321 |
Gesinsgeweld: 'n kriminologiese ondersoekJooste, Thomas Ignatius Muller 28 February 2005 (has links)
The purpose of this research was to describe and explain family violence in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. It was conducted by means of a literature review, followed by empirical research, based on police dockets, against the background of Seligman's theory on learned helplessness. Other theories were also applied eclectically. The literature review was used to design a research schedule (questionnaire). This schedule was used for data capturing from police dockets from the Crime Information Analysis Centre (CIAC) at their Gauteng Regional office in Johannesburg. From this data, a convenience sample consisting of 415 cases, was compiled. These cases were reported at the charge offices of Laudium, Alexandra, Hillbrow, Rietgat, Eersterust and Mamelodi, during the period between 1 January 2001 and 1 March 2002.
Domestic violence is caused by macrosocial-, gender- and relationship factors. These causes can be explained by certain aspects of structural- process- reaction and the learned helplesness theories. The adjudication of this causes and explanations focus on primary, secondary and tersiary aspects of prevention. Triggering facors, confrontation, crime incidents and restoring the equalibrium were studied in relation to the dynamics of domestic violence. All these factors such as causes, explanations, prevention and dynamics , are considered to explain the stabilization of domestic violence. / Die doel van hierdie navorsing was om gesinsgeweld in die Gauteng-Provinsie van
Suid-Afrika te beskryf en te verklaar. E)it is gedoen aan die hand van 'n
literatuurstudie, en is uitgebrei met 'n empiiiese ondersoek wat op polisiedossiere
gebaseer is, teen die agtergrond van Seligman se teorie van aangeleerde
hulpeloosheid, asook ander teoriee wat eklekties bygewerk is. Die literahmrstudie is
gebrnik om 'n skedule (vraelys) te ontwerp. Die navorsingskedule is gebruik vir
datavangs uit polisiedossiere. Die polisiedossiere van die Misdaadinligting-
Analisesentrum (MIAS) van Gauteng se streekkantoor in Johannesburg is gebruik vir
die samestelling van 'n geriefHkheidsteekproef bestaande uit 415 gevalle. Hierdie
gevalle kom uit die aanmeldings by die aanklagkantore van Laudium, Alexandra,
Hillbrow, Rietgat Eersterust en Mamelodi, tussen 1 Jamiaiie 2001 en 1 Maart 2002.
Makrososiale faktore, geslagsrolsosialisering en verhoudingsfaktore veroorsaak
gesinsgeweld. Sekere elemente van die struktuur- proses- reaksie- en aangeleerde
hulpeloosheidsteoriee kan dit verklaar. Die beregting van bogenoemde fokus op
primere, sekondere en tersiere voorkomingsaksies. Die dinamika waarop gefokus
word met betrekking tot gesinsgeweld sluit in aspekte soos: die snellerfaktore,
konfrontasie, die praktiese misdaadinsident en uiteindelik die herstelde ekwillibrium.
A1 die faktore (oorsake, verklarings, voorkoming en dinamika) lei uiteindelik tot die
stadium waar waar verduidelik word hoe gesinsgeweld gestabilliseer word. / Criminology / D. Litt. et Phil. (Criminology)
|
322 |
Gesinsgeweld: 'n kriminologiese ondersoekJooste, Thomas Ignatius Muller 28 February 2005 (has links)
The purpose of this research was to describe and explain family violence in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. It was conducted by means of a literature review, followed by empirical research, based on police dockets, against the background of Seligman's theory on learned helplessness. Other theories were also applied eclectically. The literature review was used to design a research schedule (questionnaire). This schedule was used for data capturing from police dockets from the Crime Information Analysis Centre (CIAC) at their Gauteng Regional office in Johannesburg. From this data, a convenience sample consisting of 415 cases, was compiled. These cases were reported at the charge offices of Laudium, Alexandra, Hillbrow, Rietgat, Eersterust and Mamelodi, during the period between 1 January 2001 and 1 March 2002.
Domestic violence is caused by macrosocial-, gender- and relationship factors. These causes can be explained by certain aspects of structural- process- reaction and the learned helplesness theories. The adjudication of this causes and explanations focus on primary, secondary and tersiary aspects of prevention. Triggering facors, confrontation, crime incidents and restoring the equalibrium were studied in relation to the dynamics of domestic violence. All these factors such as causes, explanations, prevention and dynamics , are considered to explain the stabilization of domestic violence. / Die doel van hierdie navorsing was om gesinsgeweld in die Gauteng-Provinsie van
Suid-Afrika te beskryf en te verklaar. E)it is gedoen aan die hand van 'n
literatuurstudie, en is uitgebrei met 'n empiiiese ondersoek wat op polisiedossiere
gebaseer is, teen die agtergrond van Seligman se teorie van aangeleerde
hulpeloosheid, asook ander teoriee wat eklekties bygewerk is. Die literahmrstudie is
gebrnik om 'n skedule (vraelys) te ontwerp. Die navorsingskedule is gebruik vir
datavangs uit polisiedossiere. Die polisiedossiere van die Misdaadinligting-
Analisesentrum (MIAS) van Gauteng se streekkantoor in Johannesburg is gebruik vir
die samestelling van 'n geriefHkheidsteekproef bestaande uit 415 gevalle. Hierdie
gevalle kom uit die aanmeldings by die aanklagkantore van Laudium, Alexandra,
Hillbrow, Rietgat Eersterust en Mamelodi, tussen 1 Jamiaiie 2001 en 1 Maart 2002.
Makrososiale faktore, geslagsrolsosialisering en verhoudingsfaktore veroorsaak
gesinsgeweld. Sekere elemente van die struktuur- proses- reaksie- en aangeleerde
hulpeloosheidsteoriee kan dit verklaar. Die beregting van bogenoemde fokus op
primere, sekondere en tersiere voorkomingsaksies. Die dinamika waarop gefokus
word met betrekking tot gesinsgeweld sluit in aspekte soos: die snellerfaktore,
konfrontasie, die praktiese misdaadinsident en uiteindelik die herstelde ekwillibrium.
A1 die faktore (oorsake, verklarings, voorkoming en dinamika) lei uiteindelik tot die
stadium waar waar verduidelik word hoe gesinsgeweld gestabilliseer word. / Criminology and Security Science / D. Litt. et Phil. (Criminology)
|
323 |
Getting it right operationalizing civilian capacity for conflict and post-conflict environments.McNaught, James A. January 1900 (has links)
"A paper submitted to the faculty of the NWC in partial satisfaction of the requirements of the JMO Department." / Title from title screen (viewed June 10, 2008). "February 14, 2005." Faculty advisor: Douglas Hime. "ADA464898"--URL. Includes bibliographical references (p. 24-27).
|
324 |
An Introductory Course in the Reading of Simple Graphic and Statistical Material for Use in Junior High SchoolsMcKenzie, Annie 01 January 1930 (has links) (PDF)
In the stories of olden times and in those of our own American Indians, we learned of the picture writing of primitive peoples. It became an early method of recording people's thoughts. This was a very useful method at a time when the race was young. This in turn was the beginning of our alphabet, later the beginning of shaping letters into words, and then word into sentences and paragraphs. As our world has grown older, new idea have come into use and we are no longer content to live as our grandparents lived. We travel by fast express trains, high powered auto- mobiles, airplanes, or zeppelins. The radio gives us the news before our papers containing it are on the street. are not able to talk with people on the other side of the world. Business men find this a very valuable means of doing business when time means money. The motion pictures bring us the story of the book we have not had time to read and the characters from its pages talk to us from the screen. In short, we must have quicker ways of doing things.
|
325 |
A Pragmatic Standard of Legal ValidityTyler, John 2012 May 1900 (has links)
American jurisprudence currently applies two incompatible validity standards to determine which laws are enforceable. The natural law tradition evaluates validity by an uncertain standard of divine law, and its methodology relies on contradictory views of human reason. Legal positivism, on the other hand, relies on a methodology that commits the analytic fallacy, separates law from its application, and produces an incomplete model of law.
These incompatible standards have created a schism in American jurisprudence that impairs the delivery of justice. This dissertation therefore formulates a new standard for legal validity. This new standard rejects the uncertainties and inconsistencies inherent in natural law theory. It also rejects the narrow linguistic methodology of legal positivism.
In their stead, this dissertation adopts a pragmatic methodology that develops a standard for legal validity based on actual legal experience. This approach focuses on the operations of law and its effects upon ongoing human activities, and it evaluates legal principles by applying the experimental method to the social consequences they produce. Because legal history provides a long record of past experimentation with legal principles, legal history is an essential feature of this method.
This new validity standard contains three principles. The principle of reason requires legal systems to respect every subject as a rational creature with a free will. The principle of reason also requires procedural due process to protect against the punishment of the innocent and the tyranny of the majority. Legal systems that respect their subjects' status as rational creatures with free wills permit their subjects to orient their own behavior. The principle of reason therefore requires substantive due process to ensure that laws provide dependable guideposts to individuals in orienting their behavior.
The principle of consent recognizes that the legitimacy of law derives from the consent of those subject to its power. Common law custom, the doctrine of stare decisis, and legislation sanctioned by the subjects' legitimate representatives all evidence consent.
The principle of autonomy establishes the authority of law. Laws must wield supremacy over political rulers, and political rulers must be subject to the same laws as other citizens. Political rulers may not arbitrarily alter the law to accord to their will.
Legal history demonstrates that, in the absence of a validity standard based on these principles, legal systems will not treat their subjects as ends in themselves. They will inevitably treat their subjects as mere means to other ends. Once laws do this, men have no rest from evil.
|
Page generated in 0.0535 seconds