- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 81 to 90 of 108 (0.073 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"moderaterna"" "subject:"moderaternas""
| 81 |
Politiskt Nomos : Ett sociologiskt verktyg för att förklara idéförmedling i partiprogram. / Political Nomos : A sociological resource for explaining the spread of political ideas through political parties' publications.Arvidsson, Eric January 2018 (has links)
Denna uppsats ämnar utforska ett statsvetenskapligt område med en sociologisk teori för att ge ett nytt verktyg i läsandet av partiprogram. Med hjälp av Peter L. Bergers teori om kosmiskt världsbyggande kallad Nomos läses partiprogram för att fram den politiska världsbyggnaden. Genom att identifiera Objektivering (politiska idéer) och Externalisering (politisk handling) i partiprogrammen försöker uppsatsen bryta ner partiprogrammen för att underlätta läsningen. Detta underlättande ger ett verktyg för förståelse av partiprogram och kan i förlängningen leda till en förbättrad källkritisk aspekt genom att läsaren förstår och kan ta ställning till de idéer och mål som presenteras, och inte bara anfalla en vägg av text. / This essay aims to explore a problem within the political sciences with a sociological theory to provide a new approach to reading political parties campaign publications. Through Peter L. Bergers sociological theory about cosmic world construction called Nomos the essay aims to capture a societal world construction through the political parties’ conceptions of society through their campaign publications; a political nomos. By identifying objectivation (political ideas) and externalization (political acts) in the publications we can try to capture the parties’ political nomos that they try to convey to the reader. In extension this provides a tool for educational purposes when trying to explain political parties’ publication to pupils or aiding in the understanding of parties underlying ideas and goals.
|
| 82 |
Idéer i förändring: : En idéanalys över den förändrade synen på välfärdens organisering i riksdagsdebatten mellan 1990-2010Klarin, Marilyn January 2012 (has links)
This thesis aimed to describe how the ideological dividing line concerning the welfare state has changed between the two largest governmental parties in Sweden, the Social Democrats and the Moderaterna, during 1990 to 2010. The scientist Mark Blyth points out that ideas are important instruments for structural and institutional change by identifying ideas as weapons, blueprints and cognitive locks, which were being used in the theoretical framework. The empirical data was made by a qualitative analysis of the parliamentary speeches and debates from both parties held every year. The results shows that the budgetary law passed in 1997 became a new institutional blueprint, which changed the political conditions for the Social Democrats. Furthermore, the results point to a change in the Moderaterna’s rhetoric concerning the welfare state to a more pragmatic view.
|
| 83 |
Den politiska debatten om yttrandefriheten : -Pranjic, Anela January 2008 (has links)
Abstract: The purpose with this study is to analyse the political debate about freedom of speech in Sweden and Denmark, after the caricatures of the Islamic Prophet Mohammed that the Danish newspaper Jyllandsposten published in September 2005. For this debate four political parties have been chosen. These are: Socialdemokratiska Partiet and Moderata Samlingspartiet in Sweden and Socialdemokraterne and Venstre in Denmark. An idea analysis has been chosen as method, and dimensions as an analysing tool. The overall result of the analysis is that right- and left political parties in Sweden and Denmark are more alike, than different in their political debate about free speech. They all wish for total freedom of speech, and see that as the foundation of the democratic society. The difference between the parties is that left parties put more weight on personal responsibility and minorities, than right parties that mostly debate about the meaning of democracy and why freedom of speech should not be restricted.
|
| 84 |
En strid om verkligheten och Nato : En studie av Natoförespråkare i Sveriges riksdagBlomstrand, Rickard January 2015 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 85 |
En dag i riksdagens Twitterrum : En språklig analys av samtliga riksdagsledamöters twittrande under 24 timmarÅberg, Mats E January 2013 (has links)
Syftet med den här uppsatsen är att beskriva riksdagsledamöternas twittrande och försöka lyfta framnågot av det som kännetecknar Twittermediet. Det uppfylls genom att besvara frågorna: • Vilken typ av interpersonella språkhandlingar utförs i riksdagsledamöternas twittrande? • Hur kan man kategorisera och beskriva de interpersonella språkhandlingarna? • Skiljer sig språkhandlingarna åt beroende på parti-, blocktillhörighet eller kön? • Finns det några språkliga särdrag som är typiska för riksdagsledamöternas användande avTwittermediet? Frågorna besvaras genom att undersöka alla tweets som skrevs av någon ledamot av Sverigesriksdag den 5 mars 2013. Uppsatsen beskriver flera aspekter av riksdagsledamöternas twittrande. Vanligaste allmänna språkhandling är ett påstående, ibland följt av en fråga. Både beröm och kritikutdelas men följer då alltid mönstret kritik åt politisk motståndare och beröm åt politisk vän. Sverigedemokraterna uttalar sig oftare med tvärsäkerhet och mer sällan med garderingar än övrigapartier. Inga stora skillnader mellan könen och Alliansen respektive de Rödgröna står att finna. Twittermediet är ofta informellt och snabbt vilket ger upphov till nya språkliga konstruktioner ochibland rena fel.
|
| 86 |
Lika som bär? : En komparativ idé och ideologianalytisk undersökning av Moderaterna och Socialdemokraterna i senmodern samhällstid / Two peas in a pod? : A comparative idea and ideology analysis of the Moderate Party and the Social Democrats in modern timesStrandberg, Anna January 2021 (has links)
This study is about the two largest and longest existing parties in Sweden, The Social Democrats, and The Moderate Party. These two parties have two different classical ideologies as their foundation which are socialism and conservatism. The question is then, have these political parties deviated from their classical ideological background? Moreover, if the parties’ positions are compared with the new scale GAL-TAN, are they more similar or dissimilar compared to when comparing the ideologies? The essay will present an explanation on what the new scale GAL-TAN is and then discuss the scale compared to the ideologies. The conclusion is that when the two parties are compared with their ideology, The Moderate Party has deviated the most from conservatism. The Social Party still follows socialism but with a modern adaptation. However, The Moderate Party has more in common with socialism than the Socialist Party has with conservatism. Moreover, the two parties’ position on the GAL-TAN-scale is very close but, The Moderate Party’s position is stronger because they focus more on individualism.
|
| 87 |
Förändringar i folkopinionen? : En kvalitativ studie om hur Socialdemokraterna och Moderaterna representerar folkopinionen utifrån vänster-högerskalan och GAL-TAN.Berggren, Josefin January 2021 (has links)
The purpose of this essay is to investigate to which extent two Swedish political parties, founded in the early 1900s, represents changes in public opinion. The question of issue to be answered is to which extent the Social Democrats and the Moderates represents their former voters´ opinions. The question of issue will be investigated throughout a comparison of party politics and public opinion in 2014 and 2018, the years Sweden had parliamentary elections. The analysis was performed by applying the GAL-TAN and left-right division on these data. The results shows how there has been a change in politics between these years among both the parties and voters. The change in public opinion is reflected in party politics in areas such as immigration and law and order but there are parts of politics that is considered irrelevant for how the voters choose to vote. The Social Democrats and Moderates are capable of representing changes in public opinion to some extent.
|
| 88 |
Analys av Moderata samlingspartiets program 1921–2020 : Liberalism och konservatism utifrån frihetsbegreppetKärkkäinen, Catarina January 2021 (has links)
No description available.
|
| 89 |
Nu får vi ordning på Sverige : En analys av det Moderata partiets migrationspolitiska utveckling mellan 2010–2022Harang, Ylva January 2022 (has links)
The purpose appears to examine the Swedish Moderate Party and their political development regarding migration politics between 2010 and 2022 with the aim to discover if voting maximization and adjust politics from that view, or if holding on to earlier beliefs exceed. Election manifesto, party programs and post-roll analyzes from the Moderate Party will constitute the material and be analyzed with the help of rational choice and utility maximization through four different political strategy arenas. In the discussion a comparison of the result of the analysis with the migration politics in a party program from 2011 by The Swedish Democrats, which the Moderate Party has lost several voters to in the last couple of years, to see if the migration politics of the Moderate Party has developed closer to The Swedish Democrats standing point.
|
| 90 |
Brottslighetens orsaker i den politiska debatten : En WPR analys av Socialdemokraternas och Moderaternas kriminalpolitiska argumentation under valrörelsen 2022Klar, Viktor January 2023 (has links)
The subject of this bachelor thesis in political science has been the drivingfactors behind crime. More specifically how Sweden’s two leading politicalparties (The Social democratic party & the Moderate Party) portrayed thecauses of crime in their public communication during the election campaignof 2022. To study this subject a WPR or what’s the problem represented tobe analysis method has been used. To better the study’s validity andreliability three models of explaining what causes crime have been used tocompare with the two parties’ public communication.Trough the use of this method the study has found that the Moderate party’spublic communication in mainly in line with an economic way of explainingthe causes of crime, whereas the Social democratic party’s publiccommunication mainly falls in line with a sociological way of explaining thecauses of crime.
|
Page generated in 0.1089 seconds