鑒於中國大陸近年來觀光旅遊產業的快速發展，於2011年排名全球第二，深具市場潛力，兩岸四地整合行銷代理商早已瞄準這塊市場大餅。台灣規模最大的旅遊集團也因此成立了J整合行銷公司，專精於代理兩岸四地NTO組織的整合行銷規劃案，並於執行過程中逐漸掌握與NTO組織的人脈關係與共同持有的旅遊影音資源，累積公司獨特競爭優勢。 旅遊市場上，存在旅遊業者對銷售平台以及品牌行銷的需求，消費者對於旅遊訊息以及產品購買的需求，NTO組織對於景區行銷的需求。J整合行銷公司利用集團公司上下游供應鏈的整合，以及對旅遊整合行銷市場的競爭優勢，建構一個以影音資源結合旅遊綜合資訊網站平台為主的新商業模式，希望建立新的獲利機制以及更高的進入門檻。 本研究以J整合行銷公司作為主要研究對象，配合對NTO組織、旅遊業者、景區業者的問卷訪談，並且透過次級資料與過去研究發現建構新商業模式，並應用策略行銷4C理論分析與建構之。

根據內政部統計，2009年的總生育率推估為1.02，再創歷史新低，並遠低於西方工業先進國家平均1.06的水準。但在生育率持續創新低的環境下，坐月子中心產業的成長完全不受生育率低落的影響，在過去十幾年的發展下，目前在台灣，經由政府立案的產後護理之家及未立案的坐月子中心，已逾百家以上；而在高度競爭的環境下，為尋求差異的競爭策略，許多新進的業者將行銷的重心從服務導向轉而訴求提供高級的硬體設備及空間環境，如此的行銷模式也因獲消費者的認同而於近年帶動了產業內業者仿效的風潮。 本研究的目的，乃深入瞭解該產業的內涵與經營，並透過個案研究及消費者評價調查來探討不同定位的業者之行銷策略差異，並進行4C交換成本態勢分析，探討其處理各個成本的能力。 目前台灣坐月子中心產業可依目標市場的區隔將業者劃分為二大類，一是主打高端消費客層，強調提供尊榮、高級的坐月子享受氛圍，另一類則以服務能力為主要訴求。本研究發現，坐月子中心的經營看似標準化程度極高，但在不同的經營策略及目標客層下，業者間所面臨的4C交換成本問題實仍存有極大的差異。而就坐月子中心的產業特性而言，因產品技術的變化及差異性不大，故業者在外顯單位效益成本的管理控制上已趨成熟一致，降低內隱交換成本，將成為企業維持市場競爭力及地位的重要關鍵。

921後，政府與民間重新審視並修訂建築法，提升對建築物耐震能力的要求。A公司順勢切入市場，致力將此器材推廣至更多工程中。然而隔減震產品於國內裝置為時不長，相關產業鏈、市場面、學術與實務研究非常稀少，多集中在產品技術面。 本研究目的在瞭解A公司面對的問題與挑戰，並與A公司及策略夥伴共組團隊，透過研究深入分析，建立A公司產業價值鏈雛型，從產品、市場、垂直整合、規模、地理涵蓋範圍與競爭優勢各面向，分析A公司的現況與優勢劣勢，最後提出A公司的市場競爭策略。 首先回顧策略文獻，整理策略之定義、規劃方法與分析工具，對所屬產業的相關論述，再針對A公司進行環境分析、資源分析、SWOT分析，並選擇其主力制震壁產品線進行五力分析，最後以策略矩陣分析法、產業矩陣分析法，研究A公司目前的策略形態，找出其策略具競爭優勢的環境前提與條件前提，並以4C交換成本理論分析，進一步組合利益關係人之目標，分析其網路定位策略形態與未來的事業策略形態，最後提出建議A公司的功能決策與組織方式。 A公司由於技術水準高，進入時機早，研發能力強，具自有品牌實績，且居中程度高，形成其優勢之來源。領先全球的研發能力為A公司的獨特能力，使A公司掌握118個世界各國專利，得以在台灣市場獨家銷售金屬製隔震、制震產品，並與美國品牌B相互技術研發合作及授權，強化品牌聲譽。 未來A公司可以努力成為唯一取得綠建材標章的隔震、制震器材廠商，產品外觀塗裝標準化，強化自有品牌視覺風格與企業形象。針對台灣市場切入更具指標性質的豪宅建案，更聚焦於私人工程專案，建立台灣、中國市場供應商資料庫並因應需求增加中國市場代理商，努力取得製造成本下降的規模經濟，追求大中華地區銷售具體成長，並且將中國市場之生產基地轉移至中國。

自八O年代以後，台灣半導體通路產業即邁入了激烈的競爭時代。眾多高同質性的業者，相互競奪上游產品線的代理權，以及下游買者市場的交易權；業者的生存契機，主要來自於提供上、下游業者間進行商業交換的平台。因此，此一平台所能提昇的交換效率，及其處理跨組織間交換成本的能力，乃成為不容忽視的課題。半導體通路業為台灣資訊工業中，歷史悠久且具重要地位的產業；研究瞭解半導體通路產業之價值鏈活動，將有助於台灣半導體通路產業之促進升級。 半導體通路商所從事之價值鏈活動功能，予以分類概有商流、物流、金流、資訊流及技術流等五大項；其中，諸多研究證實——技術支援能力，乃屬半導體通路商之核心競爭力之一。過去有關半導體通路商的研究，大多是由競爭策略、企業資源規劃及整體通路之價值鏈活動等觀點著手，但專注於技術流部分，予以進行4C交換成本態勢分析之探討者，則尚未得見；因此，本研究乃有其創始性。 本研究以台灣地區的半導體通路商為研究對象，期望所做研究結果可供台灣半導體通路業者，做為規劃技術行銷策略之實務參考。本研究屬於質性之探索性研究，經由個案訪談及問卷之初級資料與次級資料的蒐集彙整，並以4C交換成本理論的四個主要變數：外顯單位效益成本、資訊搜尋成本、道德危機成本、專屬陷入成本，進行個案企業之比較分析，並歸納出下列之研究發現與結論： 1. 上游供應商與通路商之技術合作，其對通路商處理交換成本能力的需求排序為：道德危機成本、資訊搜尋成本、專屬陷入成本、外顯單位效益成本。 2. 技術性協力廠商與通路商之技術合作，其對通路商處理交換成本能力的需求排序：道德危機成本、外顯單位效益成本、資訊搜尋成本、專屬陷入成本。 3. 下游系統製造廠商與通路商之技術合作，其對通路商處理交換成本能力的需求為：外顯單位效益成本之功效，高於內隱交換成本之效能。 4. 規模經濟型之半導體通路商，其對下游系統製造商所提供之技術支援服務功能，外顯單位效益成本的優勢，高於內隱交換成本。 5. 利基型之半導體通路商，其對下游系統製造商所提供之技術支援服務功能，內隱交換成本優勢，高於外顯單位效益成本。 6. 經營低技術層次產品之半導體通路商，其對下游系統製造商所提供之技術支援服務功能，外顯單位效益成本的優勢，高於內隱交換成本。 / After the eighth decade, the channel industry of Taiwan semiconductor moved toward serious competition. Many of high similarity company compete with each other in the agency of product line source and the buyer market of OEM customer; the survival opportunity of company is to provide the platform for the exchange between the supplier and customer. Hence, the most critical point is to increase the efficiency and to reduce the exchange cost between the cross-organization in the platform. Semiconductor channel industry is long historical with important position in Taiwan information industry; to investigate and study the semiconductor channel industry will contribute to the research for the upgrade of semiconductor channel industry in Taiwan. The value chain activity of semiconductor channel can be break through into business flow, logistics, financial flow, information flow and technology flow; Among them, technical support ability has been approved to be one of the key competitiveness of the semiconductor channel by many researches. Most of the past researches stood on the views, such as competitive strategy, Enterprise Resource Planning and whole value chain activity, etc., but the point on the 4C exchanges cost co-opetition analysis in the technology flow has not been seen yet. Hence, it’s important for this research. This research is expected to provide the result for the practice reference of the technical marketing strategy to the Taiwan semiconductor channel by focusing on them. This research is belong to the qualitative exploratory research from the data collection of the primary and the secondary information in the interview cases and questionnaires, then to analyze the cases comparatively by the four primary parameters of the 4C exchange cost the cost: the external cost on utility, information searches, morals hazard and hold up asset specificity. Finally, the following important results have been pointed out: 1. The sort of the technical cooperation between the channel and the supplier to the requirement for the channel ability in dealing with exchange cost is: morals hazard, information searches, asset specificity and the external cost on utility. 2. The sort of the technical cooperation between the channel and the independent design house (IDH) to the requirement for the channel ability in dealing with exchange cost is: moral hazard, the external cost on utility, information searches and asset specificity. 3. The technical cooperation between the channel and the system manufacture customer to the requirement for the channel ability in dealing with exchange cost is: the effectiveness of the external cost on utility is higher than that of the inner exchange cost. 4. The technology support service function to the system manufacture customer from the semiconductor channel of the scale economic type is: the advantage of the external cost on utility is higher than that of the inner exchange cost. 5. The technology support service function to the system manufacture customer from the niche type semiconductor channel is: the advantage of the inner exchange cost is higher than that of the external cost on utility. 6. The technology support service function to the system manufacture customer from the semiconductor channel with operating in the low technical level product is: the advantage of the external cost on utility is higher than that of the inner exchange cost.

台灣自1994年首家廠商明基電通投入手機的研發，在1997年第一支自製手機問世，開啟手機產業嶄新的一頁，短短的十年間，成就「 手機代工王國」的美譽，並且在2006年攀上最高峰，手機整體出貨量終於突破1億支（黃建智，2007），全球市佔率也衝上13.8%（葉憶如，2007）。過去十年來，手機廠商的生存契機，主要來自於代工訂單的爭取。而基於各別公司生產策略之不同，自製與外包的程度差異頗大，一直以來釋單較積極的國際大廠只有美商Motorola。 台灣有研發及製造的實力，但是因為廠商過度集中於代工客戶的訂單，在代工大餅沒太大增加，但手機廠商家數直線成長的情況下，部份廠商乃積極轉型發展品牌並加強行銷管理。過去有關手機品牌發展的研究，大多是由競爭策略、整體通路之價值鏈活動等觀點著手，但專注於品牌策略，進行4C交換成本態勢分析之探討者，則尚不多見，因此，本研究乃有其先導性。 本研究以台灣地區的大學生手機市場為研究對象，期望所做研究結果可供台灣手機廠商，做為規劃手機品牌行銷策略之實務參考。本研究經由問卷調查以灰階層統計分析，並將其結果以4C交換成本理論的四個主要變數：外顯單位效益成本、資訊搜尋成本、道德危機成本、專屬陷入成本，進行大學生消費族群之消費偏好分析，並歸納出： 首先，台灣的手機品牌廠商在專利成本高於國際大廠而品牌知名度低於國際大廠的情況下，其「外顯單位效益成本」高。其次， 台灣的手機品牌在市場定位不是很清楚的情況下，它的「資訊搜尋成本」偏高。此外，與品牌歷史悠久的歐美品牌及積極擴張的韓國品牌比起來，台灣的手機品牌在消費者的心中屬於高「道德危機成本」風險的選擇。最後，在專屬資產的建立上面，台灣的手機廠商因為品牌的發展資歷較淺，經驗累積不足，在這一方面的操作略顯不成熟，因此對消費者而言也沒有很高的一般專屬陷入成本。 / In 1994, the first Taiwanese company –BenQ Corporation (former Acer Peripherals)– started the involvement on the research and development of mobile phone, and it was the beginning of the new era of mobile phone industry has been started since the launch of the first “Made in Taiwan” handset in 1997. After one decade, Taiwan became the “ODM Kingdom of mobile phone”, and reaching a historical high on 2006 of the overall shipping volume — 100M units, meanwhile achieved a 13.8% of the global market share. In the pass decade, the survival opportunity of Taiwanese mobile phone maker was from ODM orders。And Motorola was the only among the international brands, which released the ODM orders aggressively. However, as the source of ODM orders is not in an upward trend and the growing number of mobile pone makers are all concentrate on ODM business, as a result that part of makers try to move toward OBM business to look for a bigger room and better development. Most of the researches stood on the views about the OBM development on the competition strategies, value chain activities of the mobile phone channels, etc., but the point on the 4C exchange cost analysis has not been seen much, which is important for this research. This research is expected to provide the result for the practical reference of the branding marketing strategy to the Taiwanese mobile phone makers. This research is been developed by the survey of questionnaire and is been analyzed by Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Analytical Hierarchy Process（AHP）, and then through the four primary parameters of the 4C exchange costs, the cost： the external cost on utility, information searches, moral hazard and asset specificity. Finally, following important result have been pointed out: First of all, the patent cost is higher and the brand awareness is lower to the Taiwanese branded mobile phone makers compare to the international branded companies, and as a result of high external cost on utility. Next, due to the market positioning developed by most of the Taiwanese mobile phone makers is unclear; the cost of information searches is obviously high to consumers. In addition, compare to the well know western brands and the aggressive Korean brands, the choice of Taiwanese brands of mobile phone has high risk on morals hazard to consumers. Finally, as a new player for mobile phone branded business, the skill on branding manipulation requires more experiences, and the cost of asset specificity is low for consumers from the Taiwanese mobile phone brands.

旅遊業為我國未來產業發展的重點之一，再加上團體套裝旅遊一直是亞洲國家中最普遍及最受觀迎的旅遊型態之一，我國2009年的團體套裝旅遊比例即佔了35.6%。其中，領隊人員可以說是團體套裝旅遊的重要元素，不僅影響著該次旅遊品質的好壞，領隊也可藉由專業的服務取得旅客的信任，而獲得後續帶團的機會；是以，由於我國過去旅行社設立門檻不高，加上領隊掌握一定旅客數，不少領隊帶槍投靠或自立門戶，造成旅行業良莠不齊、競爭激烈。 因此，本研究欲探討現行旅行社對於領隊的管理模式，運用交易成本理論及4C交換成本理論架構，剖析旅行社、領隊與團體旅遊消費者間三方交換之關係，並對於旅行社提出適當的領隊管理建議，期盼能對於旅行產業的市場紊亂情形有所助益。而由於本研究議題過去缺乏學術研究成果且未被有系統的討論，故採用質性研究及深度訪談做為本論文的研究方法。 研究結果得知，透過訪談資料的整理與分析，歸納出兩種現行的領隊管理模式。管理模式1：旅行社著重於處理與消費者間的4C關係，並設法阻礙領隊與消費者間4C關係的建立，使消費者購買團體旅遊產品是出自於旅行社本身，而非領隊；管理模式2：旅行社與領隊共生共榮，在旅行社與消費者的交換關係方面，旅行社著重於產品的外顯單位效益成本；而在旅行社與領隊的交換關係方面，旅行社運用4C的處理得宜，維繫優秀的領隊，鞏固銷售。 本研究以4C交換成本理論，歸納出兩種領隊管理模式，建議後續研究者可針對旅行社背景，探討何種領隊管理模式對其最有利；另外，針對國內網路時代的盛行，有業者引進國外居家旅遊商業模式H.B.T.A.(Home Based Travel Agents)，類似於本研究所提出的管理模式2，後續研究者也可針對此議題進行深入探討。 / Travel industry will be one of the most promising industries in Taiwan; in addition, Group Package Tour is one of the most popular traveling types in Asian countries. In 2009, the percent of Group Package Tour in Taiwan is highly 35.6%. Especially, Tour leader (or tour escort) is the critical element of Group Package Tour.He (or she) can not only influence on the quality of travel, but also can get customers’ trust and the chances of business by professional service. Therefore, because of the low entry barrier of Travel industry and tour leader holding up some customers, lots of tour leaders job-hop or build up their own business. It makes travel industry highly competitive. For this reason, this study wants to use the Transaction Cost Theory and 4C Exchange Cost Theory to discuss current tour leader’s management model, and analyze the exchange relationship among travel agent, tour leader and Group Package Tour customer. Finally, this study wants to propose management recommendations for travel agents. However, this topic was less discussed in the past, so that this study uses qualitative research and in-depth interview as the research method. According to the research result, this study generalizes two kinds of tour leader’s management model. Model 1: Travel agents focus on the 4C relationship with consumers, and manage to hinder the 4C relationship between tour leader and consumer; Model 2: Travel agents cooperate with tour leader. Between travel agent and consumer, travel agents focus on C1. Between travel agent and tour leader, travel agents focus on the 4C relationship for holding up excellent tour leaders. For future research, this study suggests to discuss what travel agent background can benefit from two kinds of tour leader’s management model, or discuss H.B.T.A. (Home Based Travel Agents) deeply.

台灣資訊服務業的興起，係源自於企業需要資訊服務以解決重複性作業及複雜的管理面問題，以及過去外商進入台灣市場促成產業的競爭發展。台灣資訊服務業者普遍存在有營運資本小、資源有限、產業鏈分工界線不明確的先天體質問題，又同時面臨內需市場小、進入障礙低、競爭者眾之環境面挑戰，在對外開拓國際市場時，又得面對瞬息萬變的環境競爭因素。 資通訊科技服務係為國家基礎建設，資通訊服務是伴隨著商業應用需求而來。繼電子、資訊及通訊產品發展成為占有台灣高達3成外銷比重之後，政府已將資訊服務業列入重點推動產業，期許能在既有的硬體產業優勢下，結合資訊服務業者於軟體質量的提升，打造台灣核心競爭優勢。尤其是資訊服務產業中占比重最高之系統整合業者，應如何建立核心競爭優勢，推出具競爭力的產品服務，建立與產業客戶的長期合作關係，並確保在利基市場上的交易競爭優勢，以求獲利與永續經營發展，是值得關切的議題。 本論文分析架構係以交易成本理論和策略行銷4C理論為基礎，以A公司個案分析為主軸。透過探討A公司發展歷程中如何建立4C行銷策略優勢，包括如何降低客戶之C1：外顯單位效益成本、C2：資訊搜尋成本、C3：道德危機成本，以及運用C4：專屬陷入成本等，以建立市場行銷優勢，並運用4C優勢，建立良性之4C循環，以求長期經營發展。A公司之行銷策略將可提供類似規模與背景的資訊服務業者參考之用。 研究分析A公司個案後，發現其4C循環策略為，建立C1優勢加強競爭力，藉由與C3優勢強者合作拓展通路以降低C2，在客戶端建立有利的C3和C4，並為符合客戶之C1需求，再強化C1之產品效用，建立更強的C3和C4；但其中最為注重C1，因為C1是競爭力的來源，是構成其他3個C的支撐點。 朝聚焦策略發展，並做好基礎技術研發和國際品質認證等基本功；對產品有明確之STP（Segmentation, Target, Positioning），並掌握市場動向之洞察力（street-smart insight），以對的產品切入對的市場（do it right），形成有利的4C循環，才能夠維持優於同業之表現。並在穩健創新經營原則下，掌握利基市場，因時因地制宜的運用4C行銷策略，才能確保4C競爭優勢。 / The advancement of Taiwan IT services is derived from the business needs for information service to solve duplicate activities and complicate management problems, and also contributed by the industrial competitions from foreign IT service companies’ entering Taiwan market. In Taiwan IT service industry there widely exist endowment problems like small operation capital, limited resources, vague supply chains, etc., and environmental challenges, such as the small domestic market, low industrial barrier, furious competitions, etc., and furthermore, there are changeable competition factors in exploring international markets. ICT services are the fundamental national infrastructure, and are accompanied by business application needs. As we know, electronic, information and communication products account for more than 30% of Taiwan exports. After this, with the expectation to create the core competitive strength for Taiwan, IT service industry is one of the key promotion targets chosen by the government, to combine the current hardware industrial strength with the upgrade of software quality and volume. Especially for system integration services, the majority type of IT service industry, it is always worthy to study how to build up its core competence, launch competitive product services, and establish long-term relationship with customers to ensure transaction strength in the niche market, gain profits and sustain for long. The research is based on the analysis framework of transaction cost theory, and strategic marketing 4C theory. The case study：Company A is the axis. By researching the development of Company A, to find how it can accumulate 4C strength, including how to lower customers’ external cost on utility, cost of information searches, cost of moral hazards, and better use cost of assets specificity to enter positive 4C cycles in the long run. Its marketing strategy can be used as a reference for the similar IT service companies. The finding of Company A’s 4C cycles is that, build up C1 power to strengthen its competitiveness, by alliance with C3 power enabled partners to lower C2, and establish customers positive C3 and C4. In the meantime, in accordance with the customer’s C1 needs to enforce the utility of C1, there is C3 and C4 competitiveness strengthened furthermore. Above all, it is suggested to focus on C1, and be aware that C1 is the source of competitiveness, and the leverage of other 3Cs. Deploy focus strategy, and elaborate the basic techniques of fundamental technology research and international quality assurance, with specific product STP（Segmentation, Target, Positioning）, street-smart insight and do-it-right, will form positive 4C cycles, which can result in better performance in the industry. Under the stable, innovative operation principles, catch niche markets and use strategic marketing 4C deliberately to ensure 4C competitive strength.