鑒於金融機構跨業經營乃係現況發展趨勢，而風險管理已成為金融機構業務管理之首務，本研究將探討國際金融機構風險管理的新規範－新版巴賽爾資本協定（Basel II），並蒐集民國八十三年六月至民國九十二年三月我國上市公司公開發行之財務資訊，分別以商業銀行、證券公司、人壽保險公司、產物保險公司及票券公司為代表，模擬為金融控股公司下之各個子公司，將結合營運性、風險性、及法令為考量之資本配置模型；進一步探討金融控股公司之風險管理與資本配置。 歸納模擬結果如下： 以營運性為考量並配合法令要求之資本配置，此配置模型係在設定盈餘目標下，追求風險極小值，或設定風險容忍水準，以追求盈餘之極大值。經過目標值的變動下，此最適化模型可得一效率前緣曲線。由此效率前緣圖可知，在盈餘維持在平均盈餘水準下，此模型可使風險值由原來的8,860佰萬元降至7,045佰萬元，其降幅為20%，RAROC由原來的0.77升至0.97，升幅為25%；若固定風險值在原來未分配前的平均水準，則盈餘由先前的7,681佰萬元提升至8,821佰萬元，其提升幅度為14%，RAROC由原來的0.77提升至0.90，提升幅度為16%，亦相當可觀。若將資本維持在歷史平均水準，則可使其盈餘達到7,305佰萬元，而風險值為6,446佰萬元，RAROC為1.00，升幅為29%。據此推論，依此配置模型分配結果，將可改善整體金融控股公司之經營績效。 綜合營運性、風險性並考量法令要求之資本分配模型，納入了風險限制條件，主要係考量高風險之業務，須有高資本以因應其非預期性損失，但同時為兼顧經營績效，必須在營運性與風險性間求得平衡點；實證結果發現，受到風險性限制條件的影響，使得此條效率前緣曲線均落在以營運性為考量資本配置模型之下方，這代表的是在此模型下，無法達到較高之盈餘，原因來自於高盈餘伴隨著高風險，但高風險在此配置模型中是不允許的。惟此模型依然有提升整體經營績效的功能。例如，將盈餘目標設為原來的7,681佰萬元，則風險值降為7,601佰萬元，降幅約14%，RAROC也提升至0.90，升幅為16%；若資本維持在平均水準177,185佰萬元，則盈餘可達到5,802佰萬元，風險值則為4,528佰萬元，RAROC為1.09，較原先高出41%。 / As cross business managing is the modern development trend and risk management has been the first task for the financial institutions, this study attempts to analyze the new standard of the international financial institutions’ risk management – new Basel II. The data concerning business operations, risks, regulations from June 1992 to March 2003 are collected for each group of commercial banks, security houses, life insurance companies, non-life insurance companies, bill finance companies to build a capital allocation model. The financial holding companies’ risk management and capital allocation is further discussed. The results of this study are summarized as follows: The capital allocation model considers business operations and regulations. This allocation model sets up profit target, seeks minimum risk or sets up level of risk tolerance to seek maximum profit. After the variable target, the suitable model can get a efficient frontier curve. From this curve we find out that the profit maintains under the average profit level. The model can make Value-at-Risk reduce from 8,860 million to 7,045 million, down 20%, RAROC rise from 0.77 to 0.97, up 25%; if the fixed Value-at-Risk is before distributing, the profit will rise from 7,681 mission to 8,821 million, up 14%, RAROC will rise from 0.77 to 0.90, up 16%, still outstanding. If the capital remains at historical average level, then the profit can reach 7,305 million, and the Value-at-Risk is 6,446 million, RAROC is 1.00, up 29%. According to the inference, the distributing result of the allocation model can improve the operation performance of the financial holding company. The capital allocation model synthesize operation, risk and consider legal requirement, bring into the restriction of risk is to consider high risky business should have high capital to deal with unexpected loss, but also to consider operation performance, need to seek balance between operation and risk; From the result of this study finds that under risk restriction, the efficient frontier curve is within the capital allocation model which considers operation, this means under the model, higher profit is hard to achieve, the reason is high profit accompanies high risk, and high risk is prohibited from the model. But this model still has the function to approve whole operation performance. For example, if the profit target is 7,681 million as original, the Value-at-Risk will reduce to 7,601 million, down 14%, RAROC will rise to 0.90, up 16%; if the capital remains at the average level’s 177,185 million, the profit can reach 5,802 million, the Value-at-Risk is 4,528 million and RAROC is 1.09, up 41%.

In response to the changing financial environment both internally and externally, the government endeavored to pass the Financial Holding Company Act, which is intended to provide an environment conducive to financial integrations. According to the Principal-Agent theory, agency problems tend to take place when misalignment occurs between an ultimate owner’s cash flow rights and voting power. It is of interest whether the financial holding company structure actually increases or decreases such misalignment. The shareholdings of the Hong family of SinoPac Holdings is the subject of this research, and the essence of the research is to examine the Hong family’s shareholding and their actual control based on the one-share-one-vote principle before and after the holding company structure. The findings conclude that the misalignment between the Hong family’s ownership and control in fact increases under the holding company structure, which is generally viewed as a negative sign of corporate governance. Notwithstanding, the Hong family has adopted some measures to strengthen corporate governance despite the widening misalignment.

我國財產保險業之簽單總保費收入為新台幣1,141.05億元，其中汽車保險之簽單保險費收入為新台幣573.34億元，佔我國財產保險業簽單總保費收入的50.25%，故汽車保險之簽單保險費收入於九十五年仍居財產保險市場各險種之冠。同時汽車保險業務量占全體產險業務量的比重，近十年來一直維持在45%～55%之間，由於汽車險業務量之消長與品質關係著保險公司經營的績效。而業務消長與品質良窳又跟行銷通路緊密相關。現今如能掌握住通路即能掌握業務，然而如何選擇良好通路及經營，對保險公司而言，是非常大的考驗與挑戰。 金融控股公司法於2001年六月二十七日經立法院三讀通過後，並於同年十一月一日起正式實施，自此台灣金融相關產業正式邁入戰國時代，大型金融控股公司紛紛成立。各金控業者藉由本身銀行、證券、產險及壽險等子公司在資源整合下，冀能發揮綜效，以達到較佳的經營糢式。 台灣汽車保險保費成長在經歷2005年達到近十年來的高峰後，2006年受到銀行雙卡壞帳緊縮消費金融的影響下，汽車經銷商新車銷售呈現大幅衰退，直接衝擊到汽車保險保費的收入與成長，因而導致2006年汽車保險保費首次呈現衰退。若高度依賴車商保代的業者，將受到同樣衰退命運，然而若業者能提前佈局多元化行銷通路，其受到衰退的影響就相對輕微，甚至部份業者的業績仍然能夠逆勢成長。有鑑於此，產險業者如何透過加入金控或開拓與壽險、銀行等合作，藉以提升業務成長，益顯重要。 本研究係以個案公司加入金控後銀行通路經營績效加以分析，確實發現產險公司若能充份發揮自身優勢與定位，爭取加入金控，藉由金控所屬子公司廣大的銷售人力及通路據點，對汽車險業務的經營績效有很大的綜效。 / Motor insurance business has played an important role in the Taiwan non-life insurance industry. The total written premium income for Motor insurance in 2006 amounted to NT$57.334 billion, which accounts for 50.25% of the overall premium income of non-life insurance industry in Taiwan. In the meantime, the business portfolio of Motor insurance to 　that of non-life insurance has been maintained at 45% - 55% over the past ten years. The quality of Motor business is significantly related to the business performance and is also closely linked to the marketing channels of the non-life insurance companies. As such, the selection of appropriate marketing channels, which is certainly a great challenge, will have predominant influence to the business performance of a non-life insurance company in Taiwan. Since the Financial Holding Company Law went into effect officially in November 2001, there are quite a number of mega financial holding companies were established afterwards. The aim of financial holding company is to integrate their respective resource among their banking sector, securities sector, non-life insurance sector, and life insurance sector, so as to achieve the synergy and to build up better business operation model as well. The premium growth for the motor insurance in 2005 has achieved the highest record nearly a decade. In 2006, the new car sales were serious impacted by the dual cards crisis (credit cards and cash cards). This certainly led to the motor premium income was first time ever reduced in the past five years. Non-life insurance companies will suffer the same of the recession as mentioned for their motor business if they highly rely on the marketing channel through the car dealers. However, the impact on the motor business could be mitigated for non-life insurance companies if they are able to explore new multi-marketing channels along with good results. The premium growth can be also anticipated for those non-life companies if they can make good use of these channels. In view of this, it will be very important for non-life insurance companies to achieve better performance by way of joining financial holding company as a subsidiary and establishing a strategic alliance with life insurance companies or banks from now on. This research is focusing on the case studies of the banking and financial holding maketing channels, for the Motor insurance business performance of the non-life insurance company. With the findings of this case study after detailed analysis, we come to conclusion that after joining the holding company, non-life insurance company can improve the business performance of synergy to a great extent for their motor insurance business by way of making full use of the sales force as well as point of sales among the subsidiaries of holding companies.

2015~2016年間台灣金融業發生許多重大新聞事件，隨著資訊科技普及，網路搜尋已成為大眾獲取資訊的重要管道。本文利用Google Trends關鍵字搜尋指數作為網路關注度的代理變數，進行與台灣上市金控公司股價報酬相關之研究。 本文使用三種研究方法進行探討，首先利用圖表式比對法，初步觀察異常搜尋指數與異常報酬出現時間之關聯性，結果並未發現搜尋指數與台灣上市金控股價報酬間有明顯且一致的關係；接著套用向量自我迴歸模型進行分析，然而14家台灣上市金控公司中，僅從兆豐金數據可發現前一期搜尋指數的異常變動量增加1%將使下一期異常報酬率下降約2.67%；最後參考相關文獻使用Fama Macbeth兩階段迴歸模型，結果發現平均而言搜尋指數的異常變動量每上升一個標準差會顯著影響兩週後股價的異常報酬率下降約0.17%，SVI對於股價報酬影響為負向符合本文研究動機與背景，且有相關文獻指出投資人對於壞消息的反應較慢，因此使股價報酬有延後反應的現象，但無法解釋兩週的反應時間，因此對於這樣的研究結果持保留的態度。 總結三種研究方法所得結果，本文認為網路關注度對於目前台灣上市金控公司股價的影響仍然有限。 / It’s unquiet for Taiwanese Financial industry between 2015 and 2016. There has been a lot of major news. With the popularity of information technology, Internet search has become an important channel for public access to information. Therefore, we use Search Volume Index (SVI) as a proxy for public online attention and conducts research related to the stock returns of listed financial holding companies in Taiwan. In this paper, three kinds of research methods are used. The first way is chart comparison method for preliminary data analysis. The results couldn’t show a clear and consistent relationship between SVI and stock returns. The second method is vector self-regression model. However, only Mega financial holding company’s result indicates abnormal search volume index(ASVI) increase 1% will decrease next week abnormal return by 2.67%. At last, we use Fama Macbeth two-stage regression model and find that on average 1 standard deviation increased in ASVI will decrease abnormal return by 0.17% after two weeks. The negative impact of SVI on the stock returns of financial holding companies is in line with the research motivation and background, and some relevant literatures prove that investors’ response to the bad news is slow, which leads to the delayed response of stock returns. However, the two weeks of reaction time for stock returns is unknown. In conclusion, this paper finds out that the impact of public online attention on share price of listed financial holding companies in Taiwan is still limited currently.

金融機構跨業經營已蔚為常態，金融機構利用不同的整併模式，積極進行跨業資源整合及業務推動。金融控股公司的設立加速跨業經營的腳步，如何利用強勢通路進行共同行銷以達成綜效，成為決勝的關鍵因素。人壽保險業務員通路利用關係行銷，掌握客戶需求，面對面進行顧客服務，滿足客戶一站購足的全方位商品服務，帶動金控集團業績，肩負舉足輕重的戰略地位。然而居高不下的壽險申訴率，引發我們對業務員進行共同行銷時是否也會發生不當行為風險的疑慮，並思考如何提前辨識及因應。 本研究嘗試以保險申訴類型與現行壽險業務員共同行銷模式進行模擬比對，以辨識風險來源，經歸納推導得知壽險業務員趨利避害思維模式及價值觀，若無適當管控，將會引發共同行銷不當行為的發生，並且將隨業務擴展逐漸浮現。為回應風險，本研究結合實務經驗，分別對相關不當行為態樣及有關單位提出風險管理建議(1)在壽險公司方面，可注意強化業務員跨業行銷專業及法令教育，嚴懲共同行銷的不當行為以敬效尤，並善用保險機制以分散風險；(2)在金控公司方面，則應建立跨業風險預判及預防機制，善用集團的資源管理風險，並進行子公司間效率運作經驗的複製及移植；(3)在主管機關方面，可思考調整產險業界業績計算方式，從制度面進行改變導正，另為配合跨業行銷爭議處理機構之設立規劃，可先從金控、公會組織逐級試行申訴運作模式，待未來正式設立時即可移轉經驗及制度，讓消費者保護沒有空檔。期能透過各方面的配合，讓共同行銷的運作能更為完善，以提升金控集團經營效率並充分保護消費者權益。 / Cross-selling seems to be a popular business model for most financial institutions. Various M&A are employed by financial institutions for the purpose of resources integration and business growth across different sectors. The establishment of financial holding companies has further accelerated the scope of business. It is very critical to leverage the advantage of strong channels to enhance synergy via cross-selling. Life insurance agents position themselves importantly for the performance of the holding company groups as they provide one-stop service, face to face interact, and satisfy the demand with their customers by leveraging the customer relationship. But the high customer complaint rations arose the concern with the appropriateness of cross-selling of the agents and the legacy risk, and encourage us to identify the related risk and figure out possible solutions. This research tries to simulate the genres of complaints and the patens of cross-selling of the agents for the purpose of identifying sources of risk. It is concluded that the agents should be well monitored and restrained because of their trade-off mind-sets and value. If not, mis-behaviors can happen along with the growth of business. In response to the related risk, this research based on operation experience leads to several suggestions according to the genres of mis-behaviors to the related entities. First, the life insurance companies should play attention to the enforcement of cross-selling skills and education of regulation of the agents, the punishment of mis-behaviors, and insurance mechanism to diversify related risks. Secondly, the holding companies should build the mechanism of identifying, measuring, and preventing the related risks, manage the risk by using group resources, and replicate the experience and know-how among the subsidiaries. Finally, the supervisory authority should consider the adjustment of performance measurement of the P&C insurance sector, try to guide the sector by change of rules, and try to set up the complaint process from the level of the holding companies and the business associations sequentially, first and then transfer these accumulated experiences and rules to the institution handling arguments about cross-selling after its official establishment in the future. Then the consumers can be well protected without any gap. It is expected that the cross-selling model can be run much better to enhance the operation efficiency of holding company groups and protection of consumers due to the cooperation of related entities.

金控銀行和獨立銀行在傳統在做績效評估時，可能都只考慮相同的技術水準，如此可能無法正確來衡量不同群體的的差異，而忽略其潛在的效率改善指標。因此，本文將先採用隨機邊界模型(SFA)，估出兩體系的隨機邊界模型，接著，再運用Rao (2006)所提出的共同邊界模型(metafrontier)，來進行兩個體系的銀行效率評估。 本研究運用了民國91年到民國97年期間，13家金控銀行與24家獨立銀行的資料為樣本，去分析此兩個群體的效率比較，可得以下結論： 1.在金控銀行與獨立銀行的個別隨機邊界中，兩個群體在於技術效率的表現上差異不大。 2.金控銀行的技術效率變動有越來越小的趨勢；而獨立銀行術效率沒有明顯的縮小的趨勢。 3.獨立銀行的技術缺口比TGR有顯著的大於金控銀行的TGR。 4.在共同邊界的技術效率中，獨立銀行的技術效率顯著的大於金控銀行 / Most of traditional banking performance evaluation analyses assume both financial holding banks and independent banks share the same level of technology, thus it may not able to identify the managerial efficiency difference of different groups correctly . In this research, a SFA model (Battese and Coelli, 1995) is used first to estimate the technologies and inefficiency factors for both systems. Then a deterministic linear programming metafrontier (Rao, 2006) is adopted to evaluate the technology gap ratio between two bank systems. We collect data of 13 financial holding banks and 24 independentbanks from 2001~2008. After analyzing two systems and making comparison, the main conclusions are as follows: 1.Two bank systems have a minor difference in SFA. 2.The variance on technical efficiency becomes smaller with time in financial holding banks, but not in independent banks. 3.Independentbanks’ TGR is significantly larger than financial holding banks’. 4.In metafrontier, technical efficiency of independent banks is significantly larger than financial holding Bbnks.

本文以1999年第4季至2011年第3季24家銀行的追蹤資料，分析銀行資本與金融控股體系對銀行放款管道的影響。全體樣本銀行的實證結果顯示，沒有顯著證據支持放款管道的存在。銀行淨值及調整成本對放款有顯著的影響，支持銀行資本管道存在。另外，銀行加入金融控股體系之後，調整成本的影響增加。 大型銀行樣本的實證結果顯示，大型銀行放款管道的作用不顯著；但是，銀行資本管道呈現顯著影響。小型銀行放款管道及資本管道皆沒有顯著證據支持兩者存在，但非存款負債對小型銀行放款的影響顯著。除此之外，小型銀行在金融控股體系下，短期投資及非存款負債對放款的影響顯著。由此結果可知，大小型銀行皆可藉由資產負債的調整來抵銷貨幣政策的衝擊，維持放款的成長。

本研究利用複迴歸模型與追蹤資料模型，透過子公司市佔率探討金控子公司組合，與公司績效及風險之關聯性，期望能找出何種子公司組合，對於金控公司的績效與風險最有影響。依據2002-2015之季資料，本文主要研究結果如下： (一)若以全產業角度而言，壽險業、證券業與票券業市佔率，對於金控績效與風險影響較為顯著。壽險業市佔率增加，會提高金控之系統風險與個別風險，而證券業市佔率增加，會提高金控的總風險、系統風險與個別風險。本研究推測主要原因為壽險業與證券業的產業風險較高，容易影響金控之經營風險，故有此現象。 (二)金控若採用雙引擎策略，可以降低金控之總風險與系統風險，亦即雙引擎策略對金控之風險經營有穩健的效果。 (三)以銀行業與壽險業組合為探討對象時，則發現銀行業市佔率提高，可能使金控之破產風險上升，而壽險業的市佔率提高，金控之總風險與系統風險亦會提升。此結果顯示銀行與壽險業的子公司組合無法有效改善金控之風險因子。 (四)以銀行業與產險業組合為探討對象時，則發現銀行市佔率提升，可能使金控之各項風險因子增加，並且會降低風險調整後的報酬。而產險業市佔率增加，則會降低金控績效，並提高金控之破產風險。 (五)以銀行業與證券業組合為探討對象時，則發現證券業市佔率增加，僅會顯著增加金控之個別風險。 (六)以銀行業與票券業組合為探討對象時，則發現銀行業市佔率增加，可能使金控之績效下降，並提高金控之破產風險，然而若票券業市佔率提高，反而會增加金控之經營績效，並降低破產風險。 / This study analyzes the effect of the subsidiary combination and market share on the performance and risk of financial holding companies (FHCs). Based on the data of 2002Q1-2015Q4, the empirical result can be summarized as follows. 1. From the viewpoint of the whole industry, there is a significant relation between the market share of the subsidiaries and the performance and risk of FHCs. The result shows there is a positive effect of life insurance market share on systematic risk and idiosyncratic risk. And there is a positive effect of securities market share on total risk, systematic risk and idiosyncratic risk. 2. FHCs can reduce their total risk and systematic risk by taking dual-engine strategy. The result shows that dual-engine strategy is a sound strategy for FHCs’ operation. 3. For the subsidiary combination of bank and life insurer, there is a positive relation between bank market share and insolvency risk. And there is a positive relation among life insurance market share, total risk and systematic risk. 4. For the subsidiary combination of bank and property insurer, there is a positive relation among bank market share and FHCs’ risk. And there is a negative relation between property insurance market share and FHCs’ performance. 5. For the subsidiary combination of bank and securities company, there is a positive relation between securities market share and idiosyncratic risk. 6. For the subsidiary combination of bank and bills company, the increase of bank market share is unfavorable for FHCs’ operation, but the increase of bills company is beneficial for FHCs’ operation.

本篇論文應用Rubin (1973)、Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983、1985a,b)所發展的配對方法(Matching Method)探討兩個議題，其一是評估企業從事社會責任行為是否可以改善績效，另一則是探討銀行加入金控後對其績效的影響。 / 針對第一個議題，我們將FTSE All-share 指數中被收錄於英國FTSE 社會責任指數的成份股定義為社會責任企業，未被收錄者定義為非社會責任企業，應用配對方法，根據特性變數是否相近為依據進行樣本配對。實證結果發現，不論使用配對前或是配對後的樣本進行分析，皆找不到社會責任企業的平均績效優於非社會責任企業的證據；相反地，部分的證據顯示社會責任企業的財務績效相對較低，因此我們的分析結果傾向支持焦點移轉假說，社會責任行為對財務績效的影響效果為負。 / 另外，我們以遠見雜誌於2006 年公佈的企業社會責任調查為基礎，將衡量企業社會責任績效的三個層面－社區參與、環境保護與財務透明，透過投資組合分析與迴歸分析來評估公司承擔社會責任與財務績效之間的關聯性。實證結果發現，第一，平均來說，公司的社會責任評分愈高，在評比結果公佈後的股票報酬愈低，兩者之間呈現負向關係；第二，公司在不同層面的社會責任行為對於股價報酬的影響具有差異性；第三、透過公司的長期財務資料發現，社會責任評分高的公司其長期平均會計績效相對較佳，但長期平均的股票報酬相對較低，表示社會責任型公司不一定是一個好的投資標的；最後，我們找不到支持社會責任行為可以做為公司績效保險的證據。本文使用各別層面的評比指標，更廣泛地評估社會責任行為對財務績效的影響，改進既有文獻中僅使用單一指標的不足之處。 / 就第二個議題而言，同樣地應用配對方法，根據銀行的特性變數是否相近為依據進行樣本篩選，利用台灣上市上櫃的銀行在2002 年第1 季至2006 年第2季的資料，我們發現在樣本配對前，平均來說，金控銀行在15 個CAMEL 績效指標的表現上皆相對較佳；樣本配對後，金控銀行除了在費用比率之外，其他的評比指標仍相對優於獨立銀行；不論使用配對前或配對後的樣本做分析，皆未出現金控銀行績效顯著較差的證據，因此，我們的實證結果偏向支持綜效假設，銀行加入金控對績效的影響效果為正向。 / 我們的研究架構與方案評估與政策衝擊分析文獻中的方法相一致，而貢獻則在於我們考慮樣本之間特性變數的差異性，進而以樣本配對的方式修正這個差異性，將有效降低既有文獻中在檢驗上述兩個議題上的選擇偏誤問題。 / In this thesis, we apply several matching methods, develop by Rubin (1973)、Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983, 1985a,b), on examing the effects of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on firm financial performance (CSR-effect) and on evaluating the effects of banks being subordinated to FHC on CAMEL indicators (join-FHC effect). / For the former application, two competing hypotheses, social impact hypothesis and shift of focus hypothesis, are proposed, where the former suggests that CSR has a positive relation with performance and the latter are opposite. To ensure the CSR-effect is not contaminated by other factors or the sample is randomly drawn, we employ four matching methods, Nearest, Caliper, Mahala and Mahala Caliper to match the characteristics of the firms with CSR (CSR-firms) and without CSR (NonCSR-firms) to get rid of sample selection bias. Although the four methods yield slightly different results, to our surprised, firms engaging in CSR activities obtain lower values on the return on assets, return on equity, return on sales and earnings per share. Therefore, CSR at the very least does not improve the firm performance, supporting the shift of focus hypothesis. Engaging in CSR activities lead to more pain than gain, at least in the short run. / On the CSR topic, using a set of disaggregated social performance indicators for community participation, environmental protection and fiancail transparency from the Global Views Monthly, we examine the relationship between CSR and financial performance of TSE listing companies. Our main results show that first, scores on composite social performance indicators are negatively related to stock returns and this relationship cannot be rationalized by multi-factor models for explaining the cross-sectional variation in stock returns. Second, the effects of three disaggregated social performance indicators on stock returns are differenct among industries. Third, aggregated social performance indicator is positively related to long-term accounting performance but negatively related to long-term market performance, and thus implies that good companies are good in books, but not good investments. Finally, firms with high CSR ratings do no exhibit smaller decline of their financial performance during stagnations and thus not support the view that CSR is insurance of financial performance. / The second application, two hypotheses, synergy hypothesis and specialization advantage hypothesis, are raised too, where the former suggests that FHC-banks performer better and the latter are contrary. Above four matching methods are still used to fix the characteristics of two groups of banks in order to correct for sample selection bias. Based on after-matching samples, most of our empirical results suggest that FHC-banks, on average, outperform independent banks on most of indicators on capital adequacy, asset quality, earning ability and liquidity but not on management ability and being FHC-banks at the very least does not deteriorate the performance of banks, making our conclusion favors the synergy hypothesis and against specialization advantage hypothesis in Taiwan. / Our framework is identical to many applications of matching method such as Persson (2001), Hutchison (2004), Glick, Guo and Hutchison (2006), and are also parallel to standard medical and biological research.

自從美國於1999年11月通過金融現代化法案（Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act），排除銀行不得兼營證券及銀行控股公司不得兼營保險業務之規定，准許原銀行控股公司可申請改制為金融控股公司，並以此金融控股公司來經營銀行、證券及保險業務後，我國為尋求國內金融機構能與國際接軌，順應國際金融集團跨業經營之趨勢，遂於2000年通過「金融機構合併法」及「銀行法部分條文修正案」，隨後再於2001年6月26、27日通過包括「金融控股公司法」等之金融六法，期望透過金融機構間之合併與成立金融控股公司，整合銀行、證券、保險、票券等金融相關產業擴大金融機構之規模，透過金融控股公司之跨業平台來滿足客戶之需求，發揮金融資源整合之綜效(Synergy)，進而得以提升競爭力與獲利能力。 然而，本國金融控股公司自成立以來發展至今，有關金融控股公司之風險管理之組織、功能與執掌，除了金管會發布之「金融控股公司內部控制及稽核制度實施辦法」之第11條、第12條及第13條，規範金控須訂定適當之風險管理政策與程序，建立獨立有效風險管理機制、應設置獨立之專責風險控管單位，並定期向董事會提出風險控管報告及風險控管機制應包括之內容等原則性規範外，並未有其他較為詳盡之法令或可遵循之規範。 本論文以個案金融控股公司之實務運作為探討，期望可提供國內金融控股公司風險管理之運行之參考，吾人從此次2007及2008次貸風暴所形成之2008世紀金融大海嘯，亦可深知風險管理之重要性，金融機構之風險管理就如同蓋一棟大樓一樣，風險管理之制度與機制是該大樓之鋼樑與鋼柱，每個樓地板是金融機構之各項業務，而串連各樓層之樓梯或電梯為風險管理與各業務部門間之溝通管道，但要大樓不倒，重點在於地基的扎實與穩固，而此大樓之地基即是所謂的「風險管理文化」，透過該地基穩固的支撐每個鋼樑鋼柱及樓地板，才能有效防止並保護大樓能夠屹立不搖。因此，重視風險管理文化之深耕，建立金融機構全員之共識與確實遵循，乃是保有地位與安全之不二法門。