Inom EU pågår ett ständigt arbete med harmonisering av lagar i syfte att utforma och införa lagstiftning av högsta kvalitet, samtidigt som hänsyn tas till att de administrativa bördorna står i proportion till deras nytta. Med detta som bakgrund har EU arbetat med att främja lättnader för små och medelstora företag på internationell såväl som nationell nivå, vilket resulterade i en revision av de egna direktiven. Som en följd av Europaparlamentet och Rådets direktiv av 2013 gällande årsbokslut, koncernredovisning och rapporter i vissa typer av företag, tillsattes i slutet av 2012 en utredning av regeringen. Utredningens uppgift var att lämna förslag till de lagbestämmelser som i svensk rätt skulle krävas för att genomföra direktivet. Utöver själva direktivet behandlade utredningen även frågan om de befintliga årsredovisningslagarna bör utformas på ett mer överskådligt och tydligt sätt. Utredningen resulterade i ett delbetänkande som behandlade genomförandet av EU:s nya redovisningsdirektiv, samt ett slutbetänkande som innefattade en översyn av årsredovisningslagarna. Remiss på slutbetänkandet skickades ut till 57 instanser och svaren på denna skulle vara Justitiedepartementet tillhanda senast den 1 december 2015. Totalt inkom det svar från 36 instanser gällande slutbetänkandet.Syftet med studien är att undersöka och redogöra för de attityder de olika remissinstanserna har till de förslag som angivits av utredningen. Genom att skapa en modifierad intressentmodell kategoriserar vi instanserna i olika intressentgrupper och undersöker om det finns samband i remissvaren baserat på vilken intressentgrupp respektive instans är kategoriserad i, samt vilka frågor som är av störst vikt för instanserna. Studien är av kvalitativ karaktär och empirin är baserad på de inkomna remissvaren.Studien visar att de flesta remissinstanserna ser positivt på ett införande av en ny företagskategori, mikroföretag. Då den svenska utredningen föreslår lägre gränsvärden för denna kategori än vad EU-direktivet gör, gav detta upphov till diskussion. Utredningen menar att det underlättar att ha samma gräns som för revisionsplikt, medan de som förespråkar högre gränsvärden anser att det medför mer svårigheter för svenska företag jämfört med deras europeiska jämlikar. Även den kostnadsbesparing som presenterats av utredningen ifrågasätts av ett flertal instanser då de anser att kalkylen är för snävt beräknad, och menar att kostnaderna kommer att bli högre både för det enskilda företaget och för samhället. Gällande moderniseringen av ÅRL och BFL är alla instanser överens om att det är något som ligger i tiden, baserat på att lagarna idag är allt för komplexa och saknar logisk struktur. Förslagen gällande fastställandet av årsredovisningen samt fastställelseintyget har renderat i minst yttranden från remissinstanserna. De instanser som svarat är också de som påverkas mest av de nya reglerna.De slutsatser vi drar är att de flesta instanserna är positiva till de förslag som presenterats av utredningen. Debatten angående gränsdragningen kommer med stor sannolikhet att fortgå även efter det att kategorin mikroföretag har införts i lagstiftningen. Vi anser att det är av vikt att Sverige tillämpar de gränsvärden som EU-direktivet förespråkar, bland annat av harmoniseringsskäl. I kostnadsfrågan ser vi att det i det långa loppet är viktigare att lättnader införs för de mindre företagen än att det på kort sikt kommer innebära merkostnader för myndigheterna. Gällande förslaget till en modernisering av ÅRL och BFL så är vi precis som remissinstanserna positiva till det då vi anser det vara av största vikt att förbättra tydligheten i lagtexten. / Within the EU, the work with harmonization of laws is an on-going process. The aim is to design and implement legislation of the highest quality, while taking into account that the administrative burdens are proportionate to their advantage. Against this background, the EU has worked to promote relief for small and medium-sized entities at the international as well as the national level, resulting in an audit of its own directives. As a result of the European Parliament and Council Directive of 2013 concerning the annual accounts, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types, an investigation was added by the government at the end of 2012. The investigators task was to submit proposals to the legislative provisions of Swedish law that would be required to implement the Directive. In addition to the Directive itself, the investigation treated the question whether the existing annual accounts legislation should be redesigned in a more transparent and clear manner. The investigation resulted in an interim report that dealt with the implementation of the new EU accounting directives, as well as a final report, that handled a review of the annual accounts act. The consultation on the final report was sent to 57 agencies and the answer to this was to be at the Ministry of Justice no later than 1 December 2015. Answers were received from 36 agencies.The purpose of this study is to examine and report on the attitudes of the various consultative agencies regarding the proposals set forth by the investigation. By creating a modified stakeholder model, we categorize instances of the various stakeholders and examine whether there is a correlation in the responses based on the stakeholder group each instance is categorized into, and what issues are of most importance to the instances. The study is qualitative in nature and the empirical data is based on the submitted consultation responses.The study shows that most agencies welcome the introduction of a new business category, micro-entities. There are some concerns regarding the limits for this category, since the limits suggested by the Swedish investigation are lower than the limits suggested by the EU. The investigation believes that it is helpful to have the same limit as for auditing duty, while those who advocate higher levels believes it will cause more problems for Swedish companies compared to their European peers. The cost saving estimated by the investigation are believed to be too narrowly calculated by several agencies, who argue that the costs will be higher for both the individual entity as well as for society. Regarding the modernization of the annual accounts acts all agencies agree that it is something that needs to be done, based on that the laws are too complex and lack logical structure. The proposals regarding the establishment of the annual report and approval certificate has rendered the least opinions of the consulted agencies. The replying agencies are the ones most affected by these new rules.The conclusions that we draw are that most of the agencies are positive towards the proposals presented by the investigation. The debate over the limits for micro-entities will likely continue after the category has been introduced to legislation. We believe that it is important for Sweden to apply the values that the EU directive advocates, for harmonization reason among other things. Regarding the cost issue we see that it is more important to promote relief for the smaller companies, than the meaning of increased costs in the short term. Regarding the modernization of the annual account acts we are, just as the consultative agencies, in favour of it because we believe it to be of utmost importance to improve the clarity of the legal text.(This essay is written in Swedish)

區段徵收為目前政府大規模進行土地整體開發，促進都市發展，以及無償取得公共設施用地的重要舉措之一，為一種具有高度自償性之土地開發事業。由於區段徵收需要投入大量的資金與人力，在政府財政困窘及國內不動產市場自民國81 年以來，長期處於不景氣之故，其非但無法達成原先設定之有效減低公共支出之目的，反而需要額外編列預算以支應財務缺口。爰此，造成縣市政府往往視區段徵收為畏途，但礙於相關政策規範及都市發展須盡速取得必要之公共設施用地，而不得不予執行，從而導致惡性循環，因此，如何解決區段徵收財務問題，乃成為政府必須面對的最大困境與挑戰。 在政府財政狀態日益惡化，短期內又無法籌措區段徵收開發過程中龐大的資金需求，再加上地方專業人力不足之困境下，使得區段徵收之辦理型態有所演變，部分地方縣（市）政府遂逐步引進民間資源與活力（即BT模式），朝向由民間機構自行籌措資金並由該機構專業人員負責規劃與執行開發工作，政府從旁提供必要之行政協助。此外，開發所需總費用均先由民間機構墊付，而政府再以剩餘可建築土地來償付費用，藉此創新開發模式，以有效解決區段徵收有關資金籌措及開發後土地去化等至為關鍵之癥結問題。 然而BT模式在實務執行過程時，仍存在著法令、政策制定及實施方式等相關爭議，以致於無法有效大量推廣實施，本文藉由研究相關法令、文獻記載、分析目前實施案例、並透過訪談專家學者及整理相關問題等，說明區段徵收業務在走向政府委託民間機構、引進民間資源辦理區段徵收BT開發模式時，所需面對與管理之委託-代理關係，藉由代理理論，探討區段徵收實務執行層面中，可行的解決措施（包括誘因與監督機制），並建議區段徵收應與時俱進地檢討與修正相關配套措施，以利此項善用民間資源與活力，並具有突破性的土地開發委外機制能夠更臻完備，並可作為後續土地整體開發學術研究之重要參考。 綜合本研究之結論與建議，謹分述如次： 一、結論 （一）區段徵收機制基於政策、民意與制度之可行性，可以作階段性創新改革。 （二）現行區段徵收委外機制相關法制，尚欠完備。 （三）區段徵收委外辦理機制，應同時配套建構監控制度。 （四）區段徵收委外過程，應運用誘因機制，以避免代理問題產生。 （五）區段徵收BT開發模式，應可進一步強化學術研究與應用探討。 二、建議 （一）限期檢討修正區段徵收BT開發模式法制化工作。 （二）由中央與地方成立專案小組，全力協助BT得標廠商。 （三）加強BT開發模式之宣導，建構良好的溝通協調機制。 （四）根據現有兩案例開發結果，審慎評估策訂推廣實施計畫。 / Zone expropriation is presently the large-scale integrated land development carried out by the government to promote urban development. Acquiring land for public facilities without compensation is also an important measure to have high self-liquidation of land development enterprise. Because zone expropriation needs to invest in a great deal of funds and manpower, the government finance and the domestic real estate market were in a long-term depression from 1981 until 1992. Not only unable to reach the targeted profit margin to reduce the public expenses, additional budget is needed to deal with financial gap. Therefore, it makes the county and city government often look at zone expropriation as a dangerous choice to take. But hindrance related to policy standardization and urban development must acquire the necessary land for public facilities as soon as possible because there's no choice but to implement it. As a result, it leads to a vicious circle. Therefore, the government needs to face the greatest dilemma and challenge on how to settle the zone expropriation financial problems. The financial status of the government is worsening day by day. Within a short time the government was unable to raise funds for the huge financial requirement of the zone expropriation. In addition, professional manpower is also a dilemma, causing the handling pattern of zone expropriation to evolve to some extent. Partially the local county and city government gradually brings in non-government resources and vitality (private participation-BT mode). Non-government organizations voluntarily raise funds and professionals in private sectors manage the plans and implementation, while the government provides necessary administrative assistance. In addition, the development necessary for the total costs is paid first by the non-government organization, and the government excess land will be liquidated, thereby creating modes in effect of settling the zone expropriation's fund raising and developed land key problems. However in the implementation of the BT mode process, the decrees, policymaking and implementation methodology related to disputes are still kept. Because of the incapability to take effect the large number of widespread implementation, this writing discuss about the laws, research about decrees, document records, analysis of present case studies, and interviews of professional scholars and arrangements related to the problems. Zone expropriation business is illustrated in moving towards the government's entrusting of non-government organizations. The introduction of non-government resources to handle the zone expropriation BT development method is necessary for facing with the management of principal-agent relationship. By means of principal-agent theory, probing into the implementation dimension, feasible resolutions (including incentive and monitoring mechanism), and recommending the steady advancement of zone expropriation to review and amend about the formation of a complete set of measures, these are all for making good use of non-government resources and vitality, as well as to have a break through in the land development outsourcing mechanism to make them more perfect, and may make a follow-up for the land integrated development academic study of important references. Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation: 1. Conclusions: (1)Gradual improvements can be made on the zone expropriation mechanism based on policy, public opinion and system feasibility. (2)The legal system regarding the current zone expropriation mechanism is still incomplete. The external committee handling zone expropriation should simultaneously form a complete construction monitoring system. (3)The external committee handling zone expropriation should utilize a financial incentive mechanism to avoid any problems. (4)A zone expropriation based on the BT model should go further in strengthening academic research and application 2. Recommendations: (1)Establish a deadline for reviewing the legal work for zone expropriation in the BT development model. (2)Allow the national and local relevant groups to fully assist the winning bidder for the BT project. (3)Strengthen guidance for the BT development model; construct a good communication mechanism. (4)Based on the development results of the above case studies, carefully appraise the presented implementation plan . Keywords: Zone Expropriation、Private Participation(BT Mode)、Principal-Agent Theory、Incentive Mechanism

Cette thèse présente l’évolution temporelle du lien entre les variables politiques et la mobilité des élites administratives dans la fonction publique provinciale au Canada. Considérant la relation entre le gouvernement et l’administration comme une relation mandant-mandataire (principal-agent), la littérature en administration publique décrit l'influence de diverses dynamiques politiques – par exemple un changement de parti au pouvoir – sur le degré d’intervention des gouvernements dans la dotation du personnel administratif. S’appuyant sur la notion de marché bureaucratique (Public Service Bargain) de Hood et Lodge (2006), la présente thèse estime que la relation entre les dynamiques politiques et la mobilité des fonctionnaires s’inscrit dans un contexte sociohistorique. Plutôt que de percevoir l’ensemble des relations politico-administratives comme présentant les caractéristiques de la théorie mandant-mandataire, avec de nombreux conflits pour l’atteinte des objectifs et une grande asymétrie des informations, cette thèse suggère que la mesure dans laquelle diverses dynamiques politiques poussent les gouvernements à procéder à des mises à pied ou à des nominations stratégiques varie avec le temps, en suivant les changements dans ce qui entoure les relations politico-administratives. Les statistiques descriptives et la régression logistique sont principalement utilisées pour analyser l’association entre les variables politiques et la mobilité, à l’aide d’une base de données originale repostant des changements de sous-ministres dans la fonction publique provinciale au Canada de 1920 à 2013. Les résultats empiriques permettent de conclure que l’influence des dynamiques politiques sur la mobilité des fonctionnaires varie en fonction des différents marchés bureaucratiques. Avant la mise en place d’une fonction publique professionnelle, où les relations politico-administratives s’inscrivaient dans un spoils bargain, les changements de gouvernement entraînaient une importante rotation des fonctionnaires. Cette pratique est conforme à un marché bureaucratique où les critères de compétences des fonctionnaires sont indéfinis, et où les fonctionnaires sont loyaux au parti au pouvoir. Dès la fin de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, jusqu’aux années 1980, l’association entre les dynamiques politiques et la mobilité diminue grandement. Cette pratique correspond au marché bureaucratique de Schaffer (Schafferian bargain), où les gouvernements favorisent la connaissance technique des politiques et la bonne volonté des fonctionnaires à donner des conseils avisés aux membres du gouvernement, peu importe le parti au pouvoir. Dès les années 1980, les dynamiques politiques sont de nouveau associées à la mobilité. Or, non seulement les changements de parti, mais également l’élection de nouveaux chefs à la tête de ceux-ci entraînent une plus grande mobilité. Cette pratique va dans le sens du managerial bargain, où les nominations sont utilisées pour encourager l’allégeance à l’agenda gouvernemental et la compétence est comprise comme étant la bonne gestion du personnel et des ressources dans le but de répondre aux directives du gouvernement. Étudiant les actions stratégiques des gouvernements dans leur contexte sociohistorique, cette étude contribue de manière originale à l’administration publique et à la politique canadienne, en démontrant que les dynamiques politiques jouent un rôle quant à la mobilité des fonctionnaires, bien que la nature de ces dynamiques et l’étendue de leurs effets varient selon les époques, qui présentent des marchés bureaucratiques distincts. / This dissertation studies temporal variances in the relationship between political variables and the mobility of administrative elites in Canada’s provincial bureaucracies. Conceptualizing the association between the government and the bureaucracy as a principal-agent relationship, research in public administration has identified how various political dynamics – such as a transition in the governing party – affects the extent to which governments interfere in the staffing of bureaucratic personnel; removing incumbents and replacing them with persons who are believed to be loyal to government’s policy agenda. This dissertation contributes to this literature by identifying the historical contingencies with which political dynamics effect mobility. Drawing upon Hood and Lodge’s (2006) concept of a Public Service Bargain (PSB), the relationship between political dynamics and mobility is situated within a more precise social-historical context. Rather than approaching political-administrative relationships as universally reflecting the specifications of principal-agent theory – exhibiting a high incidence of goal conflict and information asymmetry – this work claims that the extent to which political dynamics prod governments to strategically dismiss and appoint personnel has varied over time, in tandem with shifts in the contours of political-administrative relationships; specifically, the nature of the bureaucracy’s competency and its loyalty. Primarily using descriptive statistics and logistic regression the association between political variables and mobility is tested with an original dataset of deputy minister turnover in Canada’s provincial bureaucracies between 1920 and 2013. Overall, the empirical evidence supports the conclusion that the effect that political dynamics have on bureaucratic mobility has varied over time across distinct PSBs. Prior to the development of the modern professional bureaucracy, where political-administrative relationships reflected a spoils bargain, transitions in the governing party resulted in increased mobility. Such actions are congruent with a PSB where the nature of governance is of a minimal character; there are no specifications concerning the bureaucracy’s competency; and the bureaucracy’s loyalty is of a partisan nature towards the governing party. Starting in the postwar period and lasting until the 1980s, the association between political dynamics and mobility is significantly reduced. Such is congruent with a Schafferian bargain where governments encourage technical knowledge of policies and a willingness amongst bureaucrats to provide frank counsel to government office holders, regardless of the party in power. Starting in the 1980s however, political dynamics are once again positively associated with mobility. Yet now, not only transitions in party, but all newly elected heads of government lead to increased mobility. This is consistent with a managerial bargain where appointments are used to encourage loyalty to the government’s policy agenda and competency is understood as the ability to manage personnel and resources to realizing the directives dictated by the government. Situating the strategic actions of governments within their social-historical context, this work makes original contributions to the fields of public administration and Canadian politics by showing that when it comes to bureaucratic mobility, political dynamics matter; but which dynamics, and the extent of their effects, vary over time across distinct PSBs.

The use of renewable energy as part of the solution for stabilising global warming has been promoted in industrialised countries for the past three decades. In the last ten years, China, a non-democratic and less-developed state, has implemented non-hydro alternative energy sources through top-down, technology-oriented measures and expanded its renewable energy capacity with unprecedented speed and breadth. This phenomenon seems to contradict to the principle of orthodox environmental governance, in which stakeholder participation is deemed as necessary condition for effective policy outcomes. Given that little research has been conducted on environmental politics in an authoritarian context, I first set out to explore the role of the Chinese state in enabling transformation of the renewable energy sector and to understand the ways in which policy elites seek to introduce developmental state and ecological modernisation strategy in the policy area. Second, by adopting principal-agent theory, I explicate how the governance mechanisms have been deployed and how challenges of the expansion of the sector in the governance system with a large territory have being mitigated. Based upon news reports, policy documents, and interviews with 32 provincial officials, business leaders, academic researchers, and NGO practitioners in two subnational governments, I argue that the renewable energy development in China is governed through a hybrid mode of environmental policy model that uses, upon the existing developmental state regime, ecological modernisation as a policy paradigm, which is partially incorporated in the process. Ultimately, I examine in this thesis the possibility of an alternative form of environmental governance in which renewable energy can be diffused in a less-participatory manner, with more direct controls and target-oriented state intervention measures. This thesis challenges the orthodox assumption that the inclusive mode of governance are the only capable form of environmental governance that reaches desired policy outcomes of renewable energy deployment.

近年來，國際間政府推動資訊公開蔚為風潮，伴隨著資訊通信科技的發展，電子化政府和政府網站更普遍被各界視為一個低成本且高效率的透明化途徑。台灣的政府網站長期受到國際間高度評價，在發展中國家更是名列前茅。然而，既有的研究與調查大多數僅片面側重於政府供給面的探究，通常以化約且可標準化的指標來評鑑特定政府網站的介面資訊功能。相形之下，鮮少有關注民眾的需求認知、機關政策執行以及網站內容評估等較全面的研究成果供參。因而無法更深入地釐清政府網站、法制和政策執行績效不彰等困境與透明化治理之間的關聯。 在委託代理理論的運用之下，本研究兼顧政府治理中委託方民眾的認知以及代理方政府機關的經驗與成效。目的在於釐清網站資訊公開供給和需求的現況與問題，並更具體地檢證政府網站資訊公開對機關施政資訊揭露、績效衡量和政府課責的影響。爰此，研究者參與多項網站資訊公開相關研究，以蒐集多元化次級資料，包括：量化的網路民眾問卷調查，各級機關的跨年度問卷調查，機關網站內容評估比較，以及質性的個別訪談、焦點團體座談。藉由理論聚焦與多重研究方法的交叉檢證分析，以達研究綜效。 研究結果分為網站資訊公開對政府施政資訊揭露，施政績效衡量，以及政府課責的影響三個部分來討論。首先，相較於法制，網站資訊公開更有助於揭露政府施政資訊，特別是網站資訊公開實施過程可呈現出政府治理內、外部的多重代理關係及代理問題，甚至可緩和部分的代理問題。其次，網站資訊公開可具體地呈現並衡量施政績效，以因應傳統官僚體系內各層代理績效難以衡量的困境。但囿於目前整體制度缺乏績效誘因設計，而限制了此效益。最後，因整體資訊公開績效制度的匱乏，也使得網站資訊公開對政府課責的效益備受限制。 整體而言，本研究揭示了代理理論應用於政府治理的價值，並檢證政府資訊公開、績效和課責等三項治理要件的關聯。研究成果可彌補實務與研究的落差，並對相關文獻做出貢獻。 / In recent years, governments from around the world have adopted Freedom of Information Act to increase transparency in their governance. With advancements in information and communication technologies (ICTs), e-Government has been seen as a cost-effective and possible mean to promote openness and transparency. Taiwan’s efforts to develop e-Government services have been well-recognized; especially, have made remarkable advantages among developing countries. Nevertheless, most of the existing researches in evaluating e-Government service are based on supply-side indicators and often assess websites alone; as yet, little information is available on the demand aspect of e-Government. The paper aims to explore the potential and practice of government website information disclosure in terms of the perspective of end user and government agencies. The results show the significance of three aspects in information disclosure of Taiwanese government websites through the application of quantitative and qualitative methodology, including self-administered questionnaire, website evaluation, individual interview, and focus group interview. First, government website information disclosure benefits the revelation of government information, manifestation of multi-agent relationships in internal and external governance of government, and alleviation of partial ageny problems. Second, government website information disclosure enhances revealing and measuring the performance of government agencies; nevertheless, in which the effectiveness is limited due to the absence of institutional incentives. Third, under the circumstances of unsound institution, the effectiveness of accountability has difficulties to be thoroughly realized through government website information disclosure. In sum, the finding contributes to a valuable reference for other countries in implementing information transparency of e-Government, and has significant implications for policy makers, government agencies, and system designers.

Bakgrund: Sedan 1988 har svenska aktiebolag haft en lagstadgad skyldighet att få sina räkenskaper granskade av en kvalificerad revisor, något som snart kommer att förändras. I en pågående utredning presenterades den 3 april 2008 ett förslag om att avskaffa revisionsplikten för 96 procent av de svenska aktiebolagen från och med 1 juli 2010. Bakgrunden till detta är att fördelar för små bolag inte anses uppväga nackdelar av revisionen. Syfte: Syftet med denna uppsats är att beskriva förändringen hos banker i kreditbedömningsprocessen vid ett avskaffande av revisionsplikten och hur dessa förändringar kommer påverka relationen mellan bank och bolag. Referensram och teori: För att analysera det empiriska materialet har intressentteorin, principal-agent teorin och teorin om asymmetrisk information använts varav samtliga är väletablerade och beprövade teorier. Teorin om tillit är en relativt ny teori som även den har använts i syfte att förklara betydelsen av tillit i näringslivet. I referensramen ges information om revision och dess grundläggande principer samt en beskrivning av banker som kreditgivare och deras kreditgivningsprocess. Metod: För att uppnå syftet har en fallstudie utförts bestående av både en kvalitativ samt en kvantitativ insamlingsmetod. Den kvalitativa delen har bestått av intervjuer med representanter från Danske Bank, Handelsbanken, Nordea, SEB samt Swedbank. Ovanstående respondenter har även svarat på en enkät i syfte att komplettera med kvantitativ mätbar information. Utöver detta har litteraturstudier gjorts för att inhämta sekundär data. Slutsats: Banker kommer att drabbas av ökade kostnader till följd av revisionspliktens avskaffande. Direkta kostnader på grund av ökad risk kommer överföras på de enskilda bolagen i form av ökade krav medan dolda kostnader på grund av längre handläggningstid kommer spridas på samtliga företagskunder. / Background: Since 1988, Swedish private limited corporations have been prescribed by law to have their accounts reviewed by a qualified auditor, something that soon will be changed. In an ongoing government investigation, a proposal presented the 3rd of April 2008 suggested that 96 percent of all private limited corporations should be eased from the auditing duty as of 1st of July 2010. The background to this proposal is that advantages for the small corporations are not considered to compensate the disadvantage with auditing. Purpose: The purpose with this thesis is to describe the change for banks in the credit rating process in the case of an abolition of the auditing duty and how these changes will affect the relation between bank and corporation. Frame of references and theory: To analyse the empirical findings the authors have used the stakeholder theory, the principal-agent theory and information asymmetry theory which all are well established theories. The theory of trust is a relatively new theory that has been used in purpose to explain the importance of trust in the business world. The frame of references provides information about auditing and its basic principles as well as describing banks as creditors and their credit rating process. Method: In order to achieve the purpose, a case study consisted of both a qualitative and a quantitative collection method, have been conducted. The qualitative part consists of interviews with representatives from Danske Bank, Handelsbanken, Nordea, SEB and Swedbank. The representatives above have also answered a questionnaire in purpose to complement the interview with quantitative measurable information. In excess of this, literature studies have been done to gather secondary data. Conclusion: As a consequence of the abolition of the auditing duty, the costs for banks will increase. Direct costs due to a greater risk will be transferred to the particular corporations as greater demands while hidden costs due to longer office turnaround time will be spread out on all corporation customers

Globalisering har möjliggjort för svenska företag att expandera utomlands och etablera sig påinternationella marknader. Det största hindret för små- och medelstora företag (SMFs) i ainternationaliseringsprocess är avsaknad av finansiella medel och kunskap om den nyamarknaden. På grund av detta är användandet av en utlandsbaserad agent ett bra alternativ. Enagent har en god lokal marknadskunskap och representerar en etableringsform som är mindrekostsam i jämförelse med etableringen av ett dotterbolag. Med hänsyn till detta äranvändandet av en agent ett vanligt tillvägagångssätt bland internationaliserande SMFs.Samtidigt drivs företaget och dess agent av olika mål på grund av skillnader i egenintresse.Trots att en agent är anlitad i syfte att arbeta i enighet med företagets ambitioner, kan denneha ett egenintresse som kolliderar med företaget. Det är därför nödvändigt för företag attskydda det egna intresset genom implementering av olika kontrollsystem. I denna studie harvi använt oss av principal- agentteorin i syfte att förklara förhållandet mellan svenska SMFsoch dess agenter. Utöver detta undersöker vi även hur svenska SMFs kan kontrollera sinautlandsagenter. För att undersöka detta har vi formulerat följande forskningsfrågor: “Hur kanprincipal-agenteorin tillämpas i syfte att beskriva uppdragsrelationen mellan svenska SMFoch dess agent på den internationella marknaden?” samt ”Hur kan svenska SMFs styra attdess agent på den internationella marknaden arbetar enligt företagets önskemål?”. I syfte attbesvara dessa forskningsfrågor har det insamlats och bearbetats teoretiskt material, vilketutgjort underlag för den semistrukturerade intervjuguide som besvarats av studiensintervjupersoner. Detta har resulterat i en analys följt av slutsats där forskningsfrågornabesvaras. Studien avslutas med rekommendationer till framtida forskning. / Globalization has enabled firms to expand abroad and enter international markets. The mainobstacle for small and medium-sized firms in their internationalization-process is the lack offinancial resources and local market knowledge. Therefore, the use of an offshore agent is agood option. An agent holds good local market knowledge and represents an establishmentform that is less costly, compared to the start-up of a subsidiary. Hence, the use of an agent isa common approach amongst internationalized small and medium-sized firms (SME’s).Simultaneously, a firm and its agent are driven by different ambitions due to divergence intheir self-interests. Although an agent is hired to work in unity with the firm’s ambitions, itmay hold a self-interest that collides with the firm’s objectives. Therefore, it is vital for firmsto protect their own interests by implementing different mechanisms that can control theagent. In this study, the principal-agent theory has been applied in order to explain therelationship between Swedish SME’s and their agents. Additionally, it has been investigatedhow Swedish SME’s are able to control their offshore agents on the international market. Toexamine this, the following two research questions have been formulated: “How can theprincipal-agent theory be applied to describe the relation between Swedish SME’s and theiragent on the international market?” and “How can Swedish SME’s control that their agent onthe international market are working in unity with the firm’s requests?” In order to answerthese two questions, theoretical material has been collected and processed in order toformulate the basis of the semi-structured interview guide that has been answered by therespondents. This has resulted in an analysis followed by a conclusion where the researchquestions are answered.

Korruption lässt sich als ökonomische Austauschbeziehung mit den Akteuren Prinzipal, Agent und Klient darstellen. Die Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, welche Faktoren das Ausmaß der Schädigung des Prinzipals durch Korruption beeinflussen und mit welchen Mitteln der Prinzipal entgegen steuern kann. Neben den Auswirkungen von Kontrollen, Strafandrohung, kulturellen und individuellen Faktoren wird insbesondere der Einfluss der Entlohnungsgestaltung untersucht. Die Zusammenhänge werden mit Hilfe formaler Modelle dargestellt und durch eine Auswertung empirischer Untersuchungen ergänzt.

<p>Bakgrund: Sedan 1988 har svenska aktiebolag haft en lagstadgad skyldighet att få sina räkenskaper granskade av en kvalificerad revisor, något som snart kommer att förändras. I en pågående utredning presenterades den 3 april 2008 ett förslag om att avskaffa revisionsplikten för 96 procent av de svenska aktiebolagen från och med 1 juli 2010. Bakgrunden till detta är att fördelar för små bolag inte anses uppväga nackdelar av revisionen.</p><p>Syfte: Syftet med denna uppsats är att beskriva förändringen hos banker i kreditbedömningsprocessen vid ett avskaffande av revisionsplikten och hur dessa förändringar kommer påverka relationen mellan bank och bolag.</p><p>Referensram och teori: För att analysera det empiriska materialet har intressentteorin, principal-agent teorin och teorin om asymmetrisk information använts varav samtliga är väletablerade och beprövade teorier. Teorin om tillit är en relativt ny teori som även den</p><p>har använts i syfte att förklara betydelsen av tillit i näringslivet. I referensramen ges information om revision och dess grundläggande principer samt en beskrivning av banker som kreditgivare och deras kreditgivningsprocess.</p><p>Metod: För att uppnå syftet har en fallstudie utförts bestående av både en kvalitativ samt en kvantitativ insamlingsmetod. Den kvalitativa delen har bestått av intervjuer med representanter</p><p>från Danske Bank, Handelsbanken, Nordea, SEB samt Swedbank. Ovanstående respondenter har även svarat på en enkät i syfte att komplettera med kvantitativ mätbar information. Utöver detta har litteraturstudier gjorts för att inhämta sekundär data.</p><p>Slutsats: Banker kommer att drabbas av ökade kostnader till följd av revisionspliktens avskaffande. Direkta kostnader på grund av ökad risk kommer överföras på de enskilda bolagen i form av ökade krav medan dolda kostnader på grund av längre handläggningstid kommer spridas på samtliga företagskunder.</p> / <p>Background: Since 1988, Swedish private limited corporations have been prescribed by law to have their accounts reviewed by a qualified auditor, something that soon will be changed. In an ongoing government investigation, a proposal presented the 3rd of April</p><p>2008 suggested that 96 percent of all private limited corporations should be eased from the auditing duty as of 1st of July 2010. The background to this proposal is that advantages for the small corporations are not considered to compensate the disadvantage with auditing.</p><p>Purpose: The purpose with this thesis is to describe the change for banks in the credit rating process in the case of an abolition of the auditing duty and how these changes will affect the relation between bank and corporation.</p><p>Frame of references and theory: To analyse the empirical findings the authors have used the stakeholder theory, the principal-agent theory and information asymmetry theory which all are well established theories. The theory of trust is a relatively new theory that has</p><p>been used in purpose to explain the importance of trust in the business world. The frame of references provides information about auditing and its basic principles as well as describing banks as creditors and their credit rating process.</p><p>Method: In order to achieve the purpose, a case study consisted of both a qualitative and a quantitative collection method, have been conducted. The qualitative part consists of interviews with representatives from Danske Bank, Handelsbanken, Nordea, SEB and Swedbank. The representatives above have also answered a questionnaire in purpose to complement the interview with quantitative measurable information. In excess of this, literature</p><p>studies have been done to gather secondary data.</p><p>Conclusion: As a consequence of the abolition of the auditing duty, the costs for banks will increase. Direct costs due to a greater risk will be transferred to the particular corporations as greater demands while hidden costs due to longer office turnaround time will be</p><p>spread out on all corporation customers</p>

The overall purpose of this thesis is to gain further knowledge of how the Swedish local government level is affected by requirements to use public procurement through competitive tendering and, more specifically, understand the actions taken by included actors when public procurement is required in implementation of public transport goals. Through case study method, an in specific process tracing, various implementation processes have been examined. One studied process complied with the procurement regulations, while the others included elements that circumvented them. In each process, the actions taken by involved actors have been the focus. The findings are presented in four papers. An overall conclusion is that, when public procurement is required in implementation at the local government level, several actors need to interact. These actors may use procurement to expand, maintain, or restrain their discretion towards others actors. In addition, various control mechanisms, such as e.g. monitoring, are used to restrain an actor’s discretion when the actor is circumventing procurement legislation. / Det övergripande syftet med denna avhandling är att öka kunskapen om hur den lokala nivån i Sverige är påverkad av kravet på att använda offentlig upphandling, och mer specifikt att förstå de handlingar som olika aktörer vidtar vid implementering av kollektivtrafik mål, då konkurrensutsatt upphandling är ett krav. Genom fallstudie metod har olika implementeringsprocesser undersökts. I en process har upphandlingsreglerna följts, medan i de andra har upphandlingslagen kringgåtts. Resultaten har analyserats utifrån principal-agent teori och presenteras i form av fyra artiklar. I studien konstateras det att flera aktörer är beroende av varandra i implementeringen. Aktörerna kan använda upphandling för att både behålla och expandera sitt handlingsutrymme gentemot andra aktörer, men upphandling kan även vara begränsande. I studien diskuteras även olika kontrollmekanismer som användas då aktörer kringgår upphandlingslagstiftningen.