négligées. Ainsi, l’historiographie sur la Guerre de Trente Ans et la politique étrangère française sous Louis XIII distingue d’un côté des acteurs motivés religieusement et de l’autre des acteurs motivés politiquement et, de ce fait, ne peut appréhender de manière satisfaisante les débats politiques du XVIIe siècle.En examinant l’impact de la Réforme catholique sur le calcul politique, cette thèse de doctorat propose une démarche qui rassemble la religion et la politique dans toutes ses dimensions. Ce faisant, elle tente de développer de nouveaux récits de l’histoire politique. Les questions du parti dévot, de la Fronde, du caractère de la Guerre de Trente Ans et de l’échec de la monarchie polonaise sont reconsidérées. En outre, elle cherche à donner une vue d’ensemble de la Réforme catholique et de ses conséquences politiques. Une grande attention est accordée à l’émergence de nouveaux cultes politico-religieux favorisant la construction étatique, et en particulier au patronage marial étatique. / Common wisdom says that it is not possible to dissociate religion from politics before the 18th century. But how is it possible to study the influence of religious patterns on political action? Since Marc Bloch and Ernst Kantorowicz, a great deal of scholarly work has been written on religious legitimization of political power, yet the other dimensions of politics - the development of policies and the struggles around it - have been somewhat neglected. Historiography about the Thirty Years’ War or French foreign policy under Louis XIII still postulates a dichotomy between religiously and politically motivated actors and, because of this, fails to analyse properly the political debates of the 17th century. Examining the influence of Catholic reform on political calculation in the first half of 17th century, the doctoral thesis proposes a way bridging religion and politics in all its dimensions, and in so doing develops new narratives of political history. The questions of the resistance to war in France, of the Fronde, of the character of the Thirty Years’ War, and of the failure of the Polish monarchy are re-considered. Furthermore, this work provides a general view of Catholic reform and of its impact on political life. It pays particular attention to the new religious-political cults propelling state construction, and especially to the State Marian patronage.

Les transformations qui interviennent en France à la suite des guerres de Religion modifient l’imbrication des sphères politique et religieuse. La scission entre protestants et catholiques, la triple reconstruction religieuse, nationale et étatique, les évolutions des pratiques et croyances religieuses ainsi que la nouvelle vigueur des gallicanismes induisent des mutations dans la dimension religieuse des conceptions du pouvoir royal entre le règne d’Henri IV et celui de Louis XIV, évolutions appréciables sur le plan symbolique. De 1589 à 1715, une iconographie abondante place le roi dans une situation religieuse, le met en rapport avec des personnages saints ou divins, ou souligne l’importance de son action en matière religieuse. Ces portraits du roi régnant ou de rois défunts, produits en des lieux disséminés sur le territoire métropolitain du XVIIe siècle, révèlent une autre image du pouvoir royal que l’iconographie plus amplement étudiée jusqu’ici. Elle intègre une sacralité héritée, fruit d’une longue construction médiévale dont l’importance se lit toujours au Grand Siècle, et des éléments neufs, qui passent en particulier par l’essor de cultes associant le roi et ses sujets, comme celui de saint Louis ou celui de Marie, marqué par le vœu de Louis XIII. Elle doit en outre se comprendre dans le cadre de l’évolution du droit divin, dans ses rapports avec l’autorité et le pouvoir du roi. L’image d’harmonie qui est élaborée témoigne de la place de cette iconographie dans la légitimation d’un ordre politique et social liant espace terrestre et monde céleste. La genèse de ces objets divers (peintures, sculptures, gravures, etc.), souvent éloignée de la cour, entretenant des relations parfois très ténues avec le pouvoir royal, ne peut être envisagée comme le fruit d’une propagande : elle souligne plutôt des fabrications collectives du portrait religieux du roi. Ainsi, cette thèse propose une histoire culturelle du politique, s’appuyant sur une approche iconographique intégrant les pratiques sociales et les théories politiques. / The transformations that occurred in France after the Wars of Religion altered the interweaving between the political and the religious spheres. The split between Protestants and Catholics, the rebuilding of the church, the nation and the state, the transformations of the religious beliefs and practices, and the new strength of the gallicanisms led to changes in the religious idea of the royal power between the reign of Henry IV and Louis XIV. These evolutions are assessable on a symbolic level. From 1589 to 1715, an abundant iconography places the monarch in a religious situation, puts him in touch with saints or God, or underlines the importance of his action in the religious field. These portraits of the reigning king or deceased kings, produced in dispatched places in the kingdom, reveal a different image of the royal power than the iconography that has most been studied up to now. It includes an inherited sacrality, built during the Middle Ages and still important in the 17th century, and new elements, which entail the growth of cults associating the monarch and his subjects, such as the cults of saint Louis and the Virgin Mary, marked by the vow of Louis XIII. It must furthermore be understood within the framework of the evolution of the divine right, in its links with the royal authority and power. It builds an image of harmony that shows the place of the iconography in the legitimization of a political and social order linking terrestrial and celestial spaces. The creation of these objects (paintings, sculptures, engravings, etc.), often far away from the court, often in loose relationships with the royal power, cannot be understood as propaganda: it rather emphasizes collective makings of the religious portrait of the king. Thus, this thesis offers a cultural history of the political field, leaning on an iconographic approach including social practices and political theories.

This thesis will contend that a permanent body of military force under royal command, a ‘standing army’, arose during the first three decades of the seventeenth century in France. Such a development constituted a transformation in the nature of the monarchy’s armed forces. It was achieved by encouraging elements of the French nobility to become long-term office-holders within royal military institutions. Those members of the nobility who joined the standing army were not coerced into doing so by the crown, but joined the new body of force because it provided them with a means of achieving one of the fundamental ambitions of the French nobility: social advancement for their family. The first four chapters of this thesis thus look at how the standing army emerged via the entrenchment of a system of permanent infantry regiments within France. They look at how certain families, particularly from the lower and middling nobility, attempted to monopolise offices within the regiments due to the social benefits they conferred. Some of the consequences that arose from the army becoming an institution in which ‘careers’ could be pursued, such as promotion and venality, will be examined, as will how elements of the the nobility were vital to the expansion of the standing army beyond its initial core of units. Chapters Five and Six will investigate how the emergence of this new type of force affected the most powerful noblemen of the realm, the grands. In particular, it will focus on those grands who held the prestigious supra-regimental military offices of Constable and Colonel General of the Infantry. The thesis concludes that the emergence of the standing army helped to alter considerably the relationship between the monarchy and the nobility by the end of the period in question. A more monarchy-centred army and state had begun to emerge in France by the late 1620s; a polity which might be dubbed the early ‘absolute monarchy’. However, such a state of affairs had only arisen due to the considerable concessions that the monarchy had made to the ambitions of certain elements of the nobility.

The Marillac were one of the most important noble families in early modern France. My analysis of this pivotal and deeply political family during the turbulent era of the French Wars of Religion (1562-1629) examines and explains the importance of the interaction of familial alliances, religion and diplomacy in the making of the state. This period represents a critical moment in the process of state development. In contrast to prevailing studies of early modern state formation that concentrate on a centrally-directed program, this dissertation argues that it was the expansion of family strategy, and its interplay with religion and diplomacy, that drove the ongoing construction of the early modern state. There was no blueprint for the creation of this state. Rather, it was born out of an accretion of policies formed by politically important clans working to advance their familial interests. By closely tracing the fortunes of the Marillac clan through archives and research libraries in France, this study discloses the nature of power in early modern Europe in its daily, practical manifestations. My project reaffirms the agency of the family and the individual in the making of the state. It showcases the importance of religious devotion to the formation of family strategy, and especially how Marillac women were drivers of this devotion. My research demonstrates how one family successfully negotiated the Wars of Religion. Additionally, I discuss the impactful role of the individual diplomat in the practice of foreign affairs. Finally, by tracing the fortunes of the Marillac family, I show how a family not only rises to power, but falls, as well as the consequences and limits of disgrace. My research will therefore contribute to the fields of early modern state-building, diplomacy, religious politics, and women and gender through the prism of Marillac family strategy and its interaction with religion and diplomacy.

Dans l'écriture de l'histoire immédiate, la pression et l'expérience de l'actualité, les valeurs, les sentiments et les intérêts personnels d'un historien peuvent le conduire à transformer le passé. L'exemple de l'historien des guerres de Religion françaises Pierre Matthieu montre comment la gestion des vérités passées s'avère délicate lorsque les historiens doivent faire des «choix éditoriaux». L'étude de la représentation qu'il fait des chefs ligueurs, de la Ligue et d'Henri IV dans son Histoire des derniers troubles de France (1594-1606) permet de comprendre le poids du présent sur l'écriture de l'histoire récente et la perception arrangée et significative qui s'en dégage pour le présent. Ce mémoire s'intéresse aux fonctions auxquelles répond cette représentation dans le processus de réconciliation nationale lancé par le premier Bourbon. Il donne un indice de la difficulté séculaire d'être acteur et rédacteur de l'histoire et permet de se demander si le présent est «historicisable».