São cada vez mais freqüentes as queixas cosméticas na sociedade contemporânea objetivando a perfeição das formas do corpo e da pele. Os dermatologistas e cirurgiões plásticos são frequentemente consultados para avaliar e tratar essas queixas. Sendo assim é importante conhecer o Transtorno Dismórfico Corporal, inicialmente chamado de dismorfofobia que foi pouco estudado até recentemente. Esse transtorno é relativamente comum, por vezes incapacitante, e envolve uma percepção distorcida da imagem corporal caracterizada pela preocupação exagerada com um defeito imaginário na aparência ou com um mínimo defeito corporal presente. A maioria dos pacientes apresenta algum grau de prejuízo no funcionamento social e ocupacional e como resultado de suas queixas obsessivas com a aparência podem desenvolver comportamentos compulsivos, em casos mais graves há risco de suicídio. O nível de juízo crítico é prejudicado, não reconhecem que seu defeito é mínimo ou inexistente e freqüentemente procuram tratamentos cosméticos para um transtorno psíquico. A prevalência do transtorno na população geral é de 1 a 2% e em pacientes dermatológicos e de cirurgia cosmética de 2,9 a 16%. Neste estudo investigou-se a prevalência do Transtorno Dismórfico Corporal em pacientes dermatológicos. Entrevistadores treinados avaliaram com questionários e entrevistas semi-estruturadas (SCID) pacientes que procuravam tratamentos cosméticos clínicos e cirúrgicos (grupo Cosmiatria, n=150), que procuravam a dermatologia em geral (grupo Geral, n=150) e grupo controle de 50 pacientes. Três psiquiatras independentes fizeram a melhor estimativa diagnóstica (best estimate diagnosis). Foram diagnosticados 32 pacientes (Cosmiatria 14%; Geral 6,7%; Controle 2%). As diferenças entre as prevalências nos três grupos foram significativas, bem como entre o grupo da Cosmiatria e o Controle. A regressão logística mostrou maior prevalência na Cosmiatria do que no grupo Geral e Controle, em indivíduos solteiros e com menor índice de massa corpórea. A gravidade foi moderada (em escala validada) e as obsessões foram mais significativas no grupo da Cosmiatria do que no Geral. A aplicação de escala de avaliação de crenças mostrou que o nível de juízo crítico estava mais prejudicado nos pacientes do grupo da Cosmiatria. Nenhum paciente havia sido diagnosticado previamente. As comorbidades psiquiátricas foram freqüentes, principalmente o Transtorno Depressivo Maior e o Transtorno Obsessivo Compulsivo. A comparação de subgrupos de pacientes que tinham o Transtorno Dismórfico Corporal ou este associado ao Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo não mostrou diferenças significativas quanto às variáveis demográficas, comorbidades psiquiátricas, gravidade do transtorno ou nível de juízo crítico. As queixas dermatológicas mais freqüentes, em média duas, foram: discromias, acne, quanto à forma do corpo e ao envelhecimento. No grupo Cosmiatria a maioria dos pacientes já havia se submetido a tratamentos ou cirurgias cosméticas com resultados insatisfatórios. Os achados desse estudo apontam para uma maior prevalência em pacientes dermatológicos, principalmente nos que procuram tratamentos cosméticos, sugerindo que possam ser mais obsessivos e ter pior nível de juízo crítico em relação aos seus sintomas. Considerando a alta prevalência do Transtorno Dismórfico Corporal em pacientes dermatológicos e que os tratamentos cosméticos raramente melhoram seus sintomas, o treinamento dos profissionais para a investigação sistemática, diagnóstico e encaminhamento para tratamento psiquiátrico parece fundamental / Cosmetic concerns are increasingly pervading the contemporary societies, focusing on body shape and the skin perfection. Dermatologists and plastic surgeons are frequently consulted to evaluate and treat these concerns. Therefore it is important to be aware of the Body Dysmorphic Disorder, also known as dysmorphophobia, little studied until recently. This disorder is relatively common sometimes causing impairment involving a distorted perception of the body image characterized by an excessive preoccupation with an imagined or minimal appearance defect. Most of the patients experience some degree of impairment in social or occupational functioning and as a result, their obsessive thoughts, may lead to repetitive behaviors and in severe cases, to attempted suicide. Most individuals have poor insight and they do not acknowledge the defect is minimal or inexistent and seek out cosmetic treatments for a psychiatric disorder. The prevalence of this disorder among general population ranges from 1 to 2 % and in dermatological and cosmetic surgery patients ranges from 2, 9 to 16%. This study assessed the prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in dermatological patients. Trained interviewers used questionnaires (BDDQ) and semi-structured clinical interviews (SCID) to access patients seeking clinical or surgical cosmetic treatments (Cosmetic group, n=150), seeking dermatology in general (General group, n=150) and a control group of 50 subjects. Three independent psychiatrists assigned the best estimate diagnosis and 32 patients were diagnosed with the disorder (Cosmetic 14%, General 6, 7% and Control 2%). Prevalence differences in the three groups were significant, also for Cosmetic and Control groups. In the logistic regression a higher prevalence has been noticed in the Cosmetic group (when compared with General and Control groups), in patients that are not currently married and with less body mass index. The severity of the symptoms assessed by a validated scale (BDD-YBOCS) was moderate and the obsessions were significantly higher in the Cosmetic group as compared to the General one. Beliefs were assessed by a scale (BABS) and insight were significantly poorer in the Cosmetic group. None of the patients had been previously diagnosed. Psychiatric co-morbidities were frequent, mostly Major Depressive Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Comparing two patients subgroups with just Body Dysmorphic Disorder and patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder as comorbidity show no differences according to demographic variables, Axis I psychiatric comorbidity, symptoms severity and level of insight. The most frequent dermatological concerns were dyschromias, acne, the shape of the body and ageing. In the Cosmetical group most of the patients have performed clinical or surgical cosmetic treatments with poor results. Our findings provide further support for higher prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in dermatological patients, mainly those seeking cosmetic treatments and suggests that those patients might be more obsessive and having poorer insight into their symptoms. Taking into account the high prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in dermatological patients and cosmetic treatments that rarely improve symptoms there are compelling reasons for training professionals to systematically investigate, diagnose and refer these patients to adequate psychiatric treatment

São cada vez mais freqüentes as queixas cosméticas na sociedade contemporânea objetivando a perfeição das formas do corpo e da pele. Os dermatologistas e cirurgiões plásticos são frequentemente consultados para avaliar e tratar essas queixas. Sendo assim é importante conhecer o Transtorno Dismórfico Corporal, inicialmente chamado de dismorfofobia que foi pouco estudado até recentemente. Esse transtorno é relativamente comum, por vezes incapacitante, e envolve uma percepção distorcida da imagem corporal caracterizada pela preocupação exagerada com um defeito imaginário na aparência ou com um mínimo defeito corporal presente. A maioria dos pacientes apresenta algum grau de prejuízo no funcionamento social e ocupacional e como resultado de suas queixas obsessivas com a aparência podem desenvolver comportamentos compulsivos, em casos mais graves há risco de suicídio. O nível de juízo crítico é prejudicado, não reconhecem que seu defeito é mínimo ou inexistente e freqüentemente procuram tratamentos cosméticos para um transtorno psíquico. A prevalência do transtorno na população geral é de 1 a 2% e em pacientes dermatológicos e de cirurgia cosmética de 2,9 a 16%. Neste estudo investigou-se a prevalência do Transtorno Dismórfico Corporal em pacientes dermatológicos. Entrevistadores treinados avaliaram com questionários e entrevistas semi-estruturadas (SCID) pacientes que procuravam tratamentos cosméticos clínicos e cirúrgicos (grupo Cosmiatria, n=150), que procuravam a dermatologia em geral (grupo Geral, n=150) e grupo controle de 50 pacientes. Três psiquiatras independentes fizeram a melhor estimativa diagnóstica (best estimate diagnosis). Foram diagnosticados 32 pacientes (Cosmiatria 14%; Geral 6,7%; Controle 2%). As diferenças entre as prevalências nos três grupos foram significativas, bem como entre o grupo da Cosmiatria e o Controle. A regressão logística mostrou maior prevalência na Cosmiatria do que no grupo Geral e Controle, em indivíduos solteiros e com menor índice de massa corpórea. A gravidade foi moderada (em escala validada) e as obsessões foram mais significativas no grupo da Cosmiatria do que no Geral. A aplicação de escala de avaliação de crenças mostrou que o nível de juízo crítico estava mais prejudicado nos pacientes do grupo da Cosmiatria. Nenhum paciente havia sido diagnosticado previamente. As comorbidades psiquiátricas foram freqüentes, principalmente o Transtorno Depressivo Maior e o Transtorno Obsessivo Compulsivo. A comparação de subgrupos de pacientes que tinham o Transtorno Dismórfico Corporal ou este associado ao Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo não mostrou diferenças significativas quanto às variáveis demográficas, comorbidades psiquiátricas, gravidade do transtorno ou nível de juízo crítico. As queixas dermatológicas mais freqüentes, em média duas, foram: discromias, acne, quanto à forma do corpo e ao envelhecimento. No grupo Cosmiatria a maioria dos pacientes já havia se submetido a tratamentos ou cirurgias cosméticas com resultados insatisfatórios. Os achados desse estudo apontam para uma maior prevalência em pacientes dermatológicos, principalmente nos que procuram tratamentos cosméticos, sugerindo que possam ser mais obsessivos e ter pior nível de juízo crítico em relação aos seus sintomas. Considerando a alta prevalência do Transtorno Dismórfico Corporal em pacientes dermatológicos e que os tratamentos cosméticos raramente melhoram seus sintomas, o treinamento dos profissionais para a investigação sistemática, diagnóstico e encaminhamento para tratamento psiquiátrico parece fundamental / Cosmetic concerns are increasingly pervading the contemporary societies, focusing on body shape and the skin perfection. Dermatologists and plastic surgeons are frequently consulted to evaluate and treat these concerns. Therefore it is important to be aware of the Body Dysmorphic Disorder, also known as dysmorphophobia, little studied until recently. This disorder is relatively common sometimes causing impairment involving a distorted perception of the body image characterized by an excessive preoccupation with an imagined or minimal appearance defect. Most of the patients experience some degree of impairment in social or occupational functioning and as a result, their obsessive thoughts, may lead to repetitive behaviors and in severe cases, to attempted suicide. Most individuals have poor insight and they do not acknowledge the defect is minimal or inexistent and seek out cosmetic treatments for a psychiatric disorder. The prevalence of this disorder among general population ranges from 1 to 2 % and in dermatological and cosmetic surgery patients ranges from 2, 9 to 16%. This study assessed the prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in dermatological patients. Trained interviewers used questionnaires (BDDQ) and semi-structured clinical interviews (SCID) to access patients seeking clinical or surgical cosmetic treatments (Cosmetic group, n=150), seeking dermatology in general (General group, n=150) and a control group of 50 subjects. Three independent psychiatrists assigned the best estimate diagnosis and 32 patients were diagnosed with the disorder (Cosmetic 14%, General 6, 7% and Control 2%). Prevalence differences in the three groups were significant, also for Cosmetic and Control groups. In the logistic regression a higher prevalence has been noticed in the Cosmetic group (when compared with General and Control groups), in patients that are not currently married and with less body mass index. The severity of the symptoms assessed by a validated scale (BDD-YBOCS) was moderate and the obsessions were significantly higher in the Cosmetic group as compared to the General one. Beliefs were assessed by a scale (BABS) and insight were significantly poorer in the Cosmetic group. None of the patients had been previously diagnosed. Psychiatric co-morbidities were frequent, mostly Major Depressive Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Comparing two patients subgroups with just Body Dysmorphic Disorder and patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder as comorbidity show no differences according to demographic variables, Axis I psychiatric comorbidity, symptoms severity and level of insight. The most frequent dermatological concerns were dyschromias, acne, the shape of the body and ageing. In the Cosmetical group most of the patients have performed clinical or surgical cosmetic treatments with poor results. Our findings provide further support for higher prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in dermatological patients, mainly those seeking cosmetic treatments and suggests that those patients might be more obsessive and having poorer insight into their symptoms. Taking into account the high prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in dermatological patients and cosmetic treatments that rarely improve symptoms there are compelling reasons for training professionals to systematically investigate, diagnose and refer these patients to adequate psychiatric treatment

This thesis extends the understanding of the neural and neurochemical contributions to two forms of behavioural adaptation, reversal learning and contingency degradation, in which stimulus/action-reward contingencies are altered. The results are interpreted within the psychological framework of the compulsivity construct, and their implications for the pathological behaviour of obsessive-compulsive-disorder (OCD) are considered. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and striatum are key brain structures involved in reversal learning, as are the neurotransmitters serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and dopamine (DA) within those respective regions. However, there has been little empirical evidence of how these two structures and neurochemical systems interact, especially in the functional context of reversal learning. In Chapter Three, the impact of experimentally-induced reductions of 5-HT in the anterior OFC on monoamine levels in subcortical structures such as the striatum and amygdala was determined, DA being found to be significantly up-regulated in the amygdala. Functionally, 5-HT depletion of the OFC has previously been shown to induce deficits in reversal learning. To determine the possible causal significance of amygdala dopamine up-regulation for said reversal learning deficit, the effects of blocking the upregulation with the infusion of intra amygdala DA receptor antagonists following bilateral OFC 5-HT depletion were investigated in a reversal learning paradigm. In Chapter Four, the differential roles of regions of striatum were examined in visual reversal learning. Two recent investigations in non-human primates highlighted the role of the striatum in reversal learning,but pinpointed the critical region to be either the ventromedial caudate or the putamen. Marmosets were trained on a serial reversal task that allowed multiple acute neural manipulations, and the ventromedial caudate and putamen were then reversibly inactivated using the GABAA agonist muscimol. Results indicated dose-related impairments specifically in reversal learning within the putamen, with sparing of discrimination retention. By contrast, similar reversible inactivation of the caudate nucleus produced marked deficits in visual discrimination performance (retention). In Chapter Five, the neural basis of action-outcome contingency knowledge was investigated by inactivating distinct regions of the PFC, the perigenual ACC (pgACC; area 32) and the anterior OFC, and determining response sensitivity to the degradation of action-outcome contingencies. In previous work, excitotoxic lesions of either the pgACC or the OFC had been found to induce insensitivity to contingency degradation in marmosets. However, the design of that experiment did not allow specification of whether stimulus- or action-outcome associations were disrupted, and a precise neural locus could not be determined for the behavioural effects as the OFC lesions included parts of the lateral and medial OFC. I therefore developed a novel contingency degradation paradigm that distinguished between stimulus- and action-outcome associations to enable the study of acute pharmacological manipulations in both brain regions. The pgACC and OFC were reversibly inactivated using GABAA-GABAB agonists (muscimol-baclofen). Whereas the pgACC inactivation produced selective deficits in sensitivity to action-outcome contingency degradation, OFC inactivation reduced the suppressive effect of noncontingent reward on responding more generally but left intact sensitivity to degradation of the contingencies. These results are discussed in terms of different theories of the functions of the pgACC and OFC. In the final discussion the findings on the neural substrates of reversal learning and contingency degradation are drawn together in terms of their significance for theories of PFC involvement in cognitive control, and for the understanding of OCD and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

O transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo (TOC) é um transtorno psiquiátrico que acomete cerca de 1 a 3,1% das pessoas ao longo da vida. Embora o seu modelo neurobiológico ainda não esteja completamente estabelecido, inúmeras evidências apontam para áreas relacionadas ao circuito córtico-estriado-pálido-talâmico-cortical (CEPTC). Em especial, o córtex órbito-frontal (COF) é uma região que desempenha um papel fundamental dentro da hipótese fisiopatológica do TOC. Paralelamente, esta região já foi associada, em sujeitos saudáveis, com a habilidade de utilização espontânea da estratégia de agrupamento semântico na memorização de palavras - o que facilita sua evocação posterior. Ao mesmo tempo, estudos neuropsicológicos evidenciaram que pacientes com TOC apresentam déficits na memória episódica verbal (MEV) e que tais déficits poderiam ser mediados por dificuldades em funções executivas ligadas ao planejamento, como utilização de estratégias. Portanto, para testar a hipótese de que há diferenças no correlato neural da codificação da MEV entre pacientes com TOC e controles saudáveis, foi utilizado um teste neuropsicológico adaptado para ressonância magnética funcional (RMf): o paradigma tinha apresentação em bloco. O objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar a etapa de codificação da MEV e a capacidade de agrupamento semântico espontâneo em crianças e adolescentes com TOC. Assim, o paradigma foi constituído por duas listas de palavras: uma, semanticamente relacionada (SR), na qual as palavras eram divididas em categorias semânticas e outra, não relacionada (NR), na qual não havia relação aparente entre as palavras. O contraste de maior interesse do estudo foi a diferença entre essas duas condições (SR > NR). O nível de agrupamento semântico foi quantificado por um índice semântico. Os grupos foram formados por 25 crianças e adolescentes com TOC e 25 controles saudáveis, pareados por sexo, idade, escolaridade, preferência manual e QI. Embora os grupos estivessem pareados por essas características, eles se diferiram em sintomas clínicos, tais como sintomas de depressão, ansiedade e necessidade de rotina por parte da criança/adolescente. Os resultados comportamentais do teste de MEV mostraram que os grupos não se diferenciaram: ambos evocaram a mesma quantidade de palavras e não apresentaram diferenças no índice semântico. Apesar disso, a comparação entre os grupos - controlada para variáveis clínicas - revelou menor ativação (sinal BOLD) nos pacientes em diversas regiões cerebrais: frontais, parietais e occipito-temporais. Por outro lado, a análise de interação psicofisiológica (PPI) revelou que os pacientes apresentaram um aumento da conectividade do COF com regiões temporais em relação aos controles. Isso ocorreu para três das quatro regiões de interesse que foram posicionadas no COF: lateral e medial de ambos os hemisférios. Além disso, o grupo de pacientes apresentou uma correlação positiva entre o índice semântico e o efeito BOLD no COF, o que não ocorreu para o grupo controle. Esses resultados indicam diferenças no funcionamento cerebral de crianças e adolescentes com TOC tanto em regiões que estão dentro do modelo neurobiológico proposto para o TOC (circuito CEPTC), como fora dele também. De acordo com os resultados do presente estudo, as diferenças de ativação e de conectividade poderiam ser consideradas como um déficit latente, uma vez que ambos os grupos apresentaram o mesmo desempenho no paradigma / The obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a psychiatric disorder that affects 1-3.1% of the general population (lifetime rate). Although its neurobiological model has not been completely establish, numerous evidences indicate that areas of the cortico-striatalpale- thalamic-cortical (CSPTC) circuit are engaged in the disease. In particular, the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is a region that plays a key role in the pathophysiological hypothesis of OCD. In parallel to this, in healthy controls this region has been associated with the ability of using spontaneous strategies of semantic clustering at the encoding of related words - in a way that facilitates the posterior retrieval of these words. At the same time, neuropsychological studies showed that OCD patients present verbal episodic memory (VEM) deficits, and that these deficits could be mediated by executive dysfunction - like planing and utilization of strategies. Thus, to investigate the hypothesis that there are differences at the neural correlates of VEM encoding between children and adolescents with OCD and healthy controls, we used a blocked design functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) paradigm to evaluate both groups. The main objective of the study was to investigate the VEM encoding and the ability to spontaneously organize words according to their semantic categories. In order to do this, the fMRI paradigm consisted of two kinds of word lists: a semantically related list (SR), in which words were divided into semantic categories and a unrelated list (UR), were there was no apparent relationship between the words. However, the contrast of most interest of this study, was the difference between the conditions (\'SR > UR\'). The semantic clustering level was quantified by a semantic clustering index. Groups were constituted by 25 children and adolescents with OCD and 25 healthy controls paired by gender, age, educational level, handedness and IQ. Although both groups were matched for these characteristics, they differed in clinical symptoms such as depression, anxiety and routines. Behavioral results showed that the groups were similar in terms of retrieved words and semantic index. Nevertheless, the comparison between groups - controlled for clinical variables - showed less activation (BOLD signal) in patients in several brain regions: frontal, parietal and occipito-temporal. On the other hand, the psychophysiological interaction analysis (PPI) revealed that patients have had an increase in the OFC connectivity with the temporal regions. This has occurred in three of the four regions of interest that were placed in the OFC: lateral and medial of both hemispheres. Also, the patients showed a positive correlation between the semantic index and the BOLD effect in the OFC, which was not observed in the control group. These results suggest that there are differences in brain functioning of children and adolescents with OCD in regions that are inside/outside of the neurobiological model for OCD (CSPTC circuit). In accordance with the present results, these differences in brain activation and connectivity could be regarded as a latent deficit, since both groups presented the same behavioral performance

本研究旨在探討「健康、性格、習慣量表(HPH)」的臨床效度。HPH最初是由柯永河教授(民84)編製，後來廣泛使用在國內臨床場域中。發展至今已有中上程度的信效度支持，但過去較缺乏臨床上區辨與構念效度的研究，因此本研究旨在探討HPH區辨不同疾患的能力，以及以臨床疾患為受試時量尺之構念效度。 本研究回顧國內外類似測驗─MMPI、KMHQ、MCMI─的發展軌跡，並參照前人作法來進行HPH的臨床區辨效度研究。初步以臨床場域中常見的精神分裂症、重鬱症、低落型情感疾患、焦慮疾患，共257名患者為受試。先以共變數分析(ANCOVA)探討控制人口與臨床變項後，不同疾患組別在HPH的A、B、D類量尺的影響。再進一步使用羅吉斯迴歸(logistic regression)探討哪些量尺及其組合可以區辨兩兩疾患間的差異。最後，本研究也進行HPH的探索性因素分析(exploratory factor analysis)，以檢驗其臨床上的因素結構。 本研究發現，精神分裂症(A1)、躁症傾向(A2)、憂鬱自殺類(A3、B4、A4)、心理功能與健康(D1、D3、D4、D5、D6)量尺在共變數分析上的差異情形與假設大致相符，後續討論分析也支持強迫症(B5)量尺效度。羅吉斯迴歸中，A1、A3、B4、B5能在兩兩疾患間區辨有顯著預測力。其中A1能在精神分裂症與其他三組疾患的兩兩區辨中預測，A3能在重鬱症與另外兩組(精神分裂症、焦慮症)的兩兩區辨中預測，B4能在低落型情感與精神分裂症的兩兩區辨中預測，B5能在強迫症與其他疾患間的兩兩區辨中預測。但是在重鬱症與低落型情感疾患間，以及低落型情感與焦慮疾患間，沒有量尺能在兩者的區辨中有顯著預測力。而各兩兩疾患間整體區辨效果有中至高度的關聯性，分類正確率也多有七成以上，顯示HPH量表在臨床上的區辨效度獲得支持。 構念效度部分，A、D類量尺因素結構與當初編製的每個量尺構念相近，B類量尺構念雖與原量尺略有不同，但仍不違背原量尺編製架構，因此構念效度亦獲得支持。不過各量尺仍有值得編修之處，討論一節中針對結果提出HPH後續編修之建議。 最後，本研究也將此結果之臨床實務應用於討論一節中詳述，以供後續研究與實務者參考。 / The purpose of this study is to examine the clinical validity of the Health, Personality, and Habit Test (HPH). The HPH was developed by Dr. Yung-Ho Ko in 1995, and has been widely used in clinical settings. The HPH has demonstrated appropriate reliability and validity, but little research has been done on its differential and construct validity in the clinical settings. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the HPH’s ability to differentiate between disorders and its construct validity in clinical context. This research reviewed the developments of similar tests, such as MMPI, KMHQ, and MCMI, and examined validity of the HPH with the same methods. Subjects were 257 patients who suffered from common disorders in clinical settings, including schizophrenia, major depression, dysthymia, and anxiety disorders. ANCOVA was first used to explore whether different disorders have an effect on category A, B, and D scales after controlling demographic and clinical variables. Next, logistic regression was used to clarify which scales and combinations can differentiate between two of four disorders. Finally, exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the structure of HPH in clinical setting. The results of ANCOVA showed that the differences of schizophrenia scale (A1), manic scale (A2), depression/suicide scales (A3, B4, & A4), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) scale (B5), and psychological function and health scales (D1, D3, D4, D5, D6) were partly consistent with assumptions, supporting the differential validity of HPH. The results of logistic regression analysis also supported the validity of A1, A3, B4, and B5 scales. More specifically, A1 was able to differentiate schizophrenia from any other three disorders, A3 was able to differentiate MDD from schizophrenia and anxiety disorders, B4 was able to differentiate dysthymia from schizophrenia, and B5 was able to differentiate OCD from other disorders. However, none of the scales was able to differentiate MDD from dysthymia, nor were they able to differentiate dysthymia from anxiety disorders. Moreover, each of the logistic regression functions showed moderate to high correlations, and most of them achieved high overall hit rates (above 70%), providing support for the clinical differential validity of the HPH. As for construct validity, these factors in category A and D scales were essentially similar to original scales. Similarly, factors in category B scales were compatible to original scales though difference was found. In sum, these results lent support to the construct validity of the HPH in the clinical settings. However, refining of the scales is needed and suggestions are discussed. Finally, the practical uses of the findings were also discussed.

These British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines cover the range and aims of treatment for anxiety disorders. They are based explicitly on the available evidence and are presented as recommendations to aid clinical decision making in primary and secondary medical care. They may also serve as a source of information for patients and their carers. The recommendations are presented together with a more detailed review of the available evidence. A consensus meeting involving experts in anxiety disorders reviewed the main subject areas and considered the strength of evidence and its clinical implications. The guidelines were constructed after extensive feedback from participants and interested parties. The strength of supporting evidence for recommendations was rated. The guidelines cover the diagnosis of anxiety disorders and key steps in clinical management, including acute treatment, relapse prevention and approaches for patients who do not respond to first-line treatments.

O transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo (TOC) é um transtorno psiquiátrico que acomete cerca de 1 a 3,1% das pessoas ao longo da vida. Embora o seu modelo neurobiológico ainda não esteja completamente estabelecido, inúmeras evidências apontam para áreas relacionadas ao circuito córtico-estriado-pálido-talâmico-cortical (CEPTC). Em especial, o córtex órbito-frontal (COF) é uma região que desempenha um papel fundamental dentro da hipótese fisiopatológica do TOC. Paralelamente, esta região já foi associada, em sujeitos saudáveis, com a habilidade de utilização espontânea da estratégia de agrupamento semântico na memorização de palavras - o que facilita sua evocação posterior. Ao mesmo tempo, estudos neuropsicológicos evidenciaram que pacientes com TOC apresentam déficits na memória episódica verbal (MEV) e que tais déficits poderiam ser mediados por dificuldades em funções executivas ligadas ao planejamento, como utilização de estratégias. Portanto, para testar a hipótese de que há diferenças no correlato neural da codificação da MEV entre pacientes com TOC e controles saudáveis, foi utilizado um teste neuropsicológico adaptado para ressonância magnética funcional (RMf): o paradigma tinha apresentação em bloco. O objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar a etapa de codificação da MEV e a capacidade de agrupamento semântico espontâneo em crianças e adolescentes com TOC. Assim, o paradigma foi constituído por duas listas de palavras: uma, semanticamente relacionada (SR), na qual as palavras eram divididas em categorias semânticas e outra, não relacionada (NR), na qual não havia relação aparente entre as palavras. O contraste de maior interesse do estudo foi a diferença entre essas duas condições (SR > NR). O nível de agrupamento semântico foi quantificado por um índice semântico. Os grupos foram formados por 25 crianças e adolescentes com TOC e 25 controles saudáveis, pareados por sexo, idade, escolaridade, preferência manual e QI. Embora os grupos estivessem pareados por essas características, eles se diferiram em sintomas clínicos, tais como sintomas de depressão, ansiedade e necessidade de rotina por parte da criança/adolescente. Os resultados comportamentais do teste de MEV mostraram que os grupos não se diferenciaram: ambos evocaram a mesma quantidade de palavras e não apresentaram diferenças no índice semântico. Apesar disso, a comparação entre os grupos - controlada para variáveis clínicas - revelou menor ativação (sinal BOLD) nos pacientes em diversas regiões cerebrais: frontais, parietais e occipito-temporais. Por outro lado, a análise de interação psicofisiológica (PPI) revelou que os pacientes apresentaram um aumento da conectividade do COF com regiões temporais em relação aos controles. Isso ocorreu para três das quatro regiões de interesse que foram posicionadas no COF: lateral e medial de ambos os hemisférios. Além disso, o grupo de pacientes apresentou uma correlação positiva entre o índice semântico e o efeito BOLD no COF, o que não ocorreu para o grupo controle. Esses resultados indicam diferenças no funcionamento cerebral de crianças e adolescentes com TOC tanto em regiões que estão dentro do modelo neurobiológico proposto para o TOC (circuito CEPTC), como fora dele também. De acordo com os resultados do presente estudo, as diferenças de ativação e de conectividade poderiam ser consideradas como um déficit latente, uma vez que ambos os grupos apresentaram o mesmo desempenho no paradigma / The obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a psychiatric disorder that affects 1-3.1% of the general population (lifetime rate). Although its neurobiological model has not been completely establish, numerous evidences indicate that areas of the cortico-striatalpale- thalamic-cortical (CSPTC) circuit are engaged in the disease. In particular, the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is a region that plays a key role in the pathophysiological hypothesis of OCD. In parallel to this, in healthy controls this region has been associated with the ability of using spontaneous strategies of semantic clustering at the encoding of related words - in a way that facilitates the posterior retrieval of these words. At the same time, neuropsychological studies showed that OCD patients present verbal episodic memory (VEM) deficits, and that these deficits could be mediated by executive dysfunction - like planing and utilization of strategies. Thus, to investigate the hypothesis that there are differences at the neural correlates of VEM encoding between children and adolescents with OCD and healthy controls, we used a blocked design functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) paradigm to evaluate both groups. The main objective of the study was to investigate the VEM encoding and the ability to spontaneously organize words according to their semantic categories. In order to do this, the fMRI paradigm consisted of two kinds of word lists: a semantically related list (SR), in which words were divided into semantic categories and a unrelated list (UR), were there was no apparent relationship between the words. However, the contrast of most interest of this study, was the difference between the conditions (\'SR > UR\'). The semantic clustering level was quantified by a semantic clustering index. Groups were constituted by 25 children and adolescents with OCD and 25 healthy controls paired by gender, age, educational level, handedness and IQ. Although both groups were matched for these characteristics, they differed in clinical symptoms such as depression, anxiety and routines. Behavioral results showed that the groups were similar in terms of retrieved words and semantic index. Nevertheless, the comparison between groups - controlled for clinical variables - showed less activation (BOLD signal) in patients in several brain regions: frontal, parietal and occipito-temporal. On the other hand, the psychophysiological interaction analysis (PPI) revealed that patients have had an increase in the OFC connectivity with the temporal regions. This has occurred in three of the four regions of interest that were placed in the OFC: lateral and medial of both hemispheres. Also, the patients showed a positive correlation between the semantic index and the BOLD effect in the OFC, which was not observed in the control group. These results suggest that there are differences in brain functioning of children and adolescents with OCD in regions that are inside/outside of the neurobiological model for OCD (CSPTC circuit). In accordance with the present results, these differences in brain activation and connectivity could be regarded as a latent deficit, since both groups presented the same behavioral performance

These British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines cover the range and aims of treatment for anxiety disorders. They are based explicitly on the available evidence and are presented as recommendations to aid clinical decision making in primary and secondary medical care. They may also serve as a source of information for patients and their carers. The recommendations are presented together with a more detailed review of the available evidence. A consensus meeting involving experts in anxiety disorders reviewed the main subject areas and considered the strength of evidence and its clinical implications. The guidelines were constructed after extensive feedback from participants and interested parties. The strength of supporting evidence for recommendations was rated. The guidelines cover the diagnosis of anxiety disorders and key steps in clinical management, including acute treatment, relapse prevention and approaches for patients who do not respond to first-line treatments.

Syftet med studien var att undersöka sambandet mellan Mental Health Literacy (MHL) och psykologisk ohälsa och hälsa via variablerna emotionell och fysisk utmattning, ångest, depression, muskeldysmorfi, välbefinnande inom idrott, harmonisk passion samt tvångsmässig passion. Det specifika syftet var att undersöka om MHL kan predicera psykologiska hälsa och ohälsa. Tidigare studier har visat signifikanta samband mellan idrottares Mental Health Literacy (MHL) och deras psykologiska hälsa, där forskning indikerar att låga nivåer av MHL leder till försämrad psykologisk hälsa jämfört med de som skattar hög MHL (Kutcher et al., 2016). I föreliggande studie användes en kvantitativ longitudinell forskningsdesign där sammanlagt 70 idrottare deltog i åldrarna 15–35 år (M= 23.7, SD= 5.69). Deltagarna rekryterades via ett tillgänglighetsurval och besvarade en enkät vid två mättillfällen, vilket innehöll sex frågeformulär. Resultatet indikerar att det inte finns något samband över tid mellan MHL och psykologisk hälsa hos idrottare. Detta indikerar att varken låga eller höga nivåer av MHL kan predicera en idrottares kommande psykologiska hälsa. Resultatet i föreliggande studie belyser att det finns goda skäl till mer forskning kring sambandet mellan MHL och psykologisk hälsa inom idrotten. / The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between Mental Health Literacy (MHL) and psychological health and illness through the variables emotional and physical exhaustion, anxiety, depression, muscle dysmorphia, well-being in sports, harmonious and obsessive passion. More specifically, the purpose was to investigate whether MHL can predict psychological health and illness. Previous studies have shown a significant relationship between athletes' Mental Health Literacy (MHL) and their psychological health, the research indicates that low levels of MHL lead to poorer psychological health compared to those who rate high MHL (Kutcher et al., 2016). A quantitative longitudinal research design was used in this study and a total of 70 athletes aged 15–35 years participated (M = 23.7, SD = 5.69). Participants were recruited via an availability sample and answered a questionnaire on two measurement occasions, which contained six questionnaires. The results indicate that there is no relationship over time between MHL and psychological health. More specifically, the results indicate that neither low or high levels of MHL can predict an athlete's future psychological health. The results of the present study highlight that there are good reasons for more research about the relationship between MHL and psychological health in sports.

Eine überaktive Überwachung eigener Handlungen, welche sich in erhöhten Amplituden der error-related negativity (ERN) zeigt, scheint eine zentrale Rolle in der Pathophysiologie der Zwangsstörung zu spielen. Die funktionelle Bedeutsamkeit der ERN, die Mechanismen, die zur erhöhten ERN bei Zwangsstörungen beitragen und der Nutzen der ERN als Ansatzpunkt für Interventionen sind jedoch nicht vollständig geklärt. Diese Dissertation umfasst drei Studien, deren Ziel es war, diese Aspekte zu untersuchen. Studie 1 untersuchte die affektive Bewertung eigener Handlungen und zeigte, dass Handlungen automatisch affektive Valenz zugeschrieben wird. Darauf aufbauend untersuchte Studie 2, ob die ERN die Valenzbewertung von Fehlern widerspiegelt und ob eine veränderte Fehlerbewertung zur erhöhten ERN bei Zwangsstörungen beiträgt. Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass Personen mit Zwangsstörung eine verminderte Valenzbewertung von Fehlern aufweisen, lieferten aber keine Hinweise auf einen Zusammenhang zwischen ERN und Fehlerbewertung, was nahelegt, dass eine veränderte Fehlerbewertung nicht der erhöhten ERN bei Zwangsstörungen zugrunde liegt. Studie 3 untersuchte, ob die ERN durch nicht-invasive Hirnstimulation modulierbar ist und lieferte Hinweise darauf, dass kathodale transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation über dem prä-supplementär motorischen Areal die ERN bei gesunden Personen und Personen mit Zwangsstörung reduziert. Zusammenfassend zeigen die Studien, dass die Handlungsüberwachung die affektive Bewertung eigener Handlungen umfasst und dass dieser Prozess bei Zwangsstörungen verändert ist; eine veränderte Fehlerbewertung scheint jedoch nicht der erhöhten ERN bei Zwangsstörungen zugrunde zu liegen. Diese Erkenntnisse tragen zum Verständnis neurokognitiver Veränderungen bei dieser Störung bei. Zudem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass nicht-invasive Hirnstimulation das Potenzial hat, die ERN bei Personen mit Zwangsstörung abzuschwächen. Dies könnte den Weg für neue Interventionsstrategien ebnen. / Overactive performance monitoring, as indicated by increased amplitudes of the error-related negativity (ERN), is considered to play a central role in the pathophysiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, the functional significance of the ERN, the mechanisms contributing to increased ERN amplitudes in OCD, and the utility of the ERN as a target for intervention are not fully understood. This dissertation comprises three studies that aimed to shed light on these questions. Study 1 examined the affective evaluation of own actions, revealing that affective valence is automatically assigned to actions. Building upon this, Study 2 investigated whether the ERN reflects the valence evaluation of errors and whether altered error evaluation contributes to heightened ERN magnitude in OCD. The results indicated that individuals with OCD show reduced valence evaluation of errors, yet they provided no evidence for an association between ERN and error evaluation, suggesting that altered error evaluation may not underlie elevated ERN magnitude in OCD. Study 3 investigated whether the ERN can be modulated by non-invasive brain stimulation, and provided tentative evidence that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the presupplementary motor area reduces the ERN in healthy individuals and individuals with OCD. In summary, the studies provide evidence that performance monitoring encompasses the affective evaluation of own actions and demonstrate that this process is altered in OCD; however, aberrant error evaluation does not seem to underlie heightened ERN amplitudes in OCD. These insights contribute to the understanding of neurocognitive alterations in this disorder. Additionally, the results suggest that non-invasive brain stimulation has the potential to attenuate the ERN in individuals with OCD, which may pave the way for novel intervention strategies.