- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 211 to 215 of 215 (0.057 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"amendment -""
| 211 |
A constitucionalidade nos julgamentos de mérito, sem citação, nos casos do artigo 285-A do CPCStrenger, Guilherme 13 May 2009 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Guilherme Strenger.pdf: 560594 bytes, checksum: d1f24191ad2a70b312f13e934462bf6e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009-05-13 / The aim of this study is to develop a constitutional analysis of article 285-A, which
added to the Civil Process Code the possibility for the judge to judge a lawsuit for
its merit, denying the request, without quoting the defendant.
The analysis of constitutional principles, especially regarding the process of law,
as well as of the contradictory and the reasonable duration of the process shall
provide better understanding on the modern process science, which obeys the
Constitution.
The interpretation of the 285-A article is needed, followed by the new legislative
alterations, mainly on Laws 11.232/06 and 11.276/06, given the fact that they bring
forth the new mentality of the process legislator, influenced by Constitutional
Amendment nº 45 / O presente tema tem como finalidade a análise constitucional do artigo 285-A, que
adicionou ao Código de Processo Civil a possibilidade de o juiz julgar uma ação
improcedente, apreciando o mérito, sem citar o réu.
A análise de princípios constitucionais, em especial do devido processo legal, do
contraditório e da razoável duração do processo, dará suporte para melhor
compreensão do cientificismo processual moderno, pautado pela obediência à
Constituição.
A interpretação do artigo 285-A se faz necessária, acompanhada das novas
alterações legislativas, principalmente das Leis 11.232/06 e 11.276/06, que
traduzem a nova mentalidade do legislador processual, influenciado pela Emenda
Constitucional nº. 45
|
| 212 |
A CPRB (Contribuição Previdenciária sobre a Receita Bruta) à luz do Sistema Constitucional TributárioToselli, Luis Henrique Marotti 10 March 2015 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:23:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Luis Henrique Marotti Toselli.pdf: 1761447 bytes, checksum: f4f83f36c33fa8101690261e307cdac0 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-03-10 / The employer contribution to the cost of the social security system in Brazil, according to
article 195, I, "a", of the Federal Constitution of 1988, must levied on the total
remuneration arising from services rendered by individuals. However, the Government
has created a replacement contribution, mandatory for taxpayers listed in the law, which is
imposed on the gross revenue of the companies. The purpose study is to investigate this
collection (called "CPRB") in light of the Brazilian constitutional tax system / A contribuição patronal destinada ao financiamento do regime previdenciário no Brasil, de
acordo com o artigo 195, I, a , da Constituição Federal de 1988, deve incidir sobre a
totalidade das remunerações pagas pelas empresas por serviços prestados por pessoas
físicas. Ocorre que o Governo criou uma contribuição substitutiva, obrigatória para os
contribuintes listados na lei, que passou a incidir sobre a receita bruta das empresas.
Nosso estudo consiste em verificar essa exação (denominada CPRB ) à luz do sistema
constitucional tributário
|
| 213 |
Les traités internationaux devant la juridiction constitutionnelle ivoirienne : contribution à l'étude du contrôle des traités en Côte d'Ivoire / International treaties before the Ivorian Constitutional Court : contribution to the study of the review of treaties in Côte d'IvoireAssi, Brou Rose Delima 24 November 2012 (has links)
La question des traités internationaux devant la juridiction constitutionnelle ivoirienne est une illustration du contentieux interne relatif au droit international conventionnel. Dans le cadre de ce contentieux relatif aux rapports entre le droit international et le droit interne, la juridiction constitutionnelle est amenée à se prononcer sur la constitutionnalité des traités internationaux avant leur insertion dans l’ordre juridique ivoirien. Les modalités d’introduction des traités internationaux en droit ivoirien traduisent l’option du pays en faveur de la doctrine moniste avec primauté du droit international. Les traités régulièrement ratifiés sont automatiquement incorporés au droit interne et ont, dès leur publication, une autorité supérieure à celle des lois internes. Cependant, avant leur ratification, la Constitution prévoit une procédure de vérification de leur constitutionnalité. Ce contrôle préventif a pour effet d’empêcher l'entrée dans l'ordre juridique ivoirien de tout traité international contraire à la Constitution, en dehors de l’intervention du pouvoir constituant. Si le traité est déclaré contraire à la Constitution, l’autorisation de le ratifier ne peut intervenir qu’après la révision constitutionnelle. Le mécanisme de contrôle mis en place par la Constitution de 1960 et reconduit par la Constitution de 2000 actuellement en vigueur a connu une évolution notable relativement à ses conditions d’exercice. Celles-ci ont été progressivement et considérablement élargies par les textes dans le but de faciliter et favoriser le déclenchement du contrôle…. Au total, la juridiction constitutionnelle n’a pu se pencher que sur une vingtaine de traités dont elle a, tant bien que mal, apprécié la conformité à la Constitution. Dans la confrontation de la norme internationale avec la Constitution, l’attitude du juge constitutionnel, emprunte parfois d’hésitations, repose largement sur une interprétation assez libérale de l’exigence de non-contrariété qui aboutit à faciliter la participation de l’État au droit international conventionnel en général et au droit communautaire africain en particulier. En effet, jusqu’ici, l’exercice du contrôle de la constitutionnalité des traités a révélé que, loin de constituer un « frein au développement du droit international », comme aurait pu laisser présager le mécanisme du contrôle, de façon générale, celui-ci s’avère plutôt favorable à l’influence du droit international. Seul le traité de Rome portant Statut de la Cour pénale internationale a été déclaré contraire à la Constitution par le Conseil constitutionnel dans sa décision du 17 décembre 2003. La révision constitutionnelle attendue en vue de la ratification du Traité de Rome permettra d’apprécier l’exécution des décisions de contrariété rendues par l’instance constitutionnelle. / The issue of international treaties before the Ivorian constitutional court is an illustration of the internal dispute relating to international treaty law. In the framework of this dispute concerning the relationship between international law and national law, the constitutional court is asked to decide on the conformity of international treaties before their integration in the Ivorian legal order. The conditions of integration of international treaties in the Ivorian domestic law reflect the country’s option in favor of the monist doctrine with primacy of international law. Treaties duly ratified are automatically incorporated into the national law and shall, upon publication, prevail over Acts of Parliament. However, before their ratification, the Constitution provides a procedure for the review of their constitutionality. The effect of this preventive review is to avoid the entry of unconstitutional international treaties into the Ivorian legal order without the decision and intervention of the constituent power. If the treaty is held not to be in conformity with the Constitution, authorization to ratify it may be given only after amending the Constitution. The mechanism of constitutional review established by the Constitution of 1960 and extended by the Constitution of 2000 (currently in force) undergone significant evolution regarding its conditions of implementation. These conditions were considerably widened in order to facilitate the release of control… In total, the constitutional court was able to look into only twenty or so treaties for which, somehow, the judge reviewed compliance with the Constitution. In the confrontation of treaties with Constitution, the attitude of the constitutional court is sometimes hesitant. Its interpretation of the requirement of non-contradiction between the treaty and the Constitution generally leads to facilitate the participation of the State to International law in general and African community law in particular. Indeed, so far, the practice of the constitutional review by the judge revealed that, the review, far from being an "obstacle to the development of international law", as could foreshadow its mechanism, is rather favorable to its development. Only the Treaty laying down the Statute of the International Criminal Court was declared not to be in conformity with the Constitution by the constitutional court in its decision of 17 December 2003. The amendment of the Constitution that is expected for the ratification of this treaty will be an opportunity to appreciate the enforcement of non-conformity decisions.
|
| 214 |
Ecology and diversity of indigenous Trichoderma species in vegetable cropping systemsBourguignon, Emmanuel January 2008 (has links)
The overall aim of this research was to improve the understanding of the ecology and diversity of Trichoderma species within the soil and rhizosphere of onion (Allium cepa L.) and potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under intensive management in New Zealand. The indigenous Trichoderma population was measured in a field trial at Pukekohe over a three year period under six different crop rotation treatments. The treatments included two continuous onion and potato rotations (intensive), two onion/potato mixed rotation (conventional), and two green manure rotations (sustainable). Results showed that Trichoderma populations were stable in both the rhizosphere and bulk soil (1.5 x 10² to 8.5 x 10³ CFU g⁻¹ ODS). The planting and incorporation of an oat (Avena sativa L.) green manure in the sustainable rotations positively increased Trichoderma colony forming unit (CFU) numbers in the rhizosphere soil from 3.4 x 10² to 2.5 x 10³ g⁻¹ ODS. A Trichoderma species identification method was developed based on colony morphology. Representative isolates were verified using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and DNA sequencing. The method allowed for rapid and reliable identification of isolated Trichoderma species. Five species were identified in the Pukekohe soil: T. asperellum, T. atroviride, T. hamatum, T. harzianum and T. koningii. Results showed identical species diversity between the rhizosphere, rhizoplane and bulk soil. The species did not strongly compete between each other for the rhizosphere ecological niche and differences in species proportions seemed to be caused by environmental factors rather than the rotation treatments. The incorporation of oat green manure in pots did not significantly promote the indigenous Trichoderma population size and diversity in the rhizosphere of onion plants up to 4 months old. The identified species were the same as in the field trial. The incorporation of onion scale residues was shown to result in low Trichoderma and high Penicillium CFU numbers and a reduction in plant size. Additionally, the presence of high levels (6.0 x 10⁵ CFU g⁻¹ ODS) of Penicillium CFU was negatively correlated with the presence of Trichoderma CFU. The effect of oat incorporation on Trichoderma saprophytic growth was also investigated in a soil sandwich assay and revealed no significant differences. A series of experiments indicated that onion extract obtained from dry onion scale residues had no antifungal activity against either Trichoderma or Penicillium and instead tended to promote their hyphal growth and sporulation. It also showed that competition between Penicillium and Trichoderma isolates was limited despite the ability of Penicillium to produce a wide range of inhibitory substances. Four indigenous Trichoderma species (T. atroviride, T. hamatum, T. harzianum and T. koningii) were shown to be rhizosphere competent in a split tube experiment over a 6 week period. The results of this experiment revealed that, the Trichoderma species clearly displayed differences in their ability to colonise the rhizosphere of young onion seedlings. Species such as T. koningii had the greatest rhizosphere colonising ability regardless of soil depth while T. harzianum displayed the weakest ability. Results also indicated that when inoculated as a mixture the four species competed with one another to colonise the rhizosphere. Overall, this research indicated that the studied crop rotation treatments and the use of oat as a green manure did not strongly promote indigenous Trichoderma populations. Species diversity was constant throughout the research with T. hamatum and T. koningii being the most frequently isolated species.
|
| 215 |
A Pragmatic Standard of Legal ValidityTyler, John 2012 May 1900 (has links)
American jurisprudence currently applies two incompatible validity standards to determine which laws are enforceable. The natural law tradition evaluates validity by an uncertain standard of divine law, and its methodology relies on contradictory views of human reason. Legal positivism, on the other hand, relies on a methodology that commits the analytic fallacy, separates law from its application, and produces an incomplete model of law.
These incompatible standards have created a schism in American jurisprudence that impairs the delivery of justice. This dissertation therefore formulates a new standard for legal validity. This new standard rejects the uncertainties and inconsistencies inherent in natural law theory. It also rejects the narrow linguistic methodology of legal positivism.
In their stead, this dissertation adopts a pragmatic methodology that develops a standard for legal validity based on actual legal experience. This approach focuses on the operations of law and its effects upon ongoing human activities, and it evaluates legal principles by applying the experimental method to the social consequences they produce. Because legal history provides a long record of past experimentation with legal principles, legal history is an essential feature of this method.
This new validity standard contains three principles. The principle of reason requires legal systems to respect every subject as a rational creature with a free will. The principle of reason also requires procedural due process to protect against the punishment of the innocent and the tyranny of the majority. Legal systems that respect their subjects' status as rational creatures with free wills permit their subjects to orient their own behavior. The principle of reason therefore requires substantive due process to ensure that laws provide dependable guideposts to individuals in orienting their behavior.
The principle of consent recognizes that the legitimacy of law derives from the consent of those subject to its power. Common law custom, the doctrine of stare decisis, and legislation sanctioned by the subjects' legitimate representatives all evidence consent.
The principle of autonomy establishes the authority of law. Laws must wield supremacy over political rulers, and political rulers must be subject to the same laws as other citizens. Political rulers may not arbitrarily alter the law to accord to their will.
Legal history demonstrates that, in the absence of a validity standard based on these principles, legal systems will not treat their subjects as ends in themselves. They will inevitably treat their subjects as mere means to other ends. Once laws do this, men have no rest from evil.
|
Page generated in 0.0646 seconds