今日企業規模逐漸擴大，公司內部結構更加複雜，且因經營與所有分離所產生之代理問題日益嚴重，經營者如果心懷不軌或公司對其疏於管控，極有可能造成公司股東、投資人，甚至社會大眾之巨大損失，故不得不加強保護投資人，但相對地，同時亦會加重公司經營者之法律責任風險，故在上開環境之推波助瀾之下，董監事及重要職員責任保險成為國內近年來責任保險保費進帳最大之險種之一。但於董監事及重要職員責任保險在我國蓬勃發展之同時，亦有論者指出董事、監察人及重要職員若有了董監事及重要職員責任保險做後盾，是否仍須負擔相關法規所規定之忠實義務、注意義務或其他法定之義務？因此，將保險公司所得承保之董事、監察人及重要職員可能負擔之法律責任加以釐清，將十分重要，否則社會大眾對於董監事及重要職員責任保險是否會破壞相關責任制度之疑慮，將不會停止，甚至將影響董監事及重要職員責任保險市場之發展。因此，本文欲將董事、監察人及重要職員在我國現行法制上面臨之法律責任風險明確化，進而將董監事及重要職員責任保險之承保範圍在學理上加以釐清，希望所得出之結果可作為保險業者承保或董事、監察人及重要職員投保時之參考。

摘要 在全球化激烈的競爭環境下，組織如何培養與提昇其「核心能力」，以取得競爭的優勢，成為企業、政府與公共管理學者的重要議題。 本研究首先從策略性人力資源管理理論為出發點，藉由研究探討國內外公私部門推動與建構核心能力的經驗，再進一步以核心能力的角度，歸納分析我國公務機關政風人員的角色、職能與核心價值；並透過深度訪談北台灣地區高階政風人員，來探討高階政風人員所應具備的核心能力，並檢視其實際上所具備的核心能力，以瞭解兩者之間的落差，找出高階政風人員所須具備與加強培育的關鍵核心能力，並提出建議供政風機構參考。 本論文除以文獻分析與實地觀察進行研究瞭解外，並以深度訪談法作為本文研究途徑；研究對象為北台灣地區現職及績效卓著的高階政風人員。希望藉由本研究，建立高階政風人員應具備的核心能力項目，並將研究成果提供政風機構作為未來推動高階政風人員核心能力培育、規劃、訓練等策略之參考。 / Abstract In the global environment of acute competition, how to acquire and upgrade their core competence to take the advantage of competence becomes an important issue for enterprises, governments and Public-Management scholars. This research begins with the strategic human resources management theory and then study the experience how the public and private establishments, in Taiwan or overseas, promote and construct their core competence. Furthermore, we analyze the roles, functions and core value of the ethics officers of the public establishments in Taiwan from the view of core competence. And by deeply interviewing the high-level ethics officers in North Taiwan, we study what kinds of core competence a high-level ethics officer should have and what they have already to give suggestions to the ethics establishments. This research exploits approaches such as survey and analysis on theoretical literatures, observation on reality and depth interview. The scope of the objects we study is confined to the high-level ethics officers, in North Taiwan, on-the-job and with excellent performance. We hope that this research can found what kinds of core competence the high-level ethics officers should have and give suggestions to the ethics establishments for their further reference regarding establishing policies of fostering, planning and training high-level ethics officers.

本研究試圖整合成人依附理論與Benjamin的SASB人際行為環複模式，主要研究目的有二，研究目的一：探討伴侶間的人際行為是否會影響個人在愛情關係中依附特質的展現，研究目的二：探討伴侶間的人際行為對個人在愛情關係中依附風格、依附特質改變的影響情形。在本研究中，在伴侶間人際行為的內涵包括親和性（又分成滋潤性與破壞性）與互依性（又分成自主性與控制性）等人際行為，伴侶間互動層次共測量個體自陳對方提供行為、實際對方提供行為，個體的尋求行為、以及提供-尋求行為之間的互補性（亦分成個體自陳伴侶間的互補性、以及實際伴侶間的互補性）。依附特質的測量包括個體自陳在愛情中與伴侶間的焦慮與逃避依附特質等，並可組合出安全型、焦慮/矛盾型、逃避型、與錯亂型等四種依附風格。 本研究採取「追蹤研究法」，平均間隔約12.49週，進行兩個時間點的測量，邀請正在約會關係中的大學生伴侶雙方共234人接受單獨的成人依附特質量表(ECR)、伴侶間人際行為量表(SASB模式)的測量，並同時詢問其壓力事件調查表與測驗大學生身心健康調查表(GHQ)，以作為排除影響依附風格改變的干擾變項，兩個時間點皆完成測驗且未分手者共計199人。研究目的一的分析對象為第一個時間受測者，但必須是正在談戀愛而未分手的大學生，共計232人符合標準，其中男性佔35％，女性佔65%，，而完整的配對資料共76對，故有152人可進行實際伴侶間互動的分析。 研究目的二的受測者除了兩個時間點皆受測且未分手外，還必須排除在兩個時間點遭受重大壓力者與GHQ量表上表現出身心健康狀況不佳者，共計有效受試者為183人，伴侶雙方皆完成測驗的共計63對，故有126人可進行實際伴侶間互動的分析。本研究亦針對個體自陳對方提供行為、以及各人際行為的親和性與互依性指標、提供與尋求行為的互補性指標等，進行信效度的檢驗。 本研究結果可分成兩大部分。第一，在人際行為對愛情依附特質與風格改變的影響方面，可發現部分伴侶間人際行為的確可對依附特質造成影響：1. 「親和性」人際行為最能影響愛情依附特質，並與依附風格、依附特質改變最有關連；2.「滋潤性親和」不同於「破壞性親和」對依附特質的影響；3.個體在愛情關係中的依附特質，主要受到個體「主觀認知」到的伴侶間人際互動，而並不一定會受到「實際」伴侶間人際互動的影響；4. 逃避特質則較明顯受到伴侶間滋潤性親和人際行為的影響，而焦慮依附特質較受到伴侶間破壞性人際行為的影響，但焦慮依附特質的改變與伴侶人際行為關連性較低。第二，對個體在關係中單向的人際行為而言，親和性比互依性人際行為更能影響愛情依附特質，甚至與依附風格、依附特質的改變更有關連；但互依性指標（自主性）對依附特質並非沒有影響力，而是會顯現在雙向人際行為的互補性當中。 最後乃說明本研究的討論與限制，並提出未來在研究上與伴侶諮商實務上的建議。 / This study tried to integrate adult attachment theory and Benjamin’s Structural Analysis of Social Behavior Models (SASB). There were two major purposes of the study: The first one was to, discussing whether the impact of dating couples’ interpersonal behaviors on romantic attachment characteristics for college students. The Second was to, discussing the impact of dating couples’ interpersonal behaviors on the change of attachment styles and characteristics. In this study, the content of dating couples’ interpersonal behaviors includes affiliation (best and worst) and interdependence (autonomy and control) behaviors. The interactions of dating couples were measured by self reporting partner’s providing behaviors, actual partner’s providing behaviors, subjects’ seeking behaviors, the complements of self reporting dating relationship with providing-seeking behaviors, and the complements of actual dating relationship with providing-seeking behaviors. The measurement of attachment characteristics included anxiety and avoidance trait, which could be combined to four attachment styles: secure, anxious-ambivalent, avoidant, disoriented / disorganized. The study took ‘panel study’, and the average interval of test-retest time points was about 12.49 weeks. Total subjects were 234, who were measured by ECR and couples’ interpersonal behaviors (SASB model). Questionnaires of stress events, and GHQ were interference variables for the use of the purpose of the second study. There were 232 subjects composed of 35% male and 65% female in the purpose of first study. These subjects who were all measured in the first timing were falling in love and not yet breaking-up. There were 76 pairs complete matching data, so 152 subjects could process the analysis of actual dating relationship. There were 183 subjects in the purpose of the second study. Besides subjects who were measured in the two time points were falling in love and not yet breaking-up, it had to eliminate two interference variables. There were 63 pairs complete matching data, so 126 subjects could process the analysis of actual dating relationship. There were two major results in this study. First, couples’ interpersonal behaviors had the impact on attachment characteristics: 1. affiliation interpersonal behaviors could affect romantic attachment characteristics, and was related to the change of attachment styles and attachment characteristics. 2. The impact on attachment characteristics was different between ‘best affiliation’ and ‘worst affiliation’. 3. Self reporting couples’ interpersonal behaviors had impact on attachment characteristics. On the contrary, actual couples’ interpersonal behaviors had no impact. 4. ‘Best affiliation’ had impact on avoidance attachment characteristics, and ‘worst affiliation’ had impact on anxiety attachment characteristics. The association between the change of anxiety attachment characteristics and couples’ interpersonal behaviors was low. Second, for one-way interpersonal behavior in dating relationship, affiliation behaviors affected romantic attachment characteristics more than interdependence. Even affiliation behaviors were more related to the change of attachment styles and attachment characteristics than interdependence. The complement of couples’ autonomy interpersonal behaviors also affected attachment characteristics. In addition, implication for adult attachment research and couple therapy in dating relationship was discussed. Research limitation was also explicated.

Character brands have become a trend in business. Firms create character brands to draw consumer’s attention. For successful character brands, a strong attachment will be created to the consumers, so the brand-customer relationship will be loyal and powerful. The purpose of this research is to examine and discuss the marketing strategies and brand management of firms adopted to build their character brands, and theoretical and managerial implications will be addressed. This research adopts the method of case study research. Four character brands with various natures will be discussed separately, and a comparison will be made accordingly. The four character brands examined in this research are Saniro’s Hello Kitty, Fujio’s Doraemon, Walt Disney’s Mickey Mouse and Charles Schultz’s Snoopy. Hello Kitty and Doraemon are Japanese character brands; Mickey Mouse and Snoopy are American character brands. These four character brands are very popular among consumers. The focus of this research is to address the similarities and differences of character development and brand management of these four character brands. The findings of this research are: First, characters with different nature (type) will have different brand concept management strategies. For comic character brands, firms will be focus on the development of character personalities. For pure character brand, firms will concentrate on the design and appearance of such characters. Second, the brand-customer relationship between character brands and consumers is very unique. Consumers gain emotional and self-expressive benefit from character brands. As a result, it is essential to reinforce the brand/character image consistently, so the attachment will be stronger. Third, similar brand management strategies, such as licensing, brand extensions, sponsorships and reinforce character image, are adopted by firms; however, the focus on character brand building for each firm is somewhat different. These four character brands are successful examples on character brand management. In order to manage good character brands, character development is necessary, and it is also crucial to create a strong brand identity. Most importantly, the brand building/management strategies have to be consistent with the nature/types of the characters. Key Word: Character, Character brand, brand management, brand-customer relationship / Character brands have become a trend in business. Firms create character brands to draw consumer’s attention. For successful character brands, a strong attachment will be created to the consumers, so the brand-customer relationship will be loyal and powerful. The purpose of this research is to examine and discuss the marketing strategies and brand management of firms adopted to build their character brands, and theoretical and managerial implications will be addressed. This research adopts the method of case study research. Four character brands with various natures will be discussed separately, and a comparison will be made accordingly. The four character brands examined in this research are Saniro’s Hello Kitty, Fujio’s Doraemon, Walt Disney’s Mickey Mouse and Charles Schultz’s Snoopy. Hello Kitty and Doraemon are Japanese character brands; Mickey Mouse and Snoopy are American character brands. These four character brands are very popular among consumers. The focus of this research is to address the similarities and differences of character development and brand management of these four character brands. The findings of this research are: First, characters with different nature (type) will have different brand concept management strategies. For comic character brands, firms will be focus on the development of character personalities. For pure character brand, firms will concentrate on the design and appearance of such characters. Second, the brand-customer relationship between character brands and consumers is very unique. Consumers gain emotional and self-expressive benefit from character brands. As a result, it is essential to reinforce the brand/character image consistently, so the attachment will be stronger. Third, similar brand management strategies, such as licensing, brand extensions, sponsorships and reinforce character image, are adopted by firms; however, the focus on character brand building for each firm is somewhat different. These four character brands are successful examples on character brand management. In order to manage good character brands, character development is necessary, and it is also crucial to create a strong brand identity. Most importantly, the brand building/management strategies have to be consistent with the nature/types of the characters. Key Word: Character, Character brand, brand management, brand-customer relationship

企業的重組再造的活絡為現今世界各國商業發展中，公司型態發展成熟、廣為運用的證明。日本於會社法訂有公司組織重組的型態以及相關法制規範，而基於日本多數的家族企業或閉鎖型公司均屬於股份有限公司形式，以企業併購的方式為組織重組並非難事。惟公司若陷入財務困難或有資產不足抵償負債時，在破產前公司可能以分割行為，選擇性地使一部陷入破產狀態，他部繼續存活，以求公司重建，實質上公司係藉由分割而為法人的脫產行為。為避免此種不法行為，日本會社法採取事前的保護措施立法模式，要求公司有資訊揭露義務，以及必須進行債權人異議程序，以保護債權人因公司分割使他公司概括繼承權利義務而有權利受損之虞。惟此債權人保護機制的缺點在於，債權人保護機制有異議陳述權主體的限制，以及分割標的、公司公司及通知義務的放寬，導致因分割而受償率受影響的債權人在分割事前無法獲得分割資訊，進而無法提出異議，亦因主體適格的限制無法主張事後救濟的結果，亦即債權人保護機制陷於失靈的狀態。公司即藉債權人保護機制的漏洞，濫用公司分割制度將公司經營之風險轉嫁予債權人。 本研究將著重於債權人對公司總資產充足之信賴因公司分割受到危害時，債權人如何將逸出資產回復於公司，或將清償責任擴及於他公司，以追及公司藉由分割而移出公司之逸出財產，滿足分割前應獲得之清償。首先，日本司法實務主要承認債權人得依日本民法及日本破產法的撤銷權與否認權規定，請求撤銷分割行為。而為了分割事業不致受過大的衝擊，回復原狀方式以金錢賠償為主。第二，基於營業讓與制度亦被濫用於公司之脫產行為，債權人主張日本會社法的商號續用責任受到實務肯認的先例，以分割制度為脫產行為時，實務也有認為債權人得類推適用商號續用責任規定追究繼承公司之責任。第三，若為新設分割，在具備相同控制力的二公司間以分割行為規避法令或契約上義務，亦即脫免債務，實務上亦出現不少以法人格否認法理為基礎，否認分割當事公司法人格，使債權人得追及責任之案例。在解釋論發展出許多債權人可資救濟的方式後，日本會社法於2015年修正中，新增詐害的公司分割下既存債權人的直接求償權規定，明文解決濫用公司分割制度之問題。 我國雖未發生分割制度受濫用的顯著案例，惟分割制度下債權人保護機制仍有不足之處，另外我國與日本較顯著不同之處在於分割後當事公司負擔原則性的連帶清償責任。現行法下除外條件並非明確，企業運用分割制度進行組織重組可能會因連帶責任的風險而卻步，不利於企業分割重組的活絡，故在立法論上應有受檢討之處。另從日本司法實務承認的債權人可資主張的救濟途徑角度，本文進一步探討債權人主張我國民法與破產法的撤銷權，以及公司法關係企業中控制公司向從屬公司責任負擔之規定、2013年新增訂之揭穿公司面紗原則的可行性，並期待我國以日本法所產生之問題為借鏡，在分割行為中，分割當事公司與債權人間權益能獲致衡平。

社群網站集結了線下各種社會關係於平台中的特色，幫助使用者重整自我人際關係。社群網站中的各種功能得以應對不同社交情況，然而，根據東方線上的調查報告指出，以多重帳號分流管理人際關係的現象愈加普遍，社群媒體打破了虛實人脈的界線，在隱私權與形象管理等需求下，衍生出「雲端多重人格症」，出現多帳號、人際分流的狀態。 　　尤其當人們踏入職場後，將比起學生族群面臨更為多樣的社會交際互動。因此，本研究以擁有多個Facebook帳號的上班族為對象，探究他們在使用多重Facebook帳號時所採取的戰術策略、所面臨的人際關係與權力影響，以及在不同帳號中所呈現的自我形象。 　　本研究透過深度訪談法蒐集了八位在Facebook中經營多重帳號之上班族的使用經驗，發現上班族使用者們以創建多個Facebook帳號，作為閃躲Facebook意圖讓使用者間更加緊密連結的主要手段，藉由「與現實生活中可連結之假名」、「不完整的個人資料編輯」、「帳號間的互相封鎖或追蹤」等戰術，來對抗Facebook希望達到的人際關係串聯。另一方面，這種策略運用可被視為對de Certeau所提出之「戰略」與「戰術」的顛覆，Facebook使用者不僅運用戰術躲避網站空間的戰略，亦用以閃躲其他戰術使用者，形成另一種「戰略」與「戰術」的共舞狀態。此外，Facebook多重帳號的上班族使用者藉著「戰術」使用，不僅翻轉了原先de Certeau對「戰略」與「戰術」之二元觀點，更推翻費孝通早期所提出的人際親疏遠近模型。社群網路中的人際關係與權力影響充滿不確定性，親疏遠近的定義隨著不同使用者而改變，透過將不同層面之好友加入不同帳號的過程，上班族使用者能夠更彈性地控制這些關係中親疏遠近的變更，並在Facebook人際互動的過程中獲得更多自主權。同時，多重帳號的使用模式將傳統虛擬社群中人們得以自由探索自我之特性帶入與現實生活緊密相連的社群網站中，藉由在不同親疏關係的帳號中有不同程度的展演，上班族使用者得以同時在前／後台中現身，一邊整飾自我形象，一邊解放真實自我。 / Given the function of representing offline social relations, social media platforms, such as Facebook, facilitate users to maintain their online relationships based on different social conditions. According to a report of Eastern Online, some users, for the reasons of privacy and image control, manage their interpersonal relationship with multiple accounts, resulting in the online phenomenon of ‘multiple accounts, multiple relations’. This is especially true when students graduate from schools and start to work. Once becoming job employees, they have to encounter their bosses, colleagues, and other phatic relations, enhancing their desire for manipulating multiple accounts. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine Facebook users who have created multiple accounts for social groupings, to explore their tactics against the potential power subjects such as their parents, their bosses, or Facebook itself, and to discover how they formulate their images in different accounts. Eight employee subjects with multiple Facebook accounts were recruited for in-depth interviews. The study found that, although the Facebook policy encourages world-wide users tightly interconnected, users tend to escape from this strategy by using pseudonym, partial and falsified personal data, and block and trace tactics among Facebook friends. On the other hand, users not only use tactics against the strategy made by Facebook, but also against other tactic users such as their parents or elders who are relatively powerless in using Facebook and would like to tactically detect their children’s actions all the times. Such findings have challenged de Certeau’s theory of everyday life practice, since the binary distinction of strategy and tactic is no more warranted. The study also found the uncertainty of interpersonal relationship in Facebook. Thanks to Facebook design, users are allowed to join different friends into different accounts. In other words, they can define who are ‘close friends’ and who are ‘not so close’ online. And this definition may change from time to time. Such self-control provides users with flexibility to rewrite the closeness of their Facebook ‘friends’ in different life periods. Consequently, they rewrite the stable nature of Fei Hsiao-Tung’s sense of ‘relationship’, in which closeness and strangeness would not change easily over time. Finally, with the use of multiple accounts, the study found both front-stage and back-stage selves in Facebook, making image management more complex and increasing the possibility of liberating the true selves.

自從2008年金融海嘯以來，企業的成長面臨到各種多變的競爭考驗與挑戰。過去企業賴以成功的模式多已不復存在，接下來面對的生存環境將更加嚴峻。因此，企業未來創新策略的思維與有效人員的執行將是一項非常重要的課題。企業人才是否能在策略的引導下，安排至關鍵崗位中充分發揮，其中組織變革是關鍵。綜觀歷年來各種企業的變革、組織再造、策略規畫等，無論有多麼獨到的分析、精闢的見解，都存在著一項不變的原則。就是需要由『人』來執行。也就是說，執行的成敗、效益，關鍵都在於『執行者』的品質。因此，如何能在企業策略形成之後，正確訂定出各項策略目標的衡量指標與達成標準，是極為關鍵的事。企業必須要能根據未來的策略，建構一套策略性人才培育系統，持續有效的發展企業未來人才，才能幫助企業永續經營發展。 本研究將參考企業策略培育的相關議題，著手探討策略形成、策略行動，結合策略培育，建構出策略性人才培育體系。將人力資源管理單位當做企業組織變革的管理顧問，針對個案公司提供策略訓練建議，並在未來企業策略目標的推動時，能有更明確的方針、流程與步驟，並結合策略地圖與績效指標，隨時提供企業內部回饋的機制與改善的方向，將可落實策略人才培育並達成訓練績效的移轉。 本研究是屬於描述性與探索性的個案研究。其個案僅當作探討此議題的輔佐性研究案例。研究過程聚焦於訓練體系的融合與應用，為一種工具性的個案研究。主要研究的問題如下： (一) 策略性人才培育體系的架構與流程 (二) 策略性人才培育體系的成功關鍵因素 (三) 策略性人才培育體系之限制或障礙

無人飛行載具或簡稱無人機是一種不實際搭載乘員的飛行裝置，不論研發的目的為何其核心概念皆是希望以機械來代替人力從事較為辛苦或較為危險的工作；歷史上記載無人機由來已久，但是類議題真正受到國際社會關切乃是2001年9月11日九一一事件後才開始。為了回應九一一事件對美國的威脅，美國除了以行使自衛權為由進攻阿富汗外，更發動了以全球伊斯蘭極端主義份子為對象的「全球反恐戰爭」並且開始大量投入武裝無人機執行定點攻擊行動，狙殺蓋達組織領導人或是與其有關聯的極端主義團體的成員。 隨著反恐戰爭的推進，美國派出的武裝無人機架次也逐年上升，隨之而來的是急遽上升的傷亡人數；驟增的傷亡數，尤其是平民傷亡引起了國際社會關切，其中「美國的武裝無人機攻擊是否違反國際法上關於武力使用的規範」成了急待解決的問題。本論文以當前國際法上關於武力使用的兩大規範：使用武力的合法性(Jus ad bellum)、武力使用的方式(Jus in bello)為途徑，檢視當前美國武裝無人機攻擊是否符合前述兩大規範，進而替美國武裝無人機攻擊衍生的國際法問題提供一個解答。

隨著醫學科技的進步，越來越多病患無法自主進行醫療決定的情況發生。西方國家受病人自主權的概念啟發，發展出預立醫囑(living will)及醫療代理人制度(durable power of attorney for health care)。醫療代理人制度提供個人預先指定醫療代理人，當事人無法自主做出醫療決定時，可由醫療代理人代替當事人作出醫療決定，以補足無預立醫囑或預立醫囑的不足。 我國同志伴侶於目前仍缺乏法律上的實質身分保障，伴侶相關的醫療權利正迫切且無預警的影響許多打算共組家庭而無法受法律上的婚姻制度保障的同志伴侶。雖有論者認為，可適用醫療法上「關係人」以及安寧緩和醫療條例之「醫療委任代理人」，即可滿足同志伴侶於醫療上的需求。然由於關係人的定義模糊，且實務上為避免醫療糾紛，往往要求病患的親屬到場，而不接受其他不具配偶、親屬身分關係者進行醫療行為的同意，「關係人」一詞於實務上難以適用。 本文試圖從醫療代理人制度的角度，期能另闢蹊徑，除強化並保障病人自主權外，提供同志伴侶在與生死攸關的醫療議題上更可能且直接的保障，也為不論是同志或其他愛的關係尋求更多可能，提供在婚姻以外的選擇能有更多彈性。本文除了介紹西方的醫療代理人制度並借鏡美國同志伴侶使用醫療代理人制度的經驗外，也探討醫療代理人制度對於我國家庭觀念、傳統醫療上家屬父權主義以及家庭中心式的醫療決策文化的影響與衝擊。同時更深入討論，同志伴侶必須面臨來自醫療院所、醫護人員對於同志是否友善；以及來自病患原生家庭對於醫療代理人及同志身分的壓力。 / With the advances in medical technology, the situation that patients couldn't determine their medical decisions increasingly occurs in our society. Inspired by the concept of patient autonomy, Western countries developed living will and durable power of attorney for health care, which is as known as health care proxy. Individuals can appoint a trustworthy person as their health care proxy. When the patient is incompetent, the health care proxy can make medical decisions for the patient to complete the inadequacy of living will. Same-sex couples can’t make medical decisions for their same-sex partners because same-sex marriage is currently illegal in Taiwan. Moreover, family members play an important role in the process of medical decision in Taiwan. Therefore, this article introduces the development of durable power of attorney for health care in Western countries, tries to address the medical issue of Taiwanese same-sex couples, and discusses the impact of durable power attorney for health care on Chinese traditional family values and family-centered medical decision making. While as a health care proxy, same-sex partner has to face the medical staff’s attitude toward homosexual, also has to confront the pressure from the patient’s family-of-origin.

隨著資訊科技的蓬勃發展，資訊技術可以提昇組織效率與競爭力，資訊系統或網站亦是組織營運重要命脈。而在近年來全球資訊安全事件不斷發生，資訊犯罪手法不斷翻新，所肇生的系統損害、資料毀損、個資外洩、財務詐騙事件近來更是層出不窮，對單位或公司而言風險不斷提高，傷害亦相對嚴重，甚至導致公司信譽破產，面臨倒閉威脅，為保護組織內部資訊相關資產與個人資料，並保持組織持續正常運作，資訊安全管理系統（ISMS）與個人資訊管理系統 (PIMS)便是一套可有效控制管理之方法；ISMS與PIMS分兩次來導入，造成組織增加工作負荷，有疊床架屋情形，成本有部分重複投資現象。本研究試著以資料的生命週期，資訊安全的機密性、完整性、可用性，PDCA運作模型...等角度進行本質上探討，來進行整合ISMS與PIMS的整合工作。 經文獻探討與專家學者建議，本研究突破各項盲點，從各角度分析進行多面向整合工作，並提出4點可有效整合具體作法：1. 清查作業流程須包含個人資料所延伸之流程。2. 進行作業流程上資訊資產及個資清查作業。3. 資訊資產及個人資料風險評鑑作業。4. 建立ISMS與PIMS四階文件，產出ISO27001適用性聲明須包含個資法。 本研究以國防部網站系統為例，運用整合結果進行實作，將實作經驗分享給未來有意導入ISMS與PIMS之IT人員，實作結果也證實本研究提出論點確實有效，更有效且更有邏輯性的面對各種資安與個資問題，以作業流程面來分析資安與個資，讓每個控制點更加明確，最後實作運用以各國均能接受的ISO標準(ISO 27001標準包含個資管理流程)來驗證本實作，也證明本研究整合後，在實施（Plan-Do-Check-Act）管理系統確實有效，均能符合相關標準與法規。