Spelling suggestions: "subject:"duas nature""
1 |
Du "piège" de la rhétorique à la critique de la critique : la pensée occidentale de la rhétorique de Friedrich Nietzsche à Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Paul de Man et Roland Barthes. / From the "trap" of rhetoric to the critique of criticism : a study of Western thinking on rhetoric from Friedrich Nietzsche to Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Paul de Man et Roland Barthes.Huang, Hai Rong 19 October 2009 (has links)
Cette étude est consacrée à la critique contemporaine occidentale de la rhétorique initiée par la critique nietzschéenne de la philosophie métaphysique. La rhétorique se présente comme une remise en cause et une ré-vision profonde et radicale de la nature du langage lui-même, et par la suite, de tous les aspects de la vie sociale et culturelle. Cette étude traite principalement de la pensée rhétorique chez quatre penseurs, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Paul de Man and Roland Barthes. Dans leurs héritage commun et leur critique de l'approche critique nietzschéenne, ils ont mis en lumière une double nature de la rhétorique : celle-ci non seulement caractérise le mécanisme de la métaphysique, mais aussi conduit tout usage du langage, y compris le discours critique, à un « piège » de déconstruction. Dans leur exposition de la nature et du mécanisme de la rhétorique, ils ont consacré leurs efforts, d'une part, à la réfutation d'une conception aristotélicienne du langage et de la rhétorique; et d'autre part, à une critique d'un certain aveuglement dont faisaient preuve les critiques de la métaphysique. Leur pensée critique sur la rhétorique se résume alors à deux questions: qu'est-ce que la nature de la rhétorique et à partir de là, du langage ? Comment la pensée critique — sur celle-ci et avec celle-ci — est-elle possible ? S’engageant dans une double tâche — une critique (démystification) et une auto-critique — la pensée critique se transforme alors à une « critique de la critique » en tant qu'une réflexion sur la limite de la pensée critique elle-même. C'est-à-dire, une critique — dans le sens kantien du mot — de l'[im]possibilité de la pensée rationnelle. Notre étude se concentre alors sur deux points : premièrement, la nature de la rhétorique telle que l'expose chacun de ces penseurs depuis sa propre perspective intellectuelle. Deuxièmement, la stratégie critique proposée et employée par chacun d'entre eux. / This thesis is a study of the contemporary Western critical approach to the problem of rhetoric pioneered by Nietzsche, in which rhetoric presents itself as a profound and radical questioning as well as a re-vision of the nature of language itself, and consequently of all aspects of social and cultural life. This study mainly addresses the rhetorical thinking of four critics — Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Paul de Man and Roland Barthes — who, in their common inheritance from and critique of Nietzsche’s own critical approach, have revealed a dual-nature of rhetoric which not only characterizes the mechanism of metaphysics, but also inevitably enmeshes all human thinking — including critical thinking — in a trap of deconstruction. This double-edged character of rhetoric sets a dual-task for critical thinking: an endless criticism [demystification] and self-criticism. Critical thinking thus turns out to be a “critique of criticism” as a reflection on the limit of critical thinking itself, that is, a critique — in the Kantian sense of the word — of the [im]possibility of rational thinking. Accordingly, this study focuses on two points: firstly, the dual-nature of rhetoric as expounded by each one of the critics from his specific intellectual perspective; secondly, the strategy for critical thinking proposed and employed by each of them.
|
2 |
Exploring the dual nature of engineering education : Opportunities and challenges in integrating the academic and professional aspects in the curriculumEdström, Kristina January 2017 (has links)
Engineering education is both academic, emphasising theory in a range of subjects, and professional, preparing students for engineering practice. Ideally, these aspects are also in a meaningful relationship in the curriculum, but the dual nature ideal is simultaneously a source of tensions. This theme is explored in the context of engineering education development, represented by the CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate) approach. Cases on programme and course level illustrate how the dual nature ideal is pursued in the integrated curriculum. CDIO is also compared with PBL (problem/project-based learning), and opportunities to further emphasise research in the CDIO community are explored. Two critical accounts suggest widening the perspective from curriculum development per se, to the organisational conditions. First, the views of Carl Richard Söderberg (1895-1979) are compared with CDIO, showing considerable similarities in ideals, arguments, and strategies. This leads to a critique of the swinging pendulum metaphor. Then, experiences of unsustainable change leads to a model called organisational gravity, explaining the stability of programmes and implying two change strategies, with different availability, risks, resource demands, and sustainability of results. Refuting a rationalist view on organisation, an institutional logics perspective is used to analyse the tensions within engineering education. It is suggested that the logics of the academic profession dominates over the logics of the engineering profession, hence favouring “teaching theory” over “teaching professionals”. The integrated curriculum strategy is contingent on educators’ ability to unite theoretical and professional aspects in courses, and on the collegial capacity for coordination. Finally, the CDIO initiative is conceptualised as a field-level driver of institutional innovation, identifying some strategies for legitimacy. / <p>QC 20171108</p>
|
3 |
Dr. Eleine MadJacobsson, Madeleine January 2021 (has links)
Dr. Eleine Mad är Madeleine Jacobsssons talesperson för dom vetenskapliga och paranormala upptäckter som uppstår i hennes världar. Hon beskriver innehåll, teknik och estetik utifrån ett kategoriseringssytem där konsten delas upp som olika typer av komponenter och därefter avkodas dessa allteftersom. För att förstå intuitionens inblandning i arbetsprocessen omförvandlas den till tre separata roller av en Sökare, Samlare och Myntare. Med rollerna försöker jag beskriva på vilka sätt som intuitionen är till gagn eller av förödelse för det konstnärliga arbetet. Sagan om M handlar om en grodlik karaktär, Delop, som lämnar sin hemplanet för att uppsöka andra världar. I sitt sökande hittar Delop ett folkslag vars syn och levnadssätt skiljer sig från hennes erfarenheter av “verkligheten” såsom hon lärt sig att överleva i den. / Dr. Eleine Mad is Madeleine Jacobsson's spokesperson for the scientific and paranormal discoveries that arise in her worlds. She describes content, tecniques and aesthetics based on a categorization system where art is divided into different types of components and then decoded as they go. To understand the intuition's involvement in the work process, it is transformed into three separate roles by a Seeker, Collector and a Myntare(In swedish language the one who is a "myntare" -is verbally declaring a concept or term). With these roles I try to describe in what ways intuition is beneficial or devastating to the artistic work. The story of M is about a frog-like character, Delop, who leaves the home planet to seek out other worlds. In her search, Delop finds a world whose views and lifestyles differ from her experiences of "reality" as she learned to survive in it. / <p>Recorded sound and image material of the presentation is available for private use.</p>
|
Page generated in 0.0385 seconds