Global ETD Search

51	Collégialité catholique et synodalité orthodoxe : recherches sur l’ecclésiologie du Concile Vatican II, ses sources, sa réception et son rôle dans le dialogue entre les Églises / Catholic collegiality and orthodox synodality : research on the ecclesiology of the Vatican II Council, its sources, its reception and its role in the dialogue between the Churches Miltos, Thomas 20 May 2017 (has links) La synodalité paraît être aujourd’hui un thème très actuel, tant pour le dialogue théologique bilatéral entre les Églises catholique et orthodoxe, qu’à l’intérieur de chaque Église. Le pontificat du pape François a mis l’accent sur la synodalité et l’Église orthodoxe vient de réaliser son Grand et Saint Concile (Crète, juin 2016). Le Concile Vatican II en 1964 a promulgué la doctrine de la collégialité épiscopale (les évêques constituent un collège qui succède au collège des Douze Apôtres), doctrine qui devait rapprocher les ecclésiologies catholique et orthodoxe. Cependant, les théologiens orthodoxes ne se sont pas retrouvés dans cette doctrine. Cinquante ans après sa promulgation, on remarque par ailleurs que la mise en œuvre de la collégialité épiscopale dans l’Église catholique est plutôt limitée. Cette étude a tenté de confronter les notions de collégialité épiscopale et de synodalité épiscopale, en vue d’une compréhension commune, entre catholiques et orthodoxes, de la place des évêques au sein de l’Église entière. Partant du constat que la synodalité épiscopale, comme l’entendent les orthodoxes, ne coïncide pas avec la doctrine de la collégialité épiscopale comme elle a été formulée au concile Vatican II, le présent travail s’est penché sur les fondements de cette dernière, afin de rechercher comment la tradition commune originelle des deux Églises conçoit la synodalité épiscopale. Le retour aux sources communes, à savoir bibliques, patristiques et dogmatiques, est proposé comme la base d’une entente sur les questions du ministère épiscopal et de la synodalité des évêques. Une telle entente s’avère indispensable afin d’aborder d’autres questions controversées, notamment celle de la primauté romaine. / Synodality seems to be a very current topic, both for the bilateral theological dialogue between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, and for each individual Church. The pontificate of Pope Francis has emphasized synodality and the Orthodox Church has just convened its Great and Holy Council (Crete, June 2016). The Second Vatican Council in 1964 promulgated the doctrine of episcopal collegiality (the bishops are organized in a college which succeeds the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles), a doctrine which was to bring closer Catholic and Orthodox ecclesiologies. However, the Orthodox theologians did not appreciate the value of this doctrine. Fifty years after its promulgation, it is also noted that the implementation of episcopal collegiality in the Catholic Church is rather restricted. This research attempts to compare the notions of episcopal collegiality and episcopal synodality, exploring a common understanding between Catholics and Orthodox of the place of the bishops within the whole Church. For Orthodox theologians, episcopal synodality does not coincide with the doctrine of episcopal collegiality, as it was formulated during the Second Vatican Council. This research focused on the common tradition of the two Churches regarding episcopal synodality. The study of common sources, namely biblical, patristic and dogmatic, is proposed as the basis for an agreement on the issue of episcopal ministry and the synodality of bishops. Such an agreement is essential to address other issues, especially that of the Roman primacy. Collégialité épiscopale Vatican II Synodalité Église locale Ignace d’Antioche Cyprien de Carthage Jean Zizioulas Primauté Ecclésiologie de communion Episcopal collegiality Vatican II Synodality Local Church Ignatius of Antioch Cyprian of Carthage John Zizioulas Primacy Communion ecclesiology
52	L'influence des normes supranationales sur le droit du travail français / The influence of supranational standards over french labour law Guyon, Charles 05 December 2015 (has links) Nul n’est censé ignorer la loi… même supranationale. La « censure » des dispositions relatives au contrat « nouvelles embauches » l’a vigoureusement démontré. Des normes supranationales, l’influence n’a jamais été aussi forte : elles couvrent progressivement l’ensemble des compartiments du droit français du travail. Tous les acteurs, publics et privés, doivent porter leur regard au-delà du cadre hexagonal. Un but est affiché : maîtriser la diffusion des normes supranationales, sans laquelle il n’est point d’adhésion de leurs destinataires, et appréhender les transformations du droit français du travail auxquelles elles conduisent. De nouveaux instruments doivent, à cet effet, être forgés. / No one is deemed ignorant of the law… including supranational standards. The “censure” of the provisions relating to the “new hiring” employment contract vigorously demonstrated so. The influence of supranational standards has never been so strong: they progressively cover all of the fields of French Labour Law. All stakeholders, whether public or private, need to look beyond French borders. The stated aim is to control the spread of supranational standards, without which there is no acceptance by its recipients, and apprehend the resulting transformations of French Labour Law. New legal methodologies and instruments need to be implemented in this respect. Primauté Articulation des normes Effet direct Interprétation conforme Contrôle de conventionnalité Normes supranationales Droit international du travail Droit européen du travail Accords collectifs transnationaux Primacy Structure of standards Applicability of standards Direct effect Consistent interpretation Control of conventionality Supranational standards International labour law European labour law
53	L’invocabilité des accords internationaux devant la Cour de justice et le Conseil d’État français / The invocability of International Agreements before the European Cour of Justice and the French “Conseil d’État” Delile, Jean-Félix 11 December 2014 (has links) L’observation de l’invocabilité des accords internationaux devant la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne et leConseil d’Etat français permet de constater une convergence des jurisprudences des deux juridictions en la matière.D’une part, les conditions constitutionnelles d’incorporation de la norme conventionnelle sont semblables en raison del’orientation moniste des ordres juridiques français et de l’Union européenne. D’autre part, l’effet direct –c’est-à-direl’aptitude de la norme à produire un droit subjectif – est le principal filtre de l’invocabilité du droit conventionneldevant les juridictions de Paris et de Luxembourg. La dévolution de l’effet direct à une norme conventionnelle procèded’un choix du juge. Et il apparaît que les méthodes d’interprétation employées par le Conseil d’Etat pour opérer cechoix, mêlant téléologie et formalisme, tendent à s’aligner sur celles prônées par la Cour de justice. Dans le cadre ducontrôle de légalité, la subordination de l’invocabilité à l’effet direct est toutefois contestable, dans la mesure où lerequérant n’appelle pas le juge à statuer sur un rapport entre la norme conventionnelle et le particulier, mais sur unrapport entre la norme conventionnelle et la norme interne. La Cour de justice et le Conseil d’Etat ont certes développédes palliatifs au principe du défaut d’invocabilité des règles conventionnelles dépourvues d’effet direct. Ellespermettent par exemple que celles-ci soient employées comme référentiels d’interprétation du droit interne. Maisl’angle mort de l’État de droit que constitue l’impossibilité de contester la violation des règles conventionnellesdépourvues d’effet direct par un acte interne doit être comblé. C’est pourquoi, il apparaît nécessaire de fonder sur laprimauté une forme d’invocabilité, autonome de l’effet direct, qui permettrait d’obtenir la sanction des violationsmanifestes de ces règles. / This thesis analyses the invocability of International Agreements before the European Court of Justice and the French“Conseil d’État”. A convergence of the Case-Law of these Courts exists on this matter. On one hand, the constitutionalconditions for incorporation of Treaty rules are similar, owing to the common monist orientation of EU and FrenchLegal Orders. On the other hand, Direct Effect – ie the ability of a rule to grant substantive Right – is the main filter ofthe invocability of Agreements before the Courts of Paris and Luxembourg. The recognition of Direct Effect isdecided by a judge’s choice. And it appears that the methods of interpretation used by the French “Conseil d’État”,combining exegesis and teleology, are coming close to those advocated by the ECJ. In the Judicial Review, theconnection between invocability and Direct Effect can however be criticized, because the claimant doesn’t call for theapplication of one of his individual Rights, but for the legality control of a norm on the ground of another norm. TheECJ and the French “Conseil d’État” have indeed given some limited effect to the non-directly effective rules ofInternational Agreements, for example by interpreting domestic law in conformity with this kind of Rules. Howeverthe impossibility to contest the violation of these Rules breaches certainly the Rule of Law. Then, it is necessary tocreate a form of invocability based on the primacy, independent of the direct effect filter, allowing domestic Courts tostrike down legislation in cases of clear-cut, manifest breaches of these Rules. Invocabilité Primauté Effet direct Rapports de systèmes Accords internationaux Accords mixtes Interprétation Contrôle de légalité Etat de droit Droit processuel Invocability Primacy Direct effect International agreements Mixtes agreements Interpretation Judicial review Rule of law Procedural law 340
54	[en] THE NEW STRATEGY OF THE UNITED STATES` FOREIGN POLICY IN THE POST COLD WAR WORLD / [pt] A NOVA ESTRATÉGIA DA POLÍTICA EXTERNA DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS NO MUNDO PÓS-GUERRA FRIA SAMO SERGIO GONCALVES 01 September 2004 (has links) [pt] Este estudo tem por finalidade mostrar que os Estados Unidos adotaram uma nova estratégia para orientar sua política externa no mundo pós-Guerra Fria. A Doutrina da Contenção guiou as relações internacionais dos Estados Unidos durante o período de confronto entre as duas superpotências. Com o fim do mundo bipolar, os Estados Unidos consolidaram-se como a única superpotência mundial. Na ordem do pós-Guerra Fria, o novo referencial da política externa dos Estados Unidos seria a estratégia da Primazia. Preservar o mundo unipolar tem sido o principal objetivo da diplomacia norte-americana desde a queda do muro de Berlim. / [en] This study intends to show that the United States adpoted a new strategy to guide its foreign policy in the post Cold War world. The Doctrine of Containment has oriented the American foreign affairs throughout the period of confrontation between the two superpowers. As a result of the end of the bipolar world, the United States has emerged as the world´s only superpower. In the post Cold War order, the new beacon of the United States foreign policy would be the strategy of Primacy. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, the maintenance of the unipolar world has been the main objective of the American foreign policy. [pt] ESTRATEGIA [en] STRATEGY [pt] POLITICA EXTERNA [en] FOREIGN POLICY [pt] GUERRA FRIA [en] COLD WAR [pt] DOUTRINA [en] DOCTRINE [pt] CONTENCAO [en] CONTAINMENT [pt] ORDEM UNIPOLAR [en] UNIPOLAR ORDER [pt] PRIMAZIA [en] PRIMACY [pt] ESTADOS UNIDOS [en] UNITED STATES
55	A fixação do marco temporal de ocupação de terras indígenas no Brasil à luz do princípio da primazia da norma mais favorável Pereira, Rodrigo Clemente de Brito 27 March 2017 (has links) Submitted by ANA KARLA PEREIRA RODRIGUES (anakarla_@hotmail.com) on 2017-09-29T16:10:00Z No. of bitstreams: 1 arquivototal.pdf: 1122632 bytes, checksum: c09cad1d7d1c0fab88b117bcd2ea8ab6 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-29T16:10:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 arquivototal.pdf: 1122632 bytes, checksum: c09cad1d7d1c0fab88b117bcd2ea8ab6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-27 / In Raposa Serra do Sol Case, the STF has established the thesis that the indigenous communities only have the rights of the lands they traditionally occupy, if such occupation could be verified on the date of the promulgation of the Constitution of 1988. This work aims to verify whether this unique time frame for the identification and demarcation of indigenous lands resists to a test of application of the principle of primacy of the most favorable norm. This principle is provided for in various human rights treaties, can be drawn from the constitutional principle of the prevalence of human rights and is applied in international and domestic jurisprudence. It establishes that law interpreters must, among plurality of normative documents and interpretations on them, seek the solution that guarantees the highest degree of protection of the human being in the concrete case, thus prohibiting the decrease of a standard of protection already achieved in the international or domestic plan. The analysis of the problem starts from the premise that the identification of the most favorable norm is a process of normative concretion that, in general, has to consider the principle of proportionality as well as other guidelines such as the international interpreters understanding, the countermajoritarian function of human rights and the principles of maximum effectiveness and prohibition of retrocession. In this sense, we will examine the issue considering each of these approaches, exploring the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, based on the precedents in which it applied the pro persona principle and in which it dealt with indigenous land issues. Finally, we will assess the implications of applying the principle of primacy of the most favorable norm in the interaction between domestic law and the IHRL, in order to demonstrate that, if the establishment of a specific time frame for the characterization of indigenous lands does not resist to a test of application of such principle, it becomes possible and necessary a constitutional mutation on the subject. / No Caso Raposa Serra do Sol, o STF fixou a tese de que somente são reconhecidos aos índios os direitos sobre as terras que tradicionalmente ocupam, se tal ocupação pudesse ser constatada na data da promulgação da Constituição de 1988. Nesta dissertação, objetivamos verificar se a fixação desse marco temporal único para a identificação e demarcação de terras indígenas resiste a um teste de aplicação do princípio da primazia da norma mais favorável. Tal princípio é previsto em diversos tratados de direitos humanos, pode ser extraído do princípio constitucional da prevalência dos direitos humanos e é aplicado na jurisprudência internacional e na interna, estabelecendo que o aplicador do direito deve, diante da pluralidade de diplomas normativos e interpretações sobre os mesmos, buscar a solução que estabeleça o maior grau de proteção do ser humano no caso concreto, proibindo, consequentemente, que um standard de proteção já alcançado no plano interno ou internacional diminua. A análise do problema parte da premissa de que a identificação da norma mais favorável é um processo de concretização normativa que, em regra, deve se valer do princípio da proporcionalidade e ter como vetores o entendimento dos intérpretes internacionais, a função contramajoritária dos direitos humanos e os princípios da máxima efetividade e da proibição do retrocesso. Nesse sentido, examinaremos a questão em tela sob cada um desses enfoques, explorando, principalmente, a jurisprudência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos, a partir dos precedentes em que aplicou o princípio pro persona e em que enfrentou a temática das terras indígenas. Finalmente, avaliaremos quais as implicações que a aplicação do princípio da primazia da norma mais favorável tem na interação entre o Direito interno e o DIDH, a fim de demonstrar que, se a fixação de um marco temporal específico para a caracterização das terras indígenas não resiste a um teste de aplicação do referido princípio, torna-se possível e necessária uma mutação constitucional quanto ao tema. Direitos humanos Demarcação - Terras indígenas Índios – Raposa Serra do Sol Mutação constitucional Marco temporal Primazia da norma mais favorável Primacy of the most favorable norm Time frame Demarcation of indigenous lands Constitutional mutation CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
56	Using sentence Transcription testing : As a way to test the interference effects and dynamics of verbal-working memory Bou Aram, Sinal January 2021 (has links) The aim of this study was to examine the validity and feasibility of sentence transcription testing (STT) for the purpose of examining the interplay between verbal working memory and central processing. The general area of interest is to understand working memory as a dynamic system that involves the management and integration of information from several temporal distances. Due to the world-wide conditions at the time this study was conducted (2020), the testing was online and computerized, which severely limited the controllability of the procedure leading to a high amount of exclusions and dubious results. The testing of 17 subjects, 9 females, 8 males with the average age of 30.5 (SD = 9.5) yielded mixed results, excluding gender, impulsivity and age as likely factors for the variance. Following these results, a post hoc analysis was added to interpret if transcription data has validity as a tool for observing effects of interference on memory recall and the task at hand. This analysis did reveal patterns that reinforce the view of language processing as a multimodal task. The type of errors seems to follow tendencies of primacy, recency and availability, as well as proactive and retroactive interference. These tendencies of memory recall seem to work in unison or is a manifestation of syntactic, lexical, and presumably semantic processing and can be used to measure individual differences in language processing and the tendency to linguistically “fill in the gaps”. The variation seen within the sample does make transcription testing appealing for further studies. The main variance within the sample can be described as replacing words with other previously attended to information, and or forgetting words during transcription. These tendencies, might reveal properties about the interaction between executive function (EF) and verbal working memory (V-WM) as a source of individual difference. However, more validation studies are proposed for weaving out factors that might skew the results in this type of testing and modelling.
57	F. A. Hayek's Critique of Legislation Holm, Cyril January 2014 (has links) The dissertation concerns F. A. Hayek’s (1899–1992) critique of legislation. The purpose of the investigation is to clarify and assess that critique. I argue that there is in Hayek’s work a critique of legislation that is distinct from his well-known critique of social planning. Further that the main claim of this critique is what I refer to as Hayek’s legislation tenet, namely that legislation that aims to achieve specific aggregate results in complex orders of society will decrease the welfare level. The legislation tenet gains support; (i) from the welfare claim – according to which there is a positive correlation between the utilization of knowledge and the welfare level in society; (ii) from the dispersal of knowledge thesis – according to which the total knowledge of society is dispersed and not available to any one agency; and (iii) from the cultural evolution thesis – according to which evolutionary rules are more favorable to the utilization of knowledge in social cooperation than are legislative rules. More specifically, I argue that these form two lines of argument in support of the legislation tenet. One line of argument is based on the conjunction of the welfare claim and the dispersal of knowledge thesis. I argue that this line of argument is true. The other line of argument is based on the conjunction of the welfare claim and the cultural evolution thesis. I argue that this line of argument is false, mainly because the empirical work of political scientist Elinor Ostrom refutes it. Because the two lines of argument support the legislation tenet independently of each other, I argue that Hayek’s critique of legislation is true. In this dissertation, I further develop a legislative policy tool as based on the welfare claim and Hayek’s conception of coercion. I also consider Hayek’s idea that rules and law are instrumental in forging rational individual action and rational social orders, and turn to review this idea in light of the work of experimental economist Vernon Smith and economic historian Avner Greif. I find that Smith and Greif support this idea of Hayek’s, and I conjecture that it contributes to our understanding of Adam Smith’s notion of the invisible hand: It is rules – not an invisible hand – that prompt subjects to align individual and aggregate rationality in social interaction. Finally, I argue that Hayek’s critique is essentially utilitarian, as it is concerned with the negative welfare consequences of certain forms of legislation. And although it may appear that the dispersal of knowledge thesis will undermine the possibility of carrying out the utilitarian calculus, due to the lack of knowledge of the consequences of one’s actions – and therefore undermine the legislation tenet itself – I argue that the distinction between utilitarianism conceived as a method of deliberation and utilitarianism conceived as a criterion of correctness may be used to save Hayek’s critique from this objection. Hayek legislation rules law rationality rational action rational social order equilibrium utilitarianism method of deliberation criterion of correctness Elinor Ostrom Avner Greif Vernon Smith Joshua Epstein complexity knowledge social cooperation information know-how the Hayek problem the invisible hand Adam Smith Mises Keynes Marx welfare state Gilbert Ryle Michael Polanyi theory of legislation legisprudence jurisprudence Neo-Kantianism historicism cognitive closure theory of prices competition syntax grammar game theory generative social science agent-based computational modeling institutional policy analysis normative primacy of economics primacy of politics Sheri Berman constructivist rationalism socialism social democracy Nozick Rawls distribution justice freedom Kant polycentric government process of experimentation speculative philosophy analytical philosophy freedom under the law liberty philosophy of mind consequentialist
58	Sujeito contemporâneo, conhecimento e barbárie: uma leitura a partir da dialética negativa, de Theodor Adorno Werlang, Julio Cesar 21 August 2015 (has links) Submitted by Silvana Teresinha Dornelles Studzinski (sstudzinski) on 2016-02-15T16:18:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Julio Cesar Werlang_.pdf: 939264 bytes, checksum: 631e477d7e6cb17f2a1fcbed748d4faf (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-02-15T16:18:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Julio Cesar Werlang_.pdf: 939264 bytes, checksum: 631e477d7e6cb17f2a1fcbed748d4faf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-08-21 / Nenhuma / Reflexão crítica sobre o sujeito e a subjetividade no contexto da contemporaneidade a partir do pensamento de Theodor Adorno, especificamente em sua dialética negativa com o foco na questão do conhecimento e bárbárie. O primado do objeto como indicativo de uma nova concepção epistemológica, necessária para abrir asreais possibilidades emancipatórias do sujeito críticono mundo administrado. O sujeito crítico e consciente de suas determinações, limites e possibilidades nas sociedades capitalistas tardias, se apresenta como quem cultiva sua interioridade e individualidade, em contraposição a autoreferencialidade e o individualismo do sujeito liberal, por isso, mantém um olhar contemplativo, reflexivo e resistente na conquista de sua liberdade em meio a falsa liberdade promovida pela indústria cultural, sendo eticamente sensível e solidário às dores e sofrimentos dos outros e da natureza, e assim, se faz artista e protagonista de um novo tempo. / Critical reflection on the subject and subjectivity in the contemporary context from the thought of Theodor Adorno, specifically in its negative dialectic with the focus on the question of knowledge and barbarism. The primacy of the object as indicative of a new epistemological conception, required to open real emancipatory possibilities of the subject in the administered world. The critical and conscious subject of its determinations, limits and possibilities in late capitalist societies, presents itself as one cultivates his inner self and individuality as opposed a self referentialityand the individualism of liberal subject, and maintains a contemplative, reflective and resilient look in winning its freedom in the midst of false freedom promoted by the culture industry, being ethically sensitive and supportive with the pain and suffering of others and of nature, and thus becomes an artist and protagonist of a new time. ACCNPQ::Ciências Humanas::Filosofia Adorno Dialética negativa Sujeito liberal e sujeito crítico Subjetividade Primado do objeto Conhecimento e barbárie Experiência emancipação Interioridade e individualidade Particular e universal Sensibilidade ética Olhar meditativo Reflexivo e resistente Artista e protagonista Negative dialectic Liberal and critical subject Primacy of the object Subjectivity Knowledge and barbarism Emancipation Inner self and individuality Contemplative Reflective and resilient look Ethically sensitive Artist and protagonist
59	A glorious and salutiferous Œconomy ...? : an ecclesiological enquiry into metropolitical authority and provincial polity in the Anglican Communion Ross, Alexander John January 2018 (has links) For at least the past two decades, international Anglicanism has been gripped by a crisis of identity: what is to be the dynamic between autonomy and interdependence? Where is authority to be located? How might the local relate to the international? How are the variously diverse national churches to be held together 'in communion'? These questions have prompted an explosion of interest in Anglican ecclesiology within both the church and academy, with particular emphasis exploring the nature of episcopacy, synodical government, liturgy and belief, and common principles of canon law. However, one aspect of Anglican ecclesiology which has received little attention is the place of provincial polity and metropolitical authority across the Communion. Yet, this is a critical area of concern for Anglican ecclesiology as it directly addresses questions of authority, interdependence and catholicity. However, since at least the twentieth century, provincial polity has largely been eclipsed by, and confused with, the emergence of a dominant 'national church' polity. This confusion has become so prevalent that the word 'province' itself is used interchangeably and imprecisely to mean both an ecclesial province in its strict sense and one of the 39 'member- churches' which formally constitute the Anglican Communion, with a handful of 'extra-provincial' exceptions. The purpose of this research project is to untangle this confusion and to give a thorough account of the development of provincial polity and metropolitical authority within the Communion, tracing the historical origins of the contemporary status quo. The scope of this task is not in any way intended to be a comprehensive history of the emergence of international Anglicanism, but rather to narrowly chart the development of this particular unit of ecclesial polity, the province, through this broader narrative. The historical work of Part One in itself represents an important new contribution to Anglican Studies; however, the project aims to go further in Parts Two and Three to identify from this context key questions concerning the problems facing contemporary Anglican polity as the basis for further theological and ecclesiological reflection. Part Two examines how provincial polity has given way to an assumption of the 'national church' as the building block of the Communion. To what extent is it consonant with Anglican tradition? How is it problematic? What tensions exist with a more traditional understanding of the province? How might all this relate to wider political understandings and critiques of the 'nation- state' in an increasingly globalised world? Along with the emergence of a 'national church' ecclesiology, so too has the role of the 'Primates' been magnified. Part Three charts this development, culminating in a critique of the recent 2016 Primates' Meeting. What is the nature of primacy within Anglicanism and how does it relate to metropolitical authority? What is the right balance of honour and authority as it relates to primacy? How do Anglican understandings of primacy correspond to those of the Roman and Orthodox Communions? Finally, Part Four attempts to give some concrete focus to the preceding discussion through the illustrative example of the Anglican Church of Australia, which is frequently cited as being analogous to the Communion in having a loose federal system and resolutely autonomous dioceses. The prevalence of this 'diocesanism' has recently been criticised by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. However, there has been a recent revival of provincial action within the Province of Victoria in response to these issues which will be evaluated to discern what the Australian example might offer toward a theologically robust and credible ecclesiology for Anglicanism into the twenty-first century.
60	Le rapport de concrétisation entre actes juridiques : étude de droit public / The relationship of concretization between legal acts : study in public law David, Jules 22 November 2014 (has links) Omniprésente dans le discours juridique, la question de « l’application » ou de la« concrétisation » du droit n’est que rarement considérée comme un objet d’étude à partentière. C’est pourtant peu dire qu’elle recouvre un phénomène multiforme, sinon confus.Cette thèse vise à l’étudier en lui-même et pour lui-même, du point de vue du rapport deconcrétisation entre actes juridiques. Mais, tout en s’inscrivant dans son sillage, l’étudeentendra dépasser la représentation classique de ce rapport livrée par l’École normativiste, àtravers la célèbre théorie de la formation du droit par degrés et de la concrétisationcroissante des normes. Elle se propose de démontrer que le rapport de concrétisation entreactes juridiques, loin de la banalité à laquelle il est généralement associé, relève en réalitéd’une opération juridique bien plus complexe qu’il n’y parait. Cela se vérifie d’abord parl’identification de ce rapport : en soi, concrétiser un acte juridique ne signifie rien pour unautre acte juridique. Tout dépend du point de vue à partir duquel le problème est envisagé.Sous un angle conceptuel, il existe en effet plusieurs figures du rapport de concrétisationentre actes juridiques, tandis qu’appréhendé par le juge, ce même rapport fait l’objet d’untraitement contentieux. Cela se vérifie ensuite par l’analyse de la pratique du rapport deconcrétisation par les acteurs juridiques. Non seulement celle-ci n’a rien de neutre, mais elles’avère pour le moins déstabilisatrice, si ce n’est subversive, à l’égard de la hiérarchie desnormes et des organes. Alors même que sa raison d’être est de rendre compte de larationalité globale de notre système juridique, le rapport de concrétisation entre actesjuridiques aboutit ainsi à la mettre en cause. / Omnipresent in legal discourse, the issue of “application” or “concretization” of law is rarelyseen as an object of study in itself. Yet it is an understatement to say that it covers amultifaceted phenomenon, if not a confused one. This thesis aims to study it in itself and foritself, from the perspective of the relationship of concretization between legal acts. But, whileremaining in its wake, the study will go beyond the classic representation of this relationshipdelivered by the Normativist school, through the famous theory of the gradual construction ofthe law and the increasing realization of norms. It aims to demonstrate that the relationship ofconcretization between legal acts, far from the banality to which it is usually associated, isreally one of a much more complex legal transaction than it looks. This checks out first by theidentification of this relationship : in itself, concretizing a legal act means nothing to anotherlegal act. It all depends on the perspective from which the problem is considered. Under aconceptual perspective, indeed there are several cases in the relationship between legalacts. Examined by the judge, this same relationship is the subject of a contentious treatment.Subsequently it is confirmed by analysis of concretizational practice between the relationshipof legal representatives. Not only is the latter nothing neutral, but it proves to be at leastdisruptive, if not subversive, with regard to the hierarchy of norms and organs. Even thoughits purpose is to report on the overall rationality of our legal system, the relationship ofconcretization between legal acts puts it into question. Application Exécution Concrétisation Acte juridique Rapport Hiérarchie des normes Formation du droit par degrés Primauté Invocabilité Applicabilité directe Exception d'illégalité Application Execution Concretization Legal act Relationship Hierarchy of norms Gradual construction of the law Primacy Justiciability Direct applicability Plea of illegality 340

Search results