在二十一世紀中，節能已成為一個重要的議題，而在眾多的節能產品之中發光二極體的發展更是為全世界所注意。本研究有鑑於台灣於發光二極體產業之產值目前已經居於全球第二名，僅次於第一名的日本，嚐試進一步分析台灣於LED產業的技術面以及管理面有何優缺點，並試圖給予進一步的建議。本研究依據發光二極體的產業鏈位置、公司成立時間以及規模等因素挑選了四間具有代表性的公司進行個案公司的相關專利佈局分析以及探討。在本研究最後的研究結論分別針對市場面、技術面以及智慧財產經營管理面做出結論，研究中發現多數廠商有事業策略落後專利佈局以及佈局範圍不夠廣泛的問題。而相對於以上所提及之研究結論，本研究也進一步做出建議：在公司的研究發展方面應做到智慧財產的同步化、將智慧財產的概念體現於公司的組織定位中以及加強研發人員的教育訓練；在技術方面，台灣廠商應積極加入制定相關標準的組織，並在接受國外廠商授權時更要積極的同步建立自主技術及專利以提升技術層次，強化自身競爭力；在策略運用方面，台灣廠商應避免將智慧財產窄化成法律的議題、善用策略聯盟跳脫傳統代工的思維、積極的部屬而非消極的跟隨、以合作的思維替代競爭的思維以及注意分散風險的概念。 / The Light Emitting Diode (LED) has become the center of attentions from industries worldwide due to its performance in energy conservation. The value share of Taiwan’s LED industry has achieved a supreme degree only second to that of Japan. This thesis aims to analyze the merits and shortages of technical and management field of LED industries in Taiwan and to provide further suggestions. The research selects four representative companies as case studies of their patent strategies, The selection criteria includes the company’s position in the industrial chain, the age and the business scale. The thesis ascertains a fact that most industries’ patent strategy is usually restricted and falls behind their business plan. This thesis suggests the synchronization and realization of intellectual property in the R&D through organization assemble and personnel training. Taiwan industries should expand the content of IP management other than legal issues, well utilize strategic alliance, transcend old-fashioned OEM management thinking, adopt the role of an active agent instead of a passive follower, collaboration instead of competition, and pay attention to diversification.

著作肩負著人類對文化傳承、藝術發揚及知識分享的重責大任，影響深遠，自應創造因誘因加以鼓勵並給予適當的法律保障；惟現代著作權法保護創作人的思維均藉由「創作完成自動保護」的途徑，賦予創作人各種著作人格權及著作財產權，一改往昔仍須藉由註冊審查或登記列冊方能享有著作權的傳統作法。然而,任何偉大的著作,其價值乃貴在廣為利用方能源遠流傳，前述各類創作人是否分享或放棄著作權之意願，由法律自動保留全部權利（all rights reserved）的預設（default）立場，使得利用人在利用著作或接續創作的平台受到重重的限制，除了能符合較抽象的「合理使用」範疇以外，利用著作前均須依法取得權利人之同意或授權方能免除因此所生侵權責任。 對於一向主張著作應視為公共財的自由派學者，前述加諸廣大利用人動輒得咎的法律限制，顯然會認為對於知識分享擴散造成阻礙的結果無法忍受，於是美國史丹福大學Lawrence Lessig教授即於2002年間號召有識之士，倡導「Creative Commons」（本研究稱為「創作共享」）之運動，藉由「保留部分著作權」（some rights reserved）的理念，設計鬆綁著作權法以釋出著作權的機制，現正積極在世界各國間推廣中。 本研究即針對上述理念之興起，思考此一創新機制與知識分享擴散及著作權保護間有無相關，並試圖找出可能直接影響機制之關鍵因素提供建言。在第一章部分，除敍明研究動機、目的、範圍、限制外，更直指本研究之問題所在及預期之貢獻；第二章即針對研究主題，包括過去對著作權保護、創作共享機制、知識分享擴散及制度創新的研究進行文獻探討，第三章則對研究核心創作共享機制具體實踐之契約條款予以法律剖析檢驗，並釋疑部分易為外界混淆或誤解之觀念；第四章則詳細闡明研究方法後，設定各個命題及假設，並各賦予操作化定義，落實為問卷調查之問題及選項，第五章則以立意取向調查方式發放及回收共547份有效問卷，並以11.0版SPSS軟體執行問卷數據分析並進而出各項判讀，印證前述命題及假設相關程度，另從管理意涵賦予各項解讀之詮釋；第六章則藉由坊間已先後運行的四個類似創作共享機制的個案，將前述檢驗的內外因素、體質因素、驅動因素等研究構面逐一比較，第七章即就研究成果列出結論並提出後續研究之建議以供來者繼續接棒發揚。 / Creative work carries the responsibilities of cultural inheritance, artistic manifestation, and knowledge sharing; its influences are far reaching and the work ought to be encouraged and properly protected by law. In contrast to traditional copyright laws, whereby protection was given only after registration or examination, current copyright laws give protection to creative work upon its completion, and provide the creator with all kinds of moral integrity rights and copyrights. However, the value of a masterpiece lies in its widespread use, and the current legal system gives the creator, by default, all rights to reserve their intention to share or forfeit their copyrights. From the user’s standpoint, this protective system means limitations and restrictions in using creative work or in continuing creative platform—requiring the user to obtain agreement or license from the rights owner for any use of the work outside the scope of “fair use.” Liberal scholars who believe creative work ought to be public property find these legal restrictions on users and limitations on the proliferation of knowledge sharing intolerable. In 2002, under the appeal of Stanford’s Professor Lawrence Lessig, the movement for Creative Commons was begun. Under this model, relaxation of copyrights with some rights reserved is called for, and this idea is being widely promoted throughout the world. This study focuses on the development of this new ideology and examines its relationship with the proliferation of knowledge sharing and copyrights protection, and further inspects the key factors that may directly influence this new mechanism as well as provides necessary suggestions. Chapter One explains the motivation, purpose, scope, and limitation of this study as well as pointing out the problems and expectations of this study. Chapter Two focuses on the main theme of this study, including empirical studies on past copyright protections, creative commons mechanism, proliferation of knowledge sharing and innovation of its system. Chapter Three examines the legal aspects of the creative commons licensing agreement and clarifies the parts that are confusing or can be easily misunderstood. Chapter Four explains the research approach and sets up theories for each topic, and defines the procedures for selecting questions for the survey. Chapter Five analyzes the 547 valid surveys, which were distributed using the conceptual approach, using v.11.0 of SPSS against the topic and theories set forth in the previous chapter, and interpret each item in the survey via management connotation. Chapter Six compares four existing mechanisms similar to the creative commons model in terms internal and external factors, physical factors, and driving factors. Chapter Seven discusses the results of this study and states suggestions for subsequent research.

本論文主要是在探討延展性權利金(reach-through royalty)條款的競爭法規制。首先，本文對於研究工具專利及延展性權利金條款的意義及概念作一說明，接著簡介目前各國之競爭法制與專利法制的權衡概況，並探討一些與延展性權利金條款有關之授權條款，以了解目前競爭法對於延展性權利金條款所可能導致之相關效應的評價，作為後續分析該條款適法性的基礎，再來整理美國實務及學說對於延展性權利金條款的看法，最後綜合檢討相關論述，提出本文見解。經研究後，本文認為，延展性權利金條款有其促進競爭效應(如提供風險分攤機制、幫助起始公司解決現金壓力問題以及提供授權雙方較佳的協商估價基礎)亦有其限制競爭效應(如降低被授權人研發誘因而有限制研發的效果及權利金堆疊效應)，因此一概禁止或一概允許此種條款皆非適當，而應視個案情形依合理原則的標準加以權衡，以決定系爭行為的適法性。 / The present article discusses the antitrust regulation for reach-through royalty provisions which mainly used in biotechnology research tool patent licensing. First, this article introduces the meanings of research tool patent and reach-through royalties. Second, it illustrates antitrust regulations for patent licensing in foreign countries specifically in U.S., European Union, together with R.O.C. and, furthermore, it also discusses provisions similar or related to reach-through royalties. Third, this article introduces the discussions about reach-through royalty provisions in U.S., including the NIH Guideline, case law regulations and other related discussions by scholars. Finally, the present article analyzes the effects of reach-through royalties more deeply based on the mentioned discussions and makes a suggestion for the regulation of reach-through royalties. This article argues: since reach-through royalties have both anti-competitive and pro-competitive effects, a total ban or allowance is not appropriate and a “rule of reason” inspection should be applied to such provisions for better efficiencies.

知識經濟時代的來臨，代表知識早已經取代勞力、土地、資本，成為最重要的生產要素，而知識創造的具體果實就是智慧財產，此項無形資產占企業財產的重要性已遠超過有形資產。個人、企業和國家唯有專注在智慧財產的創造、保護、管理和運用上，方可成為知識經濟下的大贏家。 近年來，隨著人類科學知識與生活智慧的增長與演進，與人類日常生活和生命安全息息相關的生物醫學技術日益突破且其重要性與日俱增，國際間生技產業發展迅速，並帶領生技產業走向多元化的發展；除此之外，生技產業也是台灣兩兆雙星計畫中所追求的新興產業之一。然而，台灣在這股趨勢洪流中，整體生技產業的發展上並不蓬勃。歸根究柢，生技產業乃為典型的高附加價值、知識導向型產業，智慧財產的重要性不言可喻並且更加突顯。智慧財產如同其他企業資產一樣，需要善加管理與運用才能發揮其價值，若企業擁有大量之智慧財產，但對該智慧財產欠缺有效之管理運用，亦無法為公司創造任何價值。因此，如何為智慧財產尋求正確的運用管道，應是智慧財產所有人最為關心的議題。由於生物技術產業十分重視技術的掌握與應用，故本論文研究將焦點放在與技術知識保護有關的「專利授權與技術移轉」上，並特別針對屬於智慧財產行銷管理層面的策略進行探討。 《時代》雜誌年度風雲人物華裔科學家何大一曾說過要用人才賭生技，其需要的是什麼樣的人才?又該如何賭?本論文研究希望能提出相對應之見解，藉由個案研究方法分析找出台灣生技企業在「專利授權與技術移轉」上的策略思考邏輯，並更加釐清智慧財產行銷管理對產業發展影響的角色與位置。 由於台灣生物技術公司目前本身先天條件不佳且資源不足，無法透過商品化與產業化之智慧財產實施方式來創造最大利益，因此透過智慧財產交換方式乃是其最佳模式，而考量相關環境條件後，其中又以「專利授權與技術移轉」為最具經濟效益且最可能成功之智慧財產商業模式與型態，因此本論文研究便針對此方面進行深入探討，以提供產業後續發展之參考借鏡。 本論文研究目的包括：1.探討推動台灣生物技術產業公司發展過程中，考量「專利授權與技術移轉」的重要因素。2.瞭解台灣生物技術產業公司目前在「專利授權與技術移轉」方面的運作機制。3.介紹台灣生物技術產業公司之指標性個案，分析其智慧財產行銷策略，歸納其關鍵成功因素，以茲其他業者參考。4.了解智慧財產行銷策略的核心結構，提出智慧財產行銷策略規劃上的建議。5.綜合研究結果，提出對台灣生物技術產業公司「專利授權與技術移轉」策略之建議，並分析該產業之潛在問題與可能限制。 本論文研究提出理論強調台灣生物技術產業公司必須考量智慧財產行銷的六大要素(6P)，以『主導產業鏈』、『控制價值鏈』、『分配供應鏈』等三鏈為目標，因而決定採取「專利授權與技術移轉」之正確的智慧財產商業模式後，站在目標被授權人的立場思考，透過「策略九說」來作檢驗，以找出最適合的智慧財產行銷之執行策略，並在執行時確實考量組織行銷之特性。 本論文研究方式採用個案研究法以及質化研究法，獲得以下結論： 1. 「專利授權與技術移轉」必須著重於專利品質，以更貼近產業與市場需求，進而強化技術移轉之成效。 2. 「專利授權與技術移轉」是屬於相當複雜且專業性高的領域，與市場互動至關密切。 3. 任何產業的任何公司當其智慧財產行銷策略之方向目標正確，且手段方法合理，則成功便是可以預期的。 4. 一旦擬定正確的智慧財產行銷策略，則後續的執行力，便成為是否成功之唯一重點。 / The coming of Knowledge-based Economy Era indicates the fact that knowledge had taken the place of labor, land and capital to become the most important production factor. The results of knowledge creation are Intellectual Property (IP). The Intangible Assets are much more important than Tangible Assets for industries in nowadays. It becomes crucial for individuals, industries, and countries to achieve success in the Knowledge-based Economy Era to concentrate on the creation, protection, management and application of intellectual property. In the recent years, because of the developments of scientific knowledge and life wisdom, the progress and importance of the biomedical technology which closely related to human life and safety advances rapidly. Besides, the biotechnology industry is also one of the booming industries of Taiwan “Two Millions, Two Stars” projects. However, the Taiwan Biotechnology Industry does not follow the trend well. The biotechnology industry is a typical high value added and knowledge oriented industry, and the importance of IP is much more distinct. Same as other corporation’s property, intellectual property needs to be managed and put to use well to manifest its value. If a corporation owns a lot of IP without effective management and application, none value or benefit will be produced for the corporation from the IP. Therefore, for the IP owner, how to find out the correct application ways of IP will be the most important concern. Since technology familiarity and application is a highly emphasized issue for biotechnology industry, this study will focus on the technology knowledge protection concerning “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring,” especially on the IP Marketing Management Strategy. David Ho, a Chinese American scientist and the Man of the year 1996 of “Time” magazine, once said that “we have to bet on biotechnology with talents”. The question is what talents are needed, and how to bet? This study aims to provide some corresponding thoughts and find out the strategy of “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” for Taiwan biotechnology corporation through case study. Furthermore, the study will manifest how IP Marketing Management will influence industry development. Due to the immature company structure and small business size of Taiwan biotechnology corporations, these corporations are unable to create the best profit through IP commercialization or industrization. Thus, the best model for them will be through IP Exchange and the “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” will be the most effective and feasible IP Business Model given the conditions of Taiwan biotechnology industry. This thesis will concentrate on this aspect and provide advices for industrial developments. The purposes of this study include: a. the important factors and the significnace of “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” in the promotion of Taiwan biotechnology corporation development; b. the current mechanism of “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” of Taiwan biotechnology corporation; c. a case study of Taiwan biotechnology corporation, including the IP Marketing Strategy analysis and the key successful factors as reference for other corporations; d. the core structure of IP Marketing Strategy and IP Marketing Strategy planning; and e. strategy suggestions for “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” and the potential problem analysis of the industry to Taiwan biotechnology corporation. This study proposes that the Taiwan biotechnology corporation must put the 6P factors of IP Marketing into consideration and target to dominate Industry Chain, to control Value Chain, and to allocate Supply Chain. They should also take the correct IP Business Model of “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring”, and then think in the position of the targeted licensee through the examination of “9 Theories of Strategy” to find out the most suitable IP Marketing strategy. They should also take the characteristics of “Organizational Marketing” into consideration in practice. This study comes to the conclusions below with case study and qualitative methods: a. The quality of patents is always important in “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” to meet the industry and market demand and thus to reinforce the technology transferring achievement. b. “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” is complicated, highly professional and closely related to the market. c. The success of any corporation of any industry lies on a correct IP Marketing Strategy and a legitimate method. d. Once the correct IP Marketing Strategy is settled, the only key factor to success will be how to enforce the strategy.

傳統上著作物與著作權是兩個涇渭分明的概念，購買著作物不當然取得與之相關的著作權，反過來說，即便僅獲得有限的著作授權，亦不影響該著作物的所有權歸屬。為了將利益最大化，著作權人試圖透過契約架空權利耗盡，最常見的方式是透過定型化契約、以授權代替銷售，直接阻斷著作物所有權移轉的發生，但權利耗盡肩負著調和著作物所有權人與著作權人間權利衝突的任務，若允許著作權人以契約打破平衡，將使著作利用人陷入使用處處受制的窘境，亦有損文化推廣、知識傳承的著作權制度本旨。 隨著數位科技的發展，著作物逐漸走向無體化，在無體著作物與著作權本身界線模糊的情況下，權利耗盡應如何適用遂成為一個複雜的問題。本論文以有體物變成無體物的著作物型態轉變做為切入點，討論著作數位化下的權利耗盡面對的挑戰，並對實務上常用的規避手段進行分析，進一步提出著作物授權和銷售契約的辨別標準，同時提出對電子定型化契約適法性的判斷方式。 近年發展蓬勃的著作訂閱服務，更是完全跳脫產品交易模式下存在的耗盡問題。本論文最後便以現存不同數位著作（音樂、電子書、軟體）的服務平台為中心，藉由其運作模式的介紹來分析當著作與雲端結合後，除了傳統存於著作上的使用限制外，還有哪些影響著作利用人的選擇因素。

在如今高度競爭且變化快速的職場中，僅僅被動接受、完成主管工作指令的部屬，已不足以幫助自己在職涯中取得成功，如何有效的向上影響主管，建立良好的上下互惠關係，已成為所有員工的首要課題，也是支持組織永續發展的關鍵。 有別於傳統以領導者為主軸的管理研究，向上影響研究強調部屬可能反過來管理主管，透過特定手段與策略來改變主管的態度與行為。過去研究已對於向上影響策略的定義與分類建立了初步的共識，與策略效能有關的研究，則大多關注於對部屬所帶來的好處，鮮少從主管的角度探討其被影響的歷程，因此本研究將主管的角色納入考量，以訊息處理理論為基礎，探討部屬向上影響策略對於主管授權的影響效果，並試圖瞭解人際信任在其中的中介作用，以及主管權力距離傾向可能扮演的調節角色。 本研究採問卷調查法施測，共蒐集291對主管-部屬對偶樣本，研究結果顯示：部屬的向上影響策略對主管授權具有顯著的影響效果，且主管對部屬的人際信任會中介向上影響策略與主管授權之間的關係，此外，本研究亦發現主管的權力距離傾向會調節部屬向上影響策略（軟性策略、硬性策略）以及人際信任之間的關係。最後，本研究針對研究結果進行討論，並對理論貢獻、實務意涵、研究限制，及未來研究方向加以闡述。 / Upward influence strategy is a gradually concerned research topic, which is considered to be highly related to organization effectiveness and numerous job outcomes. However, most of studies explored this issue from subordinates’ perspective and focused on subordinates’ outcomes, such as job satisfaction, promotion and salary progression. The present study aims at investigating the dynamic process of upward influence strategy from the perspectives of the supervisor, examining the relationship among upward influence strategies, interpersonal trust, delegation and power-distance orientation. Results from over 200 supervisor-subordinate dyads in Taiwan generally supported the hypothesis. Supervisor-perceived subordinate’ s upward influence strategies, i.e. soft, hard, rational, had a significant impact on delegation through the mediating effect of interpersonal trust. In addition, supervisor’s power-distance orientation moderated the relationships between upward influence strategies (soft strategy, hard strategy) and interpersonal trust. Managerial implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

隨著工商社會的繁榮，以往消費時支付工具大多為使用現金；但隨著信用卡的發明，以及其特約商店的普及，現代人在消費時以信用卡來代替現金的使用者漸多。使用信用卡對消費者而言，有諸多的便利，然對發卡機構而言，如何擴大市場佔有率，吸引顧客，為其行銷策略上重要的考量；但在另一方面，接受申請者的申請與否，接受之後如何管理，亦發卡機構經營上的重要的課題。 但隨著信用卡使用的普及，詐欺的事件也時有所聞，發卡機構除了本身正常營運風險的損失，又須面臨詐欺事件的防範；對於企業的經營者而言，又增加許多成本的支出。持卡人不繳納發卡機構所代墊其消費金額時，發卡機構在催討無效後，只有訴諸於法律途徑來獲清償。這從發卡前的徵信、使用中的控管、詐欺的防止以及帳款的催收，實為當前發卡機構經營管理的重要課題。 本文之研究目的，旨在瞭解現行信用卡管理之問題，並吸取國外之經驗，參酌現行管理之制度，就現行作業之徵信、信用授權、帳款催收、詐欺的防止及定型化契約等方面提出信用卡管理上之建議，作為發卡機構之參考。 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機及目的 第二節 研究範圍及限制 第三節 研究大綱 第二章 信用卡之意義、功能、種類、發展與業務體系 第一節 信用卡的意義、功能、種類 第二節 信用卡之發展 第三節 國內信用卡之發展 第四節 信用卡的業務體系 第三章 信用授信與帳款催收管理之問題 第一節 信用授信 第二節 帳款催收 第四章 信用授權與詐欺管理之問題 第一節 信用授權 第二節 詐 欺 第五章 定型化契約 第一節 定型化契約的意義 第二節 定型化契約的法律效力 第三節 行政規則下的信用卡定型化契約 第六章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 第二節 建議

本研究係針對資本額在四仟萬以下之海外廠商台灣技術移公司作問卷調查 ，調查的地區包括中國大陸、泰國、越南、菲律賓、韓國等開發中國家， 探討台灣產業的技術發展過程、台灣中小企業的技術移轉方式、技術價值 認定、以及技術移轉成敗的關鍵因素。研究發現得到下列結論：一.台灣 技術移轉廠商在台灣經營時間愈久，海外技術愈易成功，顯見基礎穩固公 司較易成功。二.以獲取技術利潤為動機的台灣廠商，技術移轉失敗率較 高。三.海外控股比例愈高的台灣廠商，技術移轉的成功率愈高。四.對海 外經營層愈重視的廠商，技術移轉的成功率愈高。五.對海外法律愈重視 的廠商，技術移轉的成功率愈高。六.移轉對象為海外產品代理商或上下 游廠商，技術移轉的成功率愈高。七.台灣廠商技術移轉前有先從事產品 輸出的廠商，技術移轉的成功率較高。八.具有市場面控制能力的台灣廠 商，技術移轉的成功率較高。九.台灣廠商事前能簽定技術移轉協議書且 經過地主國法律保護，技術移轉成功率較高。十.資本力愈高的台灣廠商 ，技術移轉成功率較高。

人類經濟活動重心之變革推動著產業競爭的樣貌，於二十一世紀的今日，知識已成為經濟活動中最主要之價值驅力，與之相應的，產業中智慧財產層面的競爭也逐漸受到重視，發展至今，智慧財產已深入產業鏈且細化為各種以智慧財產運用為中心以創造獲利之企業。 半導體產業於台灣經濟發展之推進中佔有關鍵性之地位，隨著台灣廠商在全球產業鏈中扮演的角色重要性與日俱增，難以避免必須因應半導體產業中由智慧財產所造就的新興商業模式，其中，智慧財產研發公司拋棄舊有以生產製造為主之商業模式，開創以知識為本的競爭場域，並挾其智慧財產進行全球化的授權以及訴訟，扮演著遊戲規則的創造者，尤其記憶體產業之兩大智慧財產研發公司Rambus Inc.以及Tessera Technology Inc.，自2000年起不斷於全球提起專利訴訟，對整體產業乃至於台灣廠商帶來無法忽視之影響。 本研究試圖建立分析智慧財產研發公司之架構，亦即由該等公司之策略演進出發，宏觀的了解其於變動的競爭環境中如何發揮企業優勢；其次，以公司策略定位為基礎，進一步推動資源投入之分配，並形塑商業模式的產生；最後，本研究萃取智慧財產研發公司商業模式中較具特色且影響廣泛之訴訟階段，藉由記憶體產業中之個案分析比較之方式進行深入之實證研究，以管窺該等公司之專利運用模式，期能透過提升對於智慧財產研發公司策略定位、商業模式以及訴訟模式之了解，活化企業智慧財產之管理，並提供台灣廠商面對專利授權與訴訟時因應之基礎。 / The revolution of economic activities of human beings has been the force behind the changing format of competition among industries. In the contemporary 21st century, knowledge has become one of the most valuable forces in economic activities; correspondently, the competition strategy of intellectual property also seized much attention. As of today, intellectual property has already been integrated in each and every industry chains and developed into various enterprises which earn profits by operating it. Semi-conductor industry played an important role in the process of Taiwan’s economic development. As Taiwanese companies claim more crucial roles in the global industry chain, they are inevitably forced to deal with the new business model established by the creation of intellectual properties. Among them, intellectual property development companies have withdrawn from old business model of production and manufacturing and create a new competition field on the basis of intellectually properties. Intellectual property development companies engage in global wide license and litigation, acting as the rule-maker within the new frame of competition. Rambus Inc. and Tessera Technology Inc. are the two leading intellectual property development companies which brought lawsuits internationally since 2000, creating serious impacts on both the entire industry and Taiwanese companies. This research aims to establish an analytical framework to observe intellectually property development companies, starting from the progress of strategy, try to understand how to exercise their advantages in the ever-changing competitive business world; furthermore, based on business strategies, this research look further into the distribution of resources and the creation of business models; lastly, this research closely examines the litigation phase of the business model of intellectual property development companies by comparative case studies, in order to conclude the operation pattern of patents of such companies. With further exploration on the strategic positioning, business model and litigation pattern of intellectual property development companies, this research provides not only a deeper understanding on the management of IPRs but also a framework for Taiwanese companies to cope with patent licenses and litigations.

自英國於1997年首度提出創意產業，讓創意的附加價值藉由無形或文化性的特質融入到產品與服務創新中，文創產業已然是後知識經濟時代的指標；基於台灣文創環境的無形資產鑑價制度尚處於建構期，整體機制尚不成熟，因此相關企業在面對成長躍進中常因資金受限，也間接影響了整體產業發展，而此種現象尤以藝術經紀授權產業為甚。 「無形資產」是藝術經紀授權產業營運模式的核心。而國內對於如何將無形資產轉換為有形之概念性商品，而且又能使商品成本與企業價值被量化之議題的論述探究甚少，因此本研究將以藝術經紀授權產業為主體架構去進行鑑價模型之分析，冀望為文創產業注入更大的延展空間。 本研究整理現今無形資產、智慧資本、智慧財產之相關鑑價理論與方法流程，並就藝術經紀授權產業現況進行質化的分析，並冀望從理論出發含概實務觀點的去建構適合此產業的鑑價機制，並挑選P個案公司去驗證本研究所提出運作模型，以實現其價值轉化過程。 本研究結果可以幫助文創產業中之無形資產鑑價分析較為貼近產業之真實面貌，亦可讓文創產業經營者引為借鏡，以期盼提升台灣整體文創產業的競爭力。最重要的是藉由檢視相關產業的發展歷程，本文獻進而讓政府在制定相關產業政策時，更能以全方位的角度衡量產業政策，降低產業投入者資金進入門檻，讓更多的創投基金及金融機構投入，以促進產業發展與提升產業競爭力。 / Since the introduction of creative industry in Great Britain in 1997, which allowed the merge of value-added creativity into product and service innovations via intangible or cultural features, cultural creative industry has apparently become the index of the post-information economy. However, the intangible asset valuation system in the cultural creative industry in Taiwan is still under construction, yet immature, and the lack of capital inflow is usually the key restriction to the development and progress for many relevant enterprises, which in turn influenced the development of the entire industry; such phenomena is especially apparent in the industry of art 、agency、 licensing. “Intangible asset” lies at the core of the operation of art 、agency、and licensing industry. But there is not enough discourse analysis domestically on issues regarding how to turn intangible asset into conceptually tangible products or to further quantify the product cost and enterprise values, therefore, this study conducts analyses of valuation model based on the scaffolding of the art 、agency、 and licensing industry, hoping to introduce greater room for expansion in the cultural creative industry. The study has compiled valuation theories, methodologies and procedures regarding intangible asset, intellectual asset, and intellectual property, conducted qualitative analysis on the current status of art agency、 licensing with the expectation to develop a valuation mechanism suitable for this industry based on the theories and practical aspects, selecting company P as example to verify the operation model proposed in the study and to realize the process of value transformation. The study aims to help bring the valuation analysis of intangible asset in the cultural creative industry closer to the reality, and also serve as a reflection for operators of the cultural creative industry with the expectation of promoting the overall competitiveness of the cultural creative industry in Taiwan. Most importantly, by inspecting the process of development in related industries, this study may in turn provide an all-rounded evaluation for the government when drafting relevant policies of the industry to lower the investment threshold, allow the introduction of more venture capitals and financial institutions, and facilitate the development of the industry and improve competitiveness.