Global ETD Search

41	Les mesures de sûreté : étude comparative des droits pénaux français et allemand / security measures : comparative study ot the German and French criminal law Frinchaboy, Jenny 20 November 2015 (has links) Les mesures de sûreté sont au cœur de la politique pénale actuelle, bien qu’elles soulèvent un grand nombre d’interrogations. Leur place est très incertaine en droit français qui, dans un souci de simplification, a opté pour un système de sanctions pénales à voie unique ne comportant que des peines. Pour autant, aux côtés des peines, il est un certain nombre de mesures de sûreté qui ne sont pas toujours reconnues comme telles, au détriment de la cohérence du droit positif. Le droit allemand, au contraire, a adopté le système « de la double voie », faisant coexister les peines et les mesures de sûreté au sein du code pénal. Ce système présente l’avantage de reconnaître la spécificité des mesures de sûreté, lesquelles reposent non sur la culpabilité du délinquant mais sur sa dangerosité. Bien que la distinction entre les deux catégories de sanctions pénales ne soit pas aisée en raison des nombreux points de convergence, une assimilation pure et simple entre les deux concepts s’avère impossible. Cette étude comparative de l’émergence et de l’autonomie des mesures de sûreté permet de conclure à la nécessité d’introduire un dualisme des sanctions pénales au sein du Code pénal français, avec un régime juridique complet et propre aux mesures de sûreté, distinct de celui des peines, mais s’inscrivant dans le respect des principes fondamentaux du droit pénal. / Security measures are at the heart of the current criminal policy, even though they raise a number of questions. Their place is very uncertain in French law, which has opted for a "single-track system", comprising only penalties, in the interest of simplification. Though, alongside the penalties, there are some security measures that are not always recognised as such, to the detriment of the coherence of the positive law. German law, on the contrary, has adopted a “dual-track system”, where penalties and security measures coexist within the criminal code. This system offers the advantage of recognizing the specificities of the security measures, which are not based on the guilt of the offender, but on his degree of danger. Although the distinction between the two categories of criminal sanctions is not an easy one, because of the areas of convergence, the two concepts cannot simply be treated as being the same. This comparative study of the emergence and the autonomy of the security measures concludes that a dualism of criminal sanctions should be introduced to the French criminal code with a complete own legal regime for the security measures, separate from the penalties’ regime, but in accordance with the basic principles of the criminal law. Mesures de sûreté Système unitaire Système dualiste Dualisme Double voie Sanctions pénales Peines Dangerosité Autonomie Principes fondamentaux Security measures Single-track system Dual-track system Dualism Criminal sanctions Penalties Dangerousness Autonomy Basic principles 340
42	O saber penal como instrumento legitimador do processo de criminalização dos trabalhadores rurais sem-terra: apontamentos acerca da Comissão Parlamentar Mista de Inquérito da Reforma Agrária e Urbana (CPMI da Terra) / The criminal knowledge to legitimate the criminalization of landless process: notes on the Joint Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry and Urban Land Reform (CPMI of Land) Borges, Guilherme Martins Teixeira 01 July 2014 (has links) Submitted by Luanna Matias (lua_matias@yahoo.com.br) on 2015-02-06T11:55:41Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Guilherme Martins Teixeira Borges - 2014.pdf: 3642605 bytes, checksum: daab13868d7272e84e616f7f49ffec97 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2015-02-19T12:54:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Guilherme Martins Teixeira Borges - 2014.pdf: 3642605 bytes, checksum: daab13868d7272e84e616f7f49ffec97 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-02-19T12:54:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Guilherme Martins Teixeira Borges - 2014.pdf: 3642605 bytes, checksum: daab13868d7272e84e616f7f49ffec97 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-07-01 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / This dissertation aims to analyze the relationship between the action of landless rural workers, especially the activities of members of the Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST), and the criminalization process of his conducts by Criminal Law. Therefore, this study aims to verify scientifically know as the criminal knowledge can be a legitimate instrument to promote the criminalization and stigmatization of these landless workers. Thus, the work takes as its starting point the characterization of their research subject, namely, the landless rural workers in its meaning of agrarian social movement, why it held an approach to the construction of social inequality and its correlation with the emergence and structuring of social movements, for, in the end, weave important considerations about what is meant by social Movement and Agrarian MST. Following aimed to explain how the criminal know contemporary Brazilian still shows a strong influence of the positivist criminological thought inaugurated by the Italian school centuries ago. It is shown how positivist criminology was responsible for creating a conception of social dangerousness and embrace a segregationist and selective criminological project, such that those individuals who were "classified" as a threat, should be removed from social interaction. We report how this discourse entered " the back door " of the criminal laws homelands and enabled the creation of an ideology of social defense and the criminalization of minorities (poor, landless ruais, black and so on). Finally, aiming to demonstrate the hypothesis elected, held a review of the work conducted by the Joint Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry ( CPMI ) and Urban Land Reform, known as "CPMI of Land ", specially her Final Report , highlighting Project Senate n . 264/2006 ( PLS No. 264 /06 ) and Project of House of Representatives n . 7485/2006 ( PL No. 7485 / 06 ), whose proposals are, appropriately, intended to spearhead a process of criminalization of landless legitimized by criminal law. / A presente dissertação objetiva analisar a relação entre a atuação dos trabalhadores rurais sem terra, em especial a atuação dos integrantes do Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra (MST), e o processo de criminalização de suas condutas por parte dos operadores do direito. Para tanto, este estudo se propõe a verificar cientificamente como o saber penal pode ser um instrumento legítimo para promover a criminalização e estigmatização penal destes trabalhadores. Desta forma, o trabalho toma como ponto de partida a caracterização do seu sujeito de pesquisa, qual seja, os trabalhadores rurais sem terra em sua acepção de movimento social agrário, razão por que se realizou uma abordagem da construção das desigualdades sociais e a sua correlação com o surgimento e estruturação dos movimentos sociais, para, ao final, tecer importantes considerações sobre o que se entende por Movimento Social Agrário e MST. Na sequência, objetivou-se explanar como o saber penal brasileiro contemporâneo ainda ilustra uma forte influência do pensamento criminológico positivista inaugurado pela Escola Italiana séculos atrás. Demonstra-se como a criminologia positivista foi responsável por criar uma concepção de periculosidade social e abraçar um projeto criminológico segregacionista e seletivo, de tal forma que aqueles indivíduos os quais fossem “classificados” como uma ameaça, deviam ser afastados do convívio social. Relata-se como esse discurso adentrou “pelas portas dos fundos” das legislações penais pátrias e possibilitou a criação de uma ideologia da defesa social e da criminalização das minorias (pobres, trabalhadores ruais sem terra, negros e etc.). Ao final, objetivando demonstrar factivelmente a hipótese de trabalho eleita, realizou-se uma análise dos trabalhos realizados pela Comissão Parlamentar Mista de Inquérito (CPMI) da Reforma Agrária e Urbana, conhecida como “CPMI da Terra”, em especial os encaminhamentos por ela declarados em seu Relatório Final, com destaque para o Projeto de Lei do Senado n. 264, de 2006 (PLS N. 264/06) e o Projeto de Lei da Câmara dos Deputados n. 7485/2006 (PL N. 7485/06), cujas propostas revelam, com propriedade, a intenção de encabeçar um processo de criminalização dos trabalhadores rurais sem terra legitimado pelo próprio Direito Penal. Desigualdade social Movimentos sociais agrários Criminalização Criminologia positivista Periculosidade social PLS N. 264/06 PL N. 7485/06 Direito agrário Social inequality Agrary social movements Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST) Criminalization Positivist criminology Social dangerousness Agrary law DIREITO::DIREITOS ESPECIAIS
43	Analýza chování řidiče při řešení situací spojených s přecházením chodců přes vozovku / Analysis of driver’s conduct during solving of situations associated with pedestrians crossing the road Maxera, Pavel January 2021 (has links) The doctoral thesis analyses driver’s conduct while solving situations associated with crossing of pedestrians across the road in cases of various design of pedestrian crossings and at different conditions. The thesis deepens the knowledge of the human factor impact on the occurrence of a traffic accident involved vehicle and pedestrian and thesis also complements knowledge for the needs of the analysis of traffic accidents, especially in solving the pre collision phase and at assessment of possibilities for collision prevention by involved participants. The thesis deals with driver’s conduct, various models of the conduct as well as the thesis focuses on the visual perception, the process of information processing, the driver’s conduct and the reaction time. In terms of the solution suitable types of experiments were designed and implemented. Based on performed measurements a method of processing and evaluating data on drivers’ conduct was found as well as more significant data set was obtained for a detailed analysis of drivers' conduct in different driving situations. The assessed quantities of drivers' conduct were analysed with respect to the dangerousness of driving situations. For these purposes, the categories of the dangerousness of driving situations were defined (situations completely safe, with increased danger, dangerous and critical), into which the analysed driving situations were subsequently included. To enable the quantification of this classification of situations into the categories of the dangerousness, the coefficient of the dangerousness (so called K) was defined. From the detailed analysis of the obtained data, the limit values of this coefficient were determined, and these were subsequently verified using data from the solution of real traffic accidents. Concurrently the analysis verified the suitability of using this hazard coefficient in the analysis of traffic accidents, especially for a detailed assessment of the possibilities of collision prevention.
44	La capacité pénale / Criminal capacity Margaine, Clément 28 October 2011 (has links) Définie à l’origine comme l’aptitude à la sanction, la capacité pénale peut s’entendre plus largement comme résumant l’ensemble des aptitudes subjectives, c’est-à-dire propres au délinquant, indispensables à l’engagement et à la sanction de sa responsabilité pénale. Ces aptitudes sont de deux ordres. L’aptitude à l’infraction et l’aptitude à l’imputation de cette infraction conditionnent le jugement de responsabilité et contribuent à en assurer la dimension morale. L’aptitude à la sanction ou capacité pénitentiaire joue un rôle plus original puisqu’elle apparaît comme le fondement de la personnalisation de la peine, permettant d’adapter la sanction pénale à la personnalité et aux besoins de celui qui doit la subir. / Originally defined as the capacity to be punished, criminal capacity can be understood more widely as summarizing mental abilities that are required for criminal responsibility. Some are needed to commit the offense, others for criminal responsibility but both ensure the moral meaning of criminal law. Applied to the penalty, criminal capacity can be used to adapt the sentence to the personality and needs of those who must endure it. Aptitude à subir un procès pénal Capacité Capacité délictuelle à l’infraction Aptitude à profiter de la sanction Conscience Contrainte Dangerosité Discernement Expertise psychiatrique Faute Imputabilité Imputation Individualisation de la sanction Libre arbitre Mesures de sûreté Minorité pénale Personnalisation de la sanction Personnalité du délinquant Personne morale Trouble mental Volonté Fitness to stand trial Capacity Capacity to the offense Ability to take advantage of the penalty Conscience Coercion Dangerousness Discernment Psychiatric examination Accountability Imputation Individualization of punishment Free will Measures security Minority Personality of the offender Corporation Mental disorder Will
45	La limitation des droits fondamentaux constitutionnels par l’ordre public / The limitation to fundamental constitutional rights by considerations of public order Gervier, Pauline 05 December 2013 (has links) La dialectique de l’ordre public et des libertés sillonne la pensée juridique depuis le XVIIIème siècle. Généré par de nouvelles formes de délinquance et de criminalité, le renforcement des exigences de l’ordre public impose de s’interroger sur la limitation des droits fondamentaux constitutionnels. En dépit de la place névralgique qu’il occupe entre ordre public et libertés, le processus de limitation demeure indéterminé en droit français. Cette recherche, organisée autour de la détermination des limites aux droits garantis, de l’identification des « limites aux limites » aux droits fondamentaux, puis de la redéfinition des droits fondamentaux par les limites, permet de préciser ce mécanisme, mais aussi de cerner les restrictions apportées à l’exercice des droits et libertés. L’autolimitation du Conseil constitutionnel marque un infléchissement progressif de la protection des droits fondamentaux. Ce constat invite à réfléchir sur l’encadrement supra-législatif de la limitation des droits garantis, et conduit à se positionner en faveur de l’insertion d’une clause de limitation des droits fondamentaux dans la Constitution. / The dialectics of public order and freedoms has been traveling throughout legal thought since the 18th century. Sparked by new forms of delinquency and criminality, the strengthening of public order requirements leads to questioning the limitation of fundamental constitutional rights. Despite its crucible place between public order and freedoms, the limitation process remains undetermined in French law. This research, which aims at determining the limitations to protected rights, identifying the limitations to those limitations themselves, and then redefining fundamental rights through those limitations, not only helps to specify this mechanism, but also to identify the restrictions brought to the enjoyment of rights and freedoms. The Conseil constitutionnel self-restraint reveals a gradual shift in the protection of fundamental rights. Acknowledging the former leads to considering a supra legislative framework to the limitations to protected rights, and advocating in favor of the constitutional entrenchment of such a clause. Autorité judiciaire Conciliation Conseil constitutionnel Constitution Contrôle de proportionnalité Dangerosité Droits fondamentaux Droits-Garanties Droits-Libertés Fichiers Garde à vue Légalité des délits et des peines Limitation Mesures de sûreté Mesures privatives de liberté Mesures restrictives de liberté Ordre public Peines Police administrative Police judiciaire Recherche des auteurs d’infractions Régimes d’exception Sauvegarde de l’ordre public Terrorisme Judicial authority Conciliation Conseil constitutionnel Constitution Proportionality Dangerousness Fundamental rights Rights to processual guarantees Rights to freedoms Files Custody Legality of penalty and offences Limitation Detention order Deprivation of liberty Restriction of liberty Public order Penalties Administrative police Judicial police Search for perpetrators of offences Regime of exceptions Protection of public order Terrorism 340
46	Les conditions de la responsabilité en droit privé : éléments pour une théorie générale de la responsabilité juridique / The conditions of responsibility in private law : elements for a general theory of legal responsibility Lagoutte, Julien 16 November 2012 (has links) Alors que l’on enseigne classiquement la distinction radicale du droit pénal et de la responsabilité civile, une étude approfondie du droit positif révèle une tendance générale et profonde à la confusion des deux disciplines. Face à ce paradoxe, le juriste s’interroge : comment articuler le droit civil et le droit pénal de la responsabilité ? Pour y répondre, cette thèse suggère d’abandonner l’approche traditionnelle de la matière, consistant à la tenir pour une simple catégorie de classement des différentes branches, civile et pénale, du droit de la responsabilité. La responsabilité juridique est présentée comme une institution autonome et générale organisant la réaction du système à la perturbation anormale de l’équilibre social. Quant au droit de la responsabilité civile et au droit criminel, ils ne sont plus conçus que comme les applications techniques de cette institution en droit positif.Sur le fondement de cette approche renouvelée et par le prisme de l’étude des conditions de la responsabilité en droit privé, la thèse propose un ordonnancement technique et rationnel du droit pénal et de la responsabilité civile susceptible de fournir les principes directeurs d’une véritable théorie générale de la responsabilité juridique. En tant qu’institution générale, celle-ci engendre à la fois un concept de responsabilité, composé des exigences de dégradation d’un intérêt juridiquement protégé, d’anormalité et de causalité juridique et qui fonde la convergence du droit pénal et du droit civil, et un système de responsabilité, qui en commande les divergences et pousse le premier vers la protection de l’intérêt général et le second vers celle des victimes. / While the radical distinction between criminal law and civil liability is classically taught, a thorough survey of positive law reveals a general and profound trend towards a confusion of these two disciplines. Faced with this paradox, the jurist wonders : how to articulate the civil and criminal laws of responsibility ? To answer this question, the thesis suggests abandoning the traditional approach of the subject, which consists in treating it as a mere category of classification of the different branches, civil and criminal, of responsibility/liability. Legal responsibility is presented as an autonomous and general institution organizing the response from the system to abnormal disturbance of social equilibrium. Civil liability law and criminal law are, as far as they are concerned, henceforth conceived as the mere technical applications of this institution in positive law.On the basis of this new approach and through the prism of the study of liability conditions in private law, the thesis proposes a technical and rational organization of criminal law and civil liability that may provide the guiding principles of a real general theory of legal responsibility. As a general institution, it gives not only a concept of responsibility, requiring degradation of a legally protected interest, abnormality and legal causation, and establishing the convergence of criminal law and civil law, but also a system of responsibility, determining the divergences of them and steering the first towards the protection of general interest and the second towards the protection of victims. Anormalité Antijuridicité Bien juridique Causalité juridique Causalité Cause étrangère Cessation de l’illicite Complicité Contrainte Culpabilité Dangerosité Discernement Dol général Dol spécial Dommage Droit des obligations Droit pénal Faits justificatifs Faute simple Faute Fautes qualifiées Force majeure Illicéité Immunités de fonction Imprudence consciente Imprudence inconsciente Imputabilité Infraction impossible Infraction Intention Mobile Personnalité juridique Personnalité morale Préjudice écologique Préjudice extrapatrimonial Préjudice patrimonial Préjudice Présomptions Principe de précaution Responsabilité civile Responsabilité contractuelle Responsabilité des personnes morales Responsabilité du fait d’autrui Responsabilité du fait des choses Responsabilité du fait personnel Responsabilité extracontractuelle Responsabilité juridique Responsabilité pénale Responsabilité pour faute Responsabilité préventive Responsabilité sans faute Résultat légal Risque Tentative Troubles du voisinage Volonté Abnormality Aggravated faults Attempt Causation Cessation of illegality Civil liability Complicity Duress Contractual liability Corporate personality Crime Criminal law Criminal liability Culpability Damage Dangerousness Discernment Dolus directus Dolus specialis Ecological damage External cause Fault Fault-based liability Force majeure Functional immunities Harm Illegality Impossible crime Individual responsibility Intent Justifications Law of obligations Legal causation Legal consequences Legal personality Legal property Legal responsibility Liability of corporations Material damage Mere faults Moral damage Motive Neighbourhood disturbances Precautionary principle Presumptions Preventive responsibility Recklessness Negligence Responsibility for the actions of things Risk Strict liability Tortious liability Vicarious responsibility Wilfulness 340

Page generated in 0.0693 seconds