本研究目的在整合依附理論、負向情緒調適預期和壓力因應三種理論觀點，建構面臨生涯抉擇的大四學生之情緒經驗歷程模式。研究採問卷調查法，以台灣八所大學783位大四學生為對象。研究工具包括依附風格量表、負向情緒調適預期量表、生涯抉擇壓力因應量表、快樂感受量表和憂鬱量表。資料分析方法為因素分析、信度分析、皮爾遜積差相關分析、t考驗、單因子變異數分析及結構方程模式。 初步模式驗證發現，初始模式與觀察資料間無法適配，故根據修正指標，刪除不適當路徑、整併觀察變項、將部分觀察變項的殘差連結後，產生三個理論模式。進一步進行模式適配度考驗，顯示三個模式與觀察資料間適配度良好，並能有效解釋變項間的關係。模式一：依附會影響負向情緒調適預期；依附會透過正向壓力因應影響情緒經驗。模式二：依附會影響負向情緒調適預期；依附會透過負向壓力因應影響情緒經驗。模式三：依附會透過情緒焦點因應影響情緒經驗；依附會透過負向情緒調適預期和情緒焦點因應影響情緒經驗。 三個模式的共通處為：依附會影響個人的壓力因應；個人的壓力因應會影響其情緒經驗；依附並不會直接影響個人的情緒經驗，但依附會透過壓力因應而對情緒經驗產生影響；依附會影響個人的負向情緒調適預期。 研究建議為：宜積極發展生涯輔導方案與生涯探索課程；協助個案瞭解依附、負向情緒調適預期和壓力因應對其情緒經驗的影響；針對不安全依附者提供預防介入；以不同性別和不同依附型態者為對象，進行模式的建構與驗證；採焦點團體法或縱貫研究法進行研究；將其他重要變項納入模式中，或探究變項間的關係；依附和情緒經驗等測量工具的改進。 / The purpose of the study was to integrate attachment theory, coping theory, and the perspective of expectancies for negative mood regulation (NMR) to develop the process model of emotional experiences for senior college students encountering the stress of career choice. The participants of the study were 783 senior college students in Taiwan. The participants were evaluated by Attachment Style Scale, NMR Scale, Coping Scale, Happiness Scale, and Depression Scale. The data were analyzed by factor analysis, Cronbach α analysis, Pearson product-moment correlation, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and SEM. In the primitive model testing, the original model couldn’t fit with the observed data. Adjustment is thus made, in accordance with the modification index, to delete the unsuitable paths, combine the observed variances and line the error variances of some observed variances. Three models are generated. As shown in the result of model testing, the three models coordinate with the observed data, explaining the relationships among main variables. Model one: Attachment can affect NMR; attachment can affect emotional experiences through positive coping. Model two: Attachment can affect NMR; attachment can affect emotional experiences through negative coping. Model three: Attachment can affect emotional experiences through emotion-focused coping; attachment can affect emotional experiences through NMR and emotion-focused coping. The similarities in the three models were as follows: Firstly, attachment can affect coping. Secondly, coping can affect emotion. Thirdly, attachment can’t affect emotional experiences directly, but attachment can affect emotional experiences through coping. Fourthly, attachment can affect NMR. The suggestions were as follows: 1.The programs of career guidance and the curriculum of career exploration should be developed. 2. The clients should be assisted to understand the influence of attachment, NMR, and coping on their emotional experiences. 3. The preventive intervention should be provided to students of insecure attachment. 4. The models should be developed and tested according to the participants of different gender and attachment styles. 5. The focus group interview and the longitudinal method should be adopted. 6. Other important variables should be added to the model; alternatively, the relationships of these variables be explored. 7. The instructions of measurement in attachment and emotional experiences should be improved.

本研究旨在探討犯罪青少年在父母婚姻衝突、父母管教方式、親子依附安全感與其外向性行為問題上之關係，是否父母婚姻衝突會透過父母管教方式，影響到親子依附安全感，最後導致孩子外向性行為問題的發生呢？或是父母婚姻衝突只透過親子依附安全感，進而影響到孩子外向性行為問題的發生呢？並探討不同性別的犯罪少年在父母婚姻衝突、父母管教方式、親子依附安全感及外向性行為問題上的差異情形，及犯罪青少年知覺父與母的管教方式、親子依附安全感上的差異情形。本研究採自陳問卷調查法，樣本選取自接受感化教育之「桃園少年輔育院」及「彰化少年輔育院」之犯罪青少年，得有效問卷：男生160份及女生53份，共計213份，將所得資料以描述性統計、t檢定及徑路分析的統計方法來進行分析。 本研究結果顯示：（1）女生知覺其父母婚姻衝突程度較男生為高。女生知覺到母親矛盾的管教程度及父母紛歧的管教程度都較男生為高，但男生知覺到母親期望的管教程度較女生為高。男生知覺到父親的信任、溝通程度及母親信任的程度都較女生為高，但男生知覺到父親的疏離程度較女生為低，且男生知覺到父親整體的依附安全感較女生為高。男生外向性行為問題的程度較女生為高。（2）犯罪青少年知覺父親在拒絕、矛盾、嚴格的管教程度上比母親高。犯罪青少年知覺父親在信任、溝通分量表及整體的依附狀況上都比母親低，但父親在疏離分量表上比母親高。（3）父母婚姻衝突會透過父母管教方式，影響到親子依附安全感，但親子依附安全感並未影響到孩子外向性行為問題的發生。（4）父母婚姻衝突會直接影響到親子依附安全感，但並未透過親子依附安全感，影響到孩子外向性行為問題的發生。 最後，依據研究結果提出討論與未來研究及實務工作上之建議。

本研究主要目的在探討有戀愛經驗大學生的「成人依附」、「社交能力」、「社會支持」、「寂寞」與「憂鬱」之間的關係。依此目的，本研究先探討不同背景變項的大學生在「逃避依附」、「焦慮依附」、「社交自我效能」、「困擾的自我揭露」、「社會支持」、「寂寞」與「憂鬱」上的差異情形，並以兩個模式探究有戀愛經驗大學生的「成人依附」、「社交能力」、「社會支持」、「寂寞」與「憂鬱」之間的關係。模式一探討「逃避依附、焦慮依附、社交自我效能、困擾的自我揭露、寂寞與憂鬱之關係」；模式二探討「逃避依附、焦慮依附、社交自我效能、困擾的自我揭露、社會支持與憂鬱之關係」。研究採問卷調查法，以台灣十一所大學805位有戀愛經驗的大學生為對象，並以隨機方式將之分為兩組，第一組399人，用來刪題與發展模式；第二組406人，用來驗證模式及探究不同背景變項的受試在各研究變項上的差異。研究工具包括成人依附量表、社交自我效能量表、困擾的自我揭露量表、寂寞量表、社會支持量表和憂鬱量表。資料分析方法為因素分析、信度分析、t考驗、單因子變異數分析及結構方程模式。 本研究以第一組樣本探討初始模式發現，初始模式與觀察資料間適配不理想，故根據修正指標進行修正，修正後的模式與資料適配後，再以第二組樣本驗證模式的穩定性，經驗證模式一及模式二具備相當穩定性，且模式一及模式二都與觀察資料適配，並能有效解釋變項間的關係。 主要研究結果如下： 第一，在背景變項方面：（一）女性受試的「困擾的自我揭露」與「社會支持」顯著高於男性；（二）一年級受試的「焦慮依附」顯著高於三年級及四年級的受試；（三）不在戀愛中受試的「逃避依附」、「焦慮依附」與「寂寞」顯著高於在戀愛中的受試，而在戀愛中受試的「社會支持」顯著高於不在戀愛中的受試；（四）無晤談經驗受試的「逃避依附」顯著高於有晤談經驗的受試，有晤談經驗受試的「寂寞」與「憂鬱」顯著高於無晤談經驗的受試。其他部分則無顯著差異。 第二，在模式方面：（一）逃避依附與焦慮依附會透過社交自我效能而間接影響寂寞，再間接影響憂鬱；（二）逃避依附與焦慮依附會透過社交自我效能而間接影響社會支持，再間接影響憂鬱；（三）逃避依附會透過困擾的自我揭露，間接影響社交自我效能，再透過社交自我效能間接影響寂寞，再間接影響憂鬱；（四）逃避依附會透過困擾的自我揭露，間接影響社交自我效能，再透過社交自我效能間接影響社會支持，再間接影響憂鬱；（五）焦慮依附會直接影響憂鬱；（六）焦慮依附會透過寂寞間接影響憂鬱；（七）焦慮依附對憂鬱的影響效果會大過逃避依附對憂鬱的影響效果；（八）困擾的自我揭露對寂寞不具直接影響力，困擾的自我揭露會透過社交自我效能間接影響寂寞；（九）逃避依附、焦慮依附、困擾的自我揭露對社會支持不具直接影響力，逃避依附、焦慮依附、困擾的自我揭露會透過社交自我效能間接影響社會支持。 最後，根據研究結果，針對個人、學校諮商與輔導實務及未來相關研究提出建議，以供參考。 / The Relationships Among Adult Attachment, Social Competencies, Social Support, Loneliness and Depression of College Students Ching-Ju Lee Abstract The main purpose of this research was to study the relationships among “adult attachment,” “social competencies,” “social support,” “loneliness” and “depression” of the college students who had romance. The researcher first investigated the differences in terms of “attachment avoidance,” “attachment anxiety,” “social self-efficacy,” “distress self-disclosure,” “social support,” “loneliness” and “depression” among the participants who had the different background variables. Also studied were the relationships among “adult attachment,” “social competencies,” “social support,” “loneliness” and “depression” of the college students who had romance by using two models. Model one was used to study “the relationships among attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, social self-efficacy, distress self-disclosure, loneliness and depression.” Model two was used to study “the relationships among attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, social self-efficacy, distress self-disclosure, social support and depression.” This study employed questionnaires to collect data. The participants of the study were 805 Taiwan college students who had romance from 11 universities, and were randomly divided into two groups. In group one, there were 399 participants whose data were used to cancel items and develop models, and in group two there were 406 participants whose data were used to test models and study the differences in regards of different research variables among the participants who had the different background variables. The participants were evaluated by Adult Attachment Scale, Social Self-efficacy Scale, Distress Self-disclosure Scale, Social Support Scale, Loneliness Scale and Depression Scale. The data were analyzed by factor analysis, Cronbach α analysis, t-test, one-way ANOVA and SEM. The initial models tested by group one did not fit well with the observed data. Therefore, applying the modification index, the researcher modified the models till the models fit the observed data, then tested the models’ stability by group two, and came to confirm the stability of model one and model two. The researcher found both model one and model two fit the observed data, and could effectively explain the relationships among the variables. The main results of this study were as follows: First, about the background variables: 1. The scores of “distress self-disclosure” and “social support” of girls were significantly higher than those of boys. 2. The scores of “attachment anxiety” of freshmen were significantly higher than those of juniors and seniors. 3. The scores of “attachment avoidance”, “attachment anxiety”, and “loneliness” of the students who were not in love were significantly higher than those of the students who were in love, and the scores of “social support” of the students who were in love were significantly higher than those of the students who were not in love. 4. The scores of “attachment avoidance” of the students who had no counseling experience were significantly higher than those of the students who had counseling experience while the scores of “loneliness” and “depression” of the students who had counseling experience were significantly higher than those of the students who had no counseling experience. There were no significant differences among other variables. Second, about the models: 1. Attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety could affect social self-efficacy, and could thus in turn affect loneliness through social self-efficacy, and could indirectly continue to affect depression through loneliness. 2. Attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety could affect social self-efficacy, and could thus in turn affect social support through social self-efficacy, and could indirectly continue to affect depression through social support. 3. Attachment avoidance could affect distress self-disclosure, and could thus in turn affect social self-efficacy through distress self-disclosure, loneliness through social self-efficacy, and depression through loneliness. 4. Attachment avoidance could affect distress self-disclosure, and could thus in turn affect social self-efficacy through distress self-disclosure, social support through social self-efficacy, and depression through social support. 5. Attachment anxiety could directly affect depression. 6. Attachment anxiety could indirectly affect depression through loneliness. 7. The effect of attachment anxiety affecting depression was higher than that of attachment avoidance affecting depression. 8. Distress self-disclosure could not directly affect loneliness, while it could indirectly affect loneliness through social self-efficacy. 9. Attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety and distress self-disclosure could not directly affect social support, whereas they could indirectly affect social support through social self-efficacy. Finally, based on the results of the study, the researcher made some further suggestions for individuals, school counseling and future researchers.

本研究旨在探討大學生不同依附風格與不同性別，對創造力情意之影響。研究過程採問卷調查法，研究對象為台北縣市八間大學的一到四年級學生，總共回收問卷370份。研究工具採用「依附風格量表」與自編之「創造力情意量表」，並將所得資料以SPSS統計軟體雙因子共變數分析進行分析處理。 本研究結果有以下五點：(一)新編「創造力情意量表」總共37題，整體信度為.893；(二)在性別與依附型態的分佈中，男大學生較多矛盾依附型，女大學生則有較多逃避依附型；(三)在「情意整體」與「好奇心」中，安全依附型與矛盾依附型的得分皆顯著高於逃避依附型，「想像力」之中三者並無差異，在「冒險性」與「挑戰性」中則是安全依附型高於非安全依附型；(四)不同性別只有在「好奇心」中有所差異，男大學生自認其好奇心高於女大學生。(五)依附風格與性別的交互作用並不會對創造力情意產生影響。 本研究根據上述結果提出建議，以供未來研究或教育心理及諮商輔導之參考。 / The purpose of this research was to assess the influence of attachment style and sex to creative affective among college students. In this research , questionnaire survey was adopted. The subjects consisted 370 valid sampling from eight Universities in Taipei. The tools adopted included Attachment Styles, Creative Affective Scale. The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics method,two-way Anova by SPSS. The major findings were as follows: 1.The new Creative Affective Scale had 37 items, and the reliability of this scale was .893 2.Among attachment style and sex, male students had much more ambivalent the female, and female had more avoidance attachment than male. 3.(1) The scores in secure and ambivalent attachment were remarkable higher than avoidance attachment in total creative affective scores and curiosity. (2) There was no remarkable differences between attachment style on “imaginative”. (3) The scores in secure attachment was remarkable higher than non-secure attachment in ”adventure”and “challenge”. 4.There were remarkable differences between different gender students only on “curiosity”. Male think they were more curious than female. 5.The interaction of attachment style and sex had no remarkable influence in creative affective. According to the findings, the study made suggestions to be referred to in the academic researches and the educational counseling in the futher.

近年來觀光產業的快速發展，使相關業者面臨激烈的競爭，旅遊目的地行銷的概念應運而生。隨著產業結構的轉型，地方都市無不透過觀光行銷來吸引投資者或遊客之進入，以增加自身競爭力，因應全球化下的競爭。 　　觀光意象是遊客對於一旅遊目的地所持的知覺、看法與印象的重組，其傳達遊客腦海中對旅遊目的地遊憩屬性的偏好，具有宣傳與行銷的功能。一般而言，觀光意象在遊客對目的地之選擇行為過程中扮演了重要的角色，具有良好觀光意象的旅遊目的地通常具有較高的吸引力，且正向的觀光意象對都市透過觀光收益來促進都市發展及經濟成長亦有顯著效果。觀光意象包含了遊客的認知與情感面，遊客將據其偏好選擇喜歡的目的地作為旅遊地點。然而，過去研究較少探討遊客主觀感受與其對地方之情感連結等心理層面對選擇行為之影響，據此，本研究以台北市貓空地區為例，以觀光意象作為前因變數，探討其對遊客之地方依附、旅遊品質、滿意度、選擇行為之影響路徑及各變數間之交互影響效果。 　　本研究以遊客問卷之設計，對非當地居民之遊客作為抽樣調查之對象，並以因素分析與結構方程模式作為資料分析方法，所得主要結果為：觀光意象對地方依附、旅遊品質與選擇行為有直接正向影響，而影響遊客對旅遊目的地選擇行為最重要的因素為地方依附。 / With the change of industry structure, tourism industry has become one of important industries in a city. Facing the competition under the global age, the concept of destination marketing has widely aroused attention because of fast development of tourism industry and keen competition among relative industry proprietors. Destination image is sum of beliefs, ideas and impressions that a person has of a destination. Destination image has been shown to be vital influence on travelers' travel behavior, that is, the urban with a positive and good image perceived by tourists can bring out the urban a significant effect on urban development and economic growth. A tourist's intent to visit a destination is determined by a combination of cognitive and affective image. Tourists usually develop emotional associations with destination where they're lovely to visit. However, very limited research has been conducted personal emotional or meanings tourists attach to the places they visited and experienced. Thus, the study takes Maokong Area of Taipei city for example, and the purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship among destination image, place attachment, trip quality, satisfaction, and traveling behavior. In research method, the survey was quantitative research oriented in order to understand visitors' ideas toward the destination images of Maokong area. Both factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to analyze for the study. The major results of this research were found that destination image directly has positive influence on place attachment, trip quality, and traveling behavior, and place attachment is the most important cause to influence tourists' behavior.

本研究旨在瞭解台灣地區大學生社會焦慮的現況，並探討影響社會焦慮的相關因素；其次，探討社會焦慮對溝通行為造成之影響;最後，再探討影響溝通行為之相關因素。 本研究取樣對象為台灣地區公私立大學院校學生，有效樣本共計572人(男生274人，女生298人)。所採用的研究工具包括「互動焦慮量表」、「外表知覺量表」、「依附風格量表」、「目標導向量表」、「間接談話風格量表」和「溝通滿意度量表」六種。研究中所使用的統計方法包括皮爾森積差相關、單因子多變量變異數分析和典型相關。 本研究的主要結果如下： 一．社會焦慮的現況方面： 大學生的社會焦慮接近中等程度，大學生表示在一般社會互動情境中最容易感到害羞、不自在；其次，與權威人物互動時會感到相當程度的焦慮;而在陌生情境則會感到有點焦慮。 二．性別、依附風格、外表知覺及目標導向與社會焦慮之關係： (一)男生的陌生情境焦慮顯著高於女生;女生則比男生更容易在社會情境中感到緊張、不自在。 (二)逃避型與焦慮矛盾型的大學生顯著比安全型的大學生更容易感到社會焦慮。 (三)大學生外表知覺中的「性感魅力」、「外表自評」與社會焦慮之負相關最高。 (四)大學生目標導向中的「成長取向」、「証明取向」與社會焦慮中的「緊張彆扭」之負相關最高。 　三．社會焦慮與間接談話風格、溝通滿意度之關係： (一)大學生的社會焦慮與間接談話風格之關係：「緊張彆扭」與「間接詮釋」之負相關最高；而「權威人物焦慮」、「陌生情境焦慮」與「間接表達」之間呈正相關。 (二)大學生的社會焦慮與溝通滿意度有顯著的負相關，其中「陌生情境焦慮」、「緊張彆扭」與「對談話整體性的滿意反應」之負相關最高。 四．性別、依附風格、外表知覺及目標導向與間接談話風格、溝通滿意度之關係： (一)性別在溝通行為上之差異：男生顯著地比女生更常使用間接談話風格；而女生的溝通滿意度顯著高於男生。 (二)依附風格在溝通行為上之差異：逃避型與焦慮矛盾型顯著地比安全型的大學生更常用間接的方式來表達；其溝通滿意度也顯著低於安全型的大學生。 (三)外表知覺與溝通行為之關係：「外表對人際之影響」、「外表對事業之影響」與間接談話風格呈顯著的正相關；「外表自評」、「性感魅力」、「重視外表」與「對談話整體性的滿意反應」之正相關最高。 (四)目標導向與溝通行為之關係：「証明取向」、「成長取向」與「間接詮釋」之正相關最高；「成長取向」、「証明取向」與「對談話整體性的滿意反應」、「自由互動」之正相關最高。 　五．大學生的依附風格、外表知覺及目標導向與社會焦慮、間接談話風格、溝通滿意度之間共可抽出四組顯著的典型相關。 本研究根據上述結果加以討論，並提出若干建議以供未來研究及教育與輔導工作之參考。 / The first purpose of this study was to assess the degree of social anxiety of college students in Taiwan. The second purpose was to investigate how gender, attachment style, physical attractiveness and goal orientation approach related to social anxiety. The third purpose was to study how social anxiety influences style of language use and communication satisfaction. The Chinese versions of the Interaction and Social Anxiousness Scale (Leary, 1983), Attachment Scale (Mikulincer, 1990), Goal Orientation Inventory (Dykman, 1998), Physical Attractiveness Inventory (Wu & Liu, 1994), Conversational Indirectness Scale (Holtgraves, 1997), and Interpersonal Communication Satisfaction Inventory (Hecht, 1978) were administered to 572 college students from 13 universities in Taiwan. The results supported most hypotheses. College students’ social anxiety was of moderate degree, but significantly higher than the American samples reported in Leary’s study (1983). There was no difference between males and females on overall social anxiety; however, males were more anxious in meeting strangers and females felt more uncomfortable in social situation. In comparison with secure students, both avoidant and anxious-ambivalent students were significantly more socially anxious. The more students perceived themselves to be physically unattractive, the more socially anxious they felt. Both growth-seeking and validation-seeking goal orientation approaches were negatively correlated with social anxiety. The study also found that social anxiety was positively and significantly correlated with indirectness of conversation, but negatively and significantly correlated with interpersonal communication satisfaction.

本研究主要以通勤家庭未通勤婦女的生活目標、配偶依附風格與幸福感間的關係來探討國內通勤家庭未通勤婦女的生活品質。本研究以問卷調查研究法，採立意取樣收集國內通勤家庭未通勤婦女有效樣本共284份。本研究得到的結果為： 1.（1）國內通勤家庭未通勤婦女的生活目標傾向追求「基本生活品質的維持」，較不重視「追求社會影響力」。 （2）不同年齡、教育程度、就業情形、有無孩子及先生不同通勤年數的未通勤婦女在生活目標上有顯著的差異存在。 2.（1）國內通勤家庭未通勤婦女的幸福感普遍在中等程度。 （2）教育程度高、有工作及先生工作地點不在大陸的未通勤婦女其幸福感較高。 （3）未通勤婦女的生活目標各層面與幸福感皆為正相關，以「追求自我的充實與成長」生活目標最能預測其幸福感。 3.（1）國內通勤家庭未通勤婦女的配偶依附風格以「害怕依附型」佔最多數，其次依序為「逃避依附型」、「安全依附型」、「焦慮依附型」。 （2）「安全依附型」之未通勤婦女較「逃避依附型」與「害怕依附型」重視「基本生活品質的維持」與「追求自我的充實與成長」生活目標，其幸福感亦較高。 （3）不同配偶依附風格者，其背景變項與生活目標各層面對幸福感有不同的預測力。「先生的通勤間距」最能預測安全依附型未通勤婦女的幸福感；「追求自我的充實與成長」生活目標取向最能預測焦慮依附型與害怕依附型未通勤婦女的幸福感；「追求生命的統整」生活目標取向最能預測逃避依附型未通勤婦女的幸福感。 根據上述研究結果，研究者提出討論與檢討，最後針對政府或民間相關單位、婚姻輔導工作者、通勤家庭婦女與未來的研究方向提供若干建議以茲參考。 關鍵字：通勤家庭、未通勤婦女、生活目標取向、配偶依附風格、幸福感

本研究試圖整合成人依附理論與Benjamin的SASB人際行為環複模式，主要研究目的有二，研究目的一：探討伴侶間的人際行為是否會影響個人在愛情關係中依附特質的展現，研究目的二：探討伴侶間的人際行為對個人在愛情關係中依附風格、依附特質改變的影響情形。在本研究中，在伴侶間人際行為的內涵包括親和性（又分成滋潤性與破壞性）與互依性（又分成自主性與控制性）等人際行為，伴侶間互動層次共測量個體自陳對方提供行為、實際對方提供行為，個體的尋求行為、以及提供-尋求行為之間的互補性（亦分成個體自陳伴侶間的互補性、以及實際伴侶間的互補性）。依附特質的測量包括個體自陳在愛情中與伴侶間的焦慮與逃避依附特質等，並可組合出安全型、焦慮/矛盾型、逃避型、與錯亂型等四種依附風格。 本研究採取「追蹤研究法」，平均間隔約12.49週，進行兩個時間點的測量，邀請正在約會關係中的大學生伴侶雙方共234人接受單獨的成人依附特質量表(ECR)、伴侶間人際行為量表(SASB模式)的測量，並同時詢問其壓力事件調查表與測驗大學生身心健康調查表(GHQ)，以作為排除影響依附風格改變的干擾變項，兩個時間點皆完成測驗且未分手者共計199人。研究目的一的分析對象為第一個時間受測者，但必須是正在談戀愛而未分手的大學生，共計232人符合標準，其中男性佔35％，女性佔65%，，而完整的配對資料共76對，故有152人可進行實際伴侶間互動的分析。 研究目的二的受測者除了兩個時間點皆受測且未分手外，還必須排除在兩個時間點遭受重大壓力者與GHQ量表上表現出身心健康狀況不佳者，共計有效受試者為183人，伴侶雙方皆完成測驗的共計63對，故有126人可進行實際伴侶間互動的分析。本研究亦針對個體自陳對方提供行為、以及各人際行為的親和性與互依性指標、提供與尋求行為的互補性指標等，進行信效度的檢驗。 本研究結果可分成兩大部分。第一，在人際行為對愛情依附特質與風格改變的影響方面，可發現部分伴侶間人際行為的確可對依附特質造成影響：1. 「親和性」人際行為最能影響愛情依附特質，並與依附風格、依附特質改變最有關連；2.「滋潤性親和」不同於「破壞性親和」對依附特質的影響；3.個體在愛情關係中的依附特質，主要受到個體「主觀認知」到的伴侶間人際互動，而並不一定會受到「實際」伴侶間人際互動的影響；4. 逃避特質則較明顯受到伴侶間滋潤性親和人際行為的影響，而焦慮依附特質較受到伴侶間破壞性人際行為的影響，但焦慮依附特質的改變與伴侶人際行為關連性較低。第二，對個體在關係中單向的人際行為而言，親和性比互依性人際行為更能影響愛情依附特質，甚至與依附風格、依附特質的改變更有關連；但互依性指標（自主性）對依附特質並非沒有影響力，而是會顯現在雙向人際行為的互補性當中。 最後乃說明本研究的討論與限制，並提出未來在研究上與伴侶諮商實務上的建議。 / This study tried to integrate adult attachment theory and Benjamin’s Structural Analysis of Social Behavior Models (SASB). There were two major purposes of the study: The first one was to, discussing whether the impact of dating couples’ interpersonal behaviors on romantic attachment characteristics for college students. The Second was to, discussing the impact of dating couples’ interpersonal behaviors on the change of attachment styles and characteristics. In this study, the content of dating couples’ interpersonal behaviors includes affiliation (best and worst) and interdependence (autonomy and control) behaviors. The interactions of dating couples were measured by self reporting partner’s providing behaviors, actual partner’s providing behaviors, subjects’ seeking behaviors, the complements of self reporting dating relationship with providing-seeking behaviors, and the complements of actual dating relationship with providing-seeking behaviors. The measurement of attachment characteristics included anxiety and avoidance trait, which could be combined to four attachment styles: secure, anxious-ambivalent, avoidant, disoriented / disorganized. The study took ‘panel study’, and the average interval of test-retest time points was about 12.49 weeks. Total subjects were 234, who were measured by ECR and couples’ interpersonal behaviors (SASB model). Questionnaires of stress events, and GHQ were interference variables for the use of the purpose of the second study. There were 232 subjects composed of 35% male and 65% female in the purpose of first study. These subjects who were all measured in the first timing were falling in love and not yet breaking-up. There were 76 pairs complete matching data, so 152 subjects could process the analysis of actual dating relationship. There were 183 subjects in the purpose of the second study. Besides subjects who were measured in the two time points were falling in love and not yet breaking-up, it had to eliminate two interference variables. There were 63 pairs complete matching data, so 126 subjects could process the analysis of actual dating relationship. There were two major results in this study. First, couples’ interpersonal behaviors had the impact on attachment characteristics: 1. affiliation interpersonal behaviors could affect romantic attachment characteristics, and was related to the change of attachment styles and attachment characteristics. 2. The impact on attachment characteristics was different between ‘best affiliation’ and ‘worst affiliation’. 3. Self reporting couples’ interpersonal behaviors had impact on attachment characteristics. On the contrary, actual couples’ interpersonal behaviors had no impact. 4. ‘Best affiliation’ had impact on avoidance attachment characteristics, and ‘worst affiliation’ had impact on anxiety attachment characteristics. The association between the change of anxiety attachment characteristics and couples’ interpersonal behaviors was low. Second, for one-way interpersonal behavior in dating relationship, affiliation behaviors affected romantic attachment characteristics more than interdependence. Even affiliation behaviors were more related to the change of attachment styles and attachment characteristics than interdependence. The complement of couples’ autonomy interpersonal behaviors also affected attachment characteristics. In addition, implication for adult attachment research and couple therapy in dating relationship was discussed. Research limitation was also explicated.

本研究目的在瞭解大學生的人際依附風格、愛情信念與關係衝突因應策略彼此間之關聯性。研究對象為856位北部大專院校通識課或相關課程的大學生。本研究使用「人際依附風格量表」（安全型依附、焦慮型依附、忽略逃避型依附、害怕逃避型依附）、「愛情信念量表」（發展信念、命運信念）與「關係衝突因應策略量表」（表明因應、忠誠因應、忽視因應、離開因應）為研究工具，所得資料先以驗證性因素分析與Cronbach’s α分析「愛情信念量表」與「關係衝突因應策略量表」之信度與效度，再以描述性統計、獨立樣本單因子多變量變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關與典型相關進行正式資料分析，主要研究結果如下： 一、 大學生的人際依附風格以「安全依附」的傾向較高；愛情信念中較傾向有「發展信念」；關係衝突因應策略較傾向採用「表明因應」。 二、 女性在「害怕逃避依附」、「發展信念」之得分高於男性；男性在「忠誠因應」、「忽視因應」及「離開因應」之得分高於女性。目前有交往對象者在「安全依附」、「發展信念」與「表明因應」的傾向較高；曾經有交往對象者在「安全依附」、「命運信念」、「忠誠因應」、「忽視因應」與「離開因應」的傾向較高；未曾有交往對象者在「焦慮依附」、「忽略逃避依附」、「害怕逃避依附」、「命運信念」、「忠誠因應」、「忽視因應」與「離開因應」的傾向較高。 三、 人際依附風格、愛情信念與關係衝突因應策略三組變項間有三組典型相關存在：1.「安全依附」和「發展信念」愈高，則其「表明因應」愈高，「忽視因應」與「離開因應」愈低；2.「焦慮依附」、「害怕逃避依附」和「命運信念」愈高，則其「忠誠因應」與「忽視因應」愈高；3.「安全依附」與「命運信念」愈高，則其「表明因應」與「離開因應」愈高。 根據以上研究發現，本研究提出進一步的討論，並提供愛情/婚姻教育與諮商實務工作上之建議及未來之研究方向。 關鍵詞：愛情關係、人際依附風格、愛情信念、關係衝突因應策略 / The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship among attachment style, love beliefs, and conflict-coping strategies in relationship. 856 college students who located in Northern Taiwan were selected as subjects. The data was collected from the inventory of attachment style (secure attachment, preoccupied attachment, fearful-avoidant attachment, dismissing-avoidant attachment), love beliefs (growth belief, destiny belief), and conflict-coping strategies in relationship (voice coping, loyalty coping, neglect coping, exit coping). The confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach’s α were used to analyze the reliability and validity for both love beliefs and conflict-coping strategies in relationship. The descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance, pearson’s correlation and canonical correlation analysis were used to complete the full analysis. The major findings are presented as follow: 1. Most of college students (in our sample) are secure attached, growth belief in love, and use voice conflict-coping strategies. 2. The dismissing-avoidant attachment, and growth belief of female college students are higher than that of the male college students, The loyalty coping, neglect coping, exit coping of male college students are higher than that of the female college students, The college students who currently in a relationship tend to have higher score in secure attachment, growth belief, and voice coping, The college student who has boy/girl friend before tend to have higher score in secure attachment, destiny belief, loyalty coping, neglect coping, exit coping, The college students who never had boy/girl friends tend to have higher score in preoccupied attachment, fearful-avoidant attachment, dismissing-avoidant attachment, destiny belief, loyalty coping, neglect coping, exit coping. 3. There were three significant canonical correlation between attachment style, love beliefs, and conflict-coping strategies in relationship. First, higher secure attachment and growth belief were associated with higher voice coping and lower neglect coping and exit coping. Second, higher preoccupied attachment and dismissing-avoidant attachment were associated with higher loyalty coping and neglect coping. Third, higher secure attachment and dismissing-avoidant attachment were associated with higher voice coping and exit coping. The implications of this study for love/marriage education and counseling worker, along with future research suggestions, are discussed herein. Keyword: love relationship, attachment style, love beliefs, and conflict-coping strategies in relationship

本文旨在探討休閒興趣相似程度與夫妻間的依附類型配對組合兩者對婚姻滿意度之影響。測量工具上採用問卷調查法的方式進行，依附類型的分類部分，參考ECR量表（Experiences in Close Relationships），自編依附關係量表，以群集分析方式分類夫妻雙方各別的依附類型；休閒興趣部分則使用自編之休閒興趣調查表，量測受試者夫妻在休閒興趣的四大向度，個人/群體*靜態/動態上之有興趣之休閒活動數量；最後以關係評估量表（Relationship Assessment Scale，RAS）作為婚姻滿意度之測量工具。樣本部分，本研究以卡培爾國際有限公司之「為愛啟程」團隊網路交友配對計畫所蒐集之夫妻樣本資料做二手資料分析，採取系統觀點以201對(共402人)完整夫妻配對資料，進行研究。 　　研究經由結果得知，夫妻雙方之休閒興趣的相似程度、各自依附類型、依附類型配對組合皆能部分解釋丈夫、妻子及雙方平均婚姻滿意度部分變異，而丈夫婚姻滿意度之解釋力以休閒興趣相似程度為最高，夫妻皆不安全依附之配對組合為次之。妻子婚姻滿意度之解釋力以夫妻皆安全依附之配對組合為最高，休閒興趣相似程度為次之，夫妻間一方為安全一方為不安全依附之配對組合則為第三高。平均婚姻滿意度之解釋力以夫妻皆不安全依附之配對組合為最高，休閒興趣相似程度為次之。 / This study aims to explore the relationships of married couple’s similarity in leisure interest, matches of attachment styles and marital satisfaction. Based on the data of “Capire International Company “collected from 201 pairs of married couples, and reconstructed this study’s model. In the study, we used attachment stype scale to test married couple’s attachment style. Cluster analysis was also used to sort out each spouse’s attachment type. As for leisure interest, we used self-edited questionnaire to measure married couple’s four dimensions of leisure interested. Finally, the RAS (Relationship Assessment Scale) was used to measure couple’s marital satisfaction. The result of the research indicated that, no matter the similarity in leisure interest of married couple, husband or wife’s individual attachment type and married couple’s matches of attachment styles all can explain part of the variation of the husband, wife and the mean of both marital satisfactions. And the similarity in leisure interest has the highest prediction for husband's marital satisfaction, with both spouses’ attachment type as insecure lying second. As for the explanation power for the wife’s marital satisfaction, both spouses’ attachment type as secure ranked the highest, with similarity in leisure interest second and one spouse attachment type as secure and another as insecure ranked the third. Last of all, for mean martial satisfaction, both spouses’ attachment type as insecure has the highest prediction, with similarity in leisure interest ranked second.