Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / Uma abordagem política dos direitos humanos na intersecção com a teologia, no resgate da gênese dos direitos humanos enquanto construção histórica, no confronto com a violência e na perspectiva de uma política da convivência, a partir do pensamento de Hannah Arendt. A primeira parte situa a teologia no debate político acerca dos direitos humanos, sem fundamentá-los teologicamente, centralizando, desse modo, sua densidade política. Evidencia limites e potencialidades da intersecção entre teologia e política, a partir da compreensão de teologia enquanto saber transfigurado pelo amor e enquanto teologia patética. Estabelece um diálogo entre a percepção política de Jürgen Moltmann e a análise da tradição teológica de Hannah Arendt. A segunda parte aborda os direitos humanos como construção histórica no âmbito de uma comunidade política e reitera que os direitos humanos não provêm da essencialização da dignidade ou da igualdade humana. São apresentadas as origens dos direitos humanos e as diferenças em sua positivação na Declaração de Independência dos Estados Unidos da América e na Declaração de Direitos do Homem e do Cidadão, evidenciando que nem todas as pessoas eram reconhecidas como iguais e detentoras de direitos. Os direitos humanos integram o espaço público e reivindicam liberdade e emancipação contra a opressão e a violência, desde que garantidos e protegidos por uma comunidade política. A terceira parte atesta que a violência invade o espaço público, revelando a inexiqüibilidade dos direitos humanos. A violência do século XX impossibilitou o direito a ter direitos, o direito de se pertencer a uma comunidade política, o direito de construir um lar. A compreensão de violência associada à política reduz o poder a relações de dominação e de medo, destruindo a pluralidade humana, impossibilitando a ação em concerto. A quarta parte aponta os direitos humanos como referenciais imprescindíveis para o estabelecimento de um mundo comum, pautado na convivência e caracterizado pela valorização e pelo reconhecimento da pluralidade humana, ressaltando a importância do poder de perdoar, de prometer e a possibilidade de começar. Apesar da destruição do mundo comum, no qual prevalecem os consumidores, a violência, o vazio reflexivo, há possibilidades de novos inícios. A esperança provém da natalidade, da relação entre as pessoas singulares e da possibilidade de resistência que encoraja à ação. Em meio à destruição de tudo o que há entre as pessoas, os direitos humanos carregam possibilidades de convivência, iniciando movimentos de resistência. Nesse processo de construção, os direitos humanos revelam que o pertencer ao mundo precisa ser resgatado, primeiro, enquanto senso comum, e, em segundo lugar, pertencer ao mundo é o direito de torná-lo um lar, e não um deserto. Por isso, os direitos humanos possuem possibilidades de promover a convivência, contrariando as condições da política atual. / This research is a political approach to human rights in intersection with theology, in the rescue of the genesis of human rights as a historical construction, in the confrontation with violence and in the political perspective of living together, based on Hannah Arendt's thought. The first part places theology in the political debate concerning human rights, without basing them on the theological thought, centralizing, thus, the political density of human rights. It evidences limits and potentialities of the intersection between theology and politics, based on the understanding of theology as "wisdom transfigured by love" and as "pathetic theology". It establishes a dialogue between Jürgen Moltmann's political perception and Hannah Arendts analysis of the theological tradition. The second part approaches human rights as a historical construction in the sphere of a political community and reiterates the fact that human rights do not come from the naturalization of dignity or of human equality. The origins of human rights and the differences are presented in its positivist period exposed in the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America and in the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen, evidencing that not all people were recognized as equals and holders of rights. Human rights integrate the public space and demand freedom and emancipation against oppression and violence, as long as they are guaranteed and protected by a political community. The third part attests that violence invades the public sphere, revealing the unfeasibility of human rights. The violence of the twentieth century disabled the right of having rights, the right of belonging to a political community, the right of building a home. The understanding of violence, associated with politics reduces the power to relationships of dominance and relationships based on fear, destroying human plurality, disabling the action in concert. The fourth part points towards human rights as indispensable references for the establishment of a common world, ruled by living together and characterized by the valorization and the recognition of human plurality, emphasizing the importance of the power of forgiving, of promising and the possibility to begin. In spite of the destruction of the common world, in which consumers, violence, and reflexive emptiness prevail, there are possibilities of new beginnings. The hope comes from the birth rate, from the relationship among singular people and from the possibility of resistance which encourages action. Amid the destruction of everything that exists among people, human rights carry possibilities of living together and begin movements of resistance. Through this construction process, human rights reveal that the idea of belonging to the world needs to be rescued, firstly, as common sense, and, secondly, human rights reveal that belonging to the world is the right of turning it a home, not a desert. Therefore, the human rights possess possibilities to promote the living together, contradicting the conditions of the current politics.

Concevoir et habiter un quartier dit durable. Injonctions écologiques et dynamiques collectives à Beauregard (Rennes) et Les Brichères (Auxerre) L'aménagement des villes constitue un enjeu crucial pour la mise en œuvre d'un développement durable. Les discours politiques font désormais de la ville durable l'horizon de la transition des espaces urbains actuels, en cherchant à davantage prendre en compte les enjeux écologiques, sociaux, économiques et de gouvernance. Dans ce contexte, les projets de quartiers dits durables se multiplient en France depuis quelques années, constituant tant des « vitrines » que des « laboratoires » d'expérimentation de ce développement urbain durable. Les concepteurs de ces quartiers dits durables cherchent à créer un « nouvel art de vivre ensemble », s'appuyant sur des modes d'habiter plus écologiques et valorisant la vie collective dans ces quartiers. Dans cette thèse nous interrogeons les principes de conception de ces projets, et notamment la projection des modes d'habiter, que nous confrontons aux pratiques réelles des habitants. Notre recherche croise trois niveaux d'analyse. Les appels à projets, en mettant en avant des « bonnes pratiques » et des objectifs d' « exemplarité », participent d'une standardisation de la conception autour de quelques principes et dispositifs, notamment techniques. Dans ces appels à projets comme dans les projets locaux, les quartiers dits durables ont pour ambition de faire évoluer les modes d'habiter. Ils sont pensés au travers de la figure d'un habitant-type adhérant au projet écologique, responsabilisé dans ses pratiques individuelles et investi dans la vie collective. Dans deux quartiers que nous avons analysés, à Beauregard (Rennes) et Les Brichères (Auxerre), des dispositifs d'incitation comportementale sont mis en œuvre. Leur appréhension par les habitants, et les formes d'appropriation dépendent des trajectoires sociales et résidentielles. C'est en effet selon qu'ils aient choisi ou non de s'installer dans ces quartiers que les habitants adhèrent au projet écologique véhiculé par le projet urbain. Quartiers durables ; développement durable ; vivre ensemble ; injonctions écologiques ; bonnes pratiques ; projet urbain ; mode d'appropriation / Designing and living in a sustainable neighbourhood. Ecological orders and collective dynamics in Beauregard (Rennes) and Les Brichères (Auxerre) Urban planning is a key issue to implement sustainable development. Political discourses make sustainable city the goal of the transition of today's urban spaces looking for a better coverage of ecological, social, economic and governance issues.In this context, the number of so-called sustainable districts projects has been growing in France for the last few years, being both “showcases” and “laboratories” of experimentation of this urban sustainable development. Designers of these so-called sustainable districts are aiming to create a “new art of living together” by relying on more ecological ways of inhabiting and by enhancing a neighborhood collective living. In this thesis, we question the design principles of these projects, and specifically the idea of the ways of inhabiting that we confront to the real practices of the inhabitants. Our research crosses three levels of analysis. Calls for projects, putting forward “best practices” and objectives of exemplarity”, contribute to a standardization of conception around a few principles and devices, especially technical ones. In these calls for projects as in local projects, so-called sustainable neighborhoods have the ambition to change the ways of inhabiting. They are considered trough a typical inhabitant ways, embracing the ecological project, made responsible in his individual practices and invested in the neighborhood collective life. In two neighbourhoods we analyzed, Beauregard in Rennes and Les Brichères in Auxerre, devices of behavior incitation are set. Their understanding and appropriation by the inhabitants depend on social and residential trajectory. Indeed, it's whether they have chosen to move in these neighborhoods that the inhabitants embrace the ecological project conveyed by the urban project. Sustainable neighborhoods; sustainable development; living together; ecological orders; best practices; urban project; mode of appropriation

Le présent mémoire part du constat qu’une thématisation redondante des motifs de l’excès et de la saturation constitue l’un des traits caractéristiques de la dramaturgie québécoise contemporaine. Si ces motifs figurent dans de nombreux textes, ils se déploient de manière singulière et originale dans plusieurs d’entre eux. Notre étude le démontre en prenant pour corpus trois pièces phares issues du théâtre québécois des cinq dernières années, Faire des enfants d’Éric Noël, Ainsi parlait d’Étienne Lepage et Nous voir nous de Guillaume Corbeil. Notre analyse sociocritique permet de mettre en exergue le fait que ces œuvres mobilisent, intègrent et transforment des sociolectes, des fragments discursifs, des programmes idéologiques, des manières de parler ou de penser qui essaiment dans le discours social contemporain. Par le travail qu’elles exercent sur ce déjà-là, chacune d’elles propose un regard critique inédit sur le vivre-ensemble et sur la manière d’être au monde à l’ère actuelle. Quelque différentes qu’elles soient dans leur procès esthétique, une lecture comparative conduit néanmoins à dégager qu’elles élaborent toutes trois une représentation oxymorique de l’individu, qui balance sans cesse entre le trop plein et le manque. / This present master’s dissertation is based on the fact that excess and saturation are some of the recurring themes of Quebec’s contemporary drama. If these themes are present in a lot of plays, they extend uncannily in a unique way in some of them. This particularity is revealed by the analysis of three important and recent Quebec plays, which are Faire des enfants by Éric Noël, Ainsi parlait by Étienne Lepage and Nous voir nous by Guillaume Corbeil. Our sociocritic study of these plays allows to point out the fact that they mobilize, take over and transform different sociolects, discursive fragments, ideological programs, languages and ways of talking or thinking that are swarming in the contemporary social discourse. By the work they do on the “already there”, each of the plays offers a critical and original glance on the present living together. As different as their critical process may be, a comparative study of these texts however leads to show that they converge in an oxymoronic representation of the modern individual, always ambivalent between overfill and lack.

Dans un contexte de remise en cause de la présence animale au sein des sociétés humaines, cette thèse propose une analyse des conditions et des implications du vivre-ensemble entre les éléphants et les Khamti dans le Nord-Est indien. L’approche retenue se situe à la croisée de l’anthropologie des humains et des non-humains, de l’anthropologie de la nature, de l’anthropologie de la conservation, ainsi que de la sociologie et de la clinique du travail. L’enquête se base sur un travail ethnographique qui a pris en compte la participation et l’engagement intersubjectif des Khamti et des pachydermes. Elle traite des différents aspects du vivre-ensemble avec les éléphants : depuis la naissance, qui passe par la capture et la socialisation d’un éléphant de forêt, jusqu’à la manière dont évoluent et perdurent les liens initialement noués au travail. Élargissant l’objet d’étude à l’échelle nationale indienne et au sort des éléphants vivant à l’état de liberté naturelle, une réflexion est menée sur le devenir du vivre-ensemble. Les conclusions soulignent la centralité du travail dans les liens entre les Khamti et les éléphants. De manière plus générale, la thèse ouvre un questionnement sur la place des animaux dans les sociétés humaines. Concernant l’éléphant d’Asie, face aux effets pervers des projets de conservation engagés en faveur de l’espèce (menacée d’extinction) et contre les campagnes menées pour « libérer » les éléphants vivant parmi les hommes, les Khamti, en travaillant avec ces animaux, pérennisent leurs relations avec eux et apparaissent comme étant les meilleurs protecteurs des éléphants et, potentiellement, les meilleurs conservateurs de l’espèce aujourd’hui. / In a context of called into question the presence of animals within human societies, this thesis proposes an analysis of the conditions and implications of living together between elephants and the Khamtis in Northeast India. The approach adopted is at the crossroads of the anthropology of humans and non-humans, the anthropology of nature, the anthropology of conservation, as well as the sociology and clinic of work. The survey is based on an ethnographic work that took into account the participation and the intersubjective engagement of the Khamtis and the pachyderms. It deals with various aspects of living together with elephants: since the birth, which involves the capture and socialization of a forest elephant, to the way in which links initially tied evolve and persist in their work. Expanding the scope of the study on the Indian national level and on the fate of elephants living in a state of natural liberty, a reflection on the future of living together is made. The conclusions stress the centrality of work in the relationships between elephants and the Khamtis. More generally, this thesis opens a questioning of animal's place in human societies. Regarding the Asian elephant, against the side effects of conservation projects committed to the species (endangered) and against the campaigns to "liberate" the animals living among men, the Khamtis, by working with those animals, perpetuate their relationships with them and appear to be the best protectionists of elephants and, potentially, the best conservationists of the species nowadays.

Les questions du vivre ensemble et de notre rapport à l’altérité interrogent chercheurs et praticiens. Elles deviennent des questions vives dans le contexte de crise de ce début du siècle. Dans le lieu institutionnel qu’est l’école élémentaire, pour les enfants scolarisés, la rencontre avec l’Autre se poursuit et elle s’effectue, entre autres expériences, lors de conflits. Notre recherche se propose d'analyser les interactions, en milieu scolaire, entre des élèves et leur enseignante lors du traitement des situations conflictuelles. En présence de leur professeure, comment les élèves rapportent-ils les faits et les dires de l’Autre, et quelles sont les pratiques langagières de chacun pour sortir (ou non) du conflit ?Pour y répondre, nous avons construit un corpus, constitué à l’école élémentaire, que nous analysons avec des outils issus de la pragmatique et des travaux sur les interactions verbales. Il s’agit de relever la manière dont chacun, dans sa pratique langagière, appréhende l’Autre ; quelles sont les stratégies des élèves pour rendre compte en interaction du conflit ; comment, à travers le traitement de conflits, l’enseignante cherche à favoriser la rencontre à l’altérité et à développer, pour ses élèves, une formation à un comportement citoyen. / The questions of living together and our relationship to the otherness ponder researchers and practitioners. These questions have become even more vivid since the crisis at the beginning of the century. The encounter with the other continues for the school children and takes place in the institutional setting of elementary school, during conflicts, among others. Our research analyzes the interactions between school children and their teacher during the handling of conflicts. How and in which manner do pupils explain - in the presence of their teacher - the facts facing the other, and what are the language practices of each of them to solve (or not) the conflict? To answer these questions, we have constituted a body at the elementary school, which we analyze with tools derived from pragmatics and works on verbal interactions. It is a question of finding out the way in which each person, in his or her language practice, apprehends the other; What are the students' strategies to report conflicts; how does the teacher seek to encourage the encounter with the Otherness through the treatment of conflicts and to develop, for its pupils, a training to a citizen behavior.

Nous allons étudier la manière dont une communauté utilise les spécificités de sa culture et les restes de ses anciennes croyances pour permettre une meilleure adaptation des individus qui la compose à des situations et des contexte variés. Dans cette étude, nous nous sommes penchés sur la diaspora des Philippines de la ville de Montréal et sur le processus migratoire qui les a conduits dans cette métropole. Pour ce faire, nous allons prendre comme exemple le rituel de la Pabasa, mis en place par les Espagnols lors de la colonisation des îles de l’archipel des Philippines, lequel est encore aujourd’hui pratiqué à Montréal et tenter d’analyser comment ce rituel construit une nouvelle tradition ancrée dans la communauté. Nous allons nous interroger sur la façon dont cette pratique contribue au vivre ensemble. Notre mémoire comprendra plusieurs parties consacrées respectivement à : une série de repères sur la Pasyon et la Pabasa, la description de la collecte de nos données, une formulation de nos hypothèses issues de cette collecte sur le terrain, et un exposé de notre cadre théorique. Suivront ensuite dans l’ordre : le premier chapitre, présentant l’histoire de l’archipel et de sa communauté ainsi que le phénomène migratoire de celle-ci. Le second chapitre porte sur notre enquête de terrain et de la Pabasa. Le troisième et dernier chapitre, dans lequel nous confrontons notre cadre théorique à l’analyse des données issues de ce terrain. / Music, adaptation capacity, living together capacity. We hereby observe and analyze how a community may use its own traditions, its archaic beliefs, to engage a process which optimize the individual and general adaptability to present contexts, i.e. the immigration in Montréal. How the Pabasa, a ritual that was created by the Spanish during the colonization of the archipelago was, and still is today in Montréal, the way throughout the tradition transforms itself? And, how does this process contribute to or even achieves a living together ? Our dissertation will include several parts devoted respectively to: a series of benchmarks on the Pasyon and the Pabasa, the description of the collect of our data, a formulation of our hypotheses resulting from this collection in the field, and a presentation of our theoretical framework. Then will follow: the first chapter, presenting the history of the archipelago and its community and the migratory phenomenon of it. The second chapter is about the field and the Pabasa. Inside of the third and last chapter, we confront our theoretical framework to the analysis of data from this field.

Cette recherche, inscrite dans le cadre du « vivre ensemble », consiste à identifier une relation entre construction de savoirs et reconnaissance mutuelle des acteurs en situation d’apprentissage. Identifier cette relation nécessite de problématiser la place du sujet scolaire éducable au « vivre ensemble » et la didactique adaptée à cette éducabilité. Déterminée par un contexte d’apprentissage de plus en plus rationalisé, la place du sujet scolaire ne lui permet plus qu’un accès au savoir ayant perdu tout sens en dehors d’une efficience indispensable aux logiques économiques et technicistes. Une autre place peut-elle permettre un autre rapport au savoir, celle d’un sujet riche de sa complexité psychologique, sociale et émotionnelle ? Ces dimensions n’impliqueraient plutôt pas un apprentissage interactif autorisant des expériences émotionnelles susceptibles d’assurer les conditions d’une reconnaissance mutuelle dans l’apprendre ? La recherche de terrain porte sur une situation interactive de lecture compréhension d’albums par un groupe identique de six enfants sur les trois ans du cycle 2. L’entretien, mené par les professeurs respectifs, se réalise selon le guide d’entretien d’un questionnement. Ce dernier a pour but de favoriser l’interprétation par le canal d’expériences émotionnelles singulières et d’aider à transformer les informations narratives en significations morales ou idéologiques comme outil de l’action de l’élève. Les outils d’analyses portent sur l’identification de l’interface des expériences émotionnelles traduites par le verbal et le non verbal des co-énonciations et leur rôle dans la reconnaissance identification et la reconnaissance mutuelle des acteurs. / The aim of this research, as part of the framework "Living Together", is to identify a relationship between the construction of knowledge and the mutual recognition of actors in a learning situation. To identify this relationship implies questioning not only the situation of the trainable school subject as to the framework "Living Together" but also the suitable didactics for this trainability. Due to an increasing rationalized learning context, the current situation only allows the school subject to acquire a knowledge which has lost all meaning beyond an efficiency dictated by economic and technical logics. Can there be a different approach to knowledge construction - that of a pupil complex and rich in psychological, social and emotional aspects? Should these dimensions not rather imply an interactive construction of knowledge, allowing for emotional experiences to ensure the conditions for mutual recognition in the learning process? The conducted field research has been based on interactive sessions of story reading to the same group of six children during three years of cycle #2. The interviews, conducted by the respective teachers, have been conducted according to the established guidelines for questioning. The purpose of the latter is to facilitate the interpretation through singular emotional experiences and to help transform narrative information into moral or ideological meanings, which can then be used as a tool by the school subject. The analytical tools focus on the identification of emotional experiences interface, through verbal and non-verbal exchanges, and their role in identity construction as well as mutual recognition of the stake holders.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-29T14:16:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Marlene Bueno Zola.pdf: 2474914 bytes, checksum: 7ba1dd333be28c818f9f075b1f0c6ec3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-11-23 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / The familiar and the communitarian living together and the centrality of the family in the public/social policies are current themes, in the international environment. In response to the demand of its debate, this thesis has for object the analysis of the different configurations of the social protection systems from the inter-relationship of the family with the State. It starts from the hypothesis that these policies do not incorporate, in their design and deployment, the due attention to the several transformations, in general, verified in the families, compromising the adequate coverage, in terms of social protection of their members, especially children and teenagers. To check out this fact, the research objective focuses in distinguishing the determinations of structural nature and the day-to-day which affect the families, together with the institutional responses configured amidst of the social policy. The methodological process is founded in the social-historical analysis of the conceptual approaches about families, State and social protection and in the understanding of the present determinations, from recognizing the Social Question to the materializing of the political decision, initially expressed in norms, until its effectuation, in public benefits and services. Comprehended between 2005 and 2010, has for empirical basis a study of international scope conducted in the cities of São Bernardo do Campo, in Brazil; Bellavista, in Peru; Soriano, in Uruguay, for Latin America; and Milan, in Italy, and Nantes in France, for Europe. The analytical approximation on the profile of the families with demand for social protection allowed verifying important proximities and differences among these several locations. Among them, the similarity of the familiar structure, in which the feminine single parent standard and the more expressive difficulties related to economical issues, children education, insufficiency or inadequacy in general of the policies developed are outstanding. The comparative analysis of the partner cities allowed for the recognition of expressions of the Social Question which lead children and teenagers to institutional protection, and also the familiar support, both in the legislation area and in the benefits, programs, projects and services. The study confirms the priority given to the child and the teenager by the guidelines related to the set of protection actions carried out by the cities studied. Therefore it points out the strategic importance attributed to the family as the designed providing instance of social protection. As a matter of fact, the public intervention conditions are distinct. Among them, three kinds of family approach may be observed: the familism; the implicit policies of family support; and the adoption of explicit familiar policy / A convivência familiar e a comunitária e a centralidade da família nas políticas públicas/sociais são temas atuais, em âmbito internacional. Respondendo à exigência de seu debate, esta tese tem por objeto de análise as diferentes conformações dos sistemas de proteção social a partir da inter-relação da família com o Estado. Parte da hipótese de que essas políticas não incorporam, em seu desenho e implantação, a devida atenção às muitas transformações, de modo geral, constatadas nas famílias, comprometendo a cobertura adequada, em termos da proteção social de seus membros, especialmente das crianças e dos adolescentes. Para verificar esse fato, os objetivos da pesquisa concentram-se em distinguir as determinações de natureza estrutural e do cotidiano que afetam as famílias, em conjunto com as respostas institucionais configuradas no bojo da política social. O processo metodológico fundamenta-se na análise sócio-histórica das abordagens conceituais sobre família, Estado e proteção social e na compreensão das determinações presentes, desde o reconhecimento da questão social à concretização da decisão política, inicialmente expressa em normatizações, até a sua efetivação, em benefícios e serviços públicos. Compreendida no período de 2005 a 2010, tem como base empírica um estudo de âmbito internacional realizado nas cidades de São Bernardo do Campo, no Brasil; Bellavista, no Peru; Soriano, no Uruguai, pela América Latina. E Milão, na Itália, e Nantes, na França, pela Europa. A aproximação analítica sobre o perfil das famílias com demanda de proteção social permitiu constatar importantes proximidades e diferenças entre esses vários locais. Entre elas, a semelhança quanto à estrutura familiar, em que se destacam o padrão monoparental feminino e as dificuldades mais expressivas relacionadas a questões econômicas, educação dos filhos, insuficiência ou inadequação no geral quanto às políticas desenvolvidas. A análise comparada das cidades sócias possibilitou reconhecer expressões da questão social que conduzem crianças e adolescentes ao acolhimento institucional, e também de apoio familiar, tanto no plano da legislação como no dos benefícios, programas, projetos e serviços. O estudo confirma a prioridade conferida à criança e ao adolescente pelas diretrizes referentes ao conjunto de ações de proteção empreendidas nas cidades estudadas. Aponta assim a importância estratégica atribuída à família como a instância provedora de proteção social. De fato, as condições de intervenção pública distinguem-se. Entre elas, podem ser observadas três modalidades de abordagem da família: o familismo; as políticas implícitas de apoio familiar; e a adoção de uma política familiar explícita

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-29T14:17:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Walkyria Acquesta Dias.pdf: 812326 bytes, checksum: 964e011f0bc5578664096f19b599121a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-05-20 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / This study discusses the practice of a pilot project of family foster care in the light of concepts considered relevant to the subject: ethical-political suffering, bond and attachment, family, resilience and social policy. It also refers to studies on the specific theme of foster family works in Brazil in recent years. From the monitoring of a child and a teenager during a process of formal family fostering, it tries to understand the contribution of this proceeding as they return to their birth families. It especially shows how the experience of living together was set up considering the relationship between the individuals as well as how the learning and other gains, both for the individual and the family, were developed during the process. It discusses the experience of living together, both within the birth and the foster family, as well as between the families themselves, highlighting the subject of affective ties in contexts of social vulnerability. In this regard, it is highlighted that the previously established relationship with the birth family is not affected by the new ties built with the foster family, the latter, moreover, providing itself as another reference of respect and affection for both the individual and their family. Being a pilot project designed for a public policy, it deals with structural issues, relating them to ideas concerning the experience of living in a family. Accordingly, the study addresses cross-sectoral issues when implementing the measure, demanding a democratic management and clarity of roles, so that the actions of various institutions involved ensure the aims of the proposal, without overlapping themselves or neglecting the families and their children. Despite some difficulties it is concluded that the results indicate elements of the experience that can contribute to the construction within the municipalities of a more comprehensive action in order to guarantee the right of children and adolescents to live with a family and a community / O presente estudo discute a prática de um projeto piloto de acolhimento familiar, à luz da contribuição de conceitos julgados pertinentes ao tema: sofrimento éticopolítico, vínculo e apego, família, resiliência e política social. Referencia-se, ainda, em estudos sobre o tema específico dos trabalhos de acolhimento familiar realizados no Brasil nos últimos anos. A partir do acompanhamento de uma criança e de um adolescente durante um processo de acolhimento formal, busca-se compreender a contribuição dessa medida para seu retorno às respectivas famílias de origem. Revela, sobretudo, como o conviver foi se configurando, a partir das relações estabelecidas entre os sujeitos, bem como os aprendizados e outros ganhos, tanto individuais como familiares, foram se compondo durante o processo. Discute-se a convivência, tanto internamente às famílias de origem e às acolhedoras, como entre ambas, ressaltando a questão dos vínculos afetivos em contextos de vulnerabilidade social. Nesse aspecto, destaca-se que o vínculo anteriormente estabelecido com a família de origem não é comprometido por novos vínculos firmados com a família acolhedora, podendo esta última, ainda, constituir-se como outra referência de relação e afeto tanto para o indivíduo acolhido como para sua família. Tratando-se de um projeto piloto, dentro da formulação de uma política pública, abordam-se questões estruturais, relacionando-as a reflexões acerca do conviver em família. Nesse sentido, o estudo aborda questões relativas à intersetorialidade na execução da medida, o que exige uma gestão democrática e clareza de papéis, para que as ações das várias instituições garantam as finalidades da proposta, sem sobreporem-se ou negligenciarem as famílias e seus filhos. Apesar de algumas das dificuldades constatadas, conclui-se que os resultados indicam elementos presentes na experiência que podem contribuir para a construção, no âmbito dos municípios, de ações mais abrangentes quanto à garantia do direito das crianças e adolescentes à convivência familiar e comunitária

« Impolitesse », « manque de savoir-vivre », « petits désordres », voire même « infraction pénale », sont autant de qualificatifs utilisés pour dénoncer les effets néfastes de l’incivilité dans les relations sociales. Présentée comme « le » phénomène responsable des maux de la société, les mesures informelles pour endiguer l’incivilité se multiplient. Néanmoins, celles-ci se révélant insuffisantes à contenir son expansion, l’intervention de la matière juridique apparaît inéluctable. En effet, le droit, et plus spécialement le droit privé, qui a pour fonction de réguler les relations entre les particuliers, ne peut ignorer la pression exercée par le groupe social pour contraindre les citoyens à respecter les règles élémentaires de la vie en société. S’il faut alors saluer l’intervention du législateur pour dénoncer et cantonner les dangers de l’incivilité, la méthode utilisée pour ce faire est fortement contestable. Méconnaissant la logique qui préside à l’élaboration de toute règle de droit, il ne s’est effectivement pas interrogé sur ce que recouvre précisément l’incivilité, se contentant de reprendre à son compte les études sociologiques liant « incivilité » et « insécurité ». De la sorte, seul le droit pénal a été utilisé pour traiter un comportement par nature peu attentatoire à l’ordre public. Or, dans une perspective de véritable juridicisation de l’incivilité, cette méprise doit être corrigée. Pour cela, il convient de dégager les contours de la notion d’incivilité juridique, puis de l’assortir d’un régime juridique propre, susceptible de permettre aux citoyens de mieux « vivre ensemble », en préservant les conditions essentielles à une société démocratique. / « Rudeness », « want of mannerliness », « behaviour disturbances » or even « criminal offence » belong to numerous qualifiers used to name the harmful effects of incivility in social relations. Presented as « the » phenomenon responsible for evils afflicting our society, it more and more requires appropriate reprisals in order to avoid overwhelming increase. Nevertheless, as they are appearing insufficient to contain its expansion, the intervention of the lawmaker appears unavoidable. Indeed, the law, particularly private law meant for regulating relations between individuals cannot ignore the pressure exerted by the social group to compel individuals to respect basic rules of social life issues. If lawmaker’s interference has to be welcomed for incivilities containment, the method seems to be highly questionable. Considering the legislator’s lack of knowledge as far as law’s elaboration is concerned, it is advisable to precisely define what encompasses incivility and the borderline between incivility and insecurity. To these days, one has just affected to criminal law in order to cope with definitively barely offensive behaviour to public order. Considering the jurisdictionnal issues linked to incivility, correcting the initial misunderstanding is highly desirable. Henceforth, the concept and limits of incivility have to be properly identified. From which a specific system will be settled allowing citizens to better « living together » and as the same time preserving the essential conditions for a democratic society.