MP3與P2P的出現，打破過去唱片業者壟斷市場及通路的遊戲規則。面對網路盜版的猖獗，不只全球主要的音樂唱片公司，嘗試從法律面及技術面去尋求解決之道，對於未來的發展方向，許多廠商及也都在努力思考，如何經由科技應用、創新經營模式以搶得市場之先機。 自蘋果電腦力邀五大唱片商合作、率先揭櫫數位音樂大旗以來，其以線上音樂商店結合iTunes軟體及iPod數位音樂播放器的經營模式，可能就是管理、法律、科技相互配合，共同捍衛智財權的最佳範例。 本論文由音樂播放軟體系統競爭的角度切入，針對線上音樂廠商，面臨系統產品的標準競爭、網路外部性、產品相容性、互補性資產等議題，所採取的各項策略進行全面性探討，其中包括平台標準的建立與選擇、系統採開放或封閉模式、廠商最適垂直整合度等決策。 本研究除了從智慧財產管理、資訊產品特性、系統平台面看線上音樂產業之發展，也探討數位版權技術的應用、經營模式的改變、法律規範的嚇阻，如何克服網路盜版音樂猖獗的問題，更試圖整理目前線上音樂業者之經營模式、蘋果電腦領先之道以供後續廠商參考，並提出新的經營模式、網路經營觀念等促進線上音樂蓬勃發展之建議。

在高科技之推波助瀾下，新經濟與全球化之競爭模式儼然成形，也使得智慧財產在此競爭中扮演著重要的角色，成為高科技公司逐鹿中原的武器之一。相對地，也迫使高科技公司在全球割喉競爭之壓力下，開始思索如何更快進入戰場，並以智慧財產制敵機先。於是，企業併購策略開始成為高科技公司之經營決策者思考採行之策略。 企業併購（Merger and Acquisition）一詞，並非明確之法律定義，實乃商業管理實務界常用之名詞，因此，與其強加定義，不如從併購之模式加以說明，更為精確。併購模式概可歸納為二大模式：一為「收購」，一為「合併」。收購又可區分為「資產收購」與「股權收購」；而合併則有以吸收合併、新設合併及存續合併為主之「法定合併」類型，與以簡式合併、三角合併、強迫合併及實質合併為主之「特殊合併」類型。 所謂「收購」，係指收購公司以取得資產或經營權之目的，而以現金或債券、股票等有價證券買受目標公司全部或一部資產或股份之行為。而「合併」則係指兩家或兩家以上之公司，訂立合併契約，並經各當事公司之全體股東同意，或股東會之特別決議同意後，結合成一家公司之法律行為。其因合併而消滅之公司之權利義務，由合併後存續或新設立之公司概括承受，毋須再為個別資產或權利義務之移轉。 在企業採行併購策略之動機上，學理與實務上歸納出五種主要之動機，包括：綜效理論假說、多角化經營假說、策略性重組假說、價值低估假說，及代理成本理論與傲慢假說。綜效理論假說主要可歸納出，以追求規模經濟與範疇經濟之「營運綜效」；以風險分散或節稅考量為思考之「財務綜效」；企圖集中市場以形成壟斷之「市場綜效」；及為更精確掌握時機而追求之「起動綜效」。多角化經營則可分別從「複合式多角化」或「中心式多角化」切入討論。而策略性重組假說則著眼於「法規環境改變」或「技術創新改變」致使企業採取併購策略以為因應之面向，加以討論。此外，價值低估價說及代理成本理論與傲慢假說，則與企業經營決策者企圖追求本業之價值極大化無關，卻也經常成為經營決策者採行併購策略之動機。 前述企業併購動機之討論，事實上與美國併購歷史上所發生之五次併購浪潮息息相關，而這五次併購浪潮之興衰則亦與美國經濟發展之歷程有關。第一波併購浪潮發生於一八九七年至一九○四年間，其特色主要為「水平整合形成獨占市場」；第二波併購浪潮發生於一九一六年至一九二九年間，其特色主要為「垂直整合以利強化體質」；第三波併購浪潮發生於一九六五年至一九六九年間，其特色主要為「複合式併購擴大多角化」；第四波併購浪潮發生於一九八一年至一九八九年間，其則係以「金融工具激化敵意併購」為主要特色；時至一九九二年至二○○○年間所發生之第五次併購浪潮，則以「策略重組點燃超級併購」，逐漸將以取得智慧財產為目的之併購動機推上台面。亦即，由於全球化競爭而掀起跨國併購，及高科技產業併購之趨勢日盛，以智慧財產之取得規劃併購策略，成為高科技公司開始思考如何將企業價值極大化之策略之一。 高科技產業之競爭，已進入「超優勢競爭（Hypercompetition）」之態勢，惟有以動態競爭因應，始能勝出。而智慧財產之佈局與運用在動態競爭情境中，扮演著極為重要之角色。因此，透過併購以取得智慧財產，而得達成「控制新資源，加速企業外部成長」、「改變商業模式，大幅躍進新市場」、「動態競爭中，整合或對抗競爭者」，或「併購取得智慧財產權，待價而沽」之成果，已成為許多高科技公司之策略思考方向。 「世上沒有賣不出去的產品，只有賣不出去的價格」。在企業併購的過程中，如何就目標公司之企業價值進行評價往往是決定併購案是否能成功之關鍵。然而，對於企業的營運有重大影響之智慧財產，其「品質」究竟如何，將會對企業未來的營運造成重大的影響。因此，對於高科技產業之併購案，如何透過對於智慧財產進行查核評估（Due Diligence），協助併購交易雙方瞭解目標公司其智慧財產之品質，使雙方得以更正確評估目標公司之價值，並就併購案可能面臨之風險預先進行規劃，即為重要之課題。 換言之，由於企業併購交易之內容複雜且代價高昂，動輒為千萬至百億金額的現金交易或股份交換。雖然在交易過程中，賣方或買方通常會準備相關交易資訊及查核評估報告，以提供對方作為評估之用。但由於交易當事人自行提供之資訊通常過於簡略或可能隱惡揚善，為避免在交易價格之決定與交易後風險之承擔及效益之展現上出現問題，因此交易當事人有自行進行查核評估之必要。此即孫子兵法《謀攻篇》中所述「知己知彼，百戰不殆；不知彼不知己，每戰必敗。」所傳達之精神。 鑑於智慧財產查核評估是一項耗時費力，且所費不貲之工作，企業內部法律顧問或外部律師在進行智慧財產查核評估時，應對於其查核之範圍有所限制。並非所有智慧財產對於買方公司皆有顯著之影響，因此必須從公司之觀點加以檢視，並以其對於公司所可能產生之價值排序其先後。而除了時間、成本與專業人力投入等因素之考量外，「買方公司之策略目標」、「目標公司之核心競爭力」，與「企業併購交易之模式」將影響智慧財產查核評估所欲進行之範圍。 對於高科技公司而言，其企圖藉由併購活動所取得之智慧財產各異，然最主要者，尤其是對於我國公司而言，仍以「專利權」之取得以利企業在全球市場產業價值鏈中之佈局為首要考量。因此本文將就「專利查核」之相關議題，略做探討。而進行專利查核時，除從「專利申請案」、「專利審查歷程」與「法律意見書」等相關文件，進行概略初步審查外，概可聚焦於「目標公司是否確為真正之完整權利擁有者」、「發明之實施是否須依賴業已存在或第三人之權利」、「目標公司之發明是否獲得足夠之保障」、「目標公司之專利是否已為適當之利用」，及「目標公司之專利是否（或可能）涉訟」等面向出發，進行深入探查。 深入探究目標公司是否確為真正之完整權利擁有者之議題上，本論文將從「共同發明」、「受雇人之發明」與「部分讓與」所涉及之問題加以討論；而在發明之實施是否須依賴業已存在或第三人之權利之議題上，關於「技術改良與從屬專利」、「交互授權」及「技術輸入授權」涉及之契約約款（例如：契約存續期間、專屬性、可轉讓性與控制權之變更、轉授權、授權範圍、技術改良與回饋授權、擔保與賠償責任、最惠待遇，與過往侵權免責等）所衍生相關問題將為本論文關心之重點。 此外，在目標公司之發明是否獲得足夠之保障之議題上，本論文將討論關於「發明之檢討與揭露程序」、「專利權之地理範圍」，及「申請專利範圍與專利審查歷程之檢討」等問題；而關於「授權實施」及「專利濫用」將係買方公司查核目標公司之專利是否已為適當之利用時之重點。最後，在目標公司之專利是否（或可能）涉訟此議題之討論中，本論文將從評估目標公司之專利組合是否侵害第三人之專利權所進行之「專利侵權評估」與如涉及專利侵權訴訟時可能之「反訴或抗辯之評估」。 為印證本論文所提高科技公司以併購活動取得智慧財產之策略及所進行之查核評估活動，在結論與建議部分將以一家台灣公司之實際經驗為個案，探討其進行跨國併購時所面臨之問題，並就多數高科技公司所忽略之「競業禁止」問題，以美國法下之經驗，作為高科技公司進行跨國（尤其是美國）併購時，在專利查核之外，亦應注意之建議，以避免研發團隊於併購前後離職或被挖角，對買方公司所造成之傷害。 / A recent survey showed that between two and five emerging technology companies are acquired for every one that does an initial public offering （IPO）. Acquisitions can provide strategic, operating and financial benefits to both emerging technology companies and the company acquiring it. A strategic acquisition can provide emerging technology companies’ shareholders with earlier liquidity than an IPO, with less risk and dilution. It also can provide emerging technology companies with the immediate leverage of Buy Company's established manufacturing or distribution infrastructure, without the dilution, time and risk of internal development. A strategic acquisition can provide Buy Company with the new products and technologies necessary to maintain its competitive advantage, growth rate and profitability. Ill-conceived or badly done acquisitions, however, can result in expense and disruption to both businesses, the discontinuance of good technologies and products, employee dissatisfaction and defection, and poor operating results by the combined company. By understanding the key factors that lead to a successful acquisition, Target Company and Buy Company can improve the probability of achieving one. When considering an M&A transaction, Target Company first step should be to identify the strategic reasons why it wants to be acquired. For example, while Target Company may seek liquidity for its founders and investors, it also may have concluded that its future success requires the synergies of complementary resources and access to the infrastructure of a major corporation. An IPO could provide Target Company’s shareholders with liquidity, but would not immediately address Target Company’s need for product synergy or provide an established infrastructure. Those needs could be better met by finding a strategic buyer for Target Company. Equally important is to identify Buy Company’s strategic objectives in acquiring Target Company. For example, Buy Company may seek to acquire a product line or key technology, gain creative, technical or management talent, or eliminate a competitor. Ultimately, Buy Company will acquire Target Company because it believes M&A transaction is a more effective means of meeting a strategic need and increasing shareholder value than internal development. If Target Company understands its own and Buy Company’s strategic objectives, it can focus on candidates that are most likely to meet its needs and value the assets that it has to offer. While the objectives of individual companies will vary, the following table identifies common strategic objectives that Target Companies and Buy Companies try to achieve through an M&A activity. Target Company Reasons to Be Acquired Buy Company Reasons to Make a M&A Access to complementary products Access to complementary markets Access to working capital Avoid dilution of building own infrastructure Best and fastest return on investment Faster access to established infrastructure Gain critical mass Improve distribution capacity More rapid expansion of customer base Acquire key technology Acquire a new distribution channel Assure a source of supply Eliminate a competitor Expand or add a product line Gain creative talent Gain expertise and entry in a new market Gain a time-to-market advantage Increase earnings per share This study focuses on intellectual property due diligence, especially for the investigation of the benefits and risks associated with the ownership and exploitation of patent right when a company involves in a M&A activity. The increased profile, frequency, and value of intellectual property-related transactions have elevated the need for all legal, financial and managerial professionals and intellectual property owners to have a thorough understanding of the assessment and valuation of these assets and their role in commercial transactions; a detailed assessment of patent right is becoming an increasingly integral part of commercial transactions for the high-technology companies. Acquiring or investing in a business that owns intellectual property assets requires expanding the scope and depth of the due diligence that is usually conducted in such transactions. The process of gathering information and assessing the merits, issues, and risks associated with a business transaction is called “due diligence.” It is a critical exercise in the acquisition and strategic utilization of intellectual property assets. Due diligence is a necessary precursor to funding a new venture, and is critically important in many other business transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, licenses, initial public offerings, and in some instances litigation. In recent years, the commercial importance of patents and other intellectual property has become highly visible. Courts have imposed large damage awards for intellectual property misuse and infringement. Multi-million dollar judgments are no longer a rarity. Courts have also granted significant injunctions to limit the products which a company can market. For instance, Kodak was virtually eliminated from the instant camera market and subject to an extremely high damage award when it was found to infringe patents owned by Polaroid. As a result of these potential events, and the increasing value of intellectual property assets in today’s high technology society, intellectual property matters have become an important aspect of a traditional due diligence study. Intellectual property due diligence can be conducted in preparation for a wide variety of transactions. For example, intellectual property assets should be analyzed in the context of a share purchase or asset transfer, or may require assessment in connection with a capital contribution, in a joint venture or security for a loan, or in preparation of disclosure in connection with an offering of securities. Intellectual property due diligence can also facilitate a company’s thorough internal assessment of its own assets. Such a self-audit can prepare the company for an externally conducted due diligence, such as audited by a buyer company involving in a M&A transaction, and can enhance the company’s own intellectual property planning and management. Intellectual property rights are the product of human thought, born of human needs and aspirations, and manifested by societal values. A thorough intellectual property due diligence also requires consideration of many nonlegal, nonmaterial aspects of the rights involved. The impact of an investment in a specific intellectual property right, and its role and value in a given M&A transaction, can be easily miscalculated if the private and public implications of those rights are not considered. Every intellectual property transaction embodies both individual and societal beliefs and values that can profoundly affect the parties’s strategies and success. The philosophical underpinnings of intellectual property rights are often discussed in academic and philosophical forums. However, these principles deserve reiteration here, in a transaction-specific context. Too often, they are forgotten amidst the binders, cabinets and files full of due diligence documents and analytical reports. In Chapter 4, Patent Due Diligence, it comprises detailed analyses of the key issues to be assessed in the patent investigation. This chapter presents the steps in the legal review that should be undertaken on patents, and reviews the pertinent law pertaining to patent right. This chapter identifies the relevant documents that should be requested, defines the subject right, and analyzes the following substantive questions: Whether Target Company owns the patent right(s); Whether the patent right(s) have been adequately protected; Whether Target Company’s use of the patent right(s) is dependent on third part rights; Whether the scope of patent right(s) is sufficient; Whether the patent right(s) have been properly exploited; and Whether the patent right(s) present a risk of litigation. An investigation of Target Company’s patent assets can require analysis of extensive documentation, as well as knowledge of the specific technical field in which Target Company conducts its business, and of patent law. The circumstances of each particular case will dictate whether specialized patent counsel will need to be retained to assist with the patent due diligence. Buyer Company should be aware that proper preparation of patentability opinions and validity / infringement opinions can require substantial lead time and budget, and should accordingly account for these contingencies. Similarly, a thorough investigation to confirm ownership and assess exploitation of Target Company’s patent portfolio can require discussions regarding contribution of inventive ideas, past and present consultant or employment status of inventors, proper use of assignments, close investigation of the technology, markets, improvement clauses, cross-licenses, and the like. In sum, if Buyer Company specifies Target Company’s patent portfolio as a high priority in the intellectual property due diligence investigation, Buyer Company is well-advised to assign the patent-related investigation tasks to team members and, as applicable, patent experts, early in the due diligence process.

新藥開發是需要大量的資金投入，同時需要專業的技術實驗人才、以及具產業經驗的管理團隊，但是其所獲取的價值和領域也是相對較大的。生技製藥產業包括新藥、學名藥、中草藥、基因及蛋白質製劑、遠距醫療、預防醫學、醫療器材等。台灣在生技製藥已經投入許多資源，但是所獲得的成果並不如預期，主要原因除了缺乏像國際大廠的充足資金之外、且沒有完整的生技製藥產業鏈，更重要的是缺少了對生技製藥智慧財產管理的經驗、沒有國際行銷能力去取得市場。起因點則為台灣生技製藥公司仿照國際成功的生技製藥大廠模式，卻沒有自己的價值創造和創新模式，為了替台灣生技製藥廠商尋找新的利基和成功模式，本文分析了國內與國外的生技製藥公司，以尋找適合台灣的價值創造模式。 台灣生技製藥廠商主要缺乏的並非是技術，而是結合智慧財產的法律議題、並且發展出市場導向的生物技術研發模式。智慧財產相關議題在生技製藥產業更是最關鍵的因素，因為新藥研發動輒10年，而一般資金來源的銀行和創投都無法忍受所投資的公司必須要十年才可以獲利退出，因此透過不同臨床時期開發的新藥，其價值也會有顯著的不同，再透過技術移轉、授權和相關合約的簽訂，才能促使台灣中小型的生技製藥公司可以生存。本文要提出價值創造模型之前，必須要針對生技製藥產業的技術研發特性進行分析，接著必須透過智慧資本與財務會計的方式計算生技製藥產業無形資產的價值，最後透過個案中不同公司的營運策略，找出最適合現今生物製藥產業發展的模式。 生技產業需要相當多的資金去做新藥研發與市場行銷，這也是生技產業特殊的供應鏈上最重要的一環。因為，創投公司不只會投資金錢，它還會幫忙被投資公司尋找人才、市場、和策略發展。因此，本文第三個個案公司Burrill&Company為美國生技創投公司，最近幾年也可以看到它在大中華地區尋求投資機會。Apex International公司選對人才創造出優良品質的委託臨床試驗、和NexMed透過技術授權所產生平台技術，三家公司所創造的價值，去印證本文所提出的生技製藥產業價值創新模式的適用性。 論文研究結果顯示生技製藥產業最成功的關鍵因素至少有兩點，第一點就是核心能耐(Core Competence)的建立、第二點就是選擇對的人才。由本論文的價值創造模式中心出發，便是透過紮實的研究發展技能；建立優良的管理技巧以降低研發風險；透過創造新的技術和產品價值的核心能力建立，再選擇正確的人才組合，創造出外部的價值，最後達到整體價值創造的綜效。希望台灣不光只是擁有科技基本法與生技新藥產業發展條例等政策，而是可以透過本論文提出之價值創造模式，有效提升整體生技製藥產業的環境，以期產生更多成功的故事。 關鍵字：生技製藥、智慧財產、實體審查、無形資產鑑價、價值創造、技術移轉。 / Biopharmaceutical is driving force of the global healthcare economy transformation. In order for a biopharmaceutical company to gain value from a new drug during its clinical development, capital investment, professional talents, and management team with industrial experience are needed. Biopharmaceutical industry are included of new drugs, generic drugs, Chinese herbal medicine or traditional Chinese medicine, genetic and protein preparations, tele-medicine, preventive medicine, medical devices and so on. Taiwan has invested a lot of resources at biopharmaceutical fields but the results are not as expectation. The main reason is the lack of adequate funding from international big pharma, and the operation is no integrity of the value chain at biopharmaceutical industry. More importantly is the lack of management experience on Intellectual Property, and no marketing ability to access to the global technology supply and demand market. The key point is that they copy of the format of big pharma but lack the spirit of the creativity and innovation. I analyzed the three cases in the thesis and tried to find a niche and successful model for the value-adding on the Taiwan’s Biopharmaceutical industry. Taiwan does have the technology know-how, but most of the companies’ problems are the lack of market-oriented R&D model and the Intellectual Property issues. IP issues including management know-how related to biopharmaceutical industry are the most crucial factors. Most companies tends to spend ten years on developing a new drug. Most of the investment banking and venture capitals are hard to endure by the long-term exit mechanism. The value will be totally different if the investors can exit at various clinical stage of new drugs at various stages with the strategy of technology transfer and licensing agreement. Such business model can make Taiwan’s small and medium-sized biopharmaceutical companies easier to survive. To verify this value creation model, I analyzed the characteristics of the industrial research and development and calculate the value of intangible assets on the technology by the methodology of intellectual capital and financial accounting. Finally, I will identify the most suitable model by compared with the different business models in three representative cases. The biotech industry needs a lot of funding to do R&D and marketing of new drugs which is the most important on this special supply chain. Not only to invest money, venture capitalist should help the company to recruit the talent, target the market, plan and execute the strategy. Therefore, the third case is the U.S. venture capital firm called Burrill & Company. In recent years, it moved to the Great China region to seek the investment opportunities. Apex International recruit the right talents to the right position and create a great world class quality project on the clinical trial, and NexMed bring their value through the platform technology and technology licensing. All the cases are selected to examine the availability and suitability of the value creation model. At least two key successful factors for biopharmaceutical industry has been revealed by the research of the thesis study. The first one is the establishment of the core competence on the technology in their respective business, and the second one is the management know how in putting the right person on the correct position. Overall, the value creation model is build on a solid research and development skills, a great management know-how to reduce the risk, and the spirit of entrepreneurship to create the true innovative products or services. With all the core competences, we can integrate the team with multidisciplinary talents to expand the value with the outside resources, and give the synergy of the whole value-added model. Hope that with the recent enactment of the Basic Science and Technology law and New Pharmaceutical Development Act in Taiwan, more successful stories can be created by this value-added model discussed in this thesis.

90年代歐美國家，對於人口增加、土地面積驟減、過量電子產品等所帶來的環境問題日益重視。歐洲最早發起「延伸生產者責任制」，透過制訂法律與政策提升資源再生利用的效率。並且陸續頒佈WEEE廢電機電子指令、RoHS有害物質限用指令、REACH化學品限制、ELV廢車輛指令等，透過污染控制、回收利用、減廢、污染預防、清潔生產等步驟，朝零污染方向進行，顯示資源再生的重要性。 資源再生產業在台灣為新興產業，規模以中小企業形式居多，雖然經營回收事業容易，但要經營技術層次較高的再生事業則需獲得政府許可證使得成為再生機構。近年來資源再生廠商利用廢棄物資源再生的技術，提煉出黃金、白銀、鉑等貴金屬，隨著全球原物料價格高漲，其所生產的二次原材料行情提升整體產值，預估到2010年總產值為580億台幣。 智慧資本目前普遍被認為是企業能形成競爭優勢的無形資產總和，即企業能用來作為開創財富的知識、資訊、智慧財產、經驗等。找出適合企業的智慧資本項目，讓企業投入在重要項目而獲取價值成為企業的重要課題。本文主要研究資源再生產業智慧資本經營方式，探討一般經營策略與智慧財產管理，對智慧資本運用與累積的影響。總結文獻探討與個案訪談分析的結果，根據研究問題，主要研究發現如下： 一、 資源再生產業為一特許經營行業，其經營需獲得政府所頒發之許可同意，同時易受上游產業廢棄物種類以及全球環保再生法規的影響。 二、 智慧財產需要透過企業策略與功能性活動執行才能提升成為智慧資本。 三、 策略目標不同將會影響智慧資本各構面投入的重要性判斷。 四、 智慧資本經營必須搭配策略與智慧財產管理制度才能達到創造、保護、管理、運用之功效。 五、 資源再生產業的智慧資本經營必須考量各國差異產生在地化的經營型態。 / Since the 1990s, the United States and the European Union (‘’EU’’) have become aware of the crucial environmental problems stemming from overpopulation, reducing residential areas, and growing quantities of end-of-life electronics. To protect the environment and diminish the impacts of household consumption and production, the EU took initiatives to devise environment policies and came up with the idea of Extended Producer Responsibility(‘’EPR’’), a strategy designed to promote the integration of environmental costs associated with products throughout their life cycles into the market price of the products. This concept is inspiring in the waste management, and urging industries to think over recycling process and use recyclable materials to produce products. Moreover, there are four important directives and policies in effect in the Europe, such as Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (‘’WEEE’’), Restriction of Hazardous Substance Directive (‘’RoHS’’), End-of Life Vehicles Directive (‘’ELV’’), Registration, and Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (‘’REACH’’). Those legislations and standards are intended to encourage companies to voluntarily adopt environmental management systems or procedures to minimize waste and emissions and to meet the goal of zero pollution. Recycling industry in Taiwan is an emerging industry and many of them are small and medium enterprises. To operate recycling business, companies have to acquire the certificate of waste management from the Environmental Protection Administration Executive Yuan. Recently, some recycling companies make it technologically possible for kinds of wastes or unwanted products to be recycled. They have developed technologies to recover from waste to precious metals like palladium, platinum, gold, or silver. Those precious metals are valuable secondary raw materials and will contribute good revenues to recycling market. Therefore, the value of recycling market in Taiwan is estimated to rise to NT$5.8 billion by 2010. Intellectual capital is widely considered as a firm’s intangible assets and is often a major determinant of the companies’ profits. It plays a crucial role in business management and needs to be analyzed in a systematic way to find out the appropriate components. This research focuses on how the companies in recycling industry manage their intellectual capitals, and how the generic strategies and the intellectual property management influence the way of creating and accumulating the intellectual capitals. The important findings of this research are as follows (extraction): 1. Recycling industry is a kind of franchising business and needs to acquire the government’s agreement to operate. The development of this industry is highly influenced by the kinds of wastes of the upstream industries and the global environment legislation. 2. Intellectual assets will be converted into valuable intellectual capital by the implementation of business strategy and functional activities. 3. Different goals of strategy bring about different priorities for the resources input of intellectual capitals. 4. To achieve the goal of value creation, protection, management, and execution, the intellectual capital management needs to combine with strategy management and the intellectual property management. 5. The intellectual capital management in recycling industry must include the consideration of different local business environments of different countries.

知識經濟時代的來臨，代表知識早已經取代勞力、土地、資本，成為最重要的生產要素，而知識創造的具體果實就是智慧財產，此項無形資產占企業財產的重要性已遠超過有形資產。個人、企業和國家唯有專注在智慧財產的創造、保護、管理和運用上，方可成為知識經濟下的大贏家。 近年來，隨著人類科學知識與生活智慧的增長與演進，與人類日常生活和生命安全息息相關的生物醫學技術日益突破且其重要性與日俱增，國際間生技產業發展迅速，並帶領生技產業走向多元化的發展；除此之外，生技產業也是台灣兩兆雙星計畫中所追求的新興產業之一。然而，台灣在這股趨勢洪流中，整體生技產業的發展上並不蓬勃。歸根究柢，生技產業乃為典型的高附加價值、知識導向型產業，智慧財產的重要性不言可喻並且更加突顯。智慧財產如同其他企業資產一樣，需要善加管理與運用才能發揮其價值，若企業擁有大量之智慧財產，但對該智慧財產欠缺有效之管理運用，亦無法為公司創造任何價值。因此，如何為智慧財產尋求正確的運用管道，應是智慧財產所有人最為關心的議題。由於生物技術產業十分重視技術的掌握與應用，故本論文研究將焦點放在與技術知識保護有關的「專利授權與技術移轉」上，並特別針對屬於智慧財產行銷管理層面的策略進行探討。 《時代》雜誌年度風雲人物華裔科學家何大一曾說過要用人才賭生技，其需要的是什麼樣的人才?又該如何賭?本論文研究希望能提出相對應之見解，藉由個案研究方法分析找出台灣生技企業在「專利授權與技術移轉」上的策略思考邏輯，並更加釐清智慧財產行銷管理對產業發展影響的角色與位置。 由於台灣生物技術公司目前本身先天條件不佳且資源不足，無法透過商品化與產業化之智慧財產實施方式來創造最大利益，因此透過智慧財產交換方式乃是其最佳模式，而考量相關環境條件後，其中又以「專利授權與技術移轉」為最具經濟效益且最可能成功之智慧財產商業模式與型態，因此本論文研究便針對此方面進行深入探討，以提供產業後續發展之參考借鏡。 本論文研究目的包括：1.探討推動台灣生物技術產業公司發展過程中，考量「專利授權與技術移轉」的重要因素。2.瞭解台灣生物技術產業公司目前在「專利授權與技術移轉」方面的運作機制。3.介紹台灣生物技術產業公司之指標性個案，分析其智慧財產行銷策略，歸納其關鍵成功因素，以茲其他業者參考。4.了解智慧財產行銷策略的核心結構，提出智慧財產行銷策略規劃上的建議。5.綜合研究結果，提出對台灣生物技術產業公司「專利授權與技術移轉」策略之建議，並分析該產業之潛在問題與可能限制。 本論文研究提出理論強調台灣生物技術產業公司必須考量智慧財產行銷的六大要素(6P)，以『主導產業鏈』、『控制價值鏈』、『分配供應鏈』等三鏈為目標，因而決定採取「專利授權與技術移轉」之正確的智慧財產商業模式後，站在目標被授權人的立場思考，透過「策略九說」來作檢驗，以找出最適合的智慧財產行銷之執行策略，並在執行時確實考量組織行銷之特性。 本論文研究方式採用個案研究法以及質化研究法，獲得以下結論： 1. 「專利授權與技術移轉」必須著重於專利品質，以更貼近產業與市場需求，進而強化技術移轉之成效。 2. 「專利授權與技術移轉」是屬於相當複雜且專業性高的領域，與市場互動至關密切。 3. 任何產業的任何公司當其智慧財產行銷策略之方向目標正確，且手段方法合理，則成功便是可以預期的。 4. 一旦擬定正確的智慧財產行銷策略，則後續的執行力，便成為是否成功之唯一重點。 / The coming of Knowledge-based Economy Era indicates the fact that knowledge had taken the place of labor, land and capital to become the most important production factor. The results of knowledge creation are Intellectual Property (IP). The Intangible Assets are much more important than Tangible Assets for industries in nowadays. It becomes crucial for individuals, industries, and countries to achieve success in the Knowledge-based Economy Era to concentrate on the creation, protection, management and application of intellectual property. In the recent years, because of the developments of scientific knowledge and life wisdom, the progress and importance of the biomedical technology which closely related to human life and safety advances rapidly. Besides, the biotechnology industry is also one of the booming industries of Taiwan “Two Millions, Two Stars” projects. However, the Taiwan Biotechnology Industry does not follow the trend well. The biotechnology industry is a typical high value added and knowledge oriented industry, and the importance of IP is much more distinct. Same as other corporation’s property, intellectual property needs to be managed and put to use well to manifest its value. If a corporation owns a lot of IP without effective management and application, none value or benefit will be produced for the corporation from the IP. Therefore, for the IP owner, how to find out the correct application ways of IP will be the most important concern. Since technology familiarity and application is a highly emphasized issue for biotechnology industry, this study will focus on the technology knowledge protection concerning “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring,” especially on the IP Marketing Management Strategy. David Ho, a Chinese American scientist and the Man of the year 1996 of “Time” magazine, once said that “we have to bet on biotechnology with talents”. The question is what talents are needed, and how to bet? This study aims to provide some corresponding thoughts and find out the strategy of “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” for Taiwan biotechnology corporation through case study. Furthermore, the study will manifest how IP Marketing Management will influence industry development. Due to the immature company structure and small business size of Taiwan biotechnology corporations, these corporations are unable to create the best profit through IP commercialization or industrization. Thus, the best model for them will be through IP Exchange and the “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” will be the most effective and feasible IP Business Model given the conditions of Taiwan biotechnology industry. This thesis will concentrate on this aspect and provide advices for industrial developments. The purposes of this study include: a. the important factors and the significnace of “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” in the promotion of Taiwan biotechnology corporation development; b. the current mechanism of “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” of Taiwan biotechnology corporation; c. a case study of Taiwan biotechnology corporation, including the IP Marketing Strategy analysis and the key successful factors as reference for other corporations; d. the core structure of IP Marketing Strategy and IP Marketing Strategy planning; and e. strategy suggestions for “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” and the potential problem analysis of the industry to Taiwan biotechnology corporation. This study proposes that the Taiwan biotechnology corporation must put the 6P factors of IP Marketing into consideration and target to dominate Industry Chain, to control Value Chain, and to allocate Supply Chain. They should also take the correct IP Business Model of “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring”, and then think in the position of the targeted licensee through the examination of “9 Theories of Strategy” to find out the most suitable IP Marketing strategy. They should also take the characteristics of “Organizational Marketing” into consideration in practice. This study comes to the conclusions below with case study and qualitative methods: a. The quality of patents is always important in “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” to meet the industry and market demand and thus to reinforce the technology transferring achievement. b. “Patent Licensing and Technology Transferring” is complicated, highly professional and closely related to the market. c. The success of any corporation of any industry lies on a correct IP Marketing Strategy and a legitimate method. d. Once the correct IP Marketing Strategy is settled, the only key factor to success will be how to enforce the strategy.

2007 年1 月9 日的MacWorld 活動中，Apple 公司的執行長在其每一屆Macworld 活動都會給予的演說 (Keynote) 中，介紹了一款Apple 公司最新的、具革命性的研究成果－iPhone。iPhone 隨及引爆了話題，並在2007 年 7 月上市時引爆了搶購熱潮，這是第一款能讓手機廠商和營運商分享利潤的手機，也是極少數的一款毛利高達50%以上的手機，更直接影響了整個手機產業。本研究從iPhone 的產品、技術探討iPhone 包含軟體、硬體的研發成果暨智慧財產，從商品化與商業模式的角度試圖討論Apple 公司如何以手機產業的新進入者而推出高附加價值的手機並在短時間內建立品牌，進而與營運商分享利潤，更以手機廠商的身份建立內容服務平台而創造高價值。最後，本研究將總結Apple 公司iPhone 研發成果與智慧財產的商品化與商業模式，以及iPhone 為產業帶來的衝擊，並給予台灣廠商幾點建議，僅供參考。 / In the Keynote of Macworld 2007 on January 9th, Steve Jobs, the CEO of Apple Company introduced the latest and revolutionary product of Apple Company whitch is actually a mobile phone, and its name is iPhone. The term“iPhone” was getting hot soon. On Junly 29th, iPhone was onto the market, and its sales soared in the market. No doubt, iPhone is the first phone earns Apple the shared revenue from mobile operater, a very small number of phones with a more-than-50% profit margin rate, and a phone changes the whole communication industry. This article starts from the product structure and technology view of iPhone, and then tries to discuss the commercialization and the business model of iPhone. It would try to probe into the key elements of the commercial success of iPhone, including the high value-added product feature, the branding of iPhone, the innovated platform providing contents and services to iPhone user, and the cooperation and revenue share with mobile operators. Finally, the article would summarize the Research on the Commercialization and Business Model of R&D results and Intellectual Properties of Apple iPhone with an additional discuss on the impact that iPhone brings to the communication industry, then give some suggestions to the Taiwan companies.

台灣的產業型態已逐漸由勞力密集的傳統產業轉型為知識密集的科技產業，已成為資訊電子生產大國，共有十多項資訊設備佔有率高居世界第一。而我國以中小企業為主的產業結構，研發經費的投入往往無法與國外大廠相比，產學研合作研發便成為我國產業創新中相當重要的一個環節，大學與研發機構在研發創新上的成果是提升產業技術水準的重要來源。 智慧財產權在科技業可說是重要的競爭武器之一，智慧財產權管理更為各企業亟欲增進的能力。立法院於1998年底通過科學技術基本法，通過將合作研發成果的智財權中政府出資部分的權利下放給研發單位，對我國產學研合作的智慧財產權管理具有相當之影響，而後如何執行以達成技術擴散，更是需要深入探討。 本文希望從管理面與法律面來探討產學研合作的智慧財產權管理，透過（1）國內外文獻探討；（2）專家深度訪談；（3）先進國家產學研合作與智財權管理之探討；（4）國內產學研合作與智財權管理之個案分析等方式來進行探討。借重國外經驗，發現國內實行時的問題，以期經由良好的合作與技術移轉制度，使學研單位獲得經費補助與權利金回饋，且亦使廠商獲得切合需要之技術的使用權，讓創新成果獲得保護，並讓知識能充分移轉流通，強化我國國家創新系統。 本研究建議如下： 一、 對政府而言 （一） 以藏富於民的原則將智財權下放 （二） 例外介入以使成果充分使用 （三） 專利成果應用的限制 （四） 建立產業技術移轉服務體系（ITTS） （五） 修改相關法令 二、 對大學而言 （一） 應設立專責的智慧財產權管理單位 （二） 與中介機構合作執行智慧財產權管理 （三） 將研究方向分為基礎研究導向與產業技術導向 （四） 鼓勵大學教授投入產業服務 （五） 設立創新技術公司 三、 對研發機構而言 （一） 研發機構應更積極鼓勵研發人員投入研發 （二） 積極與民間企業合作並從事技術推廣與技術移轉 （三） 加強智慧財產權管理能力 （四） 落實R＆D人數/智財權業務人數比例 四、 對廠商而言 （一） 培養本身研發能力與技術承接能力 （二） 善用外在技術資源 （三） 建立智慧財產權權管理制度 （四） 與學研單位合作應秉持多次合作的誠意 （五） 與學研單位建立長期合作關係並合理的給予回饋 目錄 表 目 錄 3 圖 目 錄 5 第一章 緒論 7 第一節 研究背景 7 第二節 研究動機 10 第三節 研究目的與問題 12 第四節 研究大綱 13 第二章 文獻探討 15 第一節 智慧財產權 15 第二節 科技基本法 26 第三節 產學合作 29 第四節 產研合作 39 第三章 研究方法 45 第一節 研究取向 45 第二節 研究方法 47 第三節 訪談對象 48 第四節 個案範圍 49 第五節 研究限制 50 第四章 先進國家產學研合作與智慧財產權管理 51 第一節 美國產學研合作與智慧財產權管理 51 第二節 日本產學研合作與智慧財產權管理 83 第三節 德國產學研合作與智慧財產權管理 101 第五章 國內個案分析 119 第一節 工業技術研究院 119 第二節 台大慶齡工業中心 155 第三節 宏□電腦 175 第六章 結論與建議 191 第一節 結論 191 第二節 對政府的建議 195 第三節 對大學的建議 201 第四節 對研發機構的建議 204 第五節 對產業界的建議 206 第六節 對後續研究的建議 209 參考文獻 213 / Taiwan’s industry has transferred from traditional labor-intensive industries to knowledge-intensive technology industries. Furthermore, Taiwan has become a leading country for information and electronics manufacturing industries. According to statistical data, Taiwan has leaded more than ten items of components in their industries in the world and their marketing shares are getting up. But our industrial structure is based on Small Middle Enterprise (SME). The R&D capability can’t keep up with the oversea big companies. The collaboration between industry, university, and research institute is very important for Taiwan’s industries. SME depend universities and research institutes’ research outcomes to bring up the industrial technology level. Intellectual Property Right (IPR) is one of the most important competitive weapons for industry. As a result, IPR management ability is what every firm would like to cultivate. In 1998, the Legislative Yuan passed the Science and Technology Basic Law which allowing the IPR releasing from the government sponsored projects to the research institutes and universities. It would have a tremendous effect on the IPR management in collaborated research between industry, university, and research institute. From the management and law’s point view, the purpose of this thesis is to (1) clarify and analyze the international and domestic data of IPR management; (2) compare the collaborated research between industry, university, and research institute in advanced countries such as the United State, Japan, and Germany; and (3) study the case of Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), Taiwan University, and ACER to discover the practical IPR management problems in Taiwan. With proper university and industry collaboration and technology transfer system, universities will get proper return for the research fund and industry will be able to utilize the invention well. Therefore the innovative research outcomes would be protected and the knowledge would diffuse smoothly that reinforce Taiwan’s National Innovation System (NIS). Consequently, this thesis makes the following suggestions for government, universities, research institutes, and industries: 1. For Government (1) Allow the university and research institute to own the Intellectual Property Right. (2) Government own the exceptional involvement right in order to apply the R&D outcomes well. (3) Proper restriction to patent application. (4) Establish Industrial Technology Transfer Service (ITTS). (5) Amend the relative regulations and laws. 2. For University (1) Establish specific IPR management office. (2) Collaborate with the agency institute to executive IPR management. (3) Divide research direction into basic research orientation and industrial technology research orientation. (4) Encourage professors devoting the industrial service. (5) Fund the innovation technological company. 3. For Research Institute (1) Encourage R&D staff devoting more effort in their job. (2) Actively collaborate with industry and engage in technology transfer and promotion. (3) Enhance IPR management ability. (4) Improve the R&D staff / IPR management staff ratio. 4. For Industry (1) Cultivate R&D ability and technology receiving ability. (2) Utilize outside technology resource well. (3) Establish IPR management system. (4) Remain condor when collaborate with universities and research institutes. (5) Establish long-term partnership with universities and research institutes then give them reasonable feedback.

無形資產中的智慧財產權與其他財產一樣，都是使競爭性的市場經濟得以發揮機能的必要條件，因為使用智慧財產權而賺得的利潤，對發明人而言是其創新的報酬，而對於向別人購買權利的人而言，亦必須因此而付出相當代價。這利潤無形中激勵了原來從事研究發展的那一方，如此一來，創新者賺取較多利潤並能長期保持競爭優勢，會更鼓勵更多的人願意投入創新發明。 本研究企圖將智慧財產權視為一項企業資源，將其視為可以商品化交易的商品，而研究其中研發所投入的成本、所投入的代價，如何在市場的交易買賣中，獲得回饋與報酬，或是形成企業的核心資源，在對價格的認知提供企業思考的方向。 本研究另一主要目的在於探討智慧財產權中專利權，其主張專利範圍權限的核心--「申請專利範圍」(claim)，述說其滿足要件、撰寫原則、侵權理論，將專利權中的申請專利範圍做全方位的分析，並說明在侵權損害認定上的優劣，提供企業在申請專利時應妥善思考的方向。 而在「專利計價模式」方面，除了整合世界各國的專利計價模式，並對專利計價模式與公司智慧財產權策略之關係，作更明確的剖析。 最後則以國內 DVD 光碟機產業為例，訪談國內企業在面對專利的評價時應有的認知與應採取的策略，並且訪問國內智慧財產保護頗有成就的公司輿相關領域專家，企圖對於企業在專利授權或是專利策略評估時，提供更明確的價格觀念，以免除其誤蹈專利地雷的窘境。 智慧財產權中，有關專利權在實務上，通常較為人注意的是法律層次的問題，而在專利權價值方面，一般文獻均歸類於會計層次，甚少將法律與評價問題作歸納整合。本研究企圖將兩者作更緊密的連結，並且歸納出有關的策略議題，期能對國內廠商在面對國外廠商索求專利權與公司內部專利權的價值評估時，有一較清楚的方向。 / Patent Pricing for DVD Technology In the business of high technology manufacturing and marketing, intellectual property is a company's lifeblood. As with any other assets, intellectual property assets must be carefully managed. When it come to manage intellectual property assets, your company's main challenge will lie in skillfully navigating a minefield of existing or pending patents, both to produce goods that do'nt infringe on other companies' right and to vouchsafe rights that will secure your marketshare. Concern for those issues is especially important when your company seeks financing. Inventors need assurance that their investment will not be endangered by infringement litigation or by poorly framed intellectual property right that do not adequately stake out a share of the company's markets Intellectual property right (IPR) encourages the R&D, and protect their IPR by litigation. In another way, the exhibition of IPR will light a way for another companies to avoid infrigement and can take more research in new product or process. The research attempt to view IPR - especially patent, as industrial resources, and make it exchangeable just like merchandise. When patent is exchanged in industrial market, how to evaluate its price? How to determine the price? According to industry norm or R&D expense? Whether to sell it or keep it in company as core competence? The research will focus on another topic -- the patent "Claim", will estate the condition of patent, the principles of patent, the infringement theory. And research will identify this topic and give a clear way for company when considering IPR. Thesis also integrates all the patent pricing models and list the relationship between pricing theory and IPR strategies. It will use the tomorrow star industry - DVD (Digital Versatile Disc) industry as a example, because it is the way for Taiwan to approach the high technology and DVD will knock the heaven's door for next century. The paper outlines all the founded documents and visit the field expert and list all the patents for various technologies, take reaserch about the determination of price and give a clear direction for Taiwan DVD industry.

在知識經濟時代下，智慧財產作為企業乃至國家國家競爭力之根本，已成為定論。然而學界對於智慧財產之管理運用的研究，多集中於智慧財產本身之管理而鮮少觸及管理智慧財產之組織。管理智慧財產之組織可以內建於企業內部，也可以外置於企業外部，也就是智慧財產控股公司。藉由對智慧財產控股公司之組織架構進行研究，便可了解將智慧財產之所有權自原企業中分離，能為企業帶來何種管理上的效益，效益又有多大？智慧財產控股公司如何為企業帶來稅務上之效益，其所面臨之挑戰為何？ 由於美國最早對於智慧財產控股公司所生之相關稅務問題進行規範，規範之內容也堪稱廣泛與細緻，故美國之稅制深具比較、對照、參考之價值。 此外，企業之稅賦除所得稅之外尚包括營業稅等稅目。但是本文就智慧財產控股公司相關稅賦問題之研究範圍，限於營利事業所得稅及所衍生之個人綜合所得稅。 在理清智慧財產控股公司之管理及稅務上效益後，本文便能為我國政府及企業提出建言，使政府能了解新型態的跨國企業智慧財產管理架構以確認合法節稅與違法的逃漏稅之界線，又能使我國企業得以藉由智慧財產控股公司架構來促進管理及稅務效益。 / In the knowledge economy era, intellectual properties, without doubt, are the foundation of competitiveness of enterprises and countries. However, studies regarding management of intellectual properties usually focus on intellectual properties themselves rather than the organizations managing intellectual properties. The managing organizations can be built in the enterprises or out of the enterprises, i.e., the intellectual property holding company (IPHC). By studying the organization structure of IPHCs, we can understand what and how huge the management benefits are to separate the ownership of intellectual properties from the enterprises, how IPHCs bring tax benefits for the enterprises, and what the challenges are in front of IPHCs. Since the United States of America is the first one who stipulates the relating tax issues of IPHCs and is probably the broadest and the finest, the tax system of USA is of great value for comparison and reference. This thesis will thus explore the USA tax system. In addition, beside income tax there are still other tax items such as business tax can be levied on enterprises. But this thesis only focuses on business income tax and thus derivated individual income tax. After clarifying the management and tax benefits of IPHCs, this thesis then is able to advice Taiwan Government and enterprises so that the government can realize the new intellectual properties managing organization structure of multinational enterprises to differ legitimate tax saving from illegal tax evasion while the enterprises can obtain the management and tax benefits through the IPHC management structure.

台灣最早投入TFT LCD是在1991年。發展早期只有兩家小公司，且受困於日本的技術屏障以及經營規模，一直無法有大格局的突破。直到1998年起，由於經濟開始衰退，日本方才開始陸續釋出TFT LCD相關技術，以授權或技轉方式讓技術開始擴散，此時方有多家台灣廠商開始陸續投入TFT LCD這個行業。 經過多年的努力，政府也漸漸開始重視TFT LCD產業，並且在2003年提出「兩兆雙星」五年國家經濟發展計畫，提供各種資源，全力扶植IC與TFT LCD兩項產業，其中TFT LCD被看好是台灣下一個產值破兆的產業，繼晶元代工之後下一個延續國家科技命脈的蓬勃生機。 從早期多數人連什麼是LCD都沒聽過，迄今八年時間，台灣LCD產業已經蓬勃發展，不僅擁有多家世界級大廠，亦成為全球平面顯示器重鎮。2007年也是台灣TFT LCD面板廠自成立以來最賺錢的一年，台灣整體平面顯示器產值首次超越韓國，整體產值並首度破兆，達到1兆2,849億台幣，其中台灣TFT LCD的產值就佔1兆2,149億台幣，佔全球TFT LCD總產值的44.5%。截至2007年為止，台灣本土TFT LCD上下游產業相關廠商共超過九十家，貢獻台灣GDP超過13%。 本文希望以TFT LCD上游材料行業背光模組為例，進行智慧財產與產業調查之工作，試著審視台灣TFT LCD關鍵零組件「背光模組」主要參與者之專利，藉由連結傳統專利分析與產業分析，從中找到能結合產業事實、專利品質和重要性的研究方法與結果，期能為台灣的背光模組行業，甚至是廣義的TFT LCD零組件行業提出一點意見與貢獻。 / Taiwan first engaged in TFT LCD industry in 1991. Only two small companies involved in the early stage; because of technical barriers established by Japan and insufficient economic scale of operation, there had been no breakthrough. Until 1998, the recession began, so that Japanese began to release the TFT LCD-related technologies by licensing or technology transfer, and resulting in the spread of technology. At this stage there are several Taiwanese manufacturers began to actively engage in TFT LCD industry. After years of efforts, the government has gradually begun to pay attention to TFT LCD industry. In 2003 the government put forward the "Two Trillion, Twin Stars" five-year national economic development plan, said plan provides resources to fully support both IC and TFT LCD industry, wherein TFT LCD is deemed next trillion industry, like Foundry, and may continue the lifeline of national science and technology. In the beginning, most people never heard of LCD. After eight years, Taiwan's LCD industry has flourished, not only has a number of world-class factories, but also has become a global center for flat panel displays. 2007 is also the most profitable year for Taiwan TFT LCD panel makers since their establishment. Taiwan's overall output value of flat panel displays exceed Korea for the first time; the overall revenue is about one trillion 2,849 billion Taiwan dollars, wherein Taiwan's TFT LCD accounted for 1 trillion 2,149 million Taiwan dollars, which also accounts for 44.5% share of the global TFT LCD output value. As of 2007, there are over 90 Taiwan companies related to TFT LCD industries, said companies contribute over 13% of GDP in Taiwan. This author wishes to take TFT LCD backlight industry as an example, performing investigation of intellectual property and industrial work, and try to examine the key patents of key players in the industry. The author looks forward to finding a new way to combine traditional patent analysis and industry analysis method, and make some contribution to the industry.